• PugJesus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 month ago

      Notice how neither side has gotten shit done that help the people?

      Speaking as someone who would literally be dead without government assistance, fuck off with that nonsense.

        • PugJesus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          Brain dead for a party over country.

          “Government assistance doesn’t exist!” - Very Serious And Politically Informed ‘Leftists’

          Fox News level education, Christ.

    • Deceptichum@quokk.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      If your sides are left and right they don’t both love billionaires.

      Take an ideological side, not a political party side.

    • Frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      If you have a politician that you rank above others, then by definition, that is your favorite politician.

    • MegaUltraChicken@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 month ago

      1000% agreed, but fuck if I wasn’t literally smitten listening to Lina Khan talk. Attacking corporate hegemony really gets my engine going.

    • stoy@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      Every election here in Sweden and EU I come to the same conclusion:

      There are no good political parties, the best you can do is to vote for the least bad party, and hope that it works out.

      • susurrus0@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Except the ‘least bad’ party gets 0.8% votes and almost all the votes go to worst and second worst. What most people mean by ‘least bad’ is simply ‘less bad’, as in ‘less bad than the other one’. And even that ‘less bad’ classification can be troublesome to wrap your head around.

        • stoy@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          Coming from Sweden, with proportional representation I can tell you that we do get niche parties elected for seats in the Riksdag (Swedish parliament) or Kommunstyrelse (municipal government) from time to time.

          So it isn’t out of the question

      • Soup@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        Pretty much all over the world people say that and then race to vote for the second worst party/person because “the better one could never win.”

        Vote for who you most align with, anything less than that is just betraying yourself and prolonging the inevitable slide to the right.

        • stoy@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          23
          ·
          1 month ago

          The issue you are describing seems to mostly stem from the idiotic and unfair system of first past the post, Sweden has proportional representation, so I do end up voting for the party I mostly align with, even if it is a completely new party.

          I have voted for several different parties in the three normal elections, even at the same election day.

          Then we have the act of protest voting, as well as support voting. These are tactics you can use in a proper voting system with a healthy amount of political alliances.

          • Soup@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            1 month ago

            Yea I’m in Canada and it’s that problem. We should be 8-9 years deep into ranked choice or similar but our centrist party that ran on that promise fucked it up big time because they realized that they’d probably never win an election ever again. Their entire platform basically depends on the Conservatives being such absolute trash that no one feels safe voting for our leftist, progressive party.

        • Doc_Crankenstein@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 month ago

          Thank you. This incessant capitulation to the lowest common denominator is why across the world we are seeing a rise in regressive, right-wing ideology.

          People stopped fighting for better and have just consigned themselves to accepting literally the 2nd worst option out of fear that the worst option will succeed.

          It’s a shitty catch-22 that is fundamental aspect of electoralist politics and why I vehemently am against them as a political structure.

  • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    Having a favorite politician is weird, like having a favorite landlord. You should care about the policies and efficacy of your politician, and not really give a fuck beyond that, unless they are a rapist, serial drunk driver, or something like that.

  • Kennystillalive@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    Having a favourite politician is alrrady almost cult like. Yeah, you can like and support some of their ideas but at the end of the day they are a politician.

    • Frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      Not really, no. Cults are a very specific means of control. Almost every organization ever has some minor aspect of the BITE model, but that does not make them cults. Doing so waters down the term and is insulting to people trying to get out or have gotten out.

  • logicbomb@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    If you’re an American and you can’t name… let’s say… 10 presidents, then it’s probably a bad sign if you even have a favorite politician.

    • pyre@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      because he smiles like he’s part of your family and makes you feel good while standing firm in his beliefs against untold amounts of racism from all sides of the political stage?

      ahem. I mean yeah why would they. I’m not in a cult. shut up.

      • njm1314@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 month ago

        Brother I’ll be honest with you, I will read 18 pages of whatever bullshit you want to write to me, but I won’t even watch 10 seconds of video.

        • Jankatarch@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          Joke is that it’s an over the top song praising united nations politician Jen Egeland by the same artists that made “what does the fox say.”

    • Frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      I’m fond of Robert La Follette (one of the loudest voices against US entry into WWI), Russ Feingold (only senator to vote against the Patriot Act), and Bernie (who doesn’t need an introduction). In all of history, there are some politicians that stand above the rest.

    • brown_guy45@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      No one has a fav politician

      I guess those people mean whom they support in an election

      • Zink@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 month ago

        Suppose I polled the American people’s agreement with the statement “In all of human history there is one politician who is my favorite above all others, and that politician is President Donald Trump.”

        We know that I would get tens of millions of people who genuinely and strongly agree with that. It would be depressingly close to, if not over, a hundred million.

        Or maybe over 100M before the Epstein revolt and below after, lol.

      • Doc_Crankenstein@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Yea. The politician whom they most support, otherwise said to be their “most preferred”.

        You know what is another way to say that something is an individual’s “most preferred”? It would be to say it is the individual’s “favorite”.

        Thus, people, in fact, do have favorites.

  • MonkRome@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 month ago

    It’s worse than that, there are Republicans that know he’s morally reprehensible, might destroy the country, know he is incompetent, and still worship him.

  • Alcoholicorn@mander.xyzBanned from community
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Pham Minh Chinh is banning ICE scooters in the capital in 1 year, and cars 2 years after that.

    What could I possibly criticize him for? Not banning vinfast cars blocking traffic with fewer than 3 people?