Compared with its peers, America overall does an unusually poor job of solving killings. The murder clearance rates of other rich nations, including Australia, Britain and Germany, hover in the 70s, 80s and even 90s

And yes, its because the cops are racist and break trust with communities

  • chunes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    Learning this statistic does not make murder more appealing. Guess I’m not a psycho. And thank god for that, you know? It seems like it would be such a hassle.

  • ℍ𝕂-𝟞𝟝@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    1 month ago

    You should buy more tanks for the police. Or fighter jets, you can bomb murderers from fighter jets, right?

    Or just buy a bunch of D9s and demolish the lives of all the people you don’t like like the IDF does.

  • python@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    30 days ago

    How would they know how many murderers it is if they get away? What if its just one very very sneaky murderer??

  • PugJesus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    “Maybe another billion dollars for police to jerk off in their cruisers and collect overtime at the expense of all other municipal budgets will help!” - Political discourse in this fucking country

    • silence7@slrpnk.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 month ago

      Problem is that what we dont need is beat cops who go around harassing people because their skin is too dark. What we actually need is detectives capable of catching killers and fences, but the incentives are to go harass minorities

  • RagingRobot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    1 month ago

    That will embolden criminals about as much as the president publicly committing crimes on TV and getting away with it

  • Boddhisatva@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    29 days ago

    In the 18th century, the Italian criminologist Cesare Beccaria devised the deterrence theory that criminal justice systems worldwide have depended on since. He cited three primary principles to deterrence: the severity of a punishment, the speed at which someone is captured and the certainty he or she will be found.

    American policy often focuses on severity. In recent decades, lawmakers responded to spikes in crime by increasing the length of prison sentences. They paid less attention to the certainty and swiftness of punishment. Yet those two other factors may matter more to deterrence, some experts say.

    America pays attention only to the severity of punishment. Certainty and swiftness of punishment is always just glossed over by the typical tough-on-crime types. And cops don’t generally care if they get the right person either. They care about conviction rates, but accuracy never seems to come up at all. Nobody in power seems to care that when you convict the wrong person, not only are you doing a great injustice to that person, you are leaving the actual murderer out on the streets to kill again! What fraction of that 58% clearance rate were not actually the real murderer and had just been beaten or otherwise coerced into confessing? I wouldn’t be surprised if that number dropped close to or even below 50% if that were to somehow be taken into account.

    Hell, even when a person in the USA is shown to have been wrongfully convicted of a crime and imprisoned, the state will fight tooth and nail to keep them in prison, particularly if it’s an election year.

  • 001Guy001@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    What’s needed is a program that analyzes and pinpoints the conditions that create violent behavior and uproots them (for example, living in scarcity with no economic security and feeling marginalized, having no empathetic communal support system, etc.)

    (cc: James Gilligan)