Tesla owners are modifying their cars to be escapable if the car catches fire, because the doors stop working like normal and you need to rely on well-hidden mechanical overrides.

Which… feels pretty dangerous, like that’s the worst possible time for the doors to stop working like normal.

  • ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    17 days ago

    At this point I don’t know why anyone is buying those death-traps. For me any benefit from the self-driving feature is outweighed by the safety and poor build quality issues.

    • MotoAsh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      17 days ago

      You’re not missing anything on the self driving side… Teslas only use cameras, so can never and will never actually be self-driving. Not competently, anyways.

    • XeroxCool@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      17 days ago

      Because risk is statistically low and fuel cost savings are more tangible than believing you’re going to crash, let alone die. Humans are not logical. We know most conservatives don’t believe in EVs and outright liberals don’t want to support Musk, so who keeps buying them? Despite the reports of slumping sales, my area is continually renewing them despite being deeply blue. There’s another category: the real silent majority. The apathetic majority that’s being selfish and diminishing the weight of their actions.

        • XeroxCool@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          17 days ago

          Minimal fuel and maintenance fees. Flashy iPad in the dash. Quiet ride. Pretty good acceleration. I say fuck Tesla at this point because Elon just couldn’t stay quiet and just couldn’t stay reasonable with the product, but Tesla is the brand that put EVs Into the common household.

    • Chozo@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      17 days ago

      I don’t know why anyone is buying those death-traps.

      I’ve got good news, then! Fewer and fewer people are buying the illegal immigrant’s dangerous and overpriced swastikar, with new buyers dropping and trade-ins rising every day as public support for the emerald mine nepo baby nazi dwindles daily.

      • halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        17 days ago

        Instead they’re buying F150s and the like that are just as dangerous to everyone else on or near the road.

    • Sporkbomber@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      16 days ago

      Take a look at comma.ai and openpilot to see whether your car is compatible. I’ve put about 100k miles on my comma running on my Honda Civic. Then you get a working car that’s not a deathtrap and improved self driving features.

    • Justin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      17 days ago

      I recently got a Volkswagen with adaptive cruise control, and I’m absolutely in love with it. Never needed the car to fully drive itself, that’s what public transport is for…

  • BadlyTimedLuck@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    17 days ago

    Huh, this reminded me of Five Nights at Freddy’s and how even with murderous robots around, there is a safety precaution where the doors open incase power goes out.

    • yeehaw@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      17 days ago

      Yeah but that’s really hard to do and has never been invented before!

    • KayLeadfoot@fedia.ioOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      42
      ·
      17 days ago

      I, for one, am baffled.

      How didn’t this get recalled after the first escapable entrapment death? I could find 12 fire deaths where the occupants were evidently trapped, and that was just my dumb ass Googling for an afternoon for recent cases, I’m sure there’s more.

      • Hegar@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        17 days ago

        And some of those are really horrific. I think in one of the CA crashes, one person was able to be pulled out a window before the battery cooking off got too hot for anyone to approach and help the three others who were trapped and died.

        • KayLeadfoot@fedia.ioOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          17 days ago

          Reading that coverage was fucking heartbreaking. Pointless, stupid, preventable.

          And you know what? The rescuer kid and the rescued kid are both going to be haunted by that forever.

      • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        17 days ago

        I remember something similar happening with the Delorean DMC-12, and they were absolutely ridiculed for it.

      • SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        17 days ago

        If a new car built by my company leaves Chicago traveling west at 60 miles per hour, and the rear differential locks up, and the car crashes and burns with everyone trapped inside, does my company initiate a recall?

        You take the population of vehicles in the field (A) and multiple it by the probable rate of failure (B), then multiply the result by the average cost of an out-of-court settlement ©.

        A times B times C equals X. This is what it will cost if we don’t initiate a recall.

        If X is greater than the cost of a recall, we recall the cars and no one gets hurt.

        If X is less than the cost of a recall, then we don’t recall.

    • atzanteol@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      17 days ago

      You don’t tend to write a rule stating “passengers must be able to easily escape the vehicle in an emergency” until some tech bro makes it hard.

      • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        16 days ago

        Thing is though, this happened with the Delorean back in the day, so it’s not a new problem at all.

        • atzanteol@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          16 days ago

          Oh did it? I hadn’t known it had difficult to open doors. Was it by design or just something to do with the gullwings?

          • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            16 days ago

            It’s far dumber than that. The door release was electric, and the alternator wasn’t powerful enough to run everything on the vehicle. So, if you were driving at night, with your headlights, wipers, heater etc running, you’d be slowly running your battery down, until the voltage got too low to run the ignition, and the vehicle would shut off.

            And you’d be trapped in a dead vehicle on the side of the road, in the dark, with no lights.

    • WanderingThoughts@europe.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      17 days ago

      Regulators figured nobody would be stupid enough to mess that up and no paragraphs are needed to make things explicit. Then came Elon who thought that technically correct is the best kind of correct so he made this abomination of a manual release.

    • Madison420@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      16 days ago

      That’s just for a few models and just on the front two doors, the rear you have to remove a panel you also have to know exists because it’s not marked in hivis. The fun one is that Tesla says you break your warranty if you actually use any of the manual releases including the y’s really accessible front one.

  • randomblock1@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    17 days ago

    It’s probably easier to get one of those ceramic window breakers and get out that way. I’m pretty sure the rip cords are actually quite hard to pull.

    • skuzz@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      17 days ago

      They use laminate glass on the side windows as well as windshield on some models for noise reduction. Traditional window breaking tools don’t work on them. It’s basically a tombmobile.

      • randomblock1@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        17 days ago

        Wow holy shit. So if you get submerged it’s just straight up a death sentence. Just when you think they can’t get worse…

  • Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    17 days ago

    You need to grab the ripcord with your right hand, conveniently placed above the heart, and thrust it forward and up.