• DrunkEngineer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    66
    ·
    2 days ago

    I’m guessing most Federal workers aren’t stupid enough to believe Trump would actually pay the buyout amount. Especially after Presidential “advisor” Elon failed to pay Twitter severance.

  • StayDoomed@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    160
    ·
    2 days ago

    They are going to be stuck rehiring people that resign as consultants because they won’t have the people to run the legally required programs in place.

    It will end up costing more money for the government.

    I have little hope that the people that actually vote will even remember how fucked all this is two years from now.

      • dohpaz42@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        I’m pretty sure the idea is to get rid of dissenters in an easy and legal way, while keeping those like-minded individuals who will toe the line.

        I think the idea is to scare dissenters into quitting, because otherwise their position may get downsized otherwise and they lose out on any benefits and pension.

      • JollyBrancher @lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 day ago

        Most federal civilian employees are now on a 401(k) equivalent. Air Traffic likes to mention how they are one of the ones left with a pension, but clearly, nothing is guaranteed.

      • wise_pancake@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        Just think of how you could retire if you put all of that into Trump and Malania coins. Heck, maybe even a Baron coin!

    • sprack@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      151
      ·
      2 days ago

      They’ll require that consultants are hired through a company owned by a Trump subsidiary and pocket a percentage of the pay.

    • Donkter@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 day ago

      “legally required programs”? What law? Show me where that matters. Who will enforce such laws when all of the people running these programs are gone?

      I know why Trump appeals to so many people. He’s the politician/business who acknowledged that rules are made up by fallible humans and can be re-written. The problem is, when we have similar politicians on the left who try to break the system for the working class the liberals agree that it’s terrible in the same way that they agree that trump is terrible, but the oligarchs don’t see an avenue for profit and so they fight against them as well.

      • StayDoomed@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        It’s as simple as you need people to actually enforce laws and carry out programs laid out by Congress.

        I don’t think you understand how laws work. The laws I work to to support were promulgated in the 1970s after rivers were lighting on fire.

        They are complicated to enforce because the companies that cause environmental harm can afford high powered attorneys and lobbyists to prevent them from being enforced.

        There is no one working on behalf of the american people to try to meet the intent of many of these laws we rely on - such as those to keep our environment, air we breathe, water we drink, relatively safe. Other than those in the government that have the authority to do so.

        I don’t know how all of the other various agencies work specifically, but that’s generally what people are doing in the government

        You don’t seem to understand this so you don’t value it. I think once it gets more fucked up, you will. This isn’t a liberal or conservative thing. The laws I work with were put on the books by Nixon. This is a rich stealing from you issue. Not left/right.

        But maybe you are just troll, probably.

    • The_v@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      If they toss in health insurance for a they will get some people resigning. Those that were planning on retiring in less than 8 months.

      Resign now and get 8 months of pay or retire in 4 months and get 4 months of pay… Hmmmmm…

      • WarlockLawyer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        The official email reads more as you keep doing your job as you have been through the end of the fiscal year and you can resign. We won’t fire you before that. If you don’t voluntarily resign we might fire you before that. Isn’t a guaranteed 8 months of work better than being fired in three months.

    • aaron@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Lol, “rehiring”. What if I told you that he doesn’t intend to replace them?

  • quafeinum@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 day ago

    Is this president wankpanzer firing people that he will regret to have fired and then rehire them again, again?!

  • nutcase2690@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    1 day ago

    Important information sharing from https://lemmy.blahaj.zone/comment/12627783 !

    Someone on reddit pointed out there’s an OPM rule that makes max payout at something like $25k. Let me go dig it up real quick.

    Because that means a lot of people wouldn’t get paid the full amount and Trump is absolutely the kind of person who would use shit like that as an excuse to not keep paying out. I wouldn’t trust this deal because based on stuff like this it doesn’t pass the sniff test.

    Apologies for (slight retch) a reddit link:

    https://old.reddit.com/r/news/comments/1ice9ml/trump_administration_offering_buyouts_to_nearly/m9pya4z/

    zedextol:

    Per OPM, the federal government can’t legally pay more than $25k, pre-tax. This is another scam. Trump is the literal master of grift. You think he’s gonna make good on this debt after years of not paying his bills?

    Edit: Source below

    https://www.opm.gov/policy-data-oversight/workforce-restructuring/voluntary-separation-incentive-payments/

  • MolecularCactus1324@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    2 days ago

    This kind of stupid blanket approach tells you that we have idiots running this country who have no idea what these workers are actually doing, nor what the impact will be of them resigning on the well being and national security of the country.

  • sudo42@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    20 hours ago

    So what happens when every employee in the IRS takes the offer, quits immediately and goes home?

      • sudo42@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        14 hours ago

        True, but my point was directed more towards “where will the Gub be getting its money from?”

        Rich people like raiding government coffers because there’s lots of free money there.

    • blakenong@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      49
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      And immediately be replaced by Nazis? I’m not sure that’s a good solution to any problem.

      • BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        37
        ·
        2 days ago

        Sometimes when things are going to go bad no matter what happens, it’s better to just speed it up rather than draw it out.

          • P00ptart@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            Not entirely. If you drag it out, they get to have everything they want while crushing all people below them in a slow steamroller death. If you completely crash the system, everyone is on more or less equal footing for the first time in this country’s history.

            • Sc00ter@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              2 days ago

              Im all for malicious compliance, when it makes sense.

              Our company tried to cut our house keeping services, and told us we needed to empty trash cans ourself. You bet your sweet ass i made sure everyone charged their engineering charges to “house keeping” for those few minutes. We got house keeping back in about 2 months

            • deegeese@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              17
              ·
              edit-2
              2 days ago

              It’s not malicious compliance when you’re helping the bad guys achieve their goal of destroying the federal government.

              That’s being a willing accomplice.

              • Windex007@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                2 days ago

                Considering how many of the orders are being written by AI, there is probably a lot of maneuvering room to comply with the written letter while completely ignoring the spirit.

                The definition of sex, for example. Every single passport reads “F” from now on. Very malicious. Very compliant. Very much ignoring the spirit.

                • deegeese@sopuli.xyz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  There’s a ton of possibilities for malicious compliance so long as you still work for the federal government. But not if you quit!

              • Nougat@fedia.io
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                2 days ago

                Leaving en masse would destroy the federal government quickly. Staying and continuing to work for this administration will destroy the federal government slowly less quickly.

                It’s just a matter of whether you want to be complicit in opposition to fascism or complicit in cooperation with fascism.

                • blakenong@lemmings.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  10
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  Leaving the system means no one is in the system to report on what is going on in the system. Accelerationism won’t end how those people think it will. It’s just 100 years of Nazis until the world collapses in on itself and humanity is endangered or extinct.

              • WatDabney@fedia.io
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                2 days ago

                Yes.

                And some people recognize that it’s not a matter of if the world burns, but merely of when, and believe that sooner is less bad than later.

      • WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        2 days ago

        Anyone with a conscience is going to be purged anyway. Either that, or they’ll be asked to do unforgiveable things. Better to just take the cash and leave with your soul intact.

        • blakenong@lemmings.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          2 days ago

          It’s not going to be much cash. Certainly not enough to escape. And, souls don’t remain intact when you sell out to the devil.

            • aramis87@fedia.io
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              12
              ·
              2 days ago

              For people who didn’t have their time in, eight months’ pay isn’t worth giving up a government pension.

            • blakenong@lemmings.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              2 days ago

              It will take them at least 6 to find a new job in this market. That is if they find one at all once that H-1B nonsense kicks in and everyone is replaced.

              The news complains about a labor shortage, meanwhile employers lower wages as prices and rent skyrocket. The shortage is people taking jobs that make less than rent.

              With no one fighting, it’s just going to happen

                • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  “Internet commenter decides to pull an ad hominem because they dislike what you’re saying but want to performatively demonstrate their lack of respect by talking past the content of what you are saying”

            • WarlockLawyer@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              No, it says you’ll keep getting paid for 8 months at your current rate. Not that you will get the money right now. You still have to work but hey we promise not to fire you for 8 months and let you still telework for those months. If you got the whole money up front they wouldn’t have the clause about resigning with an earlier end date

    • azertyfun@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Says who? Under the US legal system, anything is legal if the SCOTUS agrees with it. If Trump declared himself Führer tomorrow they’d validate that as constitutional. At this point suing the US government for its blatantly unconstitutional acts is merely a delaying tactic.

      Americans must stop twiddling their thumbs while expecting Trump’s DoJ/SCOTUS/congress to work for the American people and start resisting because the key institutions have already fallen to fascism.

      • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        I mean it’s a somewhat rhetorical question. I think the extant legal doctrine the US exists under is effectively “whatever power decides” is legal.

        • azertyfun@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          “whatever power decides” is legal

          Not true. When Biden decided to cancel student debt, the court system said “no”. The SCOTUS isn’t subservient to “power” in general, it’s subservient to powerful fascists. Big difference. Trump has spent a decade following the Nazi playbook and acquiring complete personal control over all branches of government and people don’t seem to have fully realized that yet. That’s why things are way worse this time around. When he started his first term the SCOTUS was conservative and corrupt but not yet fascist. This time it’s fully loyalist. In case you forgot, he also had already placed a bunch of loyalists in key judicial roles that Biden didn’t fire.

          He’s made sure the law won’t stop him, and now he’s purging his enemies to make sure the institutions won’t resist his unlawful orders. It’s not a “both sides” issue, it’s not even just a “the rich are winning” issue. They might get the green light to deport every union leader, but they’ll be ruling over a kingdom of ashes and blood by the time this is over. Assuming the billionaires aren’t caught up in the purge; plenty of that in autocratic regimes, oligarchs infighting is a great way to ensure loyalty because that makes them incapable of organizing to stage a coup.

  • Spazz@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Break it, then claim it’s not working and only you can fix it, straight out of the fascist playbook

  • Jyek@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    14 hours ago

    It’s not actually a buyout. It’s a promise to pay them exactly how much they would make to work for 6 more months and then quit. But they can’t quit before then. Also they need to let them know by next week. Also also, there will be no additional severance pay.

  • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    2 days ago

    This is going to save so much money guys. Nevermind that they’ll likely end up rehiring most of these folks at higher rates when they realize they don’t know the code for the fax machine.

  • Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    54
    ·
    1 day ago

    It’s a good thing this guy always pays his debts otherwise some might think this is a dirt trick.