• Lukas Murch@thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 month ago

      I came here to say this sounds like something Trump or DeSantis would do. Disappointing it is Newsome. We need leaders with solutions, not bigger prisons. (I’m not sure what I would do, but I’m also not the Gov of California hoping to be in the Dem shortlist in 2028).

      • SinningStromgald@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        I’m trying wrap my head around the possibility of voting for Newsome just to keep whoever the Nazis nominate is really painful.

      • pineapple_pizza@lemmy.dexlit.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        1 month ago

        I mean, they’ve been trying other solutions and they obviously haven’t been working. Citizens don’t like living near these and this issue is rallying people to the right. I get that banning and sweeping sucks and is just moving people around, but if that ends up moving people from a highly visible area to a less visible area then it can go a long way for local businesses and tourism.

        • SinningStromgald@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          So hide the icky poor’s away so people with money don’t get bad feelings when they go on vacation and businesses can make more money. How very humanitarian of you.

    • Sundiata@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      his ex; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EhFks_9faQY

      his current wife; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jennifer_Siebel_Newsom

      Siebel Newsom was registered as a Republican until 2008, before re-registering as No Party Preference. Prior to registering as an independent voter, she accidentally registered with the far-right American Independent Party, before correcting her party to “decline to state”.

      I think yes, yes he is.

  • blady_blah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 month ago

    I’m very liberal on 95% of issues, but if there is one issue I lean conservative it’s homelessness. I want them to get the help they need, I support programs to help them, but I do not want to see a homeless encampment s take over public parks or other areas. I don’t want the trash and safety issues near where I live and near my family.

    I know this will get me dumped on my the ultra leftists here, but I didn’t think my feelings are unreasonable.

    • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      So you’re liberal until it inconveniences you?

      How about instead of outlawing homelessness, we created a housing system for them. Then we can talk about moving them out of parks.

      • blady_blah@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        It’s also a tragedy-of-the-commons type issue. Nobody else can use the park if they are camping there. There are legitimate safety concerns due to the mental health and drug issues that are prevalent in the homeless. To pretend these aren’t real issues is stupid.

        I’m being honest here. This is an issue that is a challenge to solve, but I still don’t want a bunch of homeless people in my neighborhood. I’d like to find a solution and I’m not afraid of my tax money is going to help them, but tent encampments are not the solution IMHO…

    • JTskulk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      You want them to get the help they need, that’s the opposite of conservative even without the support for programs.

    • Gabadabs@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Your feelings are unreasonable. Banning homeless encampments is criminalization of existing in public for people who do not have anywhere else to go. Homeless people are not a danger to you, rather they are some of the most vulnerable people in our society - and people don’t want them to be able to sleep, or cook or eat, or anything in public. Where do you want them to go? Shelters do not have room for everyone and are a massive risk for people that do make it in.

  • yesman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 month ago

    California is a garden of Eden,

    A paradise to live in or see

    but believe it or not

    you won’t find it so hot

    if you ain’t got the doe ray me.

    • pineapple_pizza@lemmy.dexlit.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      I don’t think the first part is true but unfortunately I agree on the second part. The west Coast in general has been struggling with this for a while and the compassionate approach hasn’t shown the promised results. Maybe it technically is, but visible homelessness is what gets people elected.

      • MehBlah@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        The solution is so simple. Its two pronged. Get them a place to live. Help them with their problems. Its what happened in this country until a republican took apart the system that was designed to do that. It had its problems but the solution shouldn’t have been the abandonment of the national mental health system. This homeless problem is 100 percent tied directly to the utter failure of all politicians who ever supported cuts to the mental health system.

        The reason they do it is also simple. They are terrified that everyone will know how bad they are on the inside. Not realizing that most of us already know.

        • pineapple_pizza@lemmy.dexlit.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          1 month ago

          Honestly you lost me at the first sentence. It’s very obviously a complex problem and to suggest it’s simple is just demoralizing to the dedicated civil servants that work so hard to fix it.

          And homelessness has always been a problem, I feel like generally people fall into this rosy recollection to a time where it was far harder to document it

          • MehBlah@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            1 month ago

            Honestly you lost me at the first sentence.

            You seem to think that matters. It isn’t complex. Its simple. The solutions are simple. By trying to over think the solution you lose sight of the goal. You are commenting without really knowing the history of this subject. Homelessness is a epidemic now due in full to the destruction of the public mental health system. I know this and nothing anyone says will change that. I watched for years as every time my states budget came up they cut the funding.

            I watched as those I worked with had to make do with less. I watched people who were getting help to keep them stable lose coverage. The people who would have been institutionalized before the 80’s were let loose onto the streets. Frankly the complete lack of understanding is the problem we have with the current sad state of events. Coupled with the outright fear many of the worst minds in our society have for mental health in general its lead us to this path and denying that just guarantees the problem will not be solved. Those minds gravitate toward power. They hone their masks to cover their true nature and get fools to vote for them. They cast blame and over complicate a rather simple matter as far as solutions are concerned. They fear exposure more than anything and think what they are doing is the best thing for them. Not for those fools who vote for them. Just for them.

            Don’t perpetuate the lie that the homeless situation is complex. Its simple. The people who are victims of it are complex but helping them isn’t.

            • pineapple_pizza@lemmy.dexlit.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 month ago

              Yeah TBH I actually agree with a lot of your points but I still feel like you’re over simplifying this. The pre 1980s mental health institution had a whole other set of problems as well.

  • Mike D.@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    He setup the conditions for San Francisco to actually do this. He just wants more cities to do it now.

    • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Not going to happen. Not because the conservative Democrats won’t be able to hoodwink enough primary voters to believe the highest priority is accommodating what they think their shittiest neighbor could (but will not) tolerate, but because in doing so they’ll lose the voters they actually need to win and Don Jr. will ascend to the throne.

      • dhork@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        You are overlooking the most valuable thing that Newsom has, that makes him even more qualified to earn enough votes to win: a penis.

        Unfortunately, if you don’t have one, you can’t get elected right now.

  • Nougat@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    If you want to get rid of homeless encampments, how about making sure people have a safe place to stay at night?

  • skuzz@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    Crazy how California is speed-running a transition from liberal to left to Authoritarian almost as fast as the Federal government is transitioning from conservative to right to Fascism.

    • BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Newsom was always a slimy neolib. He was just the lesser evil. The same story plays out constantly all over the US thanks to our broken two-right-wing-parties system, in which both parties are owned and operated by self-serving billionaires.

  • PeterisBacon@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    1 month ago

    Crazy how fast the internet turns. A few months ago? Everyone loved him for not letting trump do the ego handshakes. Now everyone calls him weird.

    • Goodmorningsunshine@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      It’s just so weird that people of a certain mindset and philosophy would praise something they approved of in line with that mindset and condemn something they didn’t in line with that mindset.