• elgordino@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Bold to assume he would even be elected again after 4 years of fucking it up. He wasn’t last time.

    • AbidanYre@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      If not for COVID he probably would have been.

      Luckily we’ve got bird fly waiting in the wings to fuck our shit up once RFKJr decides we should follow the Leslie Knope disaster response plan and start giving the birds CPR.

    • Whitebrow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Reminder that they control all branches of government and can do whatever the hell they want.

      Even though I partially agree that it’s probably somebody sucking up instead of them passing a “remove all term limits” bill instead.

      Or maybe they’re just testing the waters and compliance of the people currently elected, heck if I know.

    • psyklax@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      And we were all overreacting about Roe v Wade. “Precedent”, “established law”, “checks and balances”. It could never happen, they said.

      • Franklin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        I really would like to see some of those checks and balances I’ve heard so much about. Must have gotten confused—it’s cheques for the rich, on our dime, to make their balance keeps going up.

    • TiaNati@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      That’s a really dangerous way of thinking. We can no longer normalize this stuff by going “it’ll never actually happen.” It CAN happen. Get your head out of the sand and stop minimizing the very real threat our democracy is facing.

      • OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        This one won’t happen though. It doesn’t have the votes. It would require a Constitutional amendment, and thus a LOT of Democrats on board.

        You can’t freak out about every possible thing.

      • dx1@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        What democracy? We’ve been living in a police state our entire lives. Talk about a dangerous way of thinking, ffs, how many hundreds of thousands of people were murdered under the Bush administration alone, and you act like that was just healthy democracy? Why were Bush and Obama on the same page about the erosion of our civil liberties and global imperialism? I swear, some of you are just miles from the correct explanation.

  • halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    135
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    Good fucking luck with that hurdle.

    They need a two-thirds vote in both the House of Representatives and the Senate; or a conventio called by Congress at the request of two-thirds of the state legislatures. Then it has to be ratified by the legislatures of three-quarters of the states.

    Even if they managed a super majority on both sides of Congress for Trumplefuck, there’s no way they’re getting 38 States to agree to that.

    • ObjectivityIncarnate@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      It’s obviously completely performative, this is a very common move in US politics in general, I’ve noticed–introducing a bill they know is definitely not going to pass, but makes them look good to their base.

    • Hegar@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      118
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 month ago

      I don’t think the law is a restricting factor for the trump regime.

    • Chainweasel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Trump is ruling by executive order and no one is stopping him from doing any of it, constitutional or not.
      He’ll just issue an executive order to lower the threshold and at best that order gets challenged and goes to the SCOTUS, and we all know what will happen there.

      • JcbAzPx@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        There’s already an injunction against one of his orders. I’m sure more will come.

      • drekloge@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 month ago

        The only effective short-term roadblocks are going to be legal challenges, like the ones WA’s governor and AG have been preparing for. You’re right that this only works until it gets overturned by SCOTUS, and it doubly hurts progressives because we now have to spend resources (time and money) fighting nonsense instead of fighting for causes we want…like some goddamn healthcare.

        Delay. Deny. Depose.

    • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      35
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      Trump is the candidate during next election

      Red States let him be an option even though they shouldn’t

      He wins enough red States to have a majority

      They name him president even though it’s against the Constitution

      The supreme Court is packed with his picks so they don’t do anything about it

      Tada! Civil war? Dissolution of the USA? Who knows!?!

      • Laurel Raven@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 month ago

        This.

        We need to stop acting like the norms matter at all, like the rules still apply. We must treat this like what it is: a threat to our very survival.

        The US government, at least the parts that actually could do something about this, are on the brink of total collapse or dismantlement. I hate to say it but I think the time for peaceful resistance is long since past, i don’t see any way this is going to end without bloodshed

    • kerrigan778@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      81
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      It’s sad that you guys still think the rule of the constitution is some massive roadblock that they’ve somehow missed. They literally made an Executive Order that just says “No” to the very first sentence of the 14th amendment, do you think none of them noticed? They get to have a vote about ludicrous things, and they get to gleefully destroy the lives of any Republican who dares vote against them. Maybe it gets struck down for the time being? Who cares, the courts are packed, they can realistically just start killing people pretty soon and it’ll start with the disloyals and the true believers as needed as it always does.

      You cannot logical trap nor get off on technicalities fascists. It does not matter to them, they will just do what they want anyways, all that matters is if they can crush anyone who tries to stop them.

      They are pushing the boundaries of the conversation and they are testing the waters, and every time they’re pushed back on they use the limp push back to consolidate more power because nobody has been willing to actually stop them.

      • witten@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        With all due respect, that is some real defeatist dog shit. Yes, Trump and cronies have no respect for the constitution or the rule of law. But if we collectively roll over at the first fascist executive order, that’s exactly what they want us to do… They are testing the waters. The supreme court is packed, but every circuit court in the country certainly isn’t. And that’s where these battles are already being fought. We need to collectively resist every encroachment, every power grab. Otherwise we’re nearly as culpable as Trump for the rise of fascism.

        • Lemming6969@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 month ago

          If you aren’t willing to kill them then they will inch forward until they win. That is why civil wars have existed.

          • witten@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            Violence isn’t the only way to fight fascism. It’s surely a way. But the courts and the school districts are two early battle grounds where folks are already pushing back (non-violently) and preventing some of that inching forward.

            • Lemming6969@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 month ago

              Preventing some, some of the time, is how you get here, inch by inch, and eventually earlier wins become future losses.

              • witten@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                edit-2
                1 month ago

                Look at it this way… We have a portfolio of tools to fight fascism. Sometimes, yes, the proper response to a specific incursion is direct action. Sometimes you can accomplish more with other means (fighting back in the courts, etc.). It doesn’t have to be all or nothing, and in fact I’d argue you accomplish the most by picking your tools wisely for each battle.

      • mortemtyrannis@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        There are only two tried and true methods I am aware of to stop fascists:

        1. Killing them
        2. Making them kill themselves

        I’m going to enjoy seeing this comment get removed. I’ll think about it as I’m put on the train to the death camp.

        • Lemming6969@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          I think the logic is sound… If anyone is allowed to introduce legislation against established reforms infinitely many times, you get gish galloped to death and they will eventually get their way no matter how terrible the idea is. Because it’s a deep ideology, you must get rid of the person to get rid of the idea.

  • aarRJaay@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    1 month ago

    FTA" “Trump “has proven himself to be the only figure in modern history capable of reversing our nation’s decay and restoring America to greatness, and he must be given the time necessary to accomplish that goal,”” - He hasn’t don’t anything yet!! How has he ‘proven himself’

  • Emerald@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    88
    ·
    1 month ago

    “It is imperative that we provide President Trump with every resource necessary to correct the disastrous course set by the Biden administration,” Ogles said in a statement

    so Biden created a bad situation for him in 4 years, yet he thinks Trump needs 8 years to undo it. Sounds like a skill issue to me.