• scutiger@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    4 days ago

    Half a liter of vodka monthly? Aren’t the Poles known for their consumption of vast quantities of the stuff?

  • MNByChoice@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    4 days ago

    I wonder how they used it. Fancy baked goods the first days, then a rush to bake long lasting good before the perishables spoil? Did widowers ask family to bake with their rations?

    • Valmond@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      3 days ago

      You didn’t live in the eighties I bet. It was cheap back then and everyone smoked.

    • BeardedGingerWonder@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      3 days ago

      For a month? It’s just dried shredded leaves wrapped in paper, cigarettes are super cheap to produce, tax makes them expensive.

    • kava@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      average smoker smokes about 20 cigarettes a day. so it’s a little less than half of a monthly use of cigarettes.

      from what i understand the ration was meant to supplement what you consume, not provide everything

      • strawberrysocial@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Is 20 cigs a day honestly the average nowadays?? Mind blowing and sad. My mum who was an addicted smoker since she was 10 years of age and went through maybe 5 to 10 cigs a day.

        • kava@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          it’s been the average for a long time. it’s due to nicotine’s pharmacological effects. its half life is roughly 1~2 hours. so a smoker on average will feel the compulsion to smoke an hour or so after the last cigarette. since most people are awake somewhere 16 hours a day, that’s about ~16 cigarettes a day.

          your mom’s smoking habits were definitely atypical

    • PugJesus@lemmy.worldOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      38
      ·
      4 days ago

      Rationing in the early 80s is considered to be one of the major agitating factors that led to increased labor union activity and, thus, the eventual end of the Communist regime in Poland. Would seem that it was not nearly enough vodka to quietly cope!

      • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        I can see why. Like if I was flat broke, these rations would be super welcome, but as an ongoing totality of what I could have for all of my labor? No, fuck that! The people at the top were obviously hoarding all the wealth, which seems to always happen every time this form of government is tried.

        • PugJesus@lemmy.worldOPM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          28
          ·
          4 days ago

          Well, you still had to purchase the food, you were just limited by ration cards in how much of certain goods you could purchase.

        • crapwittyname@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          It happens every time any form of government is tried to be honest. The problem is with people, not the system of government.

          The major problem—one of the major problems, for there are several—one of the many major problems with governing people is that of whom you get to do it; or rather of who manages to get people to let them do it to them. To summarize: it is a well-known fact that those people who must want to rule people are, ipso facto, those least suited to do it. To summarize the summary: anyone who is capable of getting themselves made President should on no account be allowed to do the job. To summarize the summary of the summary: people are a problem.

          -Douglas Adams, The Restaurant at the End of the Universe

          • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            4 days ago

            Right. Which is a fundamental reason why the government should not be trusted to act in the best interest of the people. There must be checks and balances, and they must be held accountable and be forced to do their duty. The USA had a great run of this, but over the last 4 decades politicians have changed the lay of the land to benefit themselves and their donors more and more, and the people haven’t the gumption, will, or faculties to challenge them and hold them to account. Politicians have also realized that much of our system relied upon integrity, or the assumption that the individual would follow the system, with very little to no consequences if they just do whatever they want.

            • crapwittyname@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              4 days ago

              I’m no historian, but I see the cycle of [Brave New World -> Prosperity / Dominance -> Decline -> Corruption -> Oppression -> Revolution -> Brave New World] as a fairly common pattern, with timescales from decades to centuries. It might be cognitive bias, but it seems kind of inevitable, really.

              Scandinavia seems like a good place to live ATM.

  • Shardikprime@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    3 days ago

    Reminds me of the leftist venezuelan regime monthly rations in the form of cajas clap.

    Absolutely disgusting food.

    Thank goodness I was able to escape the dictatorship with my family

    • strawberrysocial@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Thank you for posting this. I don’t understand what a lot of those foods are. It looks like a heck of a lot of it is pasta/noodles based though. And maybe milk powder? Where is the protein other than the canned tuna(?) up at the top.

      • Shardikprime@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        That was it. No more than that. Worst thing is that almost all this products are from Mexico. Before the collectivists and leftists took power in Venezuela, we used to make all these products

        Left to right

        4 blue pasta packages, 200 grams each

        4 green rice packages, 1 kg

        4 yellow spaghetti packs. 200 grams each

        6 shredded tuna cans. 130 grams each

        1 oil bottle. 1 liter

        2 red bottles, tomato sauce/ketchup. 220 grams each

        2 orange packs, corn flour, 1kg each

        1 pack of refined sugar, 1kg

        1 white pack, dry whole milk, 500 grams

        2 green packs, black beans, 1kg each

        3 yellow packs, egg spaghetti, 290 grams each

        3 red packs, elbow shaped spaghetti , 200 grams each

        1 blue pack, lentils, 1 kg

        Take into account that this is supposed to last a family of 4 a month. If it ever arrives.

        Because it’s assigned per family

        Also, as most of these products are from Mexico, the transportation is not the best and most of the time they arrive corroded, open by rats, or with less or very different products than advertised

        So yeah I’m glad I escaped the collectivistic hellhole with my family mostly intact

        • strawberrysocial@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          23 hours ago

          Thank you for answering, this is very eye opening. In Canada we get a similar amount of food at our volunteer based food banks that is supposed to last a month but lasts a few days, but it’s different in the type of product. And it would never be given to us in a state that was degraded or torn into by pests.

  • Kvoth@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 days ago

    I’m not gonna say that’s anywhere near sufficient, but as a US citizen where do I sign up

    • PugJesus@lemmy.worldOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      3 days ago

      To be ration-limited by what you can purchase? I’m sure that’s a fad diet somewhere.

      • TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        3 days ago

        I might bring tankies out of the woodwork for saying this, but I remember one time a tankie told me that scarcity in communist countries is by design and it’s a good thing, after I pointed out that people had to be on the waiting list just to get a car. What if the person lives in rural with no access to public transport?

        I understand capitalism is wasteful, but doing the extreme opposite and making people wait to own a car or giving someone bare essentials is not a good thing. Having a scarcity economy is not good, especially considering that the Soviet Union produced more tanks than cars throughout its history. The American military industrial complex is rightly criticised for overspending, but communist countries are worse since the case is that more tanks were made than civilian cars. It means more budget went to the military than to producing consumer good. Talk about priorities.

        • Valmond@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          No, are you sure? /s

          Don’t take what tankied say like they mean it, it’s just propaganda / they amuse themselves coming up with lies that you have to unravel and defeat. And if you do so, then magically the discussion is over and we’ll talk about some other thing.

        • Justas🇱🇹@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 days ago

          Soviet Union had a limited ability to produce things, especially heavy machinery. Their leadership quickly realised that they can’t outproduce the Western countries on everything, so they decided to only match their military production capabilities. Which led to them falling further and further behind.

        • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          Not a tankie, nor a communist, just a progressive with an interest in history, but,

          after I pointed out that people had to be on the waiting list just to get a car. What if the person lives in rural with no access to public transport?

          Is such a US-centric view. They all didn’t need to drive cars, dude, they had public transportation.

          Edit: Added emphasis for people having trouble reading

          • TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            Not all countries have good public transport system. Imagine living in Siberia at the time of the communists, unless you’re in gulag which doesn’t require you to travel to other places.

              • Takumidesh@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 days ago

                No but the person you replied to called out a specific scenario in which the person lives in a rural area with no public transport access which is a real thing in every single country, with good public transit or not.

                The concept of someone not having access to public transit isn’t an American centric point of view.

          • Justas🇱🇹@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            Yes, busses were relatively common and affordable, but many of them were smelly and horrible. Except for the Icaruses, the passengers of which felt like kings among men.

    • PixellatedDave@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 days ago

      Well if you really want to be restricted purchasing the maximum amount of those items then you don’t need to sign up. Just limit your monthly amount to be as displayed.

    • acargitz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      4 days ago

      They are in the same place where pro-capitalist liberals are when people talk about food insecurity in today’s West, and let’s face it, the rest of the non-Western world.

    • repungnant_canary@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      This has little to do with socialism/capitalism and more with that fact that the economy was centrally (terribly) governed and most of the products were exported to the “friend nation USSR”

      • PugJesus@lemmy.worldOPM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        75% of sugar output exported to the Sovs while the citizens of Poland ‘enjoyed’ sugar rationing.

        • niktemadur@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          4 days ago

          75% of sugar output exported to moscow and leningrad, you think the people of anywhere outside the immediate vicinity of those two cities got to see any of it? Let alone anywhere east of the Urals?

      • Tja@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        19
        ·
        4 days ago

        Comunimsm is not that bad! It only has a 100% failure rate, but that’s the CIA/UFO/Soros fault!

        • gmtom@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          27
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          4 days ago

          Reminder you live in a country where you have to pay other people to deny you healthcare.

          • sneaky@r.nf
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 days ago

            Plenty of countries with universal healthcare that are also capatalistic societies. I love communism, too but the other comment had a valid point.

        • humble peat digger@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          Ussr never fully recovered after ww2 and had to engage in a very expensive arms race while attempting to rebuild. Imo saying that communism doesn’t work often forgets this fact.

          • _cryptagion@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            3 days ago

            I mean, they didn’t have to engage in an arms race, any more than either side had to go to space or the moon. They did so for the propaganda, and to make themselves look tough, the same as the US.

          • Tja@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            3 days ago

            Plenty of capitalist countries did recover, so that just one more argument against communism.

            • humble peat digger@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              3 days ago

              Completely different situations. One country had to recover from complete devastation and bootstrap everything from scratch, could not rely on anyone and had to fund and support allies with that.

              While other European countries were barely touched it could benefit from US funding which was in itself completely untouched and benefited from the collapse of the entire capitalist competition worldwide.

              • Tja@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                3 days ago

                The ussr was much less devastated than Germany, and it didn’t support allies, it received support first and exploited colonies later.

                • humble peat digger@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  Not true. Majority of ussr most economically valuable areas were destroyed.
                  https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=kPVo9w79D6w

                  Ussr provided major military assistance to china Korea, vietnam, African countries fighting for freedom.
                  Also look up comecon.
                  Also who do you think was responsible for reconstruction of half the germany? It was ussr most which was also half destroyed itself.

                  All of this was a much higher burden on ussr than US which was left intact.

  • Jikiya@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    3 days ago

    That’s not enough butter. I would have been put down young for rioting about criminally low amounts of butter.

      • Shardikprime@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        15 hours ago

        Holy shit that’s a lot. I use about 10 grams per portion of 1 meal, usually breakfast.

        I don’t eat that daily but even like that, 30 full days non stop , that’s like 300 grams

        What the hell are you guys doing up there with a pound of butter?

        Oh no, don’t tell me. I don’t want to know

  • Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    3 days ago

    Can someone calculate the calories in that? I’m too lazy.

    Maybe don’t include the sugar. That’s a shit ton of sugar to go through in month.

    • asqapro@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      3 days ago

      Ballpark estimate, excluding the sugar:

      2.5kg beef: ~6265 Calories

      0.5l vodka: ~1082 Calories

      1.3kg white rice: ~4743 Calories

      1.3kg flour: ~4732 Calories

      500g butter: ~3585 Calories

      300g cooking oil (Google says rapeseed oil is popular in Poland so I used that): ~2652 Calories

      250g chocolate: ~1338 Calories

      Total: 24,397 Calories or ~813 Calories per day

      Some other people online also did the math and came up with similar numbers. For example: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37027027 came up with 33,063 Calories (including the sugar)

      • kralk@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        You get another 333 calories from the sugar, add it to the vodka!

      • Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        3 days ago

        Nice, that was super fast. I guess it’s probably enough for one person to survive if they practically don’t move at all the entire month, for a little while at least.

        Still not pleasant I imagine.

        • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          What would you be willing to do to ensure that your fellow citizens aren’t dying of literal hunger on the streets?

          (Clearly to most Americans, that answer is “absolutely nothing”)

          • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 days ago

            Exactly, and thst sounds like the sort of rations Americans had during the world wars. It was supplimented by a mass movement of community gardens. Personally I’m more a fan of the ration points system we used so that you aren’t stuck with stuff you won’t use and those who’d rather eat like Hannibal of Carthage and go less hungry can do that while those who’d rather eat more resource intensive foods like meat can accept the cost of their demands in the form of calories. Though that may just be because I’ve always been the sort who’d rather be full of lentils and potatoes than hungry after a burger, even before I quit meat.

            • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              22 hours ago

              Though that may just be because I’ve always been the sort who’d rather be full of lentils and potatoes than hungry after a burger,

              I think some of us have experienced poverty (or near-poverty) in our lives, so we understand things like this.