Lofgren’s bill would impose site-blocking requirements on broadband providers with at least 100,000 subscribers and providers of public domain name resolution services with annual revenue of over $100 million. The bill has exemptions for VPN services and “similar services that encrypt and route user traffic through intermediary servers”; DNS providers that offer service “exclusively through encrypted DNS protocols”; and operators of premises that provide Internet access, like coffee shops, bookstores, airlines, and universities.

Invest in VPN providers.

  • werefreeatlast@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Okay… And that helps anyone how? Where’s the other foot? I would like to help? I have a sledge hammer! C’mon don’t be shy.

    But, I got ideas! How about everyone who files for a patent has to give the Democratic party all their money or how autocorrect wants, all their monkey! That’ll show them!

    And how about everyone who goes to and graduates from college must serve a 30 year sentence? Fabulous!

    Need a car license? Just smash your car on this steel wall! Yey! So easy! So much better than racists!

    WTF! Put the thinking cap back on dudes!

    • FMT99@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      98
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Great to see our representatives finally focusing on the real issues in these difficult times.

      • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        TBH they can’t really pass anything even if they wanted to focus on more important issues. Majority Leaders call votes and they’re both Republicans.

        • FMT99@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          In a democracy, when you’re not in power what do you do to get that power back? You show the electorate that you’re fighting for what they think is important. If Democrats absolutely insist on business as usual, promoting corporate interests and occasionally pausing to shout “fascist” at Trump, all the while just plain ignoring people’s actual concerns we’re going to lose the next election and the next one.

  • SquiffSquiff@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    I’m missing the part where consumers are required to use their ISP DNS. I never do, in favour of CloudFlare DNS, Google DNS, etc

    • Quokka@mastodon.au
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      @SquiffSquiff @some_guy They do that here to some degree. ISP’s DNS give a shitty warning about pirating if you try to visit any of the normal places for that kind of thing. Personally i just use a local DNS over HTTPS server. Which reminds me I need to see if he/she would like a donation.

    • LordCrom@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      Whoever wrote this bill probably lacks the basic network skills to know you can do that.

  • mwguy@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    2 months ago

    Is the capability to block any website something the Democrats want to enable with for Trump to abuse?

  • kreskin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    2 months ago

    Even out of power they still find a way to give hand jobs for industry donations and casually screw the public. I admire their energy.

  • taiyang@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    77 year old who has been in the house since the 90s. Actually a prime example of why we need term limits and real competition in elections (if not from GOP, at least in primaries). Irony is she reps a district that isn’t really associated with streaming or producing movies.

    My guess? She won her primary because she was the incombent or was unopposed, but she probably receives cash from the film industry. Almost all house seats are uncompetitive unless someone drops out or gets redistricted. Until something changes, this is and will be the way our government continues to work.

    • 𝔼𝕩𝕦𝕤𝕚𝕒@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      2 months ago

      in power since the 90s

      Oh so carrying the torch for the LAST time they tried to go after media with the moral panic of “Explicit” music label stuff led by Tipper Gore? The one where Twisted Sister showed up in 1985. A continuation from when they had a panic about VHS recordings in 1969 and Mr Rogers testified.

      • taiyang@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        2 months ago

        I specially went Obama over Clinton because she was still saying in 2008 how video games promote violence. There’s a certain type of Dem, and they’re still ramming them down our throats.

        • 𝔼𝕩𝕦𝕤𝕚𝕒@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          I swear. The harder they mess with this type of stuff the more single-issue-voters it pushes to vote against them. This war on media is such a losing battle I don’t understand why they’re opting to wage it with the current fish on the grill. This kind of unpopular legislation is stuff you try and push when you’re in power, and try to sell it as an “eat your veggies” moment. Rebranding while they’re down certainly makes for an interesting conversation when they rubber band back into power and say “we’ve said we were gonna do this since 2025” type conversation.

  • shoulderoforion@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    After the US does this, Europe will be soon to follow guaranteed, then everyone will be trying to pipe through the same VPN exit server in Barbados

  • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    72
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    Democrats: why won’t anyone vote for us?

    Also Democrats: let’s be like the Republicans, they get so many votes! Let’s miss the entire point of democracy and just support large companies!

    • surph_ninja@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      2 months ago

      Because they want the big money donors more than they want to win. Their campaigns are above all designed to bring in money for the high-priced consultants.

      • Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        99942 Apophis is scheduled to come visit for a near pass on Friday, April 13, 2029. It briefly held the highest rating of any object ever on the Torino scale when it was discovered 20 years ago. Another asteroid detected just last week is currently a Torino 3 but also won’t be here for 7 years and only has a 1.4% chance of striking Earth based on current observations.

        • Cracks_InTheWalls@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Friday, April 13, 2029

          Can’t help but wonder if it’s bad luck if it hits us, or bad luck if it misses us at this point.

          (/s shit’s fucked but I still prefer getting missed)