Theres no death note community to post this in so… here we go…
(Btw, how many names do you think you can fit on there?)
Just copy the Forbes richest people list.
Yup, and add in world leaders if there is still room on the page
I just write, “FLORIDA”.
Instructions unclear. Killed every single “FLORIDA” key chain instead.
Florida is actually a fairly common first name, you’ll need to write Florida America.
With a first name like Florida, they can go too, honestly.
It depends on how small you write, I suppose.
If you just want people to die, you can put down quite the massacre on both sides of an A4 page.
However, if you want people do to specific things before they die, like billionaires redisteubuting their personal wealth, or steer world leaders to reverse a lot of their bullshit, you’re going to have to get very creative with your wording to optimise as much page space as possible.
It depends on how small you write, I suppose.
I see I’m gonna need to buy a microfiche printer…
I’d save it exclusively for people who drive like donkeys. I’ll solve bad driving once and for all.
This is the worst use of a Death Note I’ve ever seen that doesn’t include race theory.
It does include race theory, since some people apparently think, that public roads are for racing.
“Kolanaki, death by snu-snu.”
Wipe my arse with it so all the shits of the world die.
Does it have to be names, or can it be entire species?
I hope you are thinink of mosquitos, and if so make sure to only pick the ones that bite humans. There are a lot of other species that don’t.
(I know which species you really mean)
Ok, mosquitoes are on number 2, number 1 is panda’s for sure. Fuck them wannabe land orca’s being so dumb, they going backwards in evolution by eating the least nutricions food ever out there (next to McDonald’s and other junkfood) while being a fucking bear. And then the odacity to be a political pawn for China, fucking disgusting. I’m a vegan because I love animals and am against animal abuse, so this says something coming from me.
I change number 2 to humans, bats need to eat too, they love mosquitoes and bats are cute AF.
That’s my list. If anyone has extra names which couldn’t fit on their list, I sell spots on my list for dead panda heads. I know, unnecessary when they are are on my list, but better to be sure.
I have a song for you.
What a masterpiece! Thank you
land orca
Thank you for the new panda nickname!
“Fake wannabe” land orca! Orca’s are amazing creatures, intelligent, beautiful. Everything a panda never was and definitely never will be.
Why do you think pinguïns started to live on Antarctica. They don’t want to be associated with pandas. Even pinguïns with their cute wiggle know how to wear the black and white like a fucking boss. During the forever dark winters they huddle together with -45°C to protect each other from freezing while a panda hangs himself “again” because he fell out of a tree “again” and got stuck “again”.
Kms
deleted by creator
I don’t know why this is a top-level comment, but I’m a bit concerned
i dont care to play god. but i will play new super luigi u.
The thing that’s always interested me is that you can choose how they die, but surely there are limits?
Could i say ‘dead by gunshot wound to the back?’ Is there a bullet left over? A gunman seen fleeing the scene?
It has to be plausable.
If there is not gun around, they just die by heart attack.
Example: If you write: “dead by Car Accident” and the victim is the middle of nowhere where its implausible for a car to be nearby, they just die of a heart attack.
A plausible seanario you could write is: “death by gunshot wound; purchases a gun and attempts to use the gun to commit bank robbery, is shot dead after shooting at responding law enforcement officers and misses, provoking a deadly return fire in response” (the bullets shot at law enforcement had to miss, since the death note cannot make a target kill other people)
Chatgpt suggests that with a 0.3mm tip pen, and writing letters no more than 2mm x 2mm, you could fit roughly 1000 names per side of an a4 sheet.
So if you’re fine with the default means of killing, and use both sides of the paper, you could take out about 2000 people.
As far as how I would personally use it? I’d put down maybe two or three names per month. I don’t have the greatest fine motor skills around, so I could fit maybe 250 names per side at most.
Who would I target? Idk. My first thought would be people like Putin & Kim Jong Un, but the concern there is if those two chucklefucks suddenly die, their countries will descend into chaos and there’s no telling what will happen to their nukes.
I think the goal would be to try and use it in a way that makes world leaders hesitant to do anything evil because they know their hearts can just explode if they get bad press.
Light Yagami could get pretty elaborate with what he required people to act out in a Death Note, but I’m not sure exactly how to destabilize our globalist economy with only one page. It likely starts with using the leader of a capitalist country to kill a large swath of it’s billionaire class at once, then forcing said leader to support the nationalization of healthcare, food production, transportation, mineral extraction, etc before trying to influence other capitalist nations to take the same path for the rest of their life before heart attack inevitably gets them. The problem is that I really think you only get to write this for one leader, due to the space requirements. I guess as long as the assumption that all the world’s ills stem from America it’s fine, but isn’t Murdoch currently operating out of Australia? Missing even a few key billionaires with the initial murder leaves a lot of powerful opposition.
If you simply take the top 3-5 leaders in the top 20 countries by gdp, it would destabilize the world immensely. Even if they all just died of a heart attack and nothing else happened. That’s 100 names, you could fit that in one side probably.
Yeah but utter destabilization isn’t the goal. A complete collapse of the current power structure would just allow corporate interests to assume direct control in the name of peacekeeping. The goal is to use my wishfish to get us toward an egalitarian society, not plunge us into chaos. Have to destroy the old ways while guiding to a new way.
I’d burn it. I’m not a murderer. Having a way to murder someone doesn’t make me want to do it.
I’m a bit of a Buddhist myself, but knowing that I stopped billions from suffering for ending the lives of a few evil people, I could do it.
I could do it with my bare hands.
If you burn it, or fail to use it, someone you briefly thought maybe should go on the list gets to use it
?? I didn’t “briefly think” to write any name, it goes straight to the gas stove.
Lots of people here forget that you can control the actions of the person before they die. If you go by the richest persons, like someone suggested, you get them to liquidate and donate their entire state, or maybe a bunch at the same time to lobby for taxes to the mega rich, before dying. If you go by world leaders, like someone else suggested, you get them to undo their shits, e.g. Putin abandons Ukraine and destroys most of Russia’s armaments before joining NATO, Kim Jong Un calls for democratic elections and forms a democratic government after opening the borders, etc.
Unfortunately you need to keep in mind that transfers and donations can be reversed posthumously. If a gunman walks up to a billionaire, forces him to transfer millions to his bank account, and then shoots him dead, the killer doesn’t just get to keep the money after getting caught. Any transfer can be reversed after the fact. And you only have a few minutes of controlling the person before they die, so you can’t have them work for years to do good with their money.
If just one billionaire died this way, the transfers would likely stand. It can be written off as one man deciding to gain a conscience before taking his own life. But if hundreds of billionaires start doing this all at once? People are reasonably going to conclude that something or someone is controlling these billionaires. Maybe people actually accept the fantastical notion of a Death Note in play. Or maybe they conclude its something strange but more scientific, like some sort of infectious electronic meme that can instantly brainwash people into carrying out some action. Maybe there’s a hereto undiscovered arrangement of pixels on a screen that can hack the human mind and gain control of it temporarily. The sort of thing that, while implausible, is at least within the realm of scientific possibility.
Regardless of the exact cause, the heirs to these billionaires will go to court and argue that their deceased relatives were clearly not of sound mind at the time they transferred all their holdings. There’s already plenty of legal precedent for this, primarily for elderly people who lose their faculties and are taken advantage of by manipulative caretakers. Even if you can convince some 90 year old woman with Alzheimer’s to sign away her fortune to you, that transfer has a good chance of being reversed in court.
Really, the most effective way to provide extreme encouragement for the heirs to give away money is by having the billionaire write, in their own blood on the wall, “my heirs should give away my money. Any that don’t will share my fate.”
This way there are no transfers to fight in court. The legitimate heirs of the billionaire do inherit the money. But after they have it, there’s nothing preventing them from donating it themselves. And the money will be like a curse. They’ll be desperate to get rid of it.
Done on a large scale, this would encourage most billionaires to give up their wealth voluntarily. You could have each of them write, “I am being killed for the crime of being a billionaire. Any other billionaire will share my fate.” If a few dozen such killings happened, and the police proved utterly unable to prevent it, then the vast majority of billionaires would give up their wealth voluntarily out of pure fear.
You can control them for days, so it’s a lot more difficult to undo stuff that was given almost a month ago, you can use cryptocurrency so that it doesn’t matter what any court decides it’s irreversible. But in general I agree with you that scaring them into giving all of their money voluntarily is more useful, however I don’t see any reason why you can’t make them give all of their money and also a warning to others, that is a lot more scary because even if you fought in court to get that money back you would immediately donate it all and die, so eventually people would not try to pursue those cases. And the fact that they had to originally leaves a clear public paper trail to track the inheritance, which would otherwise be impossible, so rich people would just hide their wealth.
And you only have a few minutes of controlling the person before they die
23 days to be exact
That might be usable. But still, well within the range of reversible transactions and court litigation.
Lots of people here forget that you can control the actions of the person before they die.
I did almost forget, thanks for the reminder. I just looked it up again, specifically you can control 23 days.
Kim Jong Un calls for democratic elections and forms a democratic government after opening the borders
He’d get couped by the generals and they’ll instate someone else. You’d have to write the key generals too. You could run out of space to write real soon. And you’d have to hope their sucessors actually continue the trajectory after 23 days (since kim and the generals be dead)
