• hendrik@palaver.p3x.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    223
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Wow, bold choice to ban the import of technology and knowledge. Usually governments are worried about export, so it doesn’t fall into the wrong hands.

    Btw, how is the Nvidia stock price doing?

    • forrgott@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      57
      ·
      2 days ago

      Right? Like, seriously, we all know somebody is just butthurt because their stock options tanked.

      Oh, wait, I’m sorry! That was very unpatriotic of me, wasn’t it? I mean, we all know that winning an election guarantees being heavily rewarded with insider trading, right? It’s not like they’re there to represent constituents or anything; I mean, doesn’t everyone know we’re a republic, not a democracy?!

      Sigh…

    • Petter1@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      24 hours ago

      To be fair, this is common practice. Countries do this all the time to protect their economies. Mostly known in the West is China which banned many US services.

      Of course, security of the data of the citizens is also a factor. You don’t want foreign countries use this data to interfere in any way.

      • hendrik@palaver.p3x.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        23 hours ago

        Honestly, I don’t think this is common practice in non-oppressive countries. I mean sure, this happens in North Korea, Iran, China… But I’m relatively free to consume what I want with a few minor exceptions. For example we don’t import food that isn’t food-safe by our standards. Regardless if it’s common practice to eat it in other places. Also food may not be able to enter the country due to laws on animal cruelty. Similar things apply to electronic devices that aren’t up to code. And some select few things are banned altogether and you can’t have them and neither can someone import them. Other than that, regulations aren’t super strict. I can use all American social media platforms despite them stealing my personal data and violating European privacy laws regularly, can use Russian or Chinese websites… I think I live in a free country.

        Helping domestic economy is done with tariffs / import tax. And not by banning things and putting people in jail.

        And mind that this isn’t about the service that collects your data and gives it to the Chinese government. This is about downloading the model file and using it all by yourself. So no data gets transferred to a foreign country. And it’s not because people could get harmed or anything. This is just because the vice president doesn’t want it personally. Like in some dictatorship. Otherwise they would have banned transferring data into foreign countries, if that’s what it’s about. But they didn’t do that, because it’s not about protecting the people.

        Or did I miss something and there are other examples for limitations on import?

    • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      1 day ago

      Ex post facto laws are expressly prohibited in Article I, so they can’t pass a law criminalizing downloads from before the law was passed.

      They can, however, criminalize possessing a copy of DeepSeek. In that case you’d be legally required to delete it after the law passed.

      • Simulation6@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Not sure about the laws wording, but if it is open source just create a branch with a different name.

      • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        edit-2
        24 hours ago

        They also can’t amend the constitution via executive order or deport US citizens, but watch them try it anyway

        • Cyrus Draegur@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          Yup.

          “they can’t do that, that’s illegal!”

          Shame the law doesn’t mean Jack Fucking Shit now.

          The law is whatever they want it to be at any moment.

  • werefreeatlast@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    2 days ago

    You wouldn’t download a car and then perform all the necessary lost wax casting, pressing, punching, machining, painting etc etc. Would you?

    No!

    You would download a finished car!

      • thefartographer@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        2 days ago

        r1 is lightweight and optimized for local environments on a home PC. It’s supposed to be pretty good at programming and logic and kinda awkward at conversation.

        v3 is powerful and meant to run on cloud servers. It’s supposed to make for some pretty convincing conversations.

        • Pennomi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          R1 isn’t really runnable with a home rig. You might be able to run a distilled version of the model though!

            • Pennomi@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              That likely is one of the distilled versions I’m talking about. R1 is 720 GB, and wouldn’t even fit into memory on a normal computer. Heck, even the 1.58-bit quant is 131GB, which is outside the range of a normal desktop PC.

              But I’m sure you know what version you’re running better than I do, so I’m not going to bother guessing.

          • thefartographer@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            You’re absolutely right, I wasn’t trying to get that in-depth, which is why I said “lightweight and optimized,” instead of “when using a distilled version” because that raises more questions than it answers. But I probably overgeneralized by making it a blanket statement like that.

      • cyd@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Base models are general purpose language models, mainly useful for AI researchers and people who want to build on top of them.

        Instruct or chat models are chatbots. They are made by fine-tuning base models.

        The V3 models linked by OP are Deepseek’s non-reasoning models, similar to Claude or ChatGPT4o. These are the “normal” chatbots that reply with whatever comes to their mind. Deepseek also has a reasoning model, R1. Such models take time to “think” before supplying their final answer; they tend to give better performance for stuff like math problems, at the cost of being slower to get the answer.

        It should be mentioned that you probably won’t be able to run these models yourself unless you have a data center style rig with 4-5 GPUs. The Deepseek V3 and R1 models are chonky beasts. There are smaller “distilled” forms of R1 that are possible to run locally, though.

  • Katana314@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    69
    ·
    1 day ago

    This is astounding.

    I mean, not the Deepseek or jailing stuff. I mean a Senator actually proposing a law. I thought the way our government worked was, the annoying orange declares a vague uncited threat to be bad, and signs an executive order on it!

    • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      1 day ago

      No, we also allow mega corporations to submit bills that get rubber stamped by a rep somewhere. I don’t think a corporation would be so audacious as to submit this, so it’s a rare case of original content.

  • dontbelasagne@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    2 days ago

    So I guess it’s free speech as long as you agree with the goverment’s speech. If not, then it’s a crime.

    • John Richard@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Elon Musk was just posting a factory of prisoners all working for cents on the dollar saying that America needs more of that.

    • ilmagico@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      Always have been, and this is a bipartisan value, heck, it’s common to all political parties of the world.

      • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        Yeah that’s called being a sovereign… They will respect each other doing since it is a club in a oligarchy or “democracy” but little people need watch that mother fucking mouth, or daddy gonna issue some backhand