Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez recently made headlines for calling perennial Green Party presidential candidate Jill Stein “predatory” and “not serious.” AOC is right.

Giving voters more choices is a good thing for democracy. But third-party politics isn’t performance art. It’s hard work — which Stein is not doing. As AOC observed: “[When] all you do is show up once every four years to speak to people who are justifiably pissed off, but you’re just showing up once every four years to do that, you’re not serious.”

To be clear: AOC was not critiquing third parties as a whole, or the idea that we need more choices in our democracy. In fact, AOC specifically cited the Working Families Party as an example of an effective third party. The organization I lead, MoveOn, supports their 365-day-a-year efforts to build power for a pro-voter, multi-party system. And I understand third parties’ power to activate voters hungry for alternatives: I myself volunteered for Ralph Nader in 2000, and that experience helped shape my lifelong commitment to people-first politics.


Register to vote: https://vote.gov/

  • Zerlyna@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    130
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    2 months ago

    I agree. The only time I hear her name is around election time. It’s too late then, the work needs to be done in between.

    • Rhaedas@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      44
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      Especially using the name and clout to help the local races which are run more often. Get third parties well known regionally with serious candidates, you’ll see demand for them grow nationally.

      • Maggoty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        And some of these local places could use some good faith environmentalism. Co-opting the environmental cause to act purely as a spoiler is going to have consequences for hundreds of years in the US. Could you imagine if Ohio had had good faith green party elected officials raising a ruckus after the train de-railed? or the difference in Flint if there had been anyone there to say, hey wait a minute, that’s not how water works!

        Instead we’re building more highway lanes, farming the deserts, and looking the other way as corporations make people homeless. (Humans are horrible at living with the land, it’s not just homeless people. Check out any tourist camping area by the end of September.) That’s what really pisses me off.

        • Rhaedas@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          2 months ago

          The Cheetos bag in the Carlsbad Caverns story says so much about our species in one breath.

        • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          2 months ago

          As an Ohioan want to know what party doesn’t bother running in Columbus? The greens. It’s proof to me that they don’t actually care about trying to govern.

      • acosmichippo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        47
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        2 months ago

        the only news I can find for Jill Stein from 2021-2023 is

        1. She was running Cornel West’s presidential campaign at some point, not sure what happened with that [link]

        2. she got in trouble with the FEC for campaign finance issues [link]

      • cm0002@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        46
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        2 months ago

        Just because you don’t hear her name doesn’t mean she isn’t putting in the work

        This is about a politician supposedly running for a presidential office, that’s exactly what it means. If people aren’t hearing your name this close to an election you aren’t really trying.

        • MisterScruffy@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          36
          ·
          2 months ago

          I was responding to a comment that said they never hear her name outside of the presidential election cycle

      • curbstickle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        47
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        2 months ago

        It just implies it.

        The records of what she does, and the performative activism, which takes place entirely and exclusively during presidential election years - that’s what shows she isn’t putting in the work.

        After repeatedly losing in Mass, the only time she runs for anything is for presidential elections. This also demonstrates she isn’t putting in the work, or she would have more involvement in more local elections.

    • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      90
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      The way she, her party, and her campaign conduct themselves make it hard to avoid the conclusion that she’s running purely as a Democratic spoiler candidate (that is, with the intent of siphoning support away from the Democratic candidate).

      Edit: to be clear, I am a staunch supporter of environmentalist causes in general. I just don’t believe the Green Party actually is an environmentalist cause at the end of the day. I judge these things by actions, not by policy documents.

      • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        2 months ago

        Yeah environmental causes have a lot that can and must be done at the local level. I’m a staunch environmentalist, it’s my primary issue, and it’s why I’m angry at my local government. I wish we had a good third party because the election is decided in the democratic primaries. Get someone running on improving public transit, forcing all apartments to offer recycling (mostly concerned about glass and metal), improving bicycle infrastructure… But funnily enough the greens don’t seem to give two shits about that easy picking.

  • Strike1@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    2 months ago

    What I want to know how they can they perform when you don’t let them at debates? As I said before, they didn’t allow people within their own party to debate such as Mike Gravel, Dennis Kucinich for not having enough money, I don’t see what the purpose of the party is.

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      The debates define rules ensuring only serious candidates join the debate - third parties need enough votes to be in the race. I’m aware that I’m letting them off the hook, but I don’t know a better solution. While it would be better to include third party candidates, we also don’t want many non-serious ones

    • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      If they had representatives in the house they could push their right to speak at debates. Senators even more so. Give them 5 senators and 21 representatives, that’s 5% of the legislature rounding generously, and then when they can’t speak at debates it’s something the two major parties should be ashamed of. As it stands now, people care about the parties that can win elections and I’m sorry but the Green Party doesn’t win elections, neither does the libertarian party, the constitution party, or the communist party. The greens and libertarians have both had moments of glory in which case they won the election for the major party they most disagreed with. And that’s coming from a fan of Nader, I think he did amazing work with the department of transportation.

      • Strike1@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        There’s not much to go on since there’s been 2 Democratic Party debates since 2008. Gravel was a 2020 Presidential candidate.

  • MisterFrog@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    Our of curiosity, and because I couldn’t immediately find anything. Is MoveOn actively trying to change the voting system itself?

    • For those who don’t get the joke: the election is this year and it is held every four years, so Stein isn’t going to run for election next year because she wouldn’t run for an election that a) is already over or b) isn’t being held yet and is several years in the future.

    • wick@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      You know what they say: fourth time’s the charm

      • blazera@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Its hilarious the upvotes im getting missing the point. There is no presidential election next year.

  • OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    28
    ·
    2 months ago

    This thread is sitting on the front page of Lemmy for a while now so I’ll share my thoughts.

    I will only ever vote for a 3rd party. I made that promise to myself after 2016, so I don’t really care if people think that means it’s effectively a vote for Trump. Because I wasn’t going to vote for the Democrats anyways.

    A slow slip into facism doesn’t appeal to me.

  • TooManyFoods@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    I’m commenting this a few times, but Alaska has implemented ranked choice, has a number of environmentalists and does outsized damage to the environment. If they were serious they’d run in state elections there, and four congress there. They are not.

  • sumguyonline@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    51
    ·
    2 months ago

    Unfortunately the Democrat, and Republican parties, are both Traitors to the Republic. As much as I’ve liked her positions on issues I care about. AOC needs to sit down and shut up. She’s in a party of Traitors.

  • TheHiddenCatboy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    89
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    2 months ago

    If Left-Wing Third Parties are serious, they will start by running their candidates as spoilers in the Democratic Primary and appealing to voters to listen and add their platforms to the list of priorities to push the Dems on. They’d simultaneously work hard to get Ranked Choice passed nation-wide as that system is the most compatible with our country’s political system. Once they get that passed, they would join efforts to reform the Electoral College so it doesn’t require 270 votes, an then implement a more effective voting system for President that ensures that left-wing voters don’t get a Right-Wing president elected voting for Third Party options. They would also push hard to win at the City, County, and State levels, as well as in the Congress, so the Jill Steins of the world have friendly legislators to rely on.

    Ocasio-Cortez is right to call this out.

      • TheHiddenCatboy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        Honestly, yes. You can’t vote third party, and you can’t not vote, if you don’t want Trump in office. If you vote Third Party or stay home, you’re good with Trump being in office, which means you’re good with leaving minorities, non-Christians, transgendered people, and gay people up Project 2025 Shit Creek without a paddle. Given my wife is a Black bisexual Goth pagan, that means you want my wife to be hurt, and that pisses me the fuck off. And judging from the 15 other downvotes you have, I’m not the only one who feels that way.

  • ATDA@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    56
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    2 months ago

    How long has stein been campaigning and didn’t know basic information about Congress.

    She’s either not serious, an imbecile, or porque no los dos?

    That means why not both, Jill.

  • Sam_Bass@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    One thing i have come to realize about most politically active people is that facts dont matter enough to affect a vote.

    • Cataphract@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Is this just 3rd party ad-lib hate? General voters hate? or Jill stein enthusiasts hate? Just seems like the most generic bot comment for upvotes without actually saying anything.

        • Cataphract@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Ahh, reddit exposure is showing lol, guess that’s why it sounded so familiar. Anyone I know outside of internet caves seems to be reasonable and receptive, idk if I consider being active on a forum as “politically active”. Idk, maybe a different term like political gooning when you’re just online spreading the same message everyone else heard 100 times.

      • mightyfoolish@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        It’s not third party hate, it’s more like love for their first party. They see competition as a potential loss for their favorite party.

  • bloodfart@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    29
    ·
    2 months ago

    I’m planning on voting for the party for socialism and liberation in November and you can too!

    They’re running Claudia de la Cruz on a platform of Palestinian statehood and an end to arms shipments to Israel.

  • son_named_bort@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 months ago

    Yeah, I feel like a serious candidate for president would know how many Representatives are in the House.

    • Cephalotrocity@biglemmowski.win
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      160
      arrow-down
      21
      ·
      2 months ago

      Supporting evidence for the 3 downvotes ATM:

      Putin’s Shill Stein wants Nato disbanded, the US to give up their SC veto, and revoke weapons to help Ukraine defend itself while simultaneously forcing ‘peace’ (subjugation) negotiations with russia.

      2015 Stein breaking bread with Putin, his senior staff, and Mike Flynn (later Trump’s national security advisor

      More context:

      For those that don’t understand how the Electoral College + FPTP voting works, voting for her means helping donald become president due to the spoiler effect.

      • anticolonialist@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        82
        ·
        2 months ago

        A spoiler is something that only exists in the mind of Liberals, even if there were no 3rd party candidates running, we would not vote for your right wing pieces of shit. There’s a better chance you would vote for a Republican than any of us would vote for either right wing party.

        • Olgratin_Magmatoe@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          27
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          A spoiler is something that only exists in the mind of Liberals

          Dude, I already showed it to you.

          Election report for election "Plurality 2 Candidates"
          Total people: 1047
          11% of people supported the winner.
          
          Kruger - 112 votes - WINNER
          Sahl - 111 votes
          

          Election report for election "Plurality 3 Candidates"
          Total people: 1047
          10% of people supported the winner.
          
          Sahl - 109 votes - WINNER
          Kruger - 93 votes
          Maikol - 91 votes
          

          The overlap of two circles means there will be an area shared in between. That’s the math, you can’t get around that.

            • Olgratin_Magmatoe@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              19
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              2 months ago

              Yet you didn’t provide explanation for why it’s bullshit. Because you know it isn’t. It’s right in front of you.

              • anticolonialist@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                19
                ·
                2 months ago

                We are not Democrats, so we will not vote for Democrats. They could show all the fucking graphs in the world, And wouldn’t change the fact that we are not Democrats, so we do not vote for Democrats.

                • Olgratin_Magmatoe@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  17
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  2 months ago

                  You’re basically saying that there is zero overlap in the venn diagram of third party voters and blue voters, yet you make efforts to convince blue voters to go third party. You know damn well that there is overlap between third party voters and blue voters, otherwise you’d never talk to them.

                  Even if you personally would never vote blue, third party voters are not a monolith, there are third party voters that are closer to the DNC than you are.

            • AbidanYre@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              27
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              2 months ago

              “It’s bullshit because it proves I’m full of shit and I don’t actually have an argument against it.”

              • Skeezix@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                15
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                2 months ago

                This is the modus operandi of conservatives, libertarians, and anyone trying to put forward a disingenuous argument

                • anticolonialist@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  arrow-down
                  22
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  That’s cute, That your binary thinking assumes a ballot critique of one thing is automatically support of the other.

                • ArxCyberwolf@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  13
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  And yet none of you have been able to explain how or why it doesn’t prove anything. Only making assertions that it doesn’t.

            • Skeezix@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              20
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              2 months ago

              You’re disagreeing with math. Congratulations, you’ve unlocked the dunce award.

            • ArxCyberwolf@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              23
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              Really now? Please explain exactly how it’s “bullshit.” Just claiming it’s bullshit is not sufficient.

        • MegaUltraChicken@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          53
          arrow-down
          11
          ·
          2 months ago

          A spoiler is something that only exists in the mind of Liberals

          Math. You’re disagreeing with math. Or are completely unaware of how FPTP voting works (I know this isn’t the case).

          • anticolonialist@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            62
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            Math has nothing to do with the fact that we are not Democrats, so we would not vote for a Democrat. That’s like trying to say math is the reason you won’t vote Republican

            • MegaUltraChicken@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              40
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              2 months ago

              I’m not making any distinction between non votes and 3rd party votes. From a purely electoral perspective a Stein voter is the same as someone who doesn’t show up. This is why people are rightfully frustrated with them. It’s a pretty simple concept and the only response is usually “not uh!”.

              • anticolonialist@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                8
                arrow-down
                44
                ·
                2 months ago

                People are upset with 3rd party voters because they won’t fall in line and do what the DNC wants them to do. The DNC feels entitled to every vote not cast for a Republican. If they want our vote they need to earn it, and they never have.

                • Olhonestjim@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  30
                  arrow-down
                  7
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  Third parties are not bothering to earn your votes either. They put in zero work except for presidential elections.

                • MegaUltraChicken@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  36
                  arrow-down
                  7
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  I don’t care about the reasoning you make for your actions. We’re talking about the results of those actions.

                  You will affect the race in one of two ways regardless of what you do. You will either benefit Party A or Party B, those parties being the two largest parties, aka Democrats and Republicans. Non votes and 3rd party votes benefit the smaller party, which is the GOP. This is an absolute fact within a FPTP system, even if you can’t accept it because of the obvious implications.

                  If you feel the GOP has done more to earn your support, that’s your call. I just think that’s some next level dumbassery.

            • blackbelt352@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              13
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              2 months ago

              Math literally has everything to do with it. There are entire branches of mathematics dedicated to figuring out ideal voting systems.

            • LengAwaits@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              23
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              2 months ago

              You don’t have to have be a democrat to vote against fascists.

              I’m not a democrat, but I plan to use my vote strategically, since fascists have a propensity toward murdering their ideological opponents. You can call the DNC fascist all you want, many do, but I’m less inclined to believe that they’ll try to murder leftists vs the US right wing.

              Your ideological purity will not save you from a fascist’s bullet.

              • anticolonialist@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                8
                arrow-down
                24
                ·
                2 months ago

                You’re talking as if the Democrat Ratchet effect is not able to fascism. In case there’s any question, yes, it does

                • LengAwaits@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  12
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  Be that as it may, I’ll still use my vote strategically to ensure that the slide toward fascism is as slow as possible, personally. I am not an accelerationist. I feel that I can more effectively perform direct actions, agitate, and educate others in service of leftist ideology during that time. Ideals without sound strategy are little more than masturbatory.

          • Skeezix@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            2 months ago

            That is not hypothetical. While you can literally vote for anyone, you can effectively only vote for one or the other. This is not due to a lack of idealists, it’s by design of the system

      • index@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        56
        ·
        2 months ago

        They are rigged and corrupted for sure just like every popular politician but let’s not forget that NATO is a terroristic organization and that producing or sending cluster munition to an authoritarian government is not a good thing.

        We should take everyone into account for chilling with russian leaders and mafiosi not just jill stein

        • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          33
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          2 months ago

          Notice the group you call a terrorist organization grows when the nation they say they are organized to protect against invades other countries. If Russia wants NATO to go away all they have to do is stop invading counties and it will slowly dissolve and disappear. They invaded Georgia in 2008 and the world didn’t do enough, they invaded Crimea (Ukraine) in 2014 and the world didn’t do enough. 2022 they set out to invade Ukraine again, and finally the world started to do more. 3 strikes. Now NATO grows because counties in the region don’t feel safe from Russia. If they stop being a threat, counties in the region will slowly leave NATO.

      • zephorah@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        52
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        2 months ago

        Downvotes are probably the people still livid that Tulsi failed, and who want a third party to break into this hopelessly entrenched duopoly of an election system.

        Fair enough, but thinking you can fix it by yourself isn’t going to fix it, just help Trump win.

        • LillyPip@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          2 months ago

          Or people smacking their foreheads that anyone took her seriously after she was revealed to be a Russian plant way back in 2017.

          I didn’t downvote, but I can’t upvote either, because seriously?

        • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          25
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          2 months ago

          Yeah you’re right. Their brainless response normally is to just shift focus away from trump as if he is irrelevant to the conversation

        • index@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          49
          ·
          2 months ago

          I downvoted because disbanding nato is a good thing and arming an authoritarian government is bad.

      • PrettyFlyForAFatGuy@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Just missing Lavrov and you’d have all four horsemen in the same picture

        Nvm i mistook Ivanov for Medvedev, only two horsemen at this table with Jill Stein