• whithom@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      1 day ago

      He would if the justice department weren’t a bunch of wimps and if the judges weren’t bought and paid for.

  • seth@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    48
    ·
    1 day ago

    You’re not a “private citizen” when you’re supposed to be a public servant. Johnson’s name is appropriate, he’s a total dick.

  • TeoTwawki@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    69
    ·
    1 day ago

    “Public figures confused about what ‘pivate citizen’ means”

    there I fixed the headline

    • Lets_Eat_Grandma@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      1 day ago

      How this doesn’t just happen is beyond me. One would think one of the MANY staffers with access to this document would have leaked it by now.

    • TheFogan@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      12 hours ago

      No see… he was a public representative, which means he’s only accountable to the house ethics pannel and not local law enforcement.

      It feels like watching those old Bonnie and Clyde and other famous historical criminals in the US that would say rob a bank, cops would be chasing them… and Oops they crossed state lines, I guess they get away this time.

  • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    100
    ·
    1 day ago

    This definition of private citizen seems to extend to all human beings… so why do we even do ethics reports.

  • Zier@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Gaetz was a congressperson when it all took place. That report is government property, AKA it belongs to all Americans.

  • PugJesus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    183
    ·
    1 day ago

    Never believe that [fascists] are completely unaware of the absurdity of their replies. They know that their remarks are frivolous, open to challenge. But they are amusing themselves, for it is their adversary who is obliged to use words responsibly, since he believes in words. The [fascists] have the right to play. They even like to play with discourse for, by giving ridiculous reasons, they discredit the seriousness of their interlocutors. They delight in acting in bad faith, since they seek not to persuade by sound argument but to intimidate and disconcert. If you press them too closely, they will abruptly fall silent, loftily indicating by some phrase that the time for argument is past.

      • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        15 hours ago

        Good question. Best answer is building robust communities that can reject them and not allow them to gain footholds. “Fuck off loser” gives them no room to twist anything

      • TheTechnician27@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        41
        ·
        1 day ago

        In the future, I highly recommend sourcing to Wikiquote instead. It’s a sister project of Wikipedia which sources its quotes so they can be independently verified, whereas Goodreads just operates on an ad populum approach of upvotes. It also for this reason tends to be more robust to error, and many more prominent figures have specific sections both for popular quotes that are known to be misattributed and for ones that are dubious but not currently falsifiable.