What is your line in the sand?

  • coaxil@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    5 hours ago

    Not at all, you are just an autocracy now but don’t fully realise it, and as the other commentator had said, not even really a good democracy in the loosest of terms before this entire mess going on ATM!

  • FaceDeer@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Unfortunately, it’s still a democracy. The electorate wanted what’s now going on. That could rapidly change at this point, but for now not yet.

    • MoonManKipper@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Democracy is a sliding scale and the US is still on it. Could the people choose something different without resorting to violent revolution and protest? Yes

      • Kissaki@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        I’m a bit skeptical about this argument because autocratic states love to hold practically fake and forced elections with 90 or 99 % approval and use that as justification.

        • thebestaquaman@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 hours ago

          I think the possibly final test for American democracy will be the midterm elections in two years. By then, I think that either trump will have broken the system enough to get a sham election, or we’ll see real, verifiable push-back against him. International organisations that monitor elections will probably take part in shaping my opinion on whether the election is fair or not. I think it’s worth remembering that whenever countries hold “fake and forced elections” there are plenty of international observers that point out the major rigging going on.

      • LH0ezVT@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Unfortunately yes. People wanted this. They still want this. But people were also cheering for like, Mao even after he put millions of his own citizens into the ground, so who knows

  • TXL@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    33 minutes ago

    Absolutely not. A two party system was barely nominally a form of democracy. Current one quacks like a dictatorship and walks like a dictatorship. They might hold a fake election one day like many of those do, but still no.

  • sinnsykfinbart@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 hours ago

    I really never did, not a well functioning at least. They’ve practiced voter repression for decades, and then they had fun testing how low they could go after 9/11, doing a lot of unlawful shit, going after citizens who spoke out against their policies and wars.

  • Intergalactic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Absolutely not. A country where two parties are the only two viable electoral options, is absolutely not a democracy. Doesn’t mean I’ll stop my membership for the PSL.