This post reads as 'You have been deemed guilty of aiding the undesirables. You will be punished."
Fun fact, 97% of gender affirming surgeries done on minors were not transgender or gender diverse (TGD) children. Only 3% of gender affirming surgeries done on minors were done on TGD children. (Study)
Of course they’ll be ignoring the 97%
deleted by creator
I believe the 97/3% is specifically looking at breast reduction surgery. This means 97% were not trans or gender diverse children but they had the surgery. This is something no one would bat an eye at if you were a cis man with man boobs and wanted to look more masculine, but if someone who is trans or gender diverse has the same procedure then it’s suddenly a huge deal.
It’s a double standard
deleted by creator
This study appears to focus on breast reduction surgeries, which is considered gender-affirming care. It seems to confirm that breast reductions are overwhelmingly performed on cisgendered males regardless of age.
Probably not a high percentage, but intersex babies are routinely “altered” to conform to one gender or another with no concern to what the child may wish in the future. Sometimes without even input from the parent.
I’m actually fine with them stopping that one. Leave it to the kid to decide.
Agree, but we both know they’ll turn a blind eye to this one.
Of gender-affirming surgical procedures identified among adults and minors, 1591 of 2664 (59.7%) and 82 of 85 (96.4%) were chest-related procedures, respectively. Of the 636 breast reductions among cisgender male and TGD adults, 507 (80%) were performed on cisgender males. Of the 151 breast reductions among cisgender male minors and TGD minors, 146 (97%) were performed on cisgender male minors (Figure 2).
It doesn’t seem to break it down quite how I’d like, but the 97% and matching 3% are specifically about breast reductions.
The things I don’t understand are the 85 and 151. What are the differences between those numbers? They both seem to refer to total procedures on minors.
I think the 85 must be a reduced fraction, but that feels weird to do in a scientific paper.
Of gender-affirming surgical procedures identified among adults and minors, 1591 of 2664 (59.7%) and 82 of 85 (96.4%) were chest-related procedures, respectively.
This first part parses to me as “Of gender-affirming surgical procedures identified, 1591 of 2664 adult surgeries (59.7%) and 82 of 85 minor child surgeries (96.4%) were chest-related procedures, respectively.” However, the next sentence doesn’t seem to line up with that notion…
Of the 636 breast reductions among men, 507 (80%) were performed on cisgender men. Of the 151 breast reductions among boys, 146 (97%) were performed on cisgender boys (Figure 2).
To make this section easier to read, I replaced some words and phrases while hopefully keeping the meaning intact.
I kind of feel like this quote is referencing two different data sets, and is missing a segue. The numbers don’t seem to line up with each other any way I poke at them.
I bet they’re still pushing for boys to be circumcised though
Revolting.
They said to report tips. You should report those missing tips.
Is this actually real? What the fuck USA, what did all these Trump voting morons get us into…
Global depression followed by world war while half the planet dies and the climate is ignored.
Oof. God willing you’ll be proven wrong. I’m afraid you won’t be though.
now now, russia is getting single-handedly held up by ukraine, china seems to be quite happy not being blithering morons and watching everyone else stab themselves in the gut, and america is incompetent, so it’ll just be a global depression with half the planet dying and the climate being ignored 🥰
Yeah but Elon or Don are stupid enough to consider nuclear winter as viable climate and resource options. Domed cities for the elite while Elons sperm ark goes through more testing.
Wish I was joking but this is the level of stupidity legitimately supported by the American people and ejaculated on the world.
FBI and CIA are behind a lot of the human trafficking, so word-salad, word-salad, “protect.”
How about the people cutting pieces of infants genitals? I wonder when that count as mutilations.
No, that’s ok because the crazy cult leader in my town said so.
They want to protect children by destroying the children that are different.
Conforming to the “norm” is the highest good in conservative ethics; it’s a way of signaling allegiance to the in-group.
Their most dripping disdain is reserved for people who refuse to live in the little box that was assigned to them; this is the social contract as conservatives see it.
But circumcision is still very much allowed and is a form of gender affirming care.
There is no way that circumcision can be considered gender-affirming care.
Some say it makes the penis look better so it’s a stretch. But it is just as much genital mutilation as the anti trans people claim some other care causes.
it makes the penis look better so it’s a stretch
Hell, these guys are making a good living making the penis look better or more interesting by stretching! (Link obviously NSFW)
That’s not gender-affirming care
I feel like I’ve seen this before… Maybe it was a movie? Or a game? No, it was a book! What was it called? Something something “History”.
I miss my foreskin.
It helps that voyager puts a baby emoji next to your account name.
Finally! I Can’t wait for them to make infant Circumcision illegal! That’s what this is about, right? RIGHT?!
That was my first thought.
Maybe we should start giving them tips about the removal of, well… tips. At a massive scale, preferably.
Mutilations huh
Everyone please call the FBI to report every single circumcision you’re aware of.
No, that’s the wrong kind of genital mutilation. Our kind of genital mutilation.is perfectly fine, we meant the other one , we hate the other one.
Mutilation tierlist
we hate the other
that’s it put succinctly.
Mr FBI director…where is my foreskin. Give me back my foreskin.
Hans Christian Graebener/Stonetoss, is that you?
Is that the far right comic guy? 😨
Yes, he got doxxed, and at point he was near suicidal about his circumcision, which would be tragic if it wasn’t for him being a nazi.
Lmfao what!? That’s nuts.
If they’re gonna go after people who mutilate children they need to start by banning circumcision.
Absolutely should flood the FBI with… ahem… tips…
Unfortunately, reactionary movements all built upon the premise of unequal enforcement of the rules, so best you can do is to waste their time by reporting intersex mutilations and circumcisions.
Wasting their time and resources should be our prime directive across the board
Spoken like a true Ron Swanson
Report pickup truck drivers lol
Become a government informant. Report your friends and family. Fabulous prizes to be won!
Sounds like a fun gameshow
I won a new kitchen set worth $12,000! All it took was ratting out my neighbors!
Says the government that uses child porn in sting operations.
