Soooo, I kind of got déjà vu reading this article because … Six days ago I “foresaw” the relevance of “weird.” Comment thread here (I think) or just check out post my post history.
The author brings up a ton of specific points I called out, including using similar words like “flip” the script and referencing how “basket of deplorables” was too directed. Were we all thinking sbout “weird” in this context six days ago already? If not… I am weirded out, y’all.
“Deplorables” and alot of other seemingly insulting, derogatory things could be worn as a badge of honor by that group. For people who pride themselves on being conservative and the representatives of “normality”, “Weird” isn’t something you can easily call yourself, you’re not weird, you’re the normal one, it’s society that’s weird for being so permissive. And then just being called “weird” is hard to defend against because everyone has some weird thing about themselves, just existing as a human being is a weird experience.
Weird isn’t bad, weird is just normal, it’s just life, but in their eyes, weird IS bad, it’s probably a part of themselves that they themselves know is wrong. I think alot of the blatant lies they tell the world aren’t just for other people, part of it is for themselves too, to make the weirdness of fascism go down a bit easier, to make it seem like they’re supporting it for justifiable reasons.
i maintain that this is because Kendrick Lamar thoroughly undermined Drake earlier this summer with a similar approach
Mother Jones Media Bias Fact Check Credibility: [High] (Click to view Full Report)
Name: Mother Jones Bias: Left-Center
Factual Reporting: High
Country: United States of America
Full Report: https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/mother-jones/Check the bias and credibility of this article on Ground.News
Thanks to Media Bias Fact Check for their access to the API.
Please consider supporting them by donating.Footer
Beep boop. This action was performed automatically. If you dont like me then please block me.💔
If you have any questions or comments about me, you can make a post to LW Support lemmy community.Silent? They never shut the fuck up.
I think pretending there are A LOT of people like you that want this specific thing that is kind of weird is an attempt to appeal to authority of slightly more invested in politics “masses”. If someone tells a conservative and disconnected corn farmer that ALL conservatives care about that trans thing and that it’s a danger to your style of life, and that they mutilate children, then they might not check if any of that is true. Just assume that someone did, since apparently all their conservative friends are in on it. And you might just make a fool out of yourself if you ask any questions, since you know you don’t really belong with “silent conservative majority” because unlike them you’re not invested in politics and didn’t do your research… So you better keep your mouth shut and go along with the flow. Same thing with facism. Also preys on embarassed ignorance of the “silent majority” …imo
The silent majority is neither of those things.
Yells. Screams. Smashes plate on the floor. Smashes plate against the wall. Flings boogers at everyone. Pulls out a gun and literally shoots somebody in the face. “Nobody is paying attention to me. I am the silent majority.”
It works because that was Trump’s angle on Harris… But she ran with it first.
It works because he’s fucking creepy weird and Harris is maximally as weird as your fun aunt that sneaks a bit of cooking sherry while making a meal.
Because it hits at what they are all about: identity.
Because it is simple and understandable.
Because it renders their grievances in the petty light they need to be seen in.
Because it hits a nerve for them.
Because it disempowers and dismisses them.
Because it’s not overtly combative.
But really really because it is true.
Betraying one’s country is really fucking weird.
More to the point, supporting someone that legitimately betrayed the country and is trying to end democracy is really fucking weird.
Especially if the person they are supporting to take lead is a dementia addled, racist rapist. Super weird.
Why do bullies get mad when you start fighting back? It’s a gawd damned “mystery!”
Use the ol’ timey word for it and call them queer. Start referring to conservatives as “the queers” just to troll them
The actual queers are gonna hate that. Maybe they can call another queervention (or was it queervalcade?) and get back to us on using it for trolling.
Hopefully one of their ambassadors will swing by and share an opinion. My Gay Agenda says, “In usage of the word “queer,” stay where you are and wait for help.”
Stop using queer as a bad word. The word you are looking for to describe Trump and the other magas is “pedophile”.
I don’t like that either. There are receipts for Trump, so that can stick, but using “pedophile” as a broad pejorative against people I disagree with politically (no matter how severely) requires me to separate that word from what it actually means (people who are sexually attracted to children), and as someone who actually gives a shit about harm reduction and justice for victims of sexual abuse, I’m not willing to stoop to the level of obfuscating the language we use to talk about those things.
This is no different than the right wing adopting “groomer” to mean “anyone who I think intrinsically harms children” (usually queer people working in education or childcare), actively destroying the very valuable vocabulary we have for describing the criminal social manipulation sexually abusive adults can use on children to get them to do what they are told.
Just because “pedo” is the nastiest thing you can call someone doesn’t make it acceptable to cry wolf about such a profoundly serious thing, no matter how much you hate the person you’re insulting.
As a bisexual British person I absolutely support the idea of returning queer to it’s classic meaning. There’s also the option of just using both meanings. Context will establish which one you mean.
The Republicans are a right queer bunch, unlike my fellow queers in the LGBTQ+ community.
Capitalizing Queers to mean our friends and lowercase queers as the descriptor for these weirdos might be a simple distinction as well.
Could also refer to the way Republicans do things as queerly, as in “why is this dumb cunt queerly burning books?”
Weird works for some people as it allows them to express disdain without getting violent
Why aren’t there rolls of stickers on Amazon of pictures of Republicans with the word “weird” under them to stick on gas pumps?
Probably because liberals are less likely to vandalize people’s property, and buy a roll of stickers. You could probably make more money on large format stickers individually.
I absolutely wouldn’t want to vandalize someone’s property however, had a conservative already put a sticker there I wouldn’t feel bad at all about covering it up.
Vandalize someone’s property
Just to make sure I understand
Vandalize = stick a removable sticker to something
Someone = an oil company
Property = infrastructure to dispense oil to be burned and pumped into the atmosphere
Honestly, I don’t think stickers go nearly far enough. Bomb an oil pipeline instead.
Yeah that won’t kill anybody. F*** over society and raise the prices for 99% of people. That seems like a perfectly well thought-out plan /s
Sounds like an opportunity to make some money. You could be the change you want to see.
How are you any less weird? You support Zionism, just like many Republicans. You are SO WEIRD! Why aren’t there rolls of stickers like that for you, @[email protected], and for all the other genocide deniers?
The words we’ve been using before – fascists, neonazis, dictators – oddly enough seem to make Republicans laugh at Democrats because we make them sound scary/we sound scared. Calling them weird trivializes them, and reduces them to barely under creepy uncle status. Calling them weird stings because they think themselves the epitome of normal – they think they’re the “real” Americans, not the aberrant ones.
I think the secret is it’s just one word that everyone knows. Democrats have a bad tendency to over-explain: “This book makes these 57 points and if you cross reference with these charts and apply this formula you’ll see….” Meanwhile, Trump will just say “what a loser.” Maybe Democrats are finally learning to keep it simple.
Yes people should want to make informed decisions, but maybe part of effective campaigning these days is accepting they don’t.
It’s fallout from the devolution of our educational system. And, well, generational lead poisoning. And I guess we’ll find out what microplastics do to our brains in the coming decades too.
Anyways, it’s frustrating that talking points have to be “dumbed down” to such an extreme degree, but at the end of the day, I’m glad that the Harris campaign is being pragmatic about doing what they have to do with their messaging to actually reach low-info/low intelligence voters.
“Weird” reverses and intervenes at the crucial point of transmission of that idea. No, it says, the appeals by the right to supposed family values (anti-trans bigotry; restricting no-fault divorce; slashing public school funding; hatred of immigrants) are not normal. They aren’t fundamental American values that the liberal elites have somehow derailed. They are, instead, deeply strange. And “we” (a new silent majority that Walz invokes in his use of “weird”) are tired of it.
This sums it up pretty nicely.
Until he ruins his point by trying to claim the silent majority in turn.
It doesn’t work, only voting works.
Hmm, and how do you sway fence sitters and braindead centrists?
Are you implying that calling people names sways votes? Because then it doesn’t matter what the Dems call him, Trump will get every single “undecided” vote for the next century. No one calls people names as much or as bigly as he.
Calling people names was also the official unofficial Democrat campaign strategy until Biden dropped out. Anyone who didn’t enthusiastically support him was a Russian troll and secret Toupee supporter.
It can work. You only need to peel off a few of the normal people and blunt his momentum. While as always you do need the rest of the population to turn up and vote.
Trumps greatest fear would be dancing up on stage at a rally and having the audience silent then slowly start laughing at him when he starts talking his nonsense.
Like the UN did.
The emperor has no clothes. He is weird.
I don’t disagree with the sentiment, but I just don’t see it changing any minds. I fear that anyone who could be convinced not to vote for Trump because he’s “weird” will be just as easily convinced not to vote for Harris for some equally vague, trivial reason. I say focus on the issues where Democrats can actually have an advantage, and leave the shit-flinging to the troglodytes that live in it.
