Florida State Senator Ileana Garcia has introduced legislation to prohibit “weather modification” activities in the state.

  • hOrni@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    2 months ago

    So when people say, the democrats do nothing, do they mean in comparison to bills like this? I mean, technically You’re right, but… dear god.

    • jballs@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      Unfortunately tinfoil hats could be classified as an apparatus that reduces the intensity of sunlight, so those are gonna have to go as well.

  • Substance_P@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 months ago

    A grand chess move until the jurisdiction ceases to apply three nautical miles out from the coast line where international waters are under federal control… Oh,I see where this is going.

  • EndOfLine@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    2 months ago

    “the injection, release, or dispersion, by any means, of a chemical, a chemical compound, a substance, or an apparatus into the atmosphere within the borders of this state for the express purpose of affecting the temperature, the weather, or the intensity of sunlight is prohibited.”

    🤔 a substance or device released into atmosphere for the express purpose of affecting the temperature or sunlight intensity

    Are they trying to ban misters, solar shades, and umbrellas?

    • Deello@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      2 months ago

      If you have a private jet then you will probably just pay the fine and consider it a parking fee.

      • Kbobabob@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Reminds me of an actor/comedian that claimed to have ran a stop sign in front of a cop during a torrential downpour. When the cop is standing outside the car in the downpour and asked if the driver knew why he was pulled over the driver replied, “yeah, do you know why I ran the stop sign?”

  • empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    190
    ·
    2 months ago

    Let them pass it, take it to the state courts and then claim (correctly with mountains of scientific evidence) that any combustion of fossil fuels counts as “weather modification”

    • floofloof@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      88
      ·
      2 months ago

      It sounds like they’ve thought of that:

      The “Weather Modification Activities” bill sets out that “the injection, release, or dispersion, by any means, of a chemical, a chemical compound, a substance, or an apparatus into the atmosphere within the borders of this state for the express purpose of affecting the temperature, the weather, or the intensity of sunlight is prohibited.”

      So it allows releasing pollution that causes climate change since it is a side effect of other things (transport, power generation, etc.), but forbids intentionally trying to mitigate climate change by releasing anything into the air. Sounds about right for Florida politics.

      That said, there is a real uncertainty about the side effects of may experimental geoengineering techniques, so some regulation is probably in order. Preferable not from Republicans for ignorant or bad faith reasons though.

      • SendMePhotos@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        That’s kind of dumb, no? Because what if we need weather control to reduce the fucking temperature?!

      • jballs@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 months ago

        Does this make outdoor misters illegal? Not sure how Disney World lines would be bearable in the summer without those misters cooling things down. But maybe they don’t consider water a chemical?

        • Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 months ago

          Nah, cause the intent is to make more money. Just happens to be by making customers more comfortable, which also just happens to be by adding moisture to the air. See, it’s a law designed to do nothing. Florida tax dollars hard at work.

      • Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 months ago

        That said, there is a real uncertainty about the side effects of may experimental geoengineering techniques, so some regulation is probably in order. Preferable not from Republicans for ignorant or bad faith reasons though.

        Well, there’s relative certainty that the absence of major geoengineering will result in climate destabilization not compatible with human life, so, we’re like half a century overdue for worrying about how to tackle this in a controlled fashion.

        We’re in the press-buttons-in-a-pure-state-of-panic-and-fucking-hope-one-of-them-fixes-something phase of climate science.

        Worse case scenario, we majorly fuck up and our corpses crisp up slightly faster than the track we’re on now. Fuck it. Might as well try.

      • IninewCrow@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Cruise ships will have to shut off their engines 200miles from shore and coast in with their engines turned off … don’t know how they will leave port tho? … rowing like a Roman Trireme maybe?

        • Azzu@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Human breathing lets out CO2, a known greenhouse chemical.

          So to be safe, just stop the breathing of everyone.

        • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          2 months ago

          … rowing like a Roman Trireme maybe?

          How else are cruise ship guests going to work off the all-you-can-eat ice cream bar available 24/7 on the lido deck?

        • floofloof@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 months ago

          No, because the bill only forbids emissions made for the express purpose of changing the weather. Cruise ship emissions, they’ll argue, are done for the purpose of making the ship go.

  • Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    So they are finally going to combat climate change? By making driving and heating mostly, and breathing in general illegal?

    • floofloof@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      No, because as the article says it’s only emissions done for the express purpose of changing the weather that the bill forbids. That’s how they make it legal to break things but illegal to even try to fix them.