Summary

A European Parliament member claimed that the U.S. gave Europe three weeks to agree on Ukraine’s “surrender” terms or risk an American withdrawal from Europe.

Mika Aaltola made the claim on X, but provided no evidence. NBC News reported that Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth suggested a U.S. troop reduction in Europe.

Trump reportedly plans to cut 20,000 troops and demand greater NATO contributions. He has pushed for higher NATO defense spending.

Trump may meet with Putin soon, believing Russia holds the upper hand in negotiations.

  • ploot@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    189
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    In a post on X, formerly Twitter, Finland’s Mika Aaltola of the European People’s Party claimed that the U.S. “has given us three weeks to agree on terms for Ukraine’s surrender,” referring to a proposed peace deal aimed at ending the war.

    “If we don’t, the United States will withdraw from Europe,” Aaltola added.

    Trump is demanding that Europe hand Ukraine to Russia, or he will hand Europe to Russia. This man is not working for the good of the USA or its traditional allies. He is working against them, destroying Europe, NATO and the USA for the sake of himself, Vladimir Putin and a few Nazi billionaires.

    And clearly when he threatens Europe like that they should not for a minute believe that he will not hand them over to Russia if they do what he says. Given that, Europe should tell him to get lost.

    • Kallioapina@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      1 day ago

      To be fair, Mika Aaltola is known in Finland as a noted populist and doomsayer that has a flair for the dramatic. His foreign policy predictions have also been pretty much all wrong since before the start of war in Ukraine.

      I’d take anything he says or leaks with a big spoon of salt.

  • twelvegoats@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Being an American that feels like they no longer have a home, I would like Europe to unleash holy hell upon the US. Do not let this fascicle president dictate what you do for your continent. You were fine before we took over swaths of your countries for their bases, you can be the strong leaders that the West need to fight everything that’s going on in your vicinity with Russia, North Korea, and any other rogue nation. I hate to say it, but the US is a part of that sentence as well. The US will not protect you anymore, I have absolutely no faith that the US will step up when you need them the most. Protect yourselves.

  • khannie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    120
    ·
    2 days ago

    I mean, we’ve all already assumed US capitulation and cessation of any alliance tbh. It only took about two weeks.

    Jog on.

    Best of luck with China and that supply chain. They’re looking at how you’re throwing Ukraine under the bus and thinking “Oh hell yes”.

    • Joncash2@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      I’m confused by what you mean. Yes, if you disconnect from Europe you would absolutely need China’s supply chain. And Russia proved it’s a very powerful supply chain. Hate it all you want, but without even sending weapons, Russia was able to sustain the war under massive sanctions.

      I mean, if Trump actually secures China’s supply chain and actually decided war is the best way to resolve Greenland and Panama, well, the world would be completely fucked. There’s nothing the rest of the world could do to stop any of this. The horrifying combination of US military, tech and China’s production capacity, Jesus fuck that’s terrifying.

      The worst thing is, this is now a likely scenario. Considering Trump and Putin are both on board, the entirety of humanity is now dependant on Xi not being as power hungry and insane. God this is nightmare fuel.

      • Sconrad122@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        2 days ago

        It’s about whether US will do the same throw under the bus routine with Taiwan I think. China would love to know that the US won’t seriously contest an attempt to invade their neighbor across the strait

        • Joncash2@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          2 days ago

          I’m not sure what Taiwan has to do with a supply chain, but yeah, Taiwan falling to China would absolutely be part of the agreement. And as insane as what I’m about to say, especially since I’m Taiwanese, Taiwan would be a tiny footnote if this all goes through. It’s nuts that the entirety of the democracy’s survival is completely dependent on the will of 3 people and 2 of them have already proven to be completely insane and the third one no one is happy with.

          • vrek@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            ·
            2 days ago

            Taiwan is important culturally to China for history reasons. But it’s much important financially and technoly wise due to tsmc. That was the true point of the chips act so us technology wouldn’t be so reliant of Taiwan but I doubt Trump understands that.

            • Joncash2@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              2 days ago

              It’s far more than historical reasons, Taiwan is complicated at best. I’m not going to claim I know who’s right or wrong or literally anything on the topic. All I can say is my personal opinion and on that I hope Taiwan will find a way to keep it’s independence regardless of their official standing in the world.

              On the chip act. Yes, I agree, very much so…

              • angrystego@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                10 hours ago

                Looking into history to determine which territory should belong to which country is such a bullshit.

      • NotLemming@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        The reason for this happening now is that Russia is on the verge of collapse and Putin has turned the screws on trump. If things don’t go his way the pee tape will leak

      • Habahnow@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        2 days ago

        I kinda doubt China wants to share things with the US. That and I doubt Putin wants the China to be stronger either. I think China would be cool not stepping in the way of the US and Russia so long as they see some opportunities for themselves.

        • Scott_of_the_Arctic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          China sees themselves as top dog in the world. The name for China in mandarin Chinese translates to “the central kingdom”. They want to exert economic control over the world rather than military. They want to be the country that all the other countries go to for help. Essentially they want the USA’s old job.

        • Joncash2@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          2 days ago

          Yeah, but we have to hope as a species that’s what China decides. Looking at their history, that’s actually likely. But we’re basically gambling on a sane decision from the CCP. That’s not a place I want to be. Though in fairness, I think most people here would agree with me.

          • Habahnow@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 hours ago

            When I stated china is look for opportunities for themselves, I don’t imagine it’s anything good for us. Regardless of what Xi’s china decides, it won’t be good for democracy nor us.

  • Iceman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    8 hours ago

    We need regime change in the USA. The global community should work together for this endeavor.

  • Gammelfisch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    16 hours ago

    The European NATO members should tell the AmeriKans they have 3 weeks to shutdown all their military bases until Jan 2029.

    • btaf45@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      15 hours ago

      As an American I am begging Europe not to give in to appeasement. Traitorapist Trump is a huge liar and buffoon. You have to stand up to Trump or he will keep abusing you over and over. Europe + Ukraine is way more powerful than Russia is anyway. Also, we need a big shock to the system to take our country back from Putin’s stooge.

    • Agent641@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      12 hours ago

      “If any man dies with a clean sword, I’ll rape his fucking corpse!” - Winston Churchill, 1940.

    • Gammelfisch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Hungary and Slovakia for sure. Italy is heading in that direction after Meloni cried about the anti-trump meeting held in Paris.

    • kreskin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      18 hours ago

      I was already boycotting france because their coffee portions are so small.

    • Gsus4@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      23 hours ago

      You can count on Hungary and maybe Slovakia to grovel…like good america/russia first Europeans.

      • mechoman444@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Trump doesn’t have the authority to dictate the foreign policy of other countries making his statement just as empty and meaningless as mine.

        • alkbch@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Are you suggesting the US hasn’t been dictating the foreign policy of any country in history? That’s a wild statement.

  • leadore@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    79
    ·
    2 days ago

    Fuck him. First, he’ll do what we wants regardless of whether you concede to his demands. If we wants to withdraw troops, he’ll withdraw them, no matter what concessions you make to him in hopes of preventing that. Look at his history. Look at how he has treated the other party in Every. Single. One. of the “deals” that he’s made. He fucks them over. NEVER believe he’ll hold up his side of whatever bargain you make. He won’t.

    Don’t ever concede to this bully. The more you concede, the more demands he’ll make, like with a blackmailer. Call his bluff. Say, “Sorry, we don’t agree. If that means you’ll withdraw, then don’t let the screen door hit ya where the good lord split ya on the way out.” Bam! End of bullying and if he didn’t want to withdraw, he’ll find some excuse no to go through with it (or probably just lie and say you agreed to do something for him behind the scenes).

      • leadore@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        14 hours ago

        Maybe not, even probably not, but with Europe’s help it can at least keep fighting for now, with the possibility that something could happen in US or Russia to change the equation in that time. That’s all very uncertain, but what is certain is that if Europe agrees to this Putin/Trump terms of surrender, it’s over for Ukraine immediately. And then other countries will be next.

        • alkbch@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          13 hours ago

          We don’t know for certain whether other countries will be next or not.

          Europe providing more support for Ukraine hoping for a miracle might lead to more suffering for Ukrainians and just more territory losses. That’s a risky bet. It also feels like a half hearted measure. Might be time Europe goes all in it really thinks Russia is an existential threat.

          • angrystego@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 hours ago

            We do know for certain, we know Putin’s plans, he’s not exactly keeping them secret. In this new situation that is more positive for him, he has no reason to suddenly choose not to continue.

            • alkbch@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 hours ago

              I insist that we don’t know for certain what Putin’s plans are. If you are so sure yourself, would you bet your most valuable possession on it?

              Besides, if you are so sure of that, isn’t time for European countries to drastically ramp up support for Ukraine and join the war?

    • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      37
      ·
      2 days ago

      Boy do I wish the EU and the UK would sign an agreement to cut all trade immediately with the U.S. and force the isolation this bafoon pretends they want. Prices will skyrocket everywhere, but the number of dumb Trump followers will fall off a cliff and he would be forced to step down by the oligarchs he surrounded himself with. The market would crash for certain.

      • Habahnow@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        2 days ago

        Idk anymore. The maga handlers have complete control of the maga cult media machine. I could imagine this happening, and right media spinning up a lie that maga eats up. “Biden did this with the Democrats!” He encouraged a coup that was recorded, and people all but forgot about it.

        • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          2 days ago

          They can lie all they want. No trade means inflation. Inflation means markets crashing. It can’t be stopped without spreading wealth oligarchs don’t want to share with those in need. When people starve, they will murder rampantly to stay alive.

          Most of the rich are smart enough to know they only stay rich if the people stay peaceful and mildly satiated. You don’t want to lock yourself in with 250,000,000 starving people with guns.

            • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              I was just doing rough math for the almost 60%+ that live paycheck to paycheck. Figure those people will make it about a month with that kind of inflation before they can’t make rent/food/ whatever

          • Ledericas@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            these billionaires have bunkers in NZ, they arnt staying here incase shit like this happens.

            • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              Point is they wouldn’t let it happen. They’d stop it by throwing Trump and co under the bus and take their money and power to the next best thing. Which would likely be backing a stupid moderate Democrat and getting things “back to normal” as fast as possible

          • Habahnow@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 hours ago

            You’re talking about the negative results, but the important point is who is attributed as causing them or the reason behind them. If there’s record inflation, I can imagine a situation where MAGAs believe it’s for a good reason, or because woke caused it or something. Remember, people died with covid, in complete disbelief of it because of conservative spin.

            I’m hoping people wake up, but who knows how far we must fall before they do. Jan 6 and COVID I thought were those points. But here we are at depths unimaginable, and accelerating.

            In regards to oligarchs, look how bad things are in other countries. Russia is an example where people have less rights, freedoms and money than us yet they aren’t rebelling. We can still reach that point sadly. I hope you’re right that people wake up and become angry way before they point.

  • Scott_of_the_Arctic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Or… Trump can pull the us military out of Europe, Canada joins the EU, and we seize American and russian assets to build a truly massive army.

  • FiveMacs@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    70
    ·
    2 days ago

    He’s gonna withdraw anyways…he works for you Putin. They are ramping for WW3 with the world vs USA/Russia/China…fucked up to put us with Russia but here we are.

    • Dragomus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      2 days ago

      Yeah he’ll withdraw troops and NATO support no matter how things go in Europe …

      He’ll need more armyboots at home defending his regime … also needs to recoup costs due to losing out on tax income and tariff lies. Then there is this thing where he wants to give Putin this favor of dismantling NATO.

      So, his demand was 2% in 2017 … and countries are exceeding that, Poland is already spending more than even the US, and Germany is climbing, so he upped it to 5% to get the excuse of the US backing out.

      Even if they meet 5%, in a few years he’ll up it further.

      Ofcourse for now he’ll assume the NATO members still feel bound to keep supplying intelligence information and buy American weaponry, even if NATO falls apart.

    • suoko@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      So a new call to the army for all european people and here we go again. Monkeys spinning the wheel because of a bunch of useless people.

    • commander@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      They are ramping for WW3 with the world vs USA/Russia/China…

      Holy fuck I feel so sorry for the world.

      Less than half of the US support Trump though, so the US would either be on the side of the World or fighting its own civil war.

      • Resand@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        About 2/3 of the voting age no?

        1/3 actively voted for him, and 1/3 was “fine with either option”

        • NotLemming@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          A lot of people don’t vote as a protest. Most stupid shit I ever heard and I instantly lose respect for anyone that doesn’t at least go spoil their ballot.

        • khannie@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          He didn’t win the >50% of the vote if you count third parties which is interesting enough.

        • commander@lemmings.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          17
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          Nah. Lumping the people who didn’t vote in as supporting trump is stupid.

          (I fully expect most of you to do it, though.)

          Edit for the downvoters: Are you really delusional enough to believe that people who didn’t vote for trump are automatically going to die for him in a war? Lol.

          • MegaUltraChicken@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            15
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            Lumping the people who didn’t vote in as supporting trump is stupid.

            In the context of electoral outcomes, it’s objectively true. Other than that, I think most of us would agree with you.

            • commander@lemmings.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              22
              ·
              2 days ago

              In the context of electoral outcomes, it’s objectively true.

              Not really, but I expect you to be delusional enough to believe it.

              • earphone843@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                10
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                2 days ago

                It is true. By not opposing fascism, you’re tacitly supporting it.

                They literally published a playbook of what they’d do if they won. The contents of it were known. The man straight up said he would be a dictator.

                Knowing all of that, if you didn’t oppose him, you were complicit in him gaining power.

                • commander@lemmings.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  9
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 day ago

                  🥱

                  The delusion on these forums is palpable.

                  “If you don’t vote in an election, you automatically support one candidate over the other!”

                  Glad most of it is contained online, though.

          • floofloof@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            Expecting them to defend the USA from Trump is also stupid. They couldn’t even be bothered to vote.

      • Alue42@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Congressional approval is required for acts of war. I know the Republicans have Congress, but are they willing to go that far??

        • MutilationWave@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 day ago

          I don’t think they’ve actually approved a war since Korea. They ceded that power to the president. Congress never declared war on Vietnam, Iraq x2, or Afghanistan. And that’s just the big ones.

          • Alue42@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            You are incorrect on each of those. Vietnam was approved by Congress with the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution (1964). Iraq was approved with the Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution (2002). Afghanistan was approved by the Congress Joint Resolution (2001).

        • Resand@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          18 hours ago

          If you don’t agree 100% with what Trump says you’re an traitor. They probably will, rightly fearing for their lives if they don’t

    • Banana@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Has China given an indication they’re allied with the US? This is an earnest question.

      • Joeffect@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        2 days ago

        I think it’s more trump / Putin and Putin/ Winnie the Pooh so they are just all friends

        • The Quuuuuill@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          41
          ·
          2 days ago

          it’s a lot like the tripartite pact. three fascist military governments are agreeing to non-compete terms. they are not allies. they are merely not enemies

      • palordrolap@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        2 days ago

        Japan and Germany were strange bedfellows the last time this all happened, if you’ll recall.

        “The enemy of my enemy is my friend” and all that.