This is the very essence of the difference that should exist between a President and a King. From Federalist 69:

The President of the United States would be liable to be impeached, tried, and, upon conviction of treason, bribery, or other high crimes or misdemeanors, removed from office; and would afterwards be liable to prosecution and punishment in the ordinary course of law. The person of the king of Great Britain is sacred and inviolable; there is no constitutional tribunal to which he is amenable; no punishment to which he can be subjected without involving the crisis of a national revolution. In this delicate and important circumstance of personal responsibility, the President of Confederated America would stand upon no better ground than a governor of New York, and upon worse ground than the governors of Maryland and Delaware.

The failure of the Republican party to support this kind of check on Presidential power is why we’re having this crisis now.

  • ERROR: Earth.exe has crashed@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    I mean, the constitution never said the supreme court has the power of judivial review, the supreme court at the time just grabbed the power, and congress at the time just went along with it. The supreme court only held on to the power because of “norms and traditions”. Today’s congress could simply just pass a resolution declaring the supreme court has no such power, and all that 200+ years of “norms and traditions” is gone. And all the law enforcement, national guard, and military people would just be like “seems legit” and go along with everything trump decrees.

  • Jhex@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    52
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Once again, to no-one’s surprise. Trump loudly claimed he would do this long ago

    Choose a felon as President, expect him to commit crimes… enjoy

  • Shawdow194@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    3 days ago

    The Trump administration is not refusing to share power with an opposing party. It is refusing to follow the constitutional limits of a government that its own party controls completely.

  • Snapz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    161
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    This is the step where the cart goes over the top of the hill, you’re not coming back if this starts.

    Hard to hear, but if goes forward, this does signal that it’s breaking windows time. We all have a Luigi line, start really considering where yours is…

    Especially if you’re young, and they are doing this before you have been able to establish your own career or a family of your own, the rest of the world needs your strength and energy in these moments. Make no mistake, they are threatening you directly, they want to sell your future for a small profit added to the pile they are hoarding. Decide how hard you want to fight against that

    • untorquer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      92
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      Especially if you’re older and know that everything you’ve worked for is at risk. Especially if you’re middle aged and your hope of a comfortable old age is being destroyed. Especially if you have family, and know your children’s future depends on it.

      I know you mean well but fuck ageism, the youth always fight. They don’t need a pep talk, older people do.

      • Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        50
        ·
        3 days ago

        And then there are the rest of us. Not quite young anymore, but we were robbed of the chance to even have anything to anchor us down. We’ve been squeezed out of the housing market nearly our entire adult lives. We never could justify having a child, perhaps because of money, perhaps because our consciences wouldn’t let us, perhaps because of both. We job-hop every few years already, as it’s the only way we’ve ever received a sizable pay raise.

        There is no house, no child, and no job for us to worry about losing. I don’t know about y’all, but I’ve been doing little more than fighting to get by for far too long.

        I’m ready to fight for something else.

      • HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 days ago

        Heh. I’m middle aged and the only hope of comfort I’ve ever had for my elder years is chemical. I’m what you call an optimist.

  • rickdg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    3 days ago

    We have years of people saying he can’t do X or he can’t do Y and not enough time spent on what happens when he doesn’t comply.

  • mRbLUE@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    2 days ago

    Groundwork for a coup by the sounds of it. When the next election is supposed to happen I wonder if he’ll declare martial law due to some invented issue.

  • Dotcom@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    So like, when will other countries start letting us evacuate to them?

    • fluxion@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      3 days ago

      We haven’t done a whole lot lately to endear ourselves to allies and partner nations unfortunately

      • Mossy Feathers (She/They)@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        Sadly a lot of the people who will get fucked the hardest, like myself, are also the kinda people who agree with the frustrations of allied and partnered nations, yet will get judged based on the behavior of magats instead of the fact that we don’t want any of the shit the US is doing but can’t change anything.

    • phx@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 days ago

      And where the fuck do you plan to go? As a Canadian, I’m looking at where to send my family to be safe from the YOUR country.

      • DicJacobus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 days ago

        your police have been militarizing themselves for 20 years to make sure you dont save yourselves, either.

    • ℍ𝕂-𝟞𝟝@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      Hi, just about any EU country here, please apply for asylum at the nearest convenient embassy in the US, and we will get to you once we processed all these people from Syria, and Africa at large. This may take several decades as the Nazis your government is funding are lobbying to defund the whole thing.

      If you want to try to expedite this process you might want to hop over to Albania and try to make your case at the wonderful township of Röszke where you can be a backdrop to the next election campaign in Hungary.

      Helpful phrases include:

      • Fehér vagyok, nem migráns! - I’m white, not a migrant!
      • Van pénzem! - I have money!

      Less helpful phrases that will only elicit laughter are:

      • Vannak jogaim! - I have rights!
      • Emberi lény vagyok! - I am a human being!

      Don’t worry, our best people who we could get to supplement the border guard as “border hunters” for 130 EUR a month full time are there to help you. They are highly qualified, as attending school for at least 8 years is mandatory (any actual grade attainment is not guaranteed and frankly unlikely).

      You thought the ICE was bad.

  • jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    207
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    3 days ago

    “Oh, shit, so you mean Biden could have just cancelled all that student debt anyway?”

    “Well of course not, don’t be stupid!”

    • silence7@slrpnk.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      114
      ·
      3 days ago

      That’s the problem with being on the side of the rule of law: you’re constrainted by it, but the side of lawlessness is not.

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        31
        arrow-down
        64
        ·
        3 days ago

        being on the side of the rule of law

        Except when you override prohibitions on arming a county in defiance of the ICC because it’s Israel.

        • Billiam@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          29
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          in defiance of the ICC because it’s Israel.

          Without commenting on the US’s attitude towards Israel, the US is not party to the ICC so no act is defiance because the ICC doesn’t have jurisdiction.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          If I challenged you to write an email to a prominent politician, celebrity or business leader asking them to use their access to the media to advocate for Palestine every time you talked about Joe Biden, would you do it?

        • dohpaz42@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          23
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          3 days ago

          Congrats! You are the toad in the (now) boiling water. Pat yourself on the back for a job well done.

          • TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            3 days ago

            Even if they are not American, they are fucked as well.

            They helped hand over the strongest military in the history of the world to fascists. Fascists do not stop at their borders. They are like locusts, hell bent on murder and conquering. I’m glad I got passports so I can get my wife and kids out when shit hits the fan.

            • dohpaz42@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              3 days ago

              I’m glad I got passports so I can get my wife and kids out when shit hits the fan.

              So, um, I have some good news and some bad news…

        • AbidanYre@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          82
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          3 days ago

          You know he’s not president anymore, right? And that party lost the election?

          Now we’ve got a guy who’s excited for ethnic cleansing so he can open a casino in Gaza.

          Congratulations.

          • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            2 days ago

            Now we’ve got a guy who’s excited for ethnic cleansing

            Damn. You’re right. The real virtue with Joe Biden was his lack of enthusiasm.

            • skulblaka@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              2 days ago

              Unironically, yes. We were forced to choose between:

              A) a historic ally of ours is doing something bad… We will speak out against them. We will not yet cut off supplies because we need the world to see that an American alliance can be relied upon. But we will speak out against these actions.

              B) KILL EM! PUT BULLETS IN THE BABIES! KILL EM ALL! BOMBS BOMBS BOMBS BOMBS BOMBS YEEEEEEEEEEAAAAAAHHHH BABY!!! FULL STEAM AHEAD! WE LOVE YOU MR NETANYAHU!

              Clearly these two things are the same.

              • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                2 days ago

                a historic ally of ours is doing something bad… We will speak out against them.

                Was that what the police were doing on Columbia and UCLA?

                You’re being boxed in. Elon bought the liberals under Obama/Biden. He’s buying out the conservatives under Trump.

                Clearly these two things are the same.

                Nothing would fundamentally change

                • skulblaka@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  Oh, sorry, I wasn’t aware that the Columbia and UCLA police are Joe Biden, or that local police forces take orders directly from the president.

          • randon31415@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            3 days ago

            You know he’s not president anymore, right? And that party lost the election?

            Maybe, just maybe, it is because something is wrong in-of-itself and not because it is a wedge issue used to demotivate voters?

  • Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    2 days ago

    “Well, when the president does it, that means that it is not illegal”

    – Richard Nixon, 1977.

    You’ve had 47 years to do something about this, to be able to hold your leaders accountable, and apparently it wasn’t worth the effort.

    I guess the upside is you won’t have to worry about all that wasteful election spending any more. 👍

    • Hobbes_Dent@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 days ago

      Oh, they’ll still allow that spending to show how many votes he gets next time. Like the other dictators do.

    • Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      2 days ago

      You don’t understand (or maybe you do but aren’t saying it). The Nixon scandal is what started the modern shitshow as we know it. Nixon’s supporters would be royally pissed that there was no specific media apparatus to fully support Nixon and his shit. They would go on to fight to repeal the fairness doctrine and to start Fox News and the modern propaganda media as we know it.

      BTW, a few years ago (during Trump’s first administration or a bit after) they even SAID ‘when the president does it , it isn’t not illegal’ or some slight word difference as a way of signalling their ultimate victory in trying to do what they wanted to have happened during Nixon’s scandals.

      • BigBenis@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        3 days ago

        I don’t think so. He has the charisma of a flat tire and it was early enough that any sympathy wave would have lost its momentum by November.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          3 days ago

          Charisma is not relevant. Do you think Lyndon Johnson had charisma? Do you think that’s why he was elected in 1964? Because people liked him?

            • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              3 days ago

              I admit I was not alive at the time, but I’m pretty sure, what with it being the 1960s, that was not the sort of thing the general public was aware of, so I doubt it.

              Also, like it or not, Vance was already elected to the Senate and had a bestselling book. Even though you (and I) do not understand it, some people think he has a magnetic personality. Just like they think about Trump, which I also do not understand.

                • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  2 days ago

                  Journalists were not the general public. 99% of the country had never personally interacted with him and those things were not reported in the news. They’re after-the-fact anecdotes in books.

                  I’m also old enough to remember when the press had the collective attitude of “let America think that the president is a good person” regardless of who was in office.

      • stopdropandprole@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        Crooks happened July 13. Vance was announced running mate July 15. No candidate = no running mate announced.

        Also, when the presidential candidate is removed from a race, it does not automatically fall to the their running mate. there is no 25th amendment for election campaigns 🤦

    • Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      He should have aimed for the chest. It would have been just as deadly. He could have gotten two hits in even before getting shot.