EDIT: See @AnimePhantasm comment below! My friend called the election board and they confirmed what @AnimePhantasm and @fmstrat commented! This was Virginia reusing last year’s envelopes.

OP I am an absentee voter in Blacksburg just next door. Shine a light on the blacked out part. I am 99% sure this is legit, they just crossed out the witness requirement. I can see the word witness under the sharpie in your picture. Virgina doesnt have to do that witness thing anymore. We did at the last general election, so I am guessing they just reused the same envelopes. You should call and ask your elections office before alerting the news. They are hardworking folks whose jobs are already 100 times harder then they used to be. Stirring up reports of election fraud where it isn’t happening makes us just as bad as them.

  • Nastybutler@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    1 month ago

    You might see if you can get this to the Meidas Touch guys too. They could help research and amplify this to the national media

    • odelik@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Ughhhhhhhhh. Sorry, but I need to rant.

      Those fuckers are so fucking sensationalist. They use the same simple-mined tactics as right-wing propaganda mills. A 20 minute video of theirs could be condensed into 5 without those tactics and actually do far more to push forward their “law based coverage”.

      I quickly put them in the “not worth the sensationalist propaganda” bucket after watching a handful of their videos

      • Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 month ago

        They all are like that. They all use heavy clickbait titles to get attention to their videos, and those titles have a tenuous at best relationship with the actual topic, which they all blow way out of proportion and act as if this will finally be the thing that brings down Trump. These are the ones who the right refer to as having “Trum Derangement Syndrome”, as they post daily videos that are almost exclusively about Trump, while peddling products that you can tell they’ve never used or even heard of in their lives by the way they read the script.

        Don’t get me wrong. The information they give is at least truthful (exaggerated, but truthful) and the products they’re shilling are actual products and not crypto scams or something, which puts them far ahead of Trump’s supporters. But they’re still basically grifting and trying to ride the Trump train as long and as hard as they can, as I don’t know what half of them are going to do once Trump is actually out of the public eye.

  • drunkpostdisaster@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    I am going to be voting in person. Hopefully Harris will win and when the Trumpers try to riot again the national guard is harsh.

  • fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    1 month ago

    Could be old instructions for witness signatures vs anything malicious. Be sure this is a real issue first. Last time they sent out conflicting instructions which was worse. But yes, report it to be safe.

    From: https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/virginia-politics/virginia-absentee-ballot-instructions-confusing/2020/09/23/4ec4dfa8-fd1b-11ea-9ceb-061d646d9c67_story.html

    Joan Porte, vice president of the Virginia League of Women Voters and an Arlington resident, said she was furious when she saw the error on the envelope, which could have been solved, she said, by crossing it out with a marker.

    More info: https://www.democracydocket.com/news-alerts/virginia-legislature-passes-bill-to-remove-witness-requirements-for-mail-in-voting/

  • EndlessApollo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    130
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    It’s almost as if Republicans can’t win the popular vote and have to cheat or something (:

    • microphone900@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 month ago

      There’s a neat post I came across some time ago showing how few votes can still win the electoral college.

      Comment link

      Direct link to website

      Turns out, though unlikely, it is possible to win the election with less than 25% of votes through the magic of the electoral college and disproportionate representation.

    • WoahWoah@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Just to be real, they really don’t care about the popular vote. They care about the electoral vote. And even that isn’t totally true. They care about the electoral victory. They long ago abandoned democracy; they don’t care about having democratically granted power. They just want the power.

      A little felony by blacking out a mail-in ballot is literally the least they’re ready, willing, and able to do to win.

      I continue to be incredibly frustrated by how little democrats have done to counter the fraud, voter suppression, constitutionally dubious laws, takeover of state election boards and volunteers, and armed, volunteer “ballot watchers” the Republicans have deployed.

      The republican “ground game” that extends beyond simply GOTV efforts and campaigning and into the wide-ranging and widespread strategies and tactics to literally dismantle and inhibit the democratic process has been met with very little resistance by the democrats. Somehow they’re going to be blindsided by this, cry foul retroactively, and then be hamstrung trying to play defense from behind. Wilfully ignorant, short-sighted, and incredibly dangerous idiocy for something so fundamentally important.

      The democrats don’t have to be unethical because the Republicans are, but they should have been being proactive and serious about countering these attacks on the democratic process. Instead the approach seems to be sticking their fingers firmly in their ears and going “lalalalala.”

      • shalafi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        and armed, volunteer “ballot watchers”

        I’ll be there on election day. Take that as you will.

        • noisefree@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          and armed, volunteer “ballot watchers” I’ll be there on election day. Take that as you will.

          Oh shit everybody, @[email protected] is gonna be there! We can all collectively sigh in relief now!

        • WoahWoah@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          That just works against your own interests. The point is people patrolling around glaring at people is voter intimidation. You think people will recognize “oh, that guy is on our side”?

          Even if that was the case, do you think knowing there are TWO armed groups that hate each other prowling around a voting location is less intimidating?

          We get it, you have a gun. You’re not helping.

          • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 month ago

            To be fair, if they’re Black, or have rainbow hair, and are glaring at the old white dudes wearing red, it would make me feel safer.

  • AnimePhantasm@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    73
    ·
    1 month ago

    OP I am an absentee voter in Blacksburg just next door. Shine a light on the blacked out part. I am 99% sure this is legit, they just crossed out the witness requirement. I can see the word witness under the sharpie in your picture. Virgina doesnt have to do that witness thing anymore. We did at the last general election, so I am guessing they just reused the same envelopes. You should call and ask your elections office before alerting the news. They are hardworking folks whose jobs are already 100 times harder then they used to be. Stirring up reports of election fraud where it isn’t happening makes us just as bad as them.

    • UnpopularCrow@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      1 month ago

      Excellent point. I alerted my friend to your post. I don’t have the envelope, they just sent me the picture. They go to bed early but I’ll update you in the morning.

  • Serinus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Is this the year old thing where the witness signature requirements was removed, but it was still included in the instructions?

  • Etterra@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    48
    ·
    1 month ago

    So somebody reported this to the State election board and told all the news agencies, right?

  • DarkCloud@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    1 month ago

    So this is what a modern day “hanging chad” looks like. They’re really drawing on every previous election to insure there can be fraud claims.

    America is going to have a rough one, no outcome will see legitimate - which is great for Putin regardless of whether he’s involved or not.

    • AlpacaChariot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 month ago

      Yep, we have the same system in the UK. In fact, the envelope looks almost exactly the same so they might even be printed by the same company.

      You get two envelopes (one big, one small), a postal voting statement, and a ballot paper.

      The actual ballot paper just has a list of options for you to put your X against; there’s no personally identifiable information on it. Once you’ve filled it out you seal it in the small envelope.

      You then fill in the voting statement (it has your name and address on it so they can cross your name off as voted, and you sign it so they can check your signature matches the one on file) and both that and the sealed ballot go in the big envelope. That way your vote is still private because they check the vote is valid in one step and then add your ballot to a pile to be counted with the others in a second step, at which point it’s anonymous.

      https://www.electoralcommission.org.uk/voting-and-elections/ways-vote/how-vote-post

    • seaQueue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      1 month ago

      I’ve always had to sign my vote by mail ballot envelope in CA. They keep a signature on file from when you last registered to absentee (not vote at your polling place) vote and compare the two to see if someone else is trying to vote in your name.

    • krelvar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      1 month ago

      For mail in balloting at least in my state you sign the return envelope NOT the ballot itself.

      • femtech@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        1 month ago

        In Illinois they give you two, well 3 technically. The one everything comes in, the one you put the ballot in, and the one you put the ballot envelope in. So the signature is not on the outside or on the ballot itself.

    • sqw@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      just imagine gremlins running around in your election system at every level. thats pretty much whats happening

    • Khanzarate@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      68
      ·
      1 month ago

      For mail-ins, yeah, you sign it to do the final “I authorize this document to be my vote”.

      If you don’t authorize it, it’s not legally your vote.

    • lolola@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 month ago

      The key point is that if it’s not signed, it gives them an excuse to throw it away.

      Do that to enough people and you end up with a big problem. The uncounted votes could swing the election, or you get a messy court case where some judges step in and basically decide the election on their own, or who knows what else.

      At a minimum, it’s sets the stage for chaos. And from the chaos can emerge a chaotic outcome.

    • Match!!@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      1 month ago

      something you have to remember about the US is that while it’s a democracy, all the democratic practices were started in the 1800s, often with explicit intention to negate the votes of some discriminated group

      • modifier@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        1 month ago

        And one party is doing their best to keep that heritage of disenfranchisement alive.

    • FlexibleToast@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      I could be mistaken, but most places check your signature against the voter roll. If your signature doesn’t match, then they’ll ask for an ID. At least that’s how it was where I volunteered in 2020. This is done before you get your ballot. You don’t actually sign the ballot itself.

    • FlowVoid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      You sign the envelope that contains the ballot. That way, an election worker can compare the signature on the envelope to your signature on file.

      This is how they make sure that someone didn’t steal the ballot from your mailbox and fill it out for you.

      Once the signature is verified, the envelope is opened and the anonymous ballot inside is removed and stored with all the others. When they are counted, there will be no way to tell who filled out each ballot.

      • Tarquinn2049@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        And yet the “scary machines” are too easy to tamper with… they are scared of them because of how hard it would be to get away with tampering with them. And they know their supporters and others in government don’t know any better and will jump on the bandwagon of the machines being vaguely scary.

        • brbposting@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          As I understand it, a fairly bulletproof method is to vote using a machine that prints out a human readable card with a punch through the candidates you voted for. So you can confirm the machine understood the options you tapped and then drop the paper ballot into a secure box, which can be used as a backup for manual recounts.

          Anybody know if this is what the experts [still] want?

          • Tarquinn2049@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            Honestly, while it would certainly help sell it to less technical people. There is no need for a paper copy to make it impossible to get away with tampering with digital voting, building in safeguards entirely digitally is actually enough.

            But yes, most commonly recommended option is to have the machines do a quick result, and then paper to verify.

      • mkwt@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 month ago

        When I did absentee voting, the voter signature and voter id information were on a perforated slip attached to the outside of the envelope.

        That way, the process is something like:

        1. Look at the slip. Verify voter signature, eligibility to vote, and mark as having voted in the voter rolls.
        2. Detach perforated slip from sealed envelope. Sealed envelope now contains no identifying information. (This envelope was mailed inside an outer mailing envelope.)
        3. Entire sealed envelope and contents thereof goes into big bin of accepted ballots.
        4. Later, election workers open the sealed envelopes from the bin and run the actual ballot papers through the scantron machine.
  • Veedem@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    62
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Honestly that is scary to see. People are going to lose the chance to influence. A true potential for a stolen election.