• MataVatnik@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    6 days ago

    Yeah let’s blame white supremacy and ignore the fact that the democratic candidate lost FOURTEEN MILLION voters this election cycle.

    • SquatDingloid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      6 days ago

      It was more like 11mil, and were almost exclusively white men who just didn’t vote this time after they chose to vote in 2020

      • kreskin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        6 days ago

        11mil, and were almost exclusively white men

        Got any proof of that? From what i heard she lost 15% of the hispanic vote, women didnt turn out as well as expected, lost 7% of the 18-29 vote, and she even lost some on the black vote. She lost in every demographc but you are trying hard to pin it on one group. So lets see you back your data up.

        • meowMix2525@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          5 days ago

          Well white men are a majority in this country period so any aggregate population is probably going to be mostly white men and of course the only possible reason a white man might sit out is because he’s sexist and racist. I’m a liberal looking for anything to blame but my candidate’s feckless campaign and to me that’s just math. 🤷🏾

          So I guess it’s finally our turn to get out the pitchforks and start going after our fellow americans while somehow retaining the moral high ground over MAGA.

          /s

          • SquatDingloid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 days ago

            I mean yeah,

            If they voted for the man who had the exact same policy but not the woman then the only difference is the sex

      • MataVatnik@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        Oh I’m sorry, only 11 million, my bad. That suddenly decided to become white supremacists out of nowhere when they had rejected trump the first time. It’s always someone else’s fault, isn’t it?

  • RedAggroBest@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    6 days ago

    The only messaging problem was taking the momentum of the debate and shitting on it with the right-wing heelturn the moment the Cheneys said “never Trump”.

  • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    83
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    7 days ago

    Republicans have a vision. Democrats have a list of policy proposals. Average people can grok the vision but since they read at a 6th grade level they don’t grok the policy proposals.

    Democrats need to stop acting like nerds if they want more people to like them.

    • TheEighthDoctor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      Democrats need to stop acting like nerds if they want more people to like them.

      If you told me this was a quote from Ideocracy I would not have doubted you for a second.

    • SleepyBear@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 days ago

      How the fuck do democrats win here then? After the Harris/Dump debate i feel like there was a lot of conjecture about how Harris didnt talk about policy enough. How do you get away with talking about policy but not “sounding like a nerd” to uneducated voters? See I think this is more about the average voter not being educated enough to understand the issues and the policies potential nominees have pertaining to them, or how their lives would be affected depending who/what they vote for.

      • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        The Democrats don’t win here.

        Just like the Tea Party transformed the GOP, we need a Guillotine Party to drag the Democratic party to the electorate.

      • BakerBagel@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        Start offering policies that help average people. Run on medicare for all. Run on forcing pharmaceutical companies lowering drug prices. Run on building new factories to create solar panels, geothermal equipment, and wind turbines. Run on creating affordable housing and ending corporate landlords. Run on campaign finance reform with a promise of ending political ads that everyone hates.

        The Democrats problem is tha they won’t do any of that because their donors dont want it. But as long as the DNC values their donorsore than their voters, they will continue to lose elections.

        • aesthelete@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          6 days ago

          The Democrats problem is tha they won’t do any of that because their donors dont want it. But as long as the DNC values their donorsore than their voters, they will continue to lose elections.

          The entire American political system we have is dependent on big money donors since citizens united. America has been an oligarchy since at least the early 2000s. You will not get a Democratic party with policies that vary wildly from what industrial heads and CEOs want simply by voting (or not) every 2-4 years. And even small deviations from what they want aren’t tolerated by many of the oligarchs (e.g. Elon Musk).

    • Jesus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      7 days ago

      Republicans also like to defund public schools and or encourage people to go to religious private schools. That way they’re either too dumb to vote for policies, or too indoctrinated to vote for the candidate that isn’t promising Christian nationalism.

    • IninewCrow@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      How about do basic stuff that people understand …

      … like tax the hell out of billionaires and use the money on people in the country.

      … stop financing overseas wars and use that free money on people in the country

      … then just keep repeating and blasting everyone that all the money the government is collecting from rich idiots and not spending on war is being spent on everyone … rinse, repeat 10,000 times.

      • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        7 days ago

        Yep. And there’s precedent for this. (Even though with this Supreme Court precedent counts for jack shit…)

        Every time Bernie got asked a question he’d turn it around to mentioning the top 1% and how they’re fucking us over. And people liked him for it. I had MAGA hat folks tell me they liked him because of it back in 2016.

          • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            7 days ago

            Yeah but they wouldn’t say that about anyone else I can think of. And we’re not trying to get MAGA, we’re trying to get people to fucking vote at all.

          • BakerBagel@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            7 days ago

            Because the DNC sceapped those proposals for more neoliberal bullshit that every one hates. People are vocal about what they care about. If people tell me they want steak and i keep giving them tacos, they are going to leave the restaurant and get pizza from the sketchy local joint next door instead.

            • Montagge@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              7 days ago

              What proposals for what neoliberal bullshit.

              Also neoliberal policies from a neoliberal party?!? Surely you jest!

              • frosty99c@midwest.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                7 days ago

                If a neoliberal party can’t win 2 out of 3 elections against a fascist, maybe they should pivot away from neoliberalism.

                • Montagge@lemmy.zip
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  7 days ago

                  To what exactly? Neoliberalism is left wing in this shit hole.

                  Don’t say progressive. If that was popular there would be more than two states that have a progressive party.

    • PugJesus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      63
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      7 days ago

      But I was told it was just that our policy proposals weren’t left enough?

      Unironically, you’re right. Most voters don’t vote based on any kind of coherent ideology. They vote on feels.

      God help us all.

      • tootoughtoremember@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        27
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        I want a country where everyone pays less for healthcare. If it can be done for seniors, why not everyone else?

        I want a country where everyone’s private medical decisions remain between them and their doctor, without being cleared by your local, state, or federal representative or by a judge.

        I want a country where everyone who works, pays taxes, and does not commit violent crime or property theft can stay and keep working without having to look over their shoulder.

        I want a country where if you work full time, you can afford your rent/mortgage, put food on the table, start a family, and still be able to retire.

        There’s a vision. Apparently all of these things have become radically progressive leftist positions and are attacked as such by the media and conservatives alike.

        • zephorah@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 days ago

          With capitalism, a middle class does not occur organically, it is created by the governing body through subsidies. If you do not subsidize a middle class there can be no middle class. This is fundamental. We really started to feel it in 2015 or so. I called it the squeeze. This tightening grip of not subsidies but further attempts to squeeze more and more blood from rocks.

          Why? Our government has been subsidizing the wrong class for a while now. Trump did kick that up a notch the first time. The data is in. Trickle down economics doesn’t work.

          As with a middle class, health care has to be subsidized. The governing body won’t allow richer people to pay the same taxes as the poorest of us so that will never happen.

          And now Elon Musk is promising “hardship” going forward, as opposed to whatever this is the last 4 yrs, on us, the poorest, rather than paying mor taxes himself. Like that would impact his alien ass at all (he’s weirdly shaped, looks like a slightly melted wax museum figure, and was born into so much money he has no idea how humans live, that’s what I mean by alien). So don’t count on it ever happening going forward.

          If you have preexisting conditions expect loss of coverage. And as a fallout from that expect the healthcare system to get slammed with much sicker people trying to find loopholes and other diagnoses so they can actually keep living and working.

          • aesthelete@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            6 days ago

            The data is in. Trickle down economics doesn’t work.

            It works for the rich. Relatedly, shitty economies where the government pumps tons of cash into rich people’s pockets also work for the rich. They inflate their assets with their additional government handouts and use those inflated asset prices to get loans to buy more mega yachts.

        • Mak'@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          7 days ago

          See, the problem with all of these ideas is that they’re at odds with the billionaires’ vision that you slave away in servitude to them, while their imaginary worth line goes up to infinity.

          It’s really nothing more complex than that. And, as soon as the non-billionaire conservatives—your neighbors, your coworkers, the people you pass by every day—wake up and understand that they’re covered by that vision, too, the sooner things get better for all of us.

          • Jiggle_Physics@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 days ago

            All of these social programs suddenly become much more popular when they are restricted to the majority population. There have been surveys demonstrating this. Another way to see it is to point to places with a lot of those policies, one of the first rebuttals you will receive is a yarn about the homogeneous population, or at least one far more so, in those places.

            So, it isn’t that they think they won’t be covered, it is because so many think it will cover people they don’t want it to.

          • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 days ago

            (I wasn’t sure whether to edit my comment or reply to your first post, so I’m putting this here)

            As for people voting on feels: I think that’s always been the case for most people. Most people are of average intelligence, with an average education and average interest in politics. They’re gonna vote based on vibes, so you have to get the vibes right or the average person won’t vote for you.

            And you can’t fake vibes by having a bunch of celebrities around.

            • TSG_Asmodeus (he, him)@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              7 days ago

              They’re gonna vote based on vibes, so you have to get the vibes right or the average person won’t vote for you.

              And you can’t fake vibes by having a bunch of celebrities around.

              So why’d they vote for a rapist who is in pictures with goddamn Epstein? That’s the part I don’t understand. Are we seriously saying the average (American) is okay with a rapist being president because they like his vibes?

              • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                7 days ago

                As far as I can tell, it’s not that people who would have otherwise voted for Kamala instead voted for Donald. It’s that people who would have otherwise voted for Kamala, including many of those who did vote for Biden, just stayed home. “We’ve got policy plans and whatever” yeah that would never make it to implementation through a gridlocked congress and a hostile supreme court.

                • TSG_Asmodeus (he, him)@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  6 days ago

                  It’s that people who would have otherwise voted for Kamala, including many of those who did vote for Biden, just stayed home. “We’ve got policy plans and whatever” yeah that would never make it to implementation through a gridlocked congress and a hostile supreme court.

                  I honestly think you’re giving them more credit than they deserve. My point is that a _rapist, fascist, cruel, racist, misogynist who has said aloud all the horrible things he will do was running for office and a lot of people just shrugged their shoulders and refused to vote. I can’t imagine that kind of apathy when a fascist is taking over. “Sure Hitler and the Nazi’s are bad, but what am I going to do, vote socialist?”

                  image

                  (Also this because people need to remember he was anti-capitalist as well.)

            • seaQueue@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              edit-2
              7 days ago

              Clinton 1 and Obama were our last successful Dem candidates. You need a charismatic candidate with a consistent message that speaks to everyone if you want to win the popularity contest. Gore, Clinton 2 and Harris failed on both of those counts. Biden won only because of pandemic and government abuse/mismanagement backlash, he would have lost to Trump in other circumstances.

    • SkybreakerEngineer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      7 days ago

      Democrats have a list of milquetoast, bottom of the barrel obvious stuff that they hope could show bipartisanship, and even then they half-ass it. There is real fixing that needs to get done, but the side they isn’t actively making things worse has no will to actually do it.

      • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        Democrat: *pushes up glasses, adjusts pocket protector* “Um, we propose to implement a 2-10% excise tax on health insurance plans which will allow us to increase access to Medicare by 16% according to these models.”

        Voters: “I just want health care.”

    • Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      There was an era where the nerds placed up a facade to give the illusion of meritocracy and measured governance. Unfortunately that just drove a wedge between people and the “ruling class.” When it came out that bill was getting blowies in the oval office people’s brains broke and the facade was forever tarnished. Today, democrats still hide behind it and pretend like we don’t know they piss and shit like everyone else. The Republicans decided to erect a monument to trump their lord and savior, the only thing keeping them from being a foot note in the history books.

      We need to look to our founders. Flawed in every way possible they did have one idea that we should still cherish. They believed in an america they could make by their own hands. They did, it sucked, it was also amazing somehow. We should be like them but be just as kind to our future as we are to the present.

    • magic_lobster_party@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      7 days ago

      Do they have a vision? The scary thing about Trump that it’s uncertain what he will do the next 4 years. Will he undo democracy or keep it? Will he continue to support Ukraine or not? Will he leave NATO or not? Will he impose those tariffs or not? Will he apply project 2025 or not? Will he impose a federal abortion ban or not?

      Kamala had a clear but boring vision: 4 more years of the current status quo. Nothing new will happen.

      • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        7 days ago

        It’s right there on the hat: Make America Great Again.

        And the neat part is it’s so vague that people can project whatever they want onto it.

        • magic_lobster_party@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 days ago

          Well that part I’m aware of, but that’s more of a slogan rather than a vision. It doesn’t tell what has gone wrong with America and how to fix it. Trump says a lot of things that sometimes contradict each other or may or may not be taken seriously, so it’s difficult to piece together a concrete vision.

          They have a concept of a vision so to say.

    • Varyk@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      you are incorrect.

      Republicans are scared of brown people, and they cried about it.

      democrats closed the border, reformed border control, and have set up a rational immigration system to allow as many legal immigrants into the country as the system can provide for and integrate into the US economy.

      Republicans are scared of vaccines, and they cried about it.

      democrats got vulnerable populations vaccinated.

      Republicans are afraid of other countries exports, and they cried about it.

      democrats increased employment, supported domestic businesses and funded domestic production.

      Republicans quake in their boots, democrats take action.

  • PunnyName@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 days ago

    This is the only take I’m gonna let in. The rest of these “hot takes” can fuck right off.

    • 4grams@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 days ago

      No shit I’m tired of the post-mortem quarterbacking. There’s always one weird trick that you can point to, everyone wants an easy reason why this happened.

      Well, I have one. america is a fascist country. Apparently we just decided to forgo the plausible deniability.

  • FrowingFostek@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    47
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    6 days ago

    I understand the poster may be very emotional because of the election. Yet, This strikes me as incredibly reductive.

    I think she lost because, she represents the continuation of the current administration. People want to break from the status quo, even if that means harming society to do it.

    The dems need a left wing populist, asap.

      • Kit@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        6 days ago

        Literally all you post is political rage-bait. How is the weather in Russia these days comrade?

        This kind of shit is exactly what Russia wants. Divide the US, push violence, destabilize the country. We have paths forward that do not involve violence. Now is the time to push for ranked choice voting to allow 3rd party candidates a real chance. The DNC has been out of touch for years, and ranked choice voting will allow us to side step them and choose a candidate with a real chance.

        Start small and local. Connect with your local representatives. Have a conversation about ranked choice voting. Come up with a plan that we can achieve together to make this a reality.

          • Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            6 days ago

            It’s a good idea but it’s so frought with controversy. I’ve yet to see the momentum needed to force it through. Like, show me you can orginiaze a national, or even just statewide, strike and I’ll start believing.

            The fact that we have this tool that no one will even look at is so discouraging. Show these Trumpers what a failed economy looks like when the people on rhe raw side of the deal throw their hands up.

        • Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          6 days ago

          You don’t get it. The Russians are getting what they want because the DNC has done nothing to stop it. You can keep fighting uphill and I’ll continue to lend my vote but you get nothing else. Sorry.

          If you want my suggestion don’t put your political capital into the DNC. They dont know how to spend it. Form a new party and make them suffer. Tea partiers did it and reshaped the GOP. You won’t have the funding of right wing billionaires at first but if you get enough momentum they will be pouring in to try and shape things.

          It’s all for naught though, once you start getting cheated out of every victory you fight for you’ll start sharpening the knife too.

      • Maggoty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        Uh no. You don’t just give up and blow up the country. Even if he gets to full authoritarian you’d need the peaceful structures of organization to have any chance at doing more than dying at 3 in the morning. It’s not sexy to Americans but the answer is the same as always, organize, protest, slow stuff down in critical work areas, and go further only if it’s absolutely required. Until he actually does anything you don’t even have a moral high ground, you’re just going to get called a terrorist, and rightly so.

    • Nuke_the_whales@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      6 days ago

      A populist isn’t gonna save you from the toxicity of your society and the stupidity of your people. You guys deserve what you get

    • Halosheep@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      6 days ago

      I keep hearing this ‘status quo’ excuse but no one ever explains what the fuck that’s supposed to even mean.

      • MataVatnik@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        Unpopular, uncharismatic, neoliberal establishment candidates that are pushed down the throat of democratic party voters (Hillary, Biden, Kamala)

        • SquatDingloid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          6 days ago

          The exact same DNC also pushed Obama down our throats who had the same policies as all those canidates, and that turned out great

          • MataVatnik@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            6 days ago

            Great? Wasn’t it that Obamas ambivalence towards lower offices and rise of identity politics that ushered an era of Republican obstructionists and things barely got passed, if at all?

            Bernie would’ve mopped the floor with Trump. But instead we got the wife of a pervert who has the charisma of a hangnail, and who on top of that, actively promoted Trump in Republican primaries because she thought he’d be an easy candidate to beat.

            Ignoring, gaslighting, belittling, and berating the electoral base is not how you gather support

          • kreskin@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            6 days ago

            Obama vowed to transform health care and he did. Biden Harris did not have any policy aspirations at all.

            This should teach the DNC that if you run on even a modest progressive policy that even the republicans want, you will win. And if you dont, you will lose. You dont even need to stop calling the progressives names, you just need to make peoples lives better and more Just.

            • SquatDingloid@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              5 days ago

              Obama vowed to transform health care and he did. Biden Harris did not have any policy aspirations at all.

              This just isn’t true at all

              Process reality

        • AA5B@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 days ago

          I have no idea what people mean by neoliberalism, since it seems to be different every time, but there are an awful lot of article from actual experts, saying the opposite. As a simplification, neoliberalism is associated with reduced regulation of businesses at the expense of people, yet so many of Biden policies have been strengthening the role if actual people for the first time in decades. Do you have any idea how many decades it’s been since a president gave real support to unions?

          • Maggoty@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 days ago

            I’ve had this argument with self described progressives several times. They do not understand what Neoliberalism is, even when linked 200 level ideologies study material about it. They want it to mean “Secretly the worst conservative”. It’s an outgrowth of the idea that both parties are the same. As such they must lump liberals in with actual Neoliberals.

          • MataVatnik@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            5 days ago

            Personally I see it as politicians that pay lip service to social causes while being corporate capitalist shills. Amazon, Google and other corporations are all bigger than ever, fleecing the employees and gouging the customers while holding a monopoly on essential services.

            Sorry im worked up, but being sincere for a second, was there an attempt by Biden to break up these megacorp? And to stop price gouging? And increase pay to prioritize workers instead of share holder value?

            I still believe that democrats are better for the workers than Republicans. And Trump will absolutely wreck the economy. But the democratic party has only done the bare fucking minimum

            • AA5B@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              4 days ago

              I also wish they acted more quickly, more assertively instead of always playing centrist, however real change can be slow and gradual. I do believe it’s the nature of the beast, not just cautiousness.

              • Real change requires stability over time, not instant gratification
              • flipping back and forth every four years can only make things worse, and has
              • real change requires foundational change, but also needs to be incorporated throughout.

              For example, bringing back unions may be one of the most important ways to restore a healthy worker class, but they don’t just appear. Biden gave more support for unions than any president I’ve seen. It’s especially notable that he was criticized for tempering efforts to bring back manufacturing, to build an electronics supply chain, a renewable energy supply chain, with union requirements. They would take time and need continued nurturing but could have started faster without the union commitment. In this vision, as that manufacturing rose over the years, unions would rise with it, and help rebuild a healthy working class. But you can see how this would take years. It will never be sudden improvement, exciting turnaround, but if we were able to build strong unions, it will not just grow better conditions for most of us, but reinforce that, strengthen that, keep it alive over the inevitable regressive backlash.

            • Maggoty@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              5 days ago

              Biden’s administration got an anti-mononopoly ruling against Google and had no plans to stop there.

        • Halosheep@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          I’m aware of the phrase’s meaning. It’s not being used this way from what I can tell.

          Seems to me that conservative policy is the status quo. Almost by definition, ‘conserving’ the way things are, or what they believe it is. As a general trend, the us has leaned much more conservative. This is the status quo.

          Changing, progressive policy is literally antithetical to the status quo. A woman in office is not the current state. So why do people say that the dem candidate is the status quo if that makes no sense?

          • AA5B@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 days ago

            There’s definitely an element of misinformation here. Too many people are rebelling against a “status quo” that never existed

  • rational_lib@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 days ago

    It’s funny how people try to rationalize why Trump won, as if has any rationality behind it whatsoever.

  • voldage@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    She didn’t? I believe that’s exactly what she came across as when she said she wouldn’t do anything different if she were to call the shots instead of Biden and also reminded everyone she signed off on most of his decisions. Sure, she lost votes because of sexism as well, but instead of fresh air she chose to bring stale coffin smell to the fart battle and lost to the stink Trump was all too happy to discharge. And that coffin did smell of a old white dude, let me tell you.

    That being said, for such a gigantic loss against someone as obnoxious as Trump, there had to be a lot of factors in play. Sexism and stagnation of the party being just a tip of the iceberg.

  • DukeHawthorne@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    5 days ago

    Harris’ messaging problem is the same problem Hilary Clinton had in 2016. Instead of appealing to the base, she went after Republicans and just assumed the left would be on board. The Democratic establishment does this every time, move closer to the center and right and tell the leftists shut up and go away.

    • PriorityMotif@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 days ago

      The average Democrat is a well off person living in the suburbs who doesn’t want higher taxes but doesn’t want to appear racist.

      • sudo@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        I wouldn’t call that the average general democrat voter but that for sure is the average democrat primary voter by like 90%.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      A big part of the election was Republicans screaming at Democrats for being too feminine and Democrats retorting “That’s good aktuly”.

      But compared to Biden’s promise of college debt relief, climate change relief, child care and reduction of health care costs, that didn’t motivate people who weren’t heavily invested in the fight. Also, plus, too, we rolled back all the universal mail in voting from 2020. As Dems were the most likely to mail in their ballots, they suffered disproportionately

      • aesthelete@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 days ago

        Also, plus, too, we rolled back all the universal mail in voting from 2020. As Dems were the most likely to mail in their ballots, they suffered disproportionately

        I have no idea why I haven’t seen this point made before. I’ve thought it several times myself. There’s absolutely no way that didn’t play a role in this election cycle.

    • Kit@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      6 days ago

      I’m fairly certain that a transwoman would have done even worse in polls. It does make me wonder how a transman would fare, though.

  • doublehelix@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    54
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    7 days ago

    When she sat down on The View and said she wouldn’t change a thing compared to Biden that was a messaging problem. People can’t afford rent and grocery inflation is out of control and she thinks everything is fine and dandy? I voted for her but I’m kind of sick of being a perpetual afterthought who has been voting for the lesser of two evils for over 20 years. They dumped the working class in favor of chasing an imaginary pool of moderates and this is the result. Give us someone we can be passionate about and, even if they’re lying, at least pretend to tell us what we want to hear.

    • BarqsHasBite@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      7 days ago

      The problem with that was that she was actually answering the question, correctly and analytically. They actually made the right decisions, even if the supply chain was still a problem. Not much the president can do about that global problem.

      even if they’re lying

      Yeah you get it. She didn’t do the politician thing where you answer adjacently.

      • SquatDingloid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        7 days ago

        Food inflation is outpacing wage growth

        People don’t give a shit what the CPI is

        Their grocery runs cost more for less food, so there is a problem with wage growth or food prices that the Dems are not willing to acknowledge

        • rigatti@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          11
          ·
          7 days ago

          Food prices are a component of CPI. Food inflation is also around 2%, which is like the ideal inflation rate: https://www.usinflationcalculator.com/inflation/food-inflation-in-the-united-states/

          Note that it was out of control a couple years ago, which is why prices went way up. I haven’t looked at the statistics, but what I have heard is that wage growth, generally, has caught up to inflation, which includes food prices. This is still a feels over reals situation. People feel that their food is too expensive, and Republicans are way better at addressing the feels. One of my favorite signs around the neighborhood said “TRUMP LOW PRICES || KAMALA HIGH PRICES”. Like, yeah, that definitely makes sense. Well explained.

            • rigatti@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              6 days ago

              Thanks for your condolences, SquatDingloid. Your contribution to this conversation has done wonders for the world.

              • SquatDingloid@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                6 days ago

                If you were ever capable of self reflection you would delete your dumb propaganda posts

                Sorry you have pride issues or whatever. As long as you refuse to educate yourself people will keep telling you this

                • rigatti@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  6 days ago

                  Kind of needlessly aggressive. Why does having an opinion and stating literal facts make it propaganda? That’s not really a word we want to cheapen with a fascist regime incoming.

      • BarqsHasBite@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        7 days ago

        That’s because low inflation does not mean prices come back down, which is what people expect. So technically inflation is not out of control. But prices are still high. That’s what people mean.

            • rigatti@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              11
              ·
              7 days ago

              It’s not pedantic. People just literally don’t understand what inflation means. Wage growth, apparently, has caught up to inflation, so it’s really just that people haven’t adjusted their mindset to the higher prices now. And they’re angry about it.

              • BarqsHasBite@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                8
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                7 days ago

                It’s not pedantic. People just literally don’t understand what inflation means

                In almost everything there is the scientific or technical definition of the term, and then there is common parlance. People will never know the technical terms, just accept that because all you’re accomplishing is being pedantic.

                • rigatti@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  9
                  ·
                  7 days ago

                  How basic of terms should we give up on? Inflation is not a difficult concept. I would barely call it a technical term.

              • Empricorn@feddit.nl
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                6 days ago

                Weird. It’s almost like colloquiality is a thing. Words weren’t written down thousands of years ago to remain unchanged through usage. Or you could choose to be an inflexible pedant in a changing world…?

                • rigatti@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  5 days ago

                  I assumed I could have a discussion on Lemmy about the very clear difference between two words without getting attacked for it, but I guess not.

                  I also don’t agree that the word inflation has colloquially changed meaning, I think people just are not aware that inflation is normal now. They look at the current prices due to the period of previous inflation and are angry about it.

      • AlDente@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        People are not goldfish with minds that reset every year. Per your own link, accumulative inflation is up 21.8% since 2020.

          • AlDente@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            6 days ago

            No. If you would look at the graph in the link you posted, you would see that 2020 is right before the huge spike in inflation. This sustained spike explains the current outrage over increased prices.

            • rigatti@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              6 days ago

              There was a two year spike. If you look at the graph in the link I posted, you would see that prices have been mostly going up as normal for almost two years now. When are people going to adjust to their mindset to the current prices?

              • AlDente@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                6 days ago

                To make people happy, I think it would take a return to a running average of 2%. This requires a temporary drop below 2%, perhaps even to 0 or negative. Otherwise, you’re just telling them to suck it up and embrace the new normal.

                • rigatti@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  6 days ago

                  I’m not an economist, but from what I’ve heard in the past, 2% is basically ideal. Price deflation or inflation that’s too low can indicate problems with the economy. Maybe this situation is different since we had really high inflation a couple years ago. But either way, I think it’s unlikely that prices will drop. Kamala needed to promise super low taxes on the working class or something to make up for it.

      • doublehelix@lemmy.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        Oh, it’s not out of control? Great! I could buy a pound of ground beef in 2019 for 4.99 and the price is now 8.99. Fuck, lucky me. It’s so in control!

      • TreeGhost@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        7 days ago

        Its not out of control now, but that doesn’t cancel out previous high inflation rates on things. If people wages haven’t kept up then they may not be able.to still afford the standard of living they had a few years ago.

      • Wes4Humanity@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        Maybe it’s back down to “normal” inflation rates… But Kamala should have come out swinging to raise minimum wage to $25/hr, tie it to inflation, and mandating everyone get a 40% raise to counter the 40% inflation we’ve had since the last time minimum wage was raised. Something along those lines… As one thing in a long list of things she should have done… Sure it might have cost her the (checks notes) zero votes she was able to scrape off Trump’s boots, but that’s a sacrifice I’m willing to make.

        • rigatti@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          I agree! Her messaging was terrible, and she didn’t know how to counter the “TRUMP LOW PRICES // KAMALA HIGH PRICES” ads.

      • Maggoty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 days ago

        You do realize that inflation is cumulative right?

        It’s out of control because some of the stuff we need on a daily basis still costs double what it used to without any real increase in wages for half of America.

          • Maggoty@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 days ago

            Okay either you’re not getting it or you’re ignoring it on purpose. If wages in 2023 met inflation, there’s still 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2008, 2009, etc where they didn’t.

            Unless wages beat inflation that’s not getting better. And wages beating inflation years later is literally too little too late. Because we finance so much stuff this means years of delayed cars, houses, remodels, tax income (for cities), etc.

            That’s not fun on its own, but then to find out companies leveraged the supply crises to keep raising prices long after it was over and caused more inflation by their greed is infuriating. Especially to then hear Democrats try to take a fucking victory lap on it.

            Democrats were told all of this back in early spring and ignored it. And now Democrats have lost the election in large part because they never stopped trying to take a victory lap. The country told you it’s still hurting and you’re still here trying to patch up family finances with top line statistics that don’t mean shit.

            • rigatti@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              5 days ago

              Except that wage growth, from what I’m seeing, has kept up with inflation. If you find me numbers to say otherwise, I’ll believe you. Until then you’re just stating how you and others feel. My point this whole time is that the feeling doesn’t match up with the numbers.

              I get that companies have been price gouging, I get that Democrats needed to push for more policies that make people feel better economically, or at least say dumb lies that make people feel better like Trump does.

              • Maggoty@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                5 days ago

                You’re looking at the median. Look at the mode which still sits somewhere around 35-40 and say that again with a straight face.

                • rigatti@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  5 days ago

                  Mode of what? 35-40 what? What source? Why are you so angry? Also why is the mode more important than the median?

      • kreskin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        so tired of hearing that

        I’m tired of centrist claiming the econony is great and anyone claiming its not are stupid. grocery prices rose 28% in 5 years: https://www.nerdwallet.com/article/finance/price-of-food

        Mcdonalds prices are up 40% in the same period. https://www.cnbc.com/2024/05/29/mcdonalds-cost-increases.html And they doubled over the last decade.

        Wages growth did not keep up with the last decade, or the last 4 years. People are constantly losing ground and Biden/Harris’s reply was that “they dont understand”, because the “stock market was at an all time high.”

        Tone deaf and privelaged, and even after losing Biden/Harris and their allies still dont get it and wont self examine.

        • rigatti@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          6 days ago

          I’ve never claimed to be a centrist. Very far from it. Grocery prices went up, yes. Grocery prices are now going up at a normal rate. That’s all I’m saying here and people are losing their minds.

  • cybermass@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    7 days ago

    The problem is the Democrats are scared to push back hard, they try to move to the right to capture moderate voters, and then lose 10x as many voters to the left who don’t care enough to vote because the Democrats are trying to make concessions with absolute lunatics.

    The DNC seems like it just doesn’t have a spine. Doesn’t matter now, it’s all fucked and it’s too late.

      • Alwaysnownevernotme@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        7 days ago

        She literally allowed him to walk the streets for 4 years after an insurrection, accepted endorsements from war criminals, and snubbed her nose to millions of people who were aghast at a genocide being committed on the other side of the world by a government that supported her opponent with every tool it had.

        This defeat was not guaranteed, it was earned.

        • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 days ago

          She literally allowed him to walk the streets for 4 years after an insurrection

          What does this mean? What power do you think the Vice President has over the prosecution of Donald Trump?

          Fucking tired of seeing this shit. People literally have no idea how their own government functions.

      • cybermass@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        Honestly it’s fucking not. Call him a rapist pedophile, call him Jeffery Epsteins other woman, say some shit that will piss him off and once he’s mad he crumbles on stage and has a melt down.

        Like seriously, they try hard to be polite and I get she was a prosecutor but that doesn’t mean she has to talk like a lawyer when calling out a child raping, tax evading, democracy overthrowing felon.

      • Sop@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        7 days ago

        Not if she promotes similar fascist ideas like deporting immigrants and funding genocide.

  • f4f4f4f4f4f4f4f4@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    The problem with Kamala Harris’s messaging was that she didn’t have millions of Xitter bots scaring people into voting for her.

    • peppers_ghost@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 days ago

      She had like triple the money trump had in his campaign and still got her ass kicked. She might have just sucked shit as a candidate ya know

      • f4f4f4f4f4f4f4f4@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        I do know, but I don’t think “sucking shit” is a specific or useful analysis.

        I defer to JD Vance immediately threatening Europe if they make any move against Xitter… and Bernie Sanders speech covered much of the rest.

    • RunawayFixer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 days ago

      And she also had noone using millions of dollars to bribe voters to go vote, but only voters of a specific flavor. Somehow that was deemed legal, the usa has basically become a banana republic.