The nuclear scientists were killed using a special weapon whose details were barred from publication, Channel 12 says.

The 10th nuclear scientist was killed shortly after the other nine, as part of the overnight Thursday-Friday Israeli operation, which included strikes on Iran’s ballistic missile program and the Natanz nuclear site, along with the elimination of top members of the Islamic Republic’s military leadership, the network says.

The nuclear scientists were all killed while they were sleeping in their beds, with Israel deciding to carry out the assassinations simultaneously so that there wouldn’t be time to tip off those being targeted.

The scientists apparently believed they were safe from such targeting in their homes, a senior Israeli official tells Channel 12, noting that previously assassinated nuclear scientists were killed while heading to their cars after work.

Israel had been tracking Iranian nuclear scientists for years and the ten killed last week were marked for assassination in November of last year, Channel 12 says.

Just when I feel like dystopian news can’t really disturb me anymore…

Leaving this totally unrelated article about Palantir and Israel here for absolutely no reason at all…

How Israel Uses AI in Gaza—And What It Might Mean for the Future of Warfare:

A program known as “The Gospel” generates suggestions for buildings and structures militants may be operating in. “Lavender” is programmed to identify suspected members of Hamas and other armed groups for assassination, from commanders all the way down to foot soldiers. “Where’s Daddy?” reportedly follows their movements by tracking their phones in order to target them—often to their homes, where their presence is regarded as confirmation of their identity. The air strike that follows might kill everyone in the target’s family, if not everyone in the apartment building.

Abraham, whose report relies on conversations with six Israeli intelligence officers with first-hand experience in Gaza operations after Oct. 7, quoted targeting officers as saying they found themselves deferring to the Lavender program, despite knowing that it produces incorrect targeting suggestions in roughly 10% of cases.

  • mhague@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    65
    ·
    3 months ago

    They are flying jets, using drones, and even small explosives. The homes of these scientists were severely damaged. The richest countries of the world are backing Israel.

    Is this just Israel putting out propaganda? These scientists thought they were safe at home. Sinister! Super secret weapon that blows up apartment buildings. Sounds revolutionary!

    • ParadoxSeahorse@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 months ago

      As usual this is teenage boy logic. They are posing with their guns as recruitment propaganda. No it’s a super secret magic cool gun from god you haven’t even heard of it because it’s so futuristic and we’re cool so not at all evil, right

  • Pennomi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    86
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    Anyone who gets uncomfortable with government surveillance because it could be used to target certain demographics of people needs to look no further than what Israel has done to prove their point.

    The only thing stopping the world from autonomously targeting people by online demographic is common human decency, and humanity is running on very short supply of that these days.

    • rottingleaf@lemmy.worldBanned
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      But that is their dream for the future. Purely automatically managing the populace as some sort of a farm.

      It’s an arms race. Like at any other point in history. Between those who think personal dignity and freedom and equality are a mistake of history or a device to keep the herd patient, and that they deserve to rule, and those who don’t.

      The good part is that this has already been tried. A fast system with deadlocks is not that different from a slow system with deadlocks. And a big redundant system deterministically degrading in itself is not that different from a smaller less redundant system deterministically degrading in itself. No USSR and no Nazi Germany anymore on the map.

      The parts about lying and false pretense of law and democracy are new, but not too much - rulers of Frederic the Great’s time had false pretenses of knightly behavior and following imperial mechanisms. One can even compare 30 years war to our two world wars in the sense of creating a new world order, which was considered impossible to change due to endless horrors following that, but eventually become a farce.

  • fluxion@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    95
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    3 months ago

    Think about this when you see politicians trying to pass absurd laws like banning all regulation of AI. AI is a cover to remove any last semblance of accountability for atrocious and illegal activities

    • Hackworth@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Politicians attempting to ban AI regulation are only shielding OpenAI, Microsoft, Google, etc. Those same politicians will pearl clutch about Hugging Face or DeepSeek in the same breath. It’s just about money and the arms race. Abdicating responsibility to AI would require either a change in how we regulate people or a granting of rights/responsibility to AI. Though I don’t doubt we will see people try to blame AI for their poor decisions.

  • pyre@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    68
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 months ago
    1. what a stupid fucking name
    2. why does Israel get to have nuclear weapons
    3. why does no one ask question 2
      • Shardikprime@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        13
        ·
        3 months ago

        Why not?

        Daily on Lemmy there are thousands of calls to murder X or Y person who doesn’t agree with collectivist ideology.

        Why would it be different for them?

          • Shardikprime@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            3 months ago

            Sure, just check the modlog, there is thousands of murder calls and violent action calls erased everyday. That’s the ones that get reported.

            I feel comfortable saying no one here is surprised in the slightest by the level of violent discourse shared in here on Lemmy

        • killingspark@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          Because lemmings that try doing it would be pulled in front of a judge if they went public about it afterwards. It would a) just be a single person that would b) face consequences for that action.

          Israel on the other hand is a state level actor killing civilians in another jurisdiction. I know it’s just another war crime between many others at this point, but it bears noticing just how little the consequences have become

    • allidoislietomyself@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      3 months ago

      Unfortunately the answer is pretty simple. The USA and Israel are best buddies and if the USA says their buddy can have a nuclear arsenal who is going to stand up and tell them otherwise?

      • pyre@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        yeah but if Israel gets them the countries they keep bombing should also get to have them. the country that jerks off to 2A somehow doesn’t think so.

          • pyre@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            3 months ago

            yes. the fact that Iran doesn’t have nuclear weapons and Israel and the US still went after then is proof that they should have had nuclear weapons. because guess what would happen if they did. Israel would have stayed the fuck away.

            • Shardikprime@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              3 months ago

              Clearly not working, Israel and the us have them nukes and that’s not stopping Iran and Palestine from retaliation

              Or do you see them staying the fuck away?

              Because I certainly don’t

              • pyre@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                3 months ago

                lol what. yeah the parties that don’t have the nukes do retaliate when the parties with the nukes are the aggressors. Iran didn’t start a war. Palestine isn’t even involved in a war that’s just genocide.

                • Shardikprime@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  You are clearly seeing having nukes has no effect on retaliation, so why would you insist on it?

        • ZeroOne@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          3 months ago

          USA is at the core of the Western-Imperialist hedgemony & Israel, Japan & Pakistan gets to have them because they are Pro-Western imperialism

          • RedFrank24@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            Japan doesn’t have nukes though. They don’t even allow nukes in their territory. They could make them if they wanted to, they have all the necessary industry to make them, but they don’t actually have any.

            There’s word of sharing nukes with the US, thanks to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and threatening to nuke any nation that tries to help them, but I’m not sure that’s actually gone ahead.

        • michaelmrose@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          3 months ago

          Iran is a terrorist state run by lunatics. Them and Israel having them is even worse than Israel having them.

          • pyre@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            weird how Israel is the one that keeps invading other countries, not to mention terrorizing palestine for its entire existence.

      • pineapplepizza@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        25
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        In 1994, Ukraine gave up its nuclear weapons in exchange for security assurances from the United States, the United Kingdom, and Russia.

          • Makhno@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            19
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            Yeah, seems like the lesson is build nukes at all costs, as it’s the only safeguard against attack.

        • WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          Typically, no one wants to die for stupid shit, especially when they are in the wrong. But when there is no consequences such as dying, a.k.a no nukes, why not go to war and take everything? There’s no morals between countries…unless enforced by nukes.

          This is why I’m pro nuclear armament of all countries.

  • BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    74
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    3 months ago

    I have always been amazed that countries are allowed to get away with this. You would expect that a country that does this would have their leadership rounded up by an international strike force instantly and hauled to Hague.

  • carlossurf@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Jesus they killed everyone in the apartment complex including their kids how is this not a war crime?!?

  • martin4598@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Marking people for assassination looks normal to the times of Israel. Nice people.

    • Basic Glitch@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      42
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      It’s guaranteed the number of bystanders that were killed while they killed these “targets” is not zero.

        • Basic Glitch@lemm.eeOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          Are you ok with just accepting any innocent humans as collateral damage? Bc as far as slippery slopes go, accepting that is a fast track to dehumanization.

          I don’t believe those scientists deserved to die, but even if you do, why did their spouses and children deserve to die too?

          Try to imagine you’re the neighbor of that scientist. Good chance you’ve barely interacted with each other more than a passing nod of acknowledgement when you’re coming and going from your home. Do you and your whole family deserve to die bc of proximity to a target?

          Apply that same question x all 10 scientists they killed. It almost makes the KGB targeting people with poison seem like humanitarian work by comparison.

          If these were your friends and family being killed by a foreign government while they slept in their beds, you would have to be a psychopath to just brush it off as necessary collateral damage.

    • SufferingSteve@feddit.nu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      But oh so lucrative, and with a catchy phrase…

      I see moneybags in this idea, wonder who will first make it a reality…

  • blitzen@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    I generally don’t believe Iran was on its way to building nuclear weapons, only nuclear energy. But, if we were to entertain for a moment the notion that they were, this is all pretty badass no?

    But, since it’s not the case this whole thing is frightening. Israel is a terrorist state and I’m tired of pretending otherwise.