• DrCake@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      60
      ·
      16 days ago

      I know Americans love Jesus a whole lot but really only 4%. That just seems crazy low

      • walden@sub.wetshaving.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        89
        ·
        16 days ago

        I think it’s because people are still uncomfortable answering “atheist” on questionnaires and polls. It’s easier to say “no religious affiliation”, and most people are probably agnostic instead of atheist anyway.

        • seeking_perhaps@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          16 days ago

          Yea, similarly there is no way 70% of Americans are Christian. That’s probably just the way they are raised and are likely to fill out if you don’t feel comfortable saying “atheist”.

          • grue@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            16 days ago

            70% Christian, 3% Atheist, 1% Muslim, 2% Jewish… WTF are the other 24%? Don’t tell me there are that many Buddhist/Hindu/Shinto/etc. folks here! Something’s not adding up.

          • 𞋴𝛂𝛋𝛆@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            16 days ago

            You might be surprised about places other than SoCal and NY NY. Like growing up in Tennessee Alabama and Georgia, everyone seemed to have some affiliation. The level of engagement varied, but I never met someone that was an openly staunch atheist in real life. There is a deep stigma about such a thing in the South, - sadly. There, even extremists like Church of God are nominalized (screaming you’re going to hell for an hour, exorcism/miracle drama nonsense, mobbing behaviors, religious masochism).

            It is likely one would need to be second or third generation removed from and religious social support network in a family unit before a person would truly answer atheist on such a poll. I don’t think many people grow to the point of self awareness to care to define an anti religious god certainty at this stage in human cultural evolution.

            • seeking_perhaps@mander.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              16 days ago

              While I have not lived in the south I do have some deeply religious and conservative family members, so I do see where you’re coming from. I just think even a good chunk of the people you mentioned have an affiliation to fit in and not because they are genuinely religious, i.e. pray regularly and go to church every Sunday. In other words, it’s a cultural thing. They probably wouldn’t go so far as to consider themselves atheist, but I could easily see them considering themselves culturally Christian and non-religious in practice. I have no idea what percentage that actually breaks down to, but my guess is it’s a decent amount lower than 70%.

        • NABDad@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          22
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          16 days ago

          I wouldn’t answer atheist because I feel that’s as much a belief as any religion. I’m agnostic. The most undecided choice possible.

          • saimen@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            16 days ago

            It’s a bit like asking me what’s my favourite marvel superhero. It’s not that I don’t like them or don’t think they are important for some people. It’s just not relevant for me.

        • Gloomy@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          45
          ·
          16 days ago

          You’re right. This survey lists 29 % of Americans as “Religiously unaffiliated”. Of those 5 % are Atheists, 6 % Agnostic and 19 % “Nothing in particular”.

    • collapse_already@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      16 days ago

      Depending on who is doing the polling, I’m not answering truthfully. I don’t want proselytizing and I don’t want to risk getting sent to any Aushwitz that they are building. I doubt I am alone.

  • GaMEChld@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    15 days ago

    I wonder how much of MAGA knows the entire population of illegal immigrants is estimated at a WHOPPING 3% of our population.

  • andyburke@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    14 days ago

    Everyone here talking about the minority groups when I think the real story is people thinking 1/5 Americans are making $1M/yr.

    What are these people smoking? I need some.

  • teolan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    15 days ago

    Americans believe a single city (New York) represents 30% of the American population?

    • whoisearth@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      15 days ago

      Forget that. They think one out of their first 3 friends they have is gay. Assuming they’re straight that means 50% of their friends are gay. Fuck that means they think 25% of their first 4 friends are trans.

      Math is not their strong point apparently

      • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        15 days ago

        TBF if you join random chat groups to meet people you might find abkut that proportion, but not roaming the parks and streets, no.

    • darthelmet@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      14 days ago

      I was kind of curious if this was close to true in any countries with higher urban population densities and the first one I checked was Japan since it has a rural depopulation issue and Tokyo is a pretty populous city and… it was right on the money. Japan’s pop is ~124 million and Tokyo’s is ~ 37 million. So roughly 30% of Japan’s population lives in one city/metro area. Not that this means anything for US population distribution, but I suppose it’s not THAT crazy to think the numbers could be in that ballpark if you weren’t really thinking about it too hard.

  • mgtzbos@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    15 days ago

    How incredible to see the effect of political messaging on citizen/voter perception. It is that the exaggerations, lies, and outrage marketing clearly have an outsized effect. I wouldn’t say the US population is dumb. But I would say the manipulation of perception is too much for the average person to do their own research and come up with unbiased facts.

    ***To those dismissing this based on inconsistencies between topics, you can’t make those comparisons. There is some blending of data in the methodology that is appropriate in order to look at the range. This is only about the gap between perception and reality, and a stack rank.

    • Doomsider@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      15 days ago

      The average person is easily manipulated by propaganda. Highly intelligent people who should know better are easily manipulated by propaganda. This is why propaganda is so dangerous and should be tightly controlled.

      • Bgugi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        15 days ago

        A great ideal so long as you’re the one in charge of deciding what propaganda is.

        • Doomsider@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          14 days ago

          Most of Western Europe has severe limits on advertising. They ban things like comparative advertising and don’t even allow advertising for prescription medication.

          It is not about deciding what propaganda is allowed, it is about setting up regulations to prevent misinformation.

          Our current model in the US is the good will outweigh the bad. That people will be able determine the truth and ignore lies. This is of course poppycock.

          Unfortunately propaganda works really well and if you allow misogynists and Nazis to have a mouthpiece their numbers will grow.

          Control is not a bad thing, those that push toxic freedom and “free speech” have moved the goalposts so far it is hard to believe. We have been so propagandized to it is hard to separate reality from the lies at times.

          The truth is propaganda, misinformation, and public relations are working to sow discontent and manipulate people and it is wrong. We are supposed to protect people, not throw them to the richest wolves who convince them that they should enjoy getting eaten.

  • sircac@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    14 days ago

    I think this bias happens a bit anywhere where there is a limited range to opinion about, may be the interesting part is where is the tilt point, with the corresponding error estimation…

    • Stowaway@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      16 days ago

      There are companies that make you watch anti union propaganda as part of orientation. They also pay tons of money to bust up any attempts at unionization. The disinformation thats pushed put about unions is baffling. Anything from its communism to the unions steal your money. Its not super surprising to me at this point.

      On the flip side all the wealthy actors are union… Says a thing or two…

    • XeroxCool@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      14 days ago

      That’s what actually brought me to the comments. The fuck? OK, so now NYC pop is about 10mil, non-NYC NY is about 10 mil, and non-NYC NYC metro is about 10 mil. How do you get even 30 mil to represent 30% of 350mil? Confuse it with the Iranian population of 92mil? And 30% is the average of the responses!

    • I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      14 days ago

      Sometimes you see data and just know that the methodology had to have been shit.

      The average response thought 30% of the US was in NY?! No fucking chance.

  • schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    16 days ago

    household income over $X per what period of time?

    I somehow don’t find it very plausible that there are many people who believe that 21% of people are transgender, or even 30% gay or lesbian. But I too would have overestimated the number of atheists.

    • tempest@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      15 days ago

      Yeah that’s bananas. I wonder if people saying 1 in 5 people are trans even know a trans person

    • vga@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      14 days ago

      I mean I guess you’re joking, but nevertheless I think it’s a bad thing to hope that every fifth person gets born into a body their mind doesn’t agree with.

      • kazerniel@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        14 days ago

        eh I’m trans, and now that I’ve transitioned, it’s largely a neutral experience, neither good nor bad, it just is. But in my comment I meant that I think society (broadly) wouldn’t be nearly as transphobic if every 5th person was trans.

  • huppakee@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    16 days ago

    the proportion who have at least a high school degree: estimate 65% vs. true 89%

    the proportion who have an advanced degree: estimate 37% vs. true 12%

    So basically what they guess is ±⅓ has no high school diploma and another ±⅓ has an advanced degree, while in reality ±1/10 doesn’t have a high school diploma and ±1/10 has an advanced degree.

    Meaning while in reality 77% does have a high school degree but not an advanced degree, the estimate is that only 28% does.

    • jj4211@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      15 days ago

      To be fair, the information they have access to suggests a much more diverse situation than reality. So it’s understandable to be reluctant to recognize that any group might dominate the majority so much or that a well recognized minority population is actually so small. You’d have to study up the specific numbers, which are usually less important to keep track of than the relative subjective realitiies associated with each group.

      • NιƙƙιDιɱҽʂ@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        15 days ago

        True, but also, how could anyone think 30% of people in the US, a population of nearly 350,000,000, live in New York City. That would dwarf the population of even Tokyo, the most densely populated metropolitan area in the world.

        That’s crazy.

        • jj4211@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          15 days ago

          As someone who tries to keep the vague number in mind, it would be strange to me as well, but I suspect a large number of people don’t really try to keep even the vague numbers in mind about how many people are about or how many people realistically could reside in a place like NYC.

          They track the rough oversimplifications. Like “barely anyone lives in the middle of the country”, and every TV show they see in the US either has a bunch of background people in NYC or LA, or is in the middle of nowhere with a town seemingly made up of mere dozens of people. They might know that “millions” live in the US and also, “millions” live in NYC, so same “ballpark” if they aren’t keeping track of the specifics. They’d probably believe 10 million in NYC and 50 million nationwide.

          This is presuming they bother to follow through on the specific math rather than merely roughly throwing out a percentage.

    • DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      15 days ago

      Don’t you know? The only city in the USA is either New York or Los Angleas or San Francisco. If its a movie about alien invasion then Washington, DC will also show up.

      If its UK, the only city is London.

      If its China, the only cities that exist are Beijing or Shanghai.

      If its Japan, the only city that exist is Tokyo.

      Welcome to Hollywood!

      • doingthestuff@lemy.lol
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        15 days ago

        It’s kinda funny though, I have six friends I stay in touch with who live in the UK. They’re all in London. No I didn’t meet them there. Coincidence also reinforces confirmation bias. I know believe it is the only city.

      • jj4211@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        15 days ago

        If its UK, the only city is London.

        It is well known that if you are a being with access to all of time and space in your bigger-on-the-inside ship you will suspiciously hang out a lot in current day London.