• Ledericas@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Spamming as a conservative on multiple posts? This is the same type of posts you see on conservative reddit, always pointing out both sides, when there’s almost none of the same type of opinionated posts when referring to Republicans. I know you like to blame Dems, but Republicans are the ones actually promoting and using racism , and fascism right? Where’s the criticism against them with such vigor as your post. Your the reason why Reddit has been so aggressive with their banning. Also because your barely mention Rs in good faith. Yes dema has their problems, but Republicans are far worst people.

  • MyDogLovesMe@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Looook,

    We are ALL going to Hell, FAST (choose your doom(CC,WWIII,etc).

    We are all in the same car, here -like it, or not.

    One party, …I’ll let you guess which 😉, has the accelerator pinned to the mat. “We’ll be there in 5 minutes, Boys!! HELL ON EARTH HERE WE COME!”

    The other party, is simply driving at half that speed. Results are the same. They are flawed. But they CAN slow the car to give us a bit more time to “brace for impact”. But they too bought into Hell as a destination.

    But ya, we’re ALL fucked no matter how much you pledge to one party or the other. One party just whispers in your ear and it’s a bit more gentle while they fuck your already ragged ass.

    The other party just dry-humps you violently until your blood provides enough lube for them to finish while pounding their chest as you lie there, bleeding out of your ass on the nice, clean sheets.

    That about sums it up from my perspective.

    • WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      The problem with this is that it assumes both parties act independently.

      You know how right now how Republicans are willing to use every loophole, cite ancient forgotten laws, and violate every norm? That’s always been possible. You can’t actually write a constitution to constrain bad-faith actors. You can always come up with a bogus interpretation to do what you want.

      If this is possible, you have to ask, why did leaders ever try to follow the law in good faith? How was it ever possible to establish a norms-based stability when either side could knock over the board at any moment?

      The answer is that good-faith interpretation of the law fails when people only do so out of principle. It succeeds when good-faith interpretation is a peace treaty. Both sides agree to follow the law in good faith, as the alternative is complete chaos as both sides try to twist every loophole.

      Democrats are a bunch of liberal arts majors that have forgotten that Democracy and the rule of law does not exist because everyone worships them as high ideals. They exist because they are a compromise, a peace treaty.

      Republicans break norms. In response, Dems latch on even tighter to the norms. Instead, they should be seeking to break them at every opportunity they can. They need to be as ruthless as the Republicans, and even more so.

      Following the rule of law is hard. It means giving up power and results that you could otherwise achieve by violating the rule of law.

      Right now, only Democrats are trying to obey every norm and precedent. As such, Republicans have nothing to lose by violating these. It’s all upside to them. Their bad behavior is the direct result of Democratic cowardice. If Democrats were willing to give as well as they get, we could actually have a rules-based order again. Paradoxically, a prerequisite for rules to be effective is that both sides need to be willing to violate them.

      • MyDogLovesMe@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Well said!

        In short, fire with fire. …can’t fight a war with one hand tied to your balls, etc.

        Dems have forgotten this. They need a leader to remind them and lead the charge.

    • eldavi@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      if someone told you that, that’s what their sex life was like; you would assume that they’re a damaged person who needs psychiatric help and those psychiatrist would try to help steer them away from sex partners like that and towards healthier sex partners.

      even our neighbors to the south have learned this fact and made their own sex lives better; but we americans are like battered spouses who keep bouncing back and forth between the same 2 abusive lovers because we both refuse to accept how damaged we truly are and because the more damaged among us keep re-inforcing the propaganda that voting democrat or republican is the only “grown up” choice to make as the “adults in the room”.

      we’re only destined for hell if we keep rejecting a third party; places like mexico have already proved that things get A LOT better once you stop carrying the propaganda that third party is “throwing away” your vote.

      (or atleast until you get the america’s attention and they send in their military and bankers to force you back into those abusive relationships… again).

  • AdolfSchmitler@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    56
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    5 months ago

    Obama and Biden said they’d legalize weed. They didn’t. They failed to put abortion rights into the constitution. I mean I can go on these are just off the top of my head.

    They are not immune to legit criticism, however it seems like people get the idea that if you criticize democrats that means you are a die hard Trumper or something…

      • UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        Probably because two political parties isn’t enough to truly represent the population.

        People shit talk non voters, but these are people who found no representation in the two party system. We can change this. We can have more then two political parties. To think otherwise is to think inside the world’s smallest box.

        • zarkanian@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          5 months ago

          Duverger’s Law says that as long as we have this system of voting, we’re going to have two, and only two, major parties. It has changed once in history: when the Republicans replaced the Whigs. So, that’s what you’re looking at: either change the system of voting or replace one of the two parties.

          • Krono@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            The major political parties may have only changed names once, but the most common stance in modern political science is that we are in the 6th political party alignment in US history.

            • Centralization 1796-1824
            • Jacksonians 1828-1852
            • Republicans 1856-1892
            • Progressives 1898-1928
            • New Dealers 1932-1972
            • Neoliberalism 1980-Present
        • AES_Enjoyer@reddthat.comBanned
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          Countries with more parties such as those in Western Europe are also electing fascists. The answer doesn’t lie in more parties. China has a majority party and it doesn’t get people doing the Sieg Heil

      • kreskin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        5 months ago

        Pelosi and the DNC have hated the left more than they hate the right for a good long time, yeah.

    • underisk@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      37
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Didn’t close gitmo. Didn’t end the war on terror. Created the same border camps democrats cry at the gates of for political points. Bailed out the perpetrators of one of this countries most high profile and damaging financial crimes because they held rich peoples stock portfolios hostage. Made pointless concessions on the ACA to republicans who never once cross the isle for even the things they want to pass because they’d rather take the credit themselves.

      Those are the ones I’m pulling off the top of my head.

    • Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Back up. Put abortion rights in the constitution? I cant take you seriously.

      Edit: 9 people are ignorant and need a civics lesson. Constitutional amendments were. never. on. the. table.

  • vfreire85@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    5 months ago

    well said. you can pretty much extrapolate this line of thought to every soc-dem, left-of-center, liberal party in the world. they make a wiener water government, blame people when they lose elections and are left wondering why people didn’t called their wiener water government a bouillabasse or an onion soup.

  • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    5 months ago

    Running a feckless campaign that refused to break with Biden’s admin on genocide is why we got this living hell. And running the most unlikeable woman in the country in 2016 is what made 2024 even a possibility.

    Dems have fucked up terribly.

    • vonbaronhans@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      5 months ago

      That about sums it up.

      I’ll vote Democrat as long as the alternative is fascism.

      But fuck me, I’d love to vote for something else. And I’ll be honest, I have no idea how we get anything better.

      I hear people saying to organize, but I can’t even imagine what that takes. I wonder if most Americans feel as helpless as I do in the face of this absolute bullshit.

      • BrainInABox@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        5 months ago

        I’ll vote Democrat as long as the alternative is fascism.

        Unfortunately, much of what the Democrats represent is fascism.

        • vonbaronhans@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          5 months ago

          Depends on what you mean by “much”? I’d argue the Democrats, on the whole, are liberals, not fascists.

          I’d certainly prefer progressives and leftists though.

          The support for Israel whole they genocide Palestine, thought… ugh. That can certainly be viewed as fascism, although where you draw the distinction between fascism and imperialism is up for debate. Not that imperialism is good either, just saying.

          • yunxiaoli@sh.itjust.worksBanned
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            5 months ago

            Liberals are the only people in history to vote for fascists to prevent class solidarity, and they’ve done it every time.

            If you scratch a liberal, a fascist bleeds.

            • vonbaronhans@midwest.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              5 months ago

              So conservatives are… what? Not a group of people? Or in your view, are conservatives just fascists already?

              • yunxiaoli@sh.itjust.worksBanned
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                7
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                5 months ago

                Conservative liberals have the same ideology as liberals, just the pace is different. American politics have fucked too many people’s brains.

                • vonbaronhans@midwest.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  7
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  Yeah, I don’t buy that. Liberalism and Conservatism have different ideological foundations, philosophical traditions, and political histories.

                  If you don’t know the difference, that’s on you.

                  I have to make a lot of leaps to guess what you mean by “conservative liberal”. Do you mean a modern “social liberal economic conservative”? Aka a neoliberal?

                  Cuz yeah US Dems and Repubs are almost all economically neoliberal, sure. Is that what you mean?

      • dx1@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        5 months ago

        The hard fact is that what the population votes for is what the population gets. They have completely given up their agency and just accept this impotent logic of “we’ll take whatever the most obvious/most apparently easy option is, that isn’t a Republican”. It’s a cyclical problem, the voters don’t care enough to force politicians to be good, and the politicians don’t care enough to court voters.

        • BrainInABox@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          The hard fact is that what the population votes for is what the population gets.

          It really isn’t, study after study has shown that popularity has basically no effect on policy.

          • dx1@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            …the candidate the population votes for. Did you need that to say “who”?

        • vonbaronhans@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          5 months ago

          At the same time, “what the population votes for is what the population gets” ignores that we are often only presented with crappy options to start with.

          Perhaps it would be more accurate to say “you get what you fight for, and if you don’t fight you get what you get.”

          I… haven’t really fought for anything. I believed the right things. I voted as best I could. But that clearly didn’t stop this.

          I want to protect my ego and say I’m not a coward. Is there a distinction to be made between cowardice and simply not knowing what to do? I don’t know. I just know I’m trying my best, but maybe that’s just not enough.

          • dx1@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            At the same time, “what the population votes for is what the population gets” ignores that we are often only presented with crappy options to start with.

            It does not ignore that, rather it explicitly takes that into account.

            The caveat to my statement would ONLY be “so long as we’re using this system.”

            Please focus more on accurate logic.

  • surph_ninja@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    78
    arrow-down
    16
    ·
    5 months ago

    You would think committing a genocide would’ve settled the whole “lesser evil” thing, but the Blue MAGA cult insists there’s a way to commit lesser evil genocide now.

  • DarkSpectrum@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    5 months ago

    A democratic that is average at democracy is better than a conservative who is great at authoritarianism.

  • Sam_Bass@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    5 months ago

    The demos current lack of action against the monkey business going on now is s loudass tell about how sympathetic they are

  • WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    5 months ago

    Because we are tired of arguing nuance, while out enemied threaten to literally exterminate us. At this point, any straying from the left is a profound moral failing. It’s usually some kind if bigotry, or support of unscientific ideas.

  • halyk.the.red@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    5 months ago

    It’s an unfortunate trait of the reddit migrations. That place was crawling with die-hard liberals, not entirely dissimilar to scabies. It stands to reason a few of the uninitiated would find their way here.

    In spite of how I started this comment, we must remember that they are of the working class, and further division is a benefit exclusive to the capitalist.

    I feel that the further we sink into full-blown fascism, the more of them will become aware, and may be counted among allies one day soon.

    I plan to speak to those who are willing to listen and learn. But beware the contentious fool, ever seeking a debate but never trying for understanding.

    • Grapho@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      .world got the liberals that were too delusional for reddit.

      • halyk.the.red@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        I agree, but the fact that they even came here gives me hope that they are open to change. It’s the ones who stayed on reddit are the lost causes, I think.