• nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Wonder why hes signaling out Whitmer after the FBI was warning people about pro trump revenge attacks. Bet there’s no other reason than the voting thing though /s

      • Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        4 months ago

        It’s not under the radar. He says it right out in the open. He always, always accuses Democrats of doing whatever thing he’s planning to do next, so when he does it and the Democrats call him out on it, it appears to be petty revenge to the general public.

        Assuming you weren’t an only child, remember when you were a kid fighting with your siblings? When you ran to mom. who always won? Whoever got there first. Whoever got their second gets to hear “Leave your brother alone and knock it off”. Being the first to run to mom and dad to settle dispultes was a huge advantage, sometimes leading to whoever got there second being punished even if whoever got there first was the antagonist.

        Trump has just shown that this strategy works. As long as you accuse them of doing it first, you significantly soften the blow when they accuse you of doing the same thing, because the accusations appear to be less genuine and more retaliatory.

  • massacre@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    62
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    “undermines the integrity of elections by increasing the opportunity for individuals to register to vote even though they are ineligible to do so.”

    The quote is false on it’s face - they already know that ineligible registrants won’t get processed or be on the roll to vote. They want to keep disengaged voters disengaged - nothing else, here except for maybe the dog whistle of “illegal immigrant voters!”

    If anything, this gives me hope still in 2024 that the GOP are STILL trying to suppress voter turnout because they know they will lose the popular vote because their policies are fascist garbage and so are their politicians.

    • Ragnarok314159@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      4 months ago

      It’s because there are articles exposing P2025 for eliminating the VA and the VA compensation program. This effectively makes millions of veterans homeless, or have drastic reduction in quality of life due to money being cut.

      For the first time in a long time, it looks like the veteran vote might not go for GOP, and (surprise Pikachu) the GOP is trying to eliminate the entire voting block.

  • Snapz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    4 months ago

    “trump takes [X action]”

    In these headlines, unless the [X action] part is farts or lies, he didn’t do it. The Heritage Foundation did. He’s an empty, inept coward and an erratic puppet.

      • Asafum@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        Yeah… It’s like definitely up there among the reasons I’m so sick of everything… This version of groundhog day really sucks.

  • Delusional@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    71
    ·
    4 months ago

    There is no reason you should be against this at all unless you’re evil.

    Sadly that’s true for a lot of things republicans are against. Fucking evil bastards.

    • Manalith@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 months ago

      I’m honestly confused what benefit this gives to evil people, I understand why closing them would be a bad thing, I just don’t see what he would get out of it.

      • Asafum@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        25
        ·
        4 months ago

        If they carry out voter suppression tactics in an area then it’s almost certainly an area they’ve determined to be advantageous to Democrats.

  • Lasherz12@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    4 months ago

    I’d say this case has no standing, but in recent years that hasn’t really mattered much. Just goes to show it’s all rules for thee not me in the Republican party.

    • Atelopus-zeteki@kbin.run
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      4 months ago

      That was my first thought, does he have standing? In what way was trump harmed by the VA Medical Centers registering voters? Did they only register dems? The game is all about making all the noise you can, distract, deflect.

  • Buelldozer@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    4 months ago

    Okay so there’s no real argument about why the RNC, DJT, and the MRP are bringing this lawsuit. It’s politically motivated and they are dicks trying to prevent people from voting.

    With that said my lay reading of the Lawsuit (22 pages, pdf warning) leads me to believe that the lawsuit has merit; meaning that they may be correct that neither the Governor nor the Secretary of State have the unilateral authority to add or remove VRAs.

    So yeah their motivation for the lawsuit is shitty but this is “Rule of Law” type stuff. We aren’t happy when Republican Governor’s pull this shit and we shouldn’t be giving Democrat Governor’s a free pass either.

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      4 months ago

      Okay so there’s no real argument about why the RNC, DJT, and the MRP are bringing this lawsuit. It’s politically motivated and they are dicks trying to prevent people from voting.

      Honestly, I disagree. I think this comment rings true, that their motive is even more ulterior than just stopping veterans from registering to vote:

      I believe this is about making as much of the election go through the corrupt court system as possible. They want this election decided by judges.

      In other words, they don’t just want people not to vote; they want the votes of people who do manage it to also not matter by manufacturing excuses for Heritage Foundation judges to throw them out wholesale.

    • evatronic@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      4 months ago

      Let’s apply the same standard, then.

      Let it ride until after the election, and then apologize and correct the mistake.

  • Xanis@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    4 months ago

    If you are all sick of this don’t stop after we win the coming election, keep on pushing at every level. Take some devious, malicious pleasure in controlling our Government by staying united and rigging the elections by choosing a candidate together. Game the system with your pinky to your lips and with every new progressive and left-leaning politician put into power, swivel that chair and laugh.

    Nothing, absolutely NOTHING, would scare the shit out of the trash-tier politicians more than us taking actual ownership.

      • Telorand@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        4 months ago

        Hi, I have a BiL in the Army (≈10yrs) who is an extremely confused libertarian who loves Trump and would rather crazy people be allowed to freely have guns than ensure his 5yo survives elementary school.

        This is a genuine question, but do you have any tips for communicating with him? Maybe help him at least give some real thought to some of his positions?

        • DantesFreezer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          4 months ago

          Vet here, also former libertarian, current father.

          People smell bullshit, so ask genuine questions. If you have an agenda it wont work.

          Ask about what kind of role he sees for government, and ask about situations you find troubling and what he things the solution is.

          Ask about specific people you may know who are too underprivileged, young, old, infirm to be self sufficient and bootstrap themselves.

          Generally give real thought to your opinions and ask him about his. You really can’t change people by wanting to do it, you have to want to understand them first and then enter into dialogue.

          • Telorand@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            Good advice. Thanks! I will try reframing some of my questions a little better.

            Honestly, it will be tough with him. He’s incredibly naive and not terribly introspective, but if I can find those points of agreement, perhaps he’ll be a little less defensive on the outset. Doesn’t help that my sister and the rest of the family are all liberal and leftward, so he’s an island.

        • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          4 months ago

          I don’t have any specific advice, but generally when trying to convince people of things it’s important to remember that belief is largely social. Facts don’t matter so much as group identity. We are all vulnerable to this. If they see you in the moment as being in an out-group, you’re extremely unlikely to convince them of anything. If you can focus on shared group membership, like “we both want to see our kids grow up healthy” or whatever, that can work.

          Like, if you try to convince a conservative to recycle via “it’s good for the environment” that’s going to ping as outgroup nonsense. If you sell it as “only america can turn trash into useful stuff”, you’ll probably have better luck.

        • Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          The Trump-loving libertarians are a weird batch. Typically the trumpanzees I deal with are GOP, and my strategy is to actually talk up the LP in an attempt to use Chase Oliver as more benign trash can to drop would-be Trump votes into.

          For actual libertarians who are already planning on voting Oliver, I point out that a fascist victory would be fatally damaging to every party except the fascists - 3rds are fucked right along with everyone else. Their best strategy is to nudge the current system into a model more conducive to a 3rd party victory, specifically via ranked choice voting so people can feel safe voting for a 3rd without worrying about the spoiler effect. To do that, they need to vote blue to keep the fascists out of power, as a vote for more time to refine their party of preference and preserve a political model that could lead to that party’s victory.

          Trump LPers are harder to speak to, to the point of being a lost cause in most cases, but I can understand wanting to give a little extra to help out a family member. Start digging into policy questions - less who he wants to win, and more what he wants to accomplish. Assess those goals, and consider if someone other than Trump would be better to achieve them.

          This debate technique is called “steelmanning” and requires putting yourself in the other side’s shoes, and building their side up in a way that’s compatible with yours, vs the usual talking points nowadays, which are usually just strawman bullshit that will never get anything done.

          Good luck!

          • Telorand@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            Good ideas! I’ll keep some of those in mind. He’s not stupid, just incredibly naive, and it doesn’t help that he lives in the big shadow of his special forces older brother and thinks (maybe subconsciously) he has to prove himself equal.

            Because of his naivete, he listens to what the right wing news orgs say as gospel, possibly because he has a weak epistemic foundation. If I can manage to push through some of that bullshit, it might give him some space to form his own opinions.

            I don’t really want to change him, per se, but it worries me that he’s so thoughtless; if I can help him learn how to put a little more thought into his choices and actions and see that life doesn’t exist in black and white terms, I’ll call that a success.

  • collapse_already@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    4 months ago

    Trump wouldn’t need to suppress the veteran vote so much if he hadn’t said that only suckers and losers would die for our country. Armed forces used to favor his party.