• Nougat@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    190
    ·
    23 days ago

    Let’s assume for a moment that the abducters here were federal agents.

    How long before people get the bright idea that they can pull a stunt like this without being federal agents? Has that already happened?

    • Basic Glitch@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      72
      ·
      edit-2
      23 days ago

      Pretty sure some people showed up at San Francisco City Hall claiming to be with DOGE and demanding they be given access to personal files.

      The staff refused and when they finally called the police the men claiming to be with DOGE fled the scene.

      It was just some insane MAGA duds pretending to be with DOGE.

      Especially with ICE going into schools and other previous safe zones now, think about how easy it would be for people to take advantage of these situations.

      If a person is already willing to kidnap someone, do you really think they wouldn’t easily be willing to disguise their own identity, command authority and prey on people’s fears of retaliation for not complying?

      • Nougat@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        49
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        23 days ago

        I suppose the scenario I was really thinking of is one where someone is literally abducted by adults, and not just fucking idiot kids playing fuck around.

        Which has happened in the article posted here, we’re just taking them on their word that they’re actually federal agents.

        • monotremata@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          34
          ·
          23 days ago

          Yeah, this was the part that really got me:

          “Show us a warrant,” the video shows one of the two women demanding as they attempt to get between the detainers and the detainee.

          “Do not touch me or impede me in my lawful duties,” the man in the pink shirt responds. “We are officers from Homeland Security.”

          That’s a real bully-logic move right there. How are we supposed to know that these are your lawful duties if you’re refusing to show us your warrant or even your badge? Like, if she had blocked them at this point and the issue were brought to court (and yes, it’s ironic that this is happening in a court), then I can’t imagine a jury saying “well yeah, you can’t prevent a guy from abducting someone just because he won’t give you any indication other than a pinky swear that he has the legal authority to do it.” But, of course, the obvious implication in the moment was that since he was from the “abduct people in an unmarked van with unlimited authority” branch of the government, this wasn’t going to a jury trial, and she was either getting out of the way or she was going in the van too.

          I dunno, man. It’s scary.

          • Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            20
            ·
            23 days ago

            So what I’m gathering here, is if you can get some friends together, you can get yourself out of court in a pinch.

            This is not behavior they want to encourage long term

            • monotremata@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              22 days ago

              Yeah, I started to write about that, but it’s unclear that this guy would have actually gained anything by getting out of the courtroom. A lot of folks are released pending trial, in which case there’s really no advantage to getting your friends to grab you out of court, rather than just, y’know, skipping town. If he was already in police custody, I imagine there actually would have been more checking of the authority.

              But yeah, making court a place where your enemies know you’ll be there and they’re free to come and grab you is a terrible precedent anyway. If you can’t expect due process even in the courts, what does the rule of law even mean anymore?

            • OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              21
              ·
              23 days ago

              Trump isn’t thinking in the long term. He’s usually not even thinking in the short term.

  • Jumpingspiderman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    22 days ago

    First, this is straight up Nazi secret police stuff. Second how did the court know these guys weren’t confederates of the folks in court intending a jail break. Where the FUCK were the bailiffs in this unlawful seizure?

    • ncrav@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      20 days ago

      Probably people should just start doing just that since apparently it’s that easy, your friend accused of random offences? No problem just walk in and grab them.

      • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        23 days ago

        I think this is one of those pearl clutching instances that won’t take kindly to that kind of language. You need to use the legal system to oppose the corrupt legal system, I guess.

        • Revan343@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          23 days ago

          Then I guess these gestapo need to be legally shot, after a legal trial and sentencing to death.

          (Stupid fucking mods.)

          • AbidanYre@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            22 days ago

            Having watched the video, that guy provided no evidence that this was anything other than a kidnapping. Shooting him in the face would be 100% self defense

        • AbidanYre@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          edit-2
          23 days ago

          Maybe, but writing mean articles about them isn’t going to stop them, and they have the support of the trump administration. The only thing that’s going to stop them is if they’re afraid they might not go home afterwards.

          Obviously the next step for them will be gearing up like they’re going into combat, but that really starts making people pay attention to what’s going on

          • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            23 days ago

            Oh, I fully support shooting nazis and their collaborators dead. I was taking a shot (pun intended) at the moderators who remove comments like “the guys running today’s concentration camps should be shot”

  • boughtmysoul@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    57
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    23 days ago

    Is this exactly the kind of stuff 2A was supposed to have solved? What were the half a billion guns for?

    • boolean_sledgehammer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      62
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      23 days ago

      A good portion of the 2A fetishists in this country love jackbooted authoritarianism as long as it’s aimed at the correct demographic.

      They love the fantasy of being a plucky revolutionary, but in reality they are the ones helping the boot come down.

      • Guns0rWeD13@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        23 days ago

        but we can change that any time. change the demographic by arming yourself and not being one of those people.

      • Ledericas@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        22 days ago

        its called ammosexuals,people who fetishized and fantasize about a scenario where they shoot people, any excuse will do. i seen a video of a poc right winger, “climaxing” over the thought of shooting someone in an unlikely scenario. it was the cringiest thing.

        • Furbag@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          22 days ago

          Important Note: For perpetuating school shootings, not stopping them. Absolutely not for stopping them. Unless we’re talking about the shooter taking themselves out when they’re done.

  • Furbag@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    22 days ago

    I’m still baffled as to how they continue to do this unimpeded.

    These people are in court trying to enter the country “the right way” by going through the legal system and are getting ambushed by ICE and Homeland Security during their hearings. Unless the desired outcome is to depress the population of “good ones” trying to stay in the country via legal means by scaring them with the threat of sudden deportation, I don’t see what this accomplishes. This war on immigration is equally as stupid and futile as the war on drugs.

    Xenophobia has completely fried the brains of most Americans. This shit isn’t normal and never should be.

  • BenLeMan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    63
    ·
    23 days ago

    Whatever happened to the Fourth Amendment? If they’re not even bothering to uphold the Constitution in a courthouse you guys are well and truly fucked.

  • Kalysta@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    22 days ago

    So three men just kidnapped a dude.

    They need to be banned from doing this in plain clothes. At minumim. At best ICE needs to be abolished.

    • Jumpingspiderman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      22 days ago

      They need to be arrested as attempted kidnappers or shot if they don’t surrender. Then they need to be prosecuted as kidnappers.

      • Bogus007@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        22 days ago

        Just figure out their names and living places. Once the shit is over, hunt them. All of them. And do whatever you like with them.

  • barneypiccolo@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    79
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    22 days ago

    What alarmed Nicholas Reppucci, head of the Charlottesville Office of the Public Defender, is that the enforcers called in to detain the two men in the city Tuesday morning were wearing plain clothes and did not display badges or arrest warrants.

    Presumably, the courthouse is filled with cops and others with arrest authority, so why did they allow two men in plainclothes without badges or warrants leave with two people?

    If the DOGE pirates had been gunned down in the first lobby the invaded, it would have ended there, or at least gone down a different path.

    We should not be normalizing this behavior, and setting precedents. Without a badge, you will not be listened to, and you will leave the building immediately. Without a warrant, you will not be putting your hands on any person. If you attempt to bypass either requirement, you will be arrested. And if you attempt to do enforce your demands by force, you will be shot.

    • flicker@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      ·
      22 days ago

      On the plus side, if anybody reading this ever has reason to think that they might need to go into a police station and remove someone being held there, apparently if you and a friend or two look sufficiently the part, you can just walk in, in plainclothes, and claim to be Homeland Security, and just… take a dude and leave.

    • Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      22 days ago

      I wish they did have the guts to shoot the DOGE team. Especially since the DOGE goons have literally dragged people out and probably physically assaulted others.

      • theblips@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        22 days ago

        I mean, isn’t this the exact scenario they wrote in the Second Amendment for? Can’t say this reaction is surprising given it’s at the roots of the country and extensively defended by the Founding Fathers

      • supernight52@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        26
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        22 days ago

        When they are disappearing people with no due process, the only logical response is violence. Gtfo of here with that dumb shit.

        • Jumpingspiderman@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          22 days ago

          I think I’m going to have to seriously think about packing heat on regular basis for the exact scenario the 2nd amendment was written to cover.

          • supernight52@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            22 days ago

            Not a bad idea, at this point. Just keep it at home, and only have it to defend yourself or others. It is always morally correct to stop a Gestapo agent through any means necessary.

              • supernight52@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                9
                ·
                22 days ago

                It has nothing to do with “chosen” and everything to do with common sense. Wtf would YOU do if a couple of dudes came up to you neighbor, grabbed them and walked off with no explanation or identification? Just shrug, and go about your day? Because that’s what you’re insinuating with this idiotic line of reasoning you’re going down.

          • bitjunkie@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            22 days ago

            I’ve been seeing “Americans are pussies for not rising up” and “you won’t vote yourselves out of this situation” on here for months… Which is it? Make up your fucking mind, internet.

            • supernight52@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              22 days ago

              It’s just the normal anti-American sentiment from fringe idiots around the globe. Anything that has to do with America or the people from there are bad, evil, and needs to be shunned and mocked. Don’t give this guy any weight as a popular opinion from the internet.

        • supernight52@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          22 days ago

          Yeah, funny how the boot lickers forget their whole wet dream of being the ones that rise up, means they need to rebel against the tyrant Trump and his dumbshit sycophants.

    • dan1101@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      59
      ·
      23 days ago

      Indeed, kidnapping is one of the things that drug cartels are known for. Now we have people claiming to be federal officers doing kidnapping? There needs to be a LOT of pushback over this, it’s crazy and ridiculous.

    • Maeve@kbin.earth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      37
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      23 days ago

      By design. It reminds me of another article posted on Lemmy recently, that “tough on crime” jurisdictions are making it less safe to live in those jurisdictions.

      “Is it worth the trouble to go to court?” Reppucci asked. “I think it’s going to make it much harder, inherently harder, and more likely that people will disregard lawfully issued subpoenas, both by the prosecution and by defense attorneys and by civil attorneys and, even perhaps, dare we say, in divorce cases or custody case hearings that people are going to evaluate whether or not it makes sense to follow lawful state orders.”

    • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      23 days ago

      You were okay with the program deporting people without trial because they “are criminals”? Are you even listening to yourself?

      • smokingpistol@lemm.eeBanned from community
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        16
        ·
        23 days ago

        No I assumed that they would take the legal route of getting rid of illegal immigrants that are criminals I didn’t expect it to be like this. But I still am on board with them getting rid of illegal immigrants that are criminals, They just need to go about it a better way

        • lemonaz@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          edit-2
          22 days ago

          That thing you wanted was already happening under Biden, and before him. How do I know? They didn’t hire new people. They just gave the signal to the existing hires that they can do what they want. They were able to deport criminals before, and they did. Trump just lied when he said they didn’t. During the campaign he duped millions of people into believing a fake problem to which he is now providing a fake solution: no additional criminals are being deported, not really — they’re just doing things more sloppily, being more cruel about it, and padding the numbers with innocent people.

          Ok, sending people to an El Salvador concentration camp instead of their home country, that’s certainly new.

          • boonhet@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            22 days ago

            At this point I’m hoping they’ll at some point make the mistake of sending some Chinese citizens to El Salvador. Hopefully someone with CCP ties. Now I’m not saying I wish this upon anyone, I’m saying they’re sending people anyway, I just hope they’ll eventually make the mistake of doing it to someone whose government can actually fight back. China could absolutely destroy the US if they wanted to at this point.

            • scintilla@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              23 days ago

              I made an account at the start of the year before changing to make one not associated with my at all. The redditification of Lemmy had become so much worse even just since I got here.

            • lemonaz@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              22 days ago

              That’s what I mean about the duping. None of that was happening under Biden. These “open borders” allegations are and have always been nonsense.

              Do people try to cross illegally? Yes. How do we know? Because they’re caught while trying to do it and sent back — this one fact should put the “open borders” claims to rest, but that’s if we lived in a sane world. And don’t get me started on all the citizen militias patrolling the border and shooting people for sport, because a lot of the border is in red states where leadership turns a blind eye to these types of vigilantes.

              Most undocumented immigrants in the US arrive normally on a visa by plane and then overstay their visa. And while some do that on purpose, a lot of the time the expiration happens accidentally due to things out of their control, like because paperwork takes too long and it’s tied to their employer who isn’t moving their ass fast enough, etc. Some are in the process of correcting their undocumented status or even taking their citizenship test when ICE detains them.

              The argument here is something you alluded to in the first comment I replied to: an undocumented immigrant merely existing in the US poses no risk to anyone, so maybe deportation isn’t really a measured response to coming across a person with undocumented status, let alone calling them “illegals” and doing all this verbal shell game between “illegal”, “criminal”, “terrorist”, deliberately confusing “insane asylum” with “asylum seekers” etc.

              All that rhetoric is meant do dehumanize and paint large groups of people with the same brush: dangerous, disgusting, inhuman. Then the “open borders” lie implies incompetence and naivete on the part of the previous administration (or even sadism if they did it knowingly). This is how we ended up here, and now they’re doing what they wanted to do in the first place: treat them all the same and continue using the verbal shell game when asked about it, saying stuff like “criminals have no right to due process ^(but we decided without due process who the criminals are)”.