• faltryka@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      12 days ago

      This is constantly where my headspace is for any public statements by people, companies, or politicians.

      I don’t judge people by their words, I judge them by their actions, and that makes the world make so much more sense.

    • jeffw@lemmy.worldM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      13 days ago

      Are non-profit insurers really any better? Many of the blues are non-profits

      • orcrist@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        12 days ago

        Of course they’re better. There are no shareholders to pay off, so the system itself is more efficient. But that alone doesn’t solve the problem. Only national healthcare will provide a comprehensive fix.

        • jeffw@lemmy.worldM
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          12 days ago

          Are they? They are just as brutal about denials. The most hated insurance company I work with is a nonprofit. I’d welcome anyone with a blue cross or blue shield plan to tell me their positive stories. Or any other nonprofit, for that matter.

  • Laereht@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    13 days ago

    “We know the health system does not work as well as it should, and we understand people’s frustrations with it. No one would design a system like the one we have,” Witty wrote. “And no one did. It’s a patchwork built over decades.”

    So it’s nobody’s fault. And nobody can fix it I guess. Oh well, guess we just take it then. Good to know nobody is responsible for a despicable system that kills when it should heal.

    • orcrist@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      12 days ago

      Describing it as a patchwork is such an abdication of accuracy and responsibility, too. Any old system has evolved over time, and this one has had half a century to get into the state that it’s in now. Just because something is old and has been modified many times over the years doesn’t mean that the current situation is accidental or inevitable.

    • psivchaz@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      13 days ago

      The thing that gets me is that it’s true. It’s a patchwork… of so many people taking more than they should and giving less than they should. If UHC tomorrow used every penny of the premiums they charge purely to cover healthcare, they still wouldn’t fix the problem. A fix would require change to the pharmacies, the drug companies, the medical equipment companies, the hospitals and hospital networks, and more levels of bullshit middlemen than I even know exist. No single person, be they President or CEO or billionaire, can fix it.

      He is still an asshole though. He is just pointing to the problem and saying “Good people are trying to fix it.” Are they? Where’s the evidence? I would love to read an article that made me think, “Yes, the healthcare industry is making one small step in the right direction” but it hasn’t come up. If this dude wants me to sympathize with him or with Brian Thompson, he should say ONE THING that either of them has ever done to address the problems of the industry and make things genuinely better for everyone. My money is that he can’t.

  • NatakuNox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    13 days ago

    Now ask him if his industry should even exist. His answer to that question is the only thing I care about.

  • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    79
    ·
    13 days ago

    “We understand and share the desire to build a health care system that works better for everyone. That is the purpose of our organization,” he wrote.

    Liar, liar, pants on fire.

    • Godnroc@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      13 days ago

      “Once we’ve finished draining the blood from the neck of the people we ensure their remaining time is as comfortable and wonderful as is possible. That is the purpose of our organization.”

      • octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        13 days ago

        “Once we’ve finished draining the blood from the neck of the people we ensure their remaining time is as comfortable and wonderful as is possible**. That is the purpose of our organization.”

         

        **Without violating any end of life profitability constraints, of course.

    • ramsorge@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      13 days ago

      I think that will require corrective action, apologies, retribution, and active lobbying for a better healthcare system… as a start.

      My guess, they’re just buying time.

      Dddepose!

  • ynazuma@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    127
    ·
    13 days ago

    From the article:

    Witty added that Thompson was “never content with the status quo” and praised the CEO for advocating for ideas that “were aimed at making health care more affordable, more transparent, more intuitive, more compassionate — and more human.”

    This is a complete lie

    UHC. Leader in denials under Thompson

    https://www.forbes.com/sites/amyfeldman/2024/12/05/unitedhealthcare-denies-more-claims-than-other-insurers---angering-patients-and-health-systems/

    Thompson accused of insider trading

    https://www.huffpost.com/entry/unitedhealthcare-brian-thompson-insider-trading-lawsuit_n_6751a2abe4b01129dffa8789

    Record profits for UHC under Thompson. 20-25% of claims denied

    https://www.forbes.com/sites/brucejapsen/2024/01/12/unitedhealth-group-profits-hit-23-billion-in-2023/

  • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    12 days ago

    Uh huh, now that the company is crashing, the C level meeting decided that maybe it’s better to play our side, act as if you actually care?

    You use words like “understand” and “share” so lovely and freely that one might almost be tempted to believe that you know what those words mean…

    Almost.

    The simple fact is that you won’t change your bottom line, enriching your shareholders. If thateans you need to pretend that you actually have a heart, and that you care, then that is what you’ll pretend.

    Anything for the shareholders.

  • Mortoc@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    13 days ago

    “No employees — be they the people who answer customer calls or nurses who visit patients in their homes — should have to fear for their and their loved ones’ safety,” Witty wrote.

    There’s something we can all agree on. Executive fear though…

    • ikidd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      13 days ago

      They should be exactly as uncertain of their survival as the people that they’re deciding claims on.

    • Frozengyro@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      13 days ago

      They shouldn’t have to fear for their safety either, they should just do right by their customers and it wouldn’t be a problem.

    • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      13 days ago

      No insurance customer should have to fear dying because their medically necessary procedures are denied. Of all the things wrong with Healthcare, prior authorization should be target number 1 for legislators. It should be 100% illegal for insurance companies to require pre-authorization.

      If a doctor regularly prescribes unnecessary treatments or medication, let the proper ayluthorities investigate and pull their credentials, if necessary. Don’t kill thousands of people to save a buck and say it’s to protect them from unnecessary procedures.