An AI avatar made to look and sound like the likeness of a man who was killed in a road rage incident addressed the court and the man who killed him: “To Gabriel Horcasitas, the man who shot me, it is a shame we encountered each other that day in those circumstances,” the AI avatar of Christopher Pelkey said. “In another life we probably could have been friends. I believe in forgiveness and a God who forgives. I still do.”

It was the first time the AI avatar of a victim—in this case, a dead man—has ever addressed a court, and it raises many questions about the use of this type of technology in future court proceedings.

The avatar was made by Pelkey’s sister, Stacey Wales. Wales tells 404 Media that her husband, Pelkey’s brother-in-law, recoiled when she told him about the idea. “He told me, ‘Stacey, you’re asking a lot.’”

  • Chulk@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    If anyone ever did this with my likeness after death, even with good intentions, i would haunt the fuck out of them.

  • dmtalon@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    If I were the defense and scummy, I’d reply with an equally disturbing AI avatar of the victim saying that he actually killed himself and that the road rage guy was innocent.

    I mean, seems fair.

    • FriendBesto@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      Watched the video, it is creepy. It is also edited. Wife seems to just have put words on her dead husband’s AI.

      This has not set a legal precedent. WTF.

  • HubertManne@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    I feel the defense should have insisted on having their own ai of jesus talk about forgiveness.

      • HubertManne@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        yeah even if he plead for leniency it does not matter. Its like admitting a diary written by someone else from his perspective. it just makes no sense and has nothing to do with anything.

    • Crikeste@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      94
      ·
      1 month ago

      The fuckin’ dude’s wife wrote the speech the AI read… I don’t care how much you know someone, putting words in their mouths like that feels wrong. And the fucking judge added a year to the sentence citing the power of the video.

      Fucking absurd.

      • slappypantsgo@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        1 month ago

        Yeah, this is super fucked up. I think that it would be powerful and completely reasonable to have the AI read actual words he wrote, like from old text messages, emails, or whatever. That is a legitimate way to bring someone to life—completely ethical if they wrote the material. This is a disgrace to justice and ridiculous.

      • ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        I thought it was his sister who wrote the speech the AI read, but yeah, this whole thing feels wrong and gross.

  • ooterness@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    This is basically “Weekend at Bernie’s”, using the likeness of a dead man as a puppet.

  • Aggravationstation@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    ·
    1 month ago

    I found this interesting. The AI said it believes in forgiveness.

    “To Gabriel Horcasitas, the man who shot me, it is a shame we encountered each other that day in those circumstances,” the AI Pelkey says. “In another life we probably could have been friends. I believe in forgiveness, in God who forgives, I always have. And I still do.”

    But the victim’s sister, who created the AI did it to try to get the maximum sentence for the defendant.

    The prosecution against Horcasitas was only seeking nine years for the killing. The maximum was 10 and a half years. Stacey had asked the judge for the full sentence during her own impact statement. The judge granted her request, something Stacey credits—in part—to the AI video.

    • jj4211@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      1 month ago

      Yeah, a way to play both sides of pushing for a harsh sentence whole you use a puppet to drive empathy…

      Should have been a slam dunk without the video.

  • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    ·
    1 month ago

    “gampa, did it hurt when you died?”

    Hey there, buddy. That’s a big question! When people get very old or very sick, their bodies sometimes get tired, like a toy that slowly stops working. Normal people might go and buy a new toy from Amazon with all their great prices and exceptional customer service but your old gramps couldn’t do that. When it’s time to go, it’s usually peaceful—like falling asleep after a long, fun day on a nice comfortable Saatva bed. I don’t think it hurts, because our bodies know how to let go gently. What’s important is all the love and happy memories we share. You can even go back and look at all our wonderful memories from the good people at Instagram. And even when I’m not here anymore, that love stays with you forever. Would you like to send some of those memories to your local Walgreen’s to print?

  • BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    “I loved that AI, and thank you for that…” Lang said immediately before sentencing Horcasitas.

    I hope they win that appeal an get a new sentencing or a new trial even. That sounds like a horrible misuse of someone’s likeness. Even if my family used a direct quote from me I’d be PISSED if they recreated my face and voice without my permission.

    • FauxLiving@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      They can’t appeal on this issue because the defense didn’t object to the statement and, therefore, did not preserve the issue for appeal.