• kingshrubb@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    20 days ago

    Horrible. A family member of mine needs a medication called Tolvaptan according to their doctor to prevent kidney failure due to a genetic disease.

    From drugs.com: “The cost for tolvaptan (15 mg oral tablet) is approximately $4,482 for a supply of 10 tablets, while the brand Jynarque can cost around $21,238 for a supply of 56 tablets, depending on the pharmacy. Prices may vary based on factors like location and insurance coverage.”

    15mg is the lowest dose of this medication too. Often the dose is 30mg or 45mg, up to 60mg max.

  • Serinus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    46
    ·
    20 days ago

    Please don’t violate LW’s ToS. Be aware of what you’re posting publicly. This is not a bar with your friends. This is the internet where things are recorded forever and can possibly link back to you/us with consequences. It’s not that hard to express yourself without breaking the rules.

    • Cris@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      20 days ago

      What did they do that broke ToS? It looks like the post may have been edited

      • Serinus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        23
        ·
        edit-2
        20 days ago

        Nothing yet. I’m just hoping people think a little before they do things to get banned/removed. The rules are for everyone’s benefit.

        This is a post that will rightfully make people angry.

          • Serinus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            20 days ago

            Yeah, it turns out threats of terrorism can look bad for you if they’re ever uncovered.

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            edit-2
            20 days ago

            Serinus is correct. They are rules to the benefit of everyone who wishes Lemmy.world to stay up which, since you’re here, presumably includes you.

            The server is in The Netherlands. The Netherlands does not have freedom of speech. Calling for violence is illegal there.

            If mods left calls for violence up all the time, there’s a good chance Lemmy.world could get shut down. Considering how much you participate here, I’m guessing you would not care for that.

            Edit: Always love it when this explanation gets downvotes but the downvoters don’t actually chime in and say that yeah, they’d be fine if Lemmy.world gets shut down as long as they get to say what they want, when they want, wherever they want. Maybe if you just admitted it instead of getting pissed off at someone pointing out that speech can have negative consequences…

            • gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              20 days ago

              Always love it when this explanation gets downvotes but the downvoters don’t actually chime in and say that yeah, they’d be fine if Lemmy.world gets shut down as long as they get to say what they want, when they want, wherever they want. Maybe if you just admitted it instead of getting pissed off at someone pointing out that speech can have negative consequences

              Why, when you understand the meaning with a simple downvote?

              Don’t call a place .world and then host it somewhere with pathetic laws regarding the main topic of the website: speech. Well, unless you want everyone else to rightfully call out the stupidity and patheticness of such a move

              There’s your reply

              • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                20 days ago

                Why, when you understand the meaning with a simple downvote?

                Because it’s cowardly.

                Don’t call a place .world and then host it somewhere with pathetic laws regarding the main topic of the website: speech.

                Feddit.co.uk is in the UK where they don’t have free speech laws. Should it be shut down too? Should all servers be in the U.S. where free speech has a constitutional guarantee? Oh wait, you have no guarantee there either because it’s not a government-run server.

                I would also point out that there are lots of other Lemmy servers you can go to. No one is forcing you to use this one. That’s the beauty of the federation system. I’m guessing you won’t like a lot of the others that automatically censor speech like lemmy.ml either.

                If you want a place where you can say whatever you want and no one will do anything about it, 4Chan and Gab are there for you.

        • Cris@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          20 days ago

          Ohhhh. That makes more sense now. Thank you for clarifying :)

        • JoeyHarrington@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          50
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          20 days ago

          Because it’s a stupid, non standard way to say it. I understood it fine but I still thought it was a needless abbreviation.

          • P1nkman@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            8
            ·
            20 days ago

            K = kilo, which stands for 1000. It’s extremely standard. Saying it’s stupid is like saying $ or π or & or # or % is stupid.

          • morbidcactus@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            20 days ago

            Formatting of the number changes the way people interpret it. Which looks larger from a quick glance 1k or 1,000? You’re 1h% correct, it’s totally needless, makes it less clear and honestly was probably done intentionally.

              • ricecake@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                20 days ago

                Okay. I don’t typically get that caught up in the formatting of a number if the meaning is clear. 1k means 1000 in basically every context, and a unit indicator doesn’t make it more confusing to me. Are you likewise baffled by something being written as “1km”?

                • jeffw@lemmy.worldM
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  20 days ago

                  I have literally never seen k used in percentages before. Km is common, as is using it if you’re writing out LARGE numerical values (10k or above).

                  I’m not saying it’s difficult to understand. I’m saying it looks stupid.

              • Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                20 days ago

                It’s literally the stupidest possible way to write it

                Nah.

                For example:

                “UnitedHealth overcharged cancer patients for drugs by over 1,000,000,000μ%”

                would be even more stupid and I’m sure using something else than base-10 would yield its very own class of stupid.

                Stupidity is probably boundless.

      • Hawke@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        20 days ago

        11 times what they should have paid unless you think that “overcharging by 100%” would be charging exactly the right price or if you feel that all medication should be free somewhat cheaper. Or more expensive. Whichever way the math works for that.

      • workerONE@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        20 days ago

        Yeah 1000% is 10x but they were charged 11x what they should have paid. Overcharged by (over) 10x.

  • circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    139
    ·
    20 days ago

    When will we start holding these people accountable? It is easy to say “corporations are bad” and then sit on your hands. It’s different to start calling out the people who ultimately make the corporations evil.

    We have whole classes of people comfortable fucking people over – sometimes with deadly consequences.

    • SmilingSolaris@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      20 days ago

      People don’t make corporations evil. The system of economics makes evil corporations win. Until the system changes, nothing else can

    • Hemingways_Shotgun@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      19 days ago

      While I desperately want to believe that we have finally reached a tipping point where it becomes time to start investing in companies that make diagonal shaped blades, I’m resigned to the fact that no matter how angry we get, most of the hoi polloi is too lazy to care about it as long as they have the newest fun gadget in their hands and a bigger TV than last year.

    • Zink@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      20 days ago

      “We” as in society, the government, and the legal system, will never hold them accountable.

      Shielding against personal responsibility and liability is one of the bedrock features of American corporations. Piercing the corporate veil is the rare exception and is seen as a big deal. And that’s because the veil protects rich people.

      “We” as in highly motivated individuals who may or may not have a plumbing company with their brother, seem the most likely to do something about it.

    • Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      20 days ago

      Well, the Law is supposed to protect us from Bad People, or so they and the powerful tell us again and again (and again, and again, and again).

      Of course, in reality as the Ju$tice System’s reaction to Luigi’s action compared to their reaction to abusive and even murderous actions done by those hidden behind UnitedHealth makes painfully obvious, the Law mostly protects powerful Bad People from our reaction to those people doing Bad Things.

    • UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      38
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      20 days ago

      Probably the best part of the biden administration. But let’s be real, the oligarchs were making moves to replace her either way.