Was thinking of this after a conversation I had on a thread about dreams. Someone joked “I was dreaming of the events of The Matrix, then I was woken up by someone worried my dream was infringing the Wachowski’s copyrights”, and it turned into a whole train of thought in my mind, like violating IP law because you stole fire from Zeus which was his intellectual property.

  • NeoNachtwaechter@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Parents have to pay a fee for the firstname they give their kids. Popular firstnames cost more, gross ones cost less.

    The kids themselves have to pay again for it monthly, their whole live long.

  • ZealotOfLuna@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    22 hours ago

    Lineages could claim copyright of children and their works as derivative. Entire families could claim copyright of their descendants and all works related. Each new generation resets the timer on expiration if the copyright expirations still apply.

  • IIII@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    22 hours ago

    Royalties every time you use a line from a Disney musical in spoken conversation

  • SlothMama@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Memes taken down and replies deleted in conversations because they contain copyrighted text and images. Lyrics censored in online conversation. All video containing any image with a logo protected by trademark, or characters protected by international copyright, even when on T shirts and signs being taken down.

  • thirteene@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    18 hours ago

    I actually think this backfires on most of you. Copyright law makes everything public domain after a period of time, Johnny Fires kids will be able to trade for all the first professionals in the world. But Life +70 years after currency is invented, anyone can print cash and trade falls apart and services and materials are the only thing if value. Copyright laws broken :shrug:

      • androogee (they/she)@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        13 hours ago

        Damn, if only someone had asked a hypothetical question wherein copyright law controls everything.

        Oh well, that’ll never happen.

        Good thing you were here to rectify such a foolish mistake.

  • j4k3@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    23 hours ago

    Discovery of oxygen.

    Stop breathing my proprietary gas!

    My time zones! Not yours!

    My special ï makes all i’s mine or I’ll sue you into bankrupt poverty.

    I own slurred accent (n + 1) and anyone speaking in said accent must cease and desist

    • hmonkey@lemy.lol
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      22 hours ago

      I think Anish Kapoor owns Vantablack if that counts. Technically he probably just owns the right to the paint

      • SynonymousStoat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        22 hours ago

        As much as I dislike Kapoor, technically Vantablack isn’t a pigment or regular paint by any means. From my understanding it is actually carbon nano tubes with who knows what else mixed in it and I believe it’s actually very dangerous to be around without proper PPE. So in that sense, it makes sense to me that he “owns” it.

        Still don’t like the guy though.

          • SynonymousStoat@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 hours ago

            I could, but I don’t personally care that much about Vantablack.

            There is a group (person) that makes an actual super deep black paint called Black 4.0 and if memory serves correctly they actually started with a jab at Kapoor by originally making the Pinkest Pink paint and banned Kapoor from buying it. Looks like they have a lot of different paints these days and are definitely worth checking out.

      • mangaskahn@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        18 hours ago

        He doesn’t own it. He has an exclusive license to use it in art. Surrey NanoSystems Limited owns the patent on VantaBlack. Stuart Semple was so angry that Kapoor received that license that he had a blacker black material created and licensed it to anyone but Kapoor. When Kapoor obtained a sample anyway, Semple had a still blacker material created, to spite him.

        https://www.theguardian.com/artanddesign/shortcuts/2019/aug/05/black-30-anish-kapoor-and-the-art-worlds-pettiest-funniest-dispute

  • Eiri@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    18 hours ago

    When you’re born, Pantone checks your skin color and charges you. You need to get a license before you get tanned or they fine you.

  • intensely_human@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 hours ago

    My comment on this thread isn’t visible when J view the thread itself. It’s visible if I access it through my own comment history.

    Does anyone know why that might be? I’m using the Voyager client for ios.

    Can y’all see a comment I made, top level, in this thread, other than this one?

  • fraksken@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Paying money every time you sit on a chair. Part goes to the owner, part goes to taxes, part goes to the chair maker’s company, part goes to the chair desiger, a drip goes to the chair maker.

  • Infynis@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    19 hours ago

    It would be pretty funny if airplane manufacturers trademarked their con-trails, so each type of plain left a different trail behind