• kitnaht@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    17 hours ago

    I mean, the existence of lead doesn’t necessarily prove the age of the earth so much as that those elements have existed for that long.

    HOWEVER – you’re basically guaranteed to find lead in uranium deposits found around the earth, and the ratio of lead/uranium is how we calculated the 4.6 billion years.

    Uranium is formed in Neutron stars or Supernova, so at the very least - the uranium found on earth itself is 4.6 billion years old. Whether “Earth” was “Earth” back then, who knows. This could be pre-moon? Could be before the earth even cooled down to have a solid outer layer? So the estimate is bound to be off by a little…

    Just not by 4.5 billion years.

    I’m pretty sure just soap has been around for more than 4.5k years and that means civilization too. So even if you do some backflips in justification here, there’s no way you get 4k.

  • LilDumpy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    77
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Real question: Is the decay of uranium the only natural way to produce lead? If so TIL.

    • Rooskie91@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      17 hours ago

      When supernovas explode they’re responsible for most exotic elements larger than iron. So it’s either that or radioactive decay.

    • Nougat@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      40
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Iron is the heaviest element capable of being created inside stars, via fusion. Once iron is fused, the star begins to rapidly collapse.

      Elements heavier than iron (28) are the result of supernova explosions, which produce energies high enough to create these heavier atoms. It is further possible, as described in the image, for very heavy elements to decay into lighter more stable elements, those still being heavier than iron.

      Lead is 82.

        • Nougat@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          13 hours ago

          Interesting. Of note, this process would mainly be in a very specific kind of star, and still would depend on an iron “seed” leftover from a previous supernova. Technically, still requires a “regular” supernova.

    • Gork@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      17 hours ago

      No. Nucleosynthesis of lead within stars generated from supernovae make up the bulk of the existing lead on Earth. Uranium decay does provide some additional lead inventory but would be fairly small in comparison.

      But the presence of it in the first place within second generation stars proves that lead is billions of years old.

  • InverseParallax@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    59
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Yeah, this is broken because all lead did not have to come from polonium, that’s how half-lives work.

    It’s still 100% bullshit in every way, someone just needs to have chatgpt4 sort out the current mass fraction to explain why, I’m way too lazy to argue against insanity.

  • heavyboots@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Dude is gonna come back at him with the first mention of lead in the bible and say, no this is where God created lead, lol.

  • BallsandBayonets@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    62
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    15 hours ago

    When I was being raised as a young earth creationist, the earth was supposedly 12,000-20,000 years old. Then it was 10,000 years old. Then only 6,000. After I outgrew that nonsense, I joked that in a few decades YECs would say that their god created the earth in 1980, and anyone older than 40 are agents of the devil sent to test your faith.

  • MicrowavedTea@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    129
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Pretty sure the point of creationism is that everything was put on the earth when it was created, including fossils etc. You can’t argue this with logic. My favorite spin off of this is Last Thursdayism where the earth was created last Thursday (regardless of what day it’s now) which basically uses the same argument.

    • Thorry84@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      14 hours ago

      And the fun scientific counterpart of the Boltzmann brain. The idea that in an infinite universe (at least in a couple of the spatial dimensions if not also a time dimension) random fluctuations could combine to form your brain. Including all of your memories, thoughts, hopes and dreams. You think you have had an entire life, but in reality your brain was just formed moments ago. And it may possibly stop existing in a few more moments, this moment being the only one the brain has actually experienced.

      When taken to its natural conclusion, the entire Earth of even the solar system or galaxy might have just been created by random chance. The perfect storm of randomness. It may have been created longer ago or just nanoseconds before now. There is no way of telling.

      Thermodynamics has been used to counter and strengthen this idea. And with infinity on the table anything goes.

      • Ashelyn@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        13 hours ago

        I always found the idea of stable Boltzmann brains fascinating. The idea that on an infinite enough universe, there must exist self-sustaining minds that function on an entirely circumstantial set of rules and logic based on whatever the quantum soup spit up.

      • Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 hours ago

        You think you have had an entire life, but in reality your brain was just formed moments ago. And it may possibly stop existing in a few more moments, this moment being the only one the brain has actually experienced.

        A moment in which I sit on the toilet and read philosophy on my fondleslab and perhaps make this comment. Really a wild thought

      • Ashelyn@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        13 hours ago

        It’s also hard to argue while also claiming your god is moral, which is why creationists usually scapegoat the task of planting fossils to Satan.

    • Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      12 hours ago

      “It Is Useless To Attempt To Reason A Man Out Of A Thing He Was Never Reasoned Into.” - Jonathan Swift

    • Ddub@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      49
      ·
      16 hours ago

      That does explain why I can never get the hang of Thursdays

  • tacosanonymous@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    13 hours ago

    I had a dude come up to me at the reference desk and tell me that the earth can’t be billions (he said trillions, lol) of years old because erosion from the Mississippi River would make it wider and deeper than it is. I pulled up some info including the idea that the Mississippi was something that came about more recently because of plate shifting, etc and he just said, “Nah.”

  • humanspiral@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    12 hours ago

    But the half life of polonium 210 is just 138 days. other is a few days. radium 226 is 1602 years. Why couldn’t the earth have started with a lot of radium 226? Checkmate round earthers.

  • StrongHorseWeakNeigh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    16 hours ago

    There’s evidence of human civilization and agriculture going back at least 10,000 years. You have to be extremely willfully ignorant to think the earth is only 4,000 years old. Hell the pyramid of Giza is older than that.

    • Buelldozer@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      14 hours ago

      You have to be extremely willfully ignorant to think the earth is only 4,000 years old.

      The Bible itself makes it obvious that the 4,000 year old thing is a lie.

    • Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 hours ago

      The craziest thing is new archeological discoveries keep pushing modern humans further and further back into pre-history. Almost makes me wonder if we’ll come full circle and go “yeah humans did in fact coexist with dinosaurs, and here’s proof at least one rode one” /hj