By all criteria, this a concentration camp. Not “concentration camp” as rhetorical inflation, or emotionally manipulative shorthand, or edgy metaphor—but as in: literally.

As in: detention without trial, state control, inhumane living conditions, forced labor, dehumanization, brutal violence, isolation from accountability, psychological torture, and—by every available logical extension—murder.

That last one we can’t yet verify in the strict evidentiary sense, but the circumstances suggest it like smoke suggests fire, and they are already trying to hide their actions and deny what is occurring.

  • Allonzee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    I’m sure Republicans would say the same and more about me, but I’d take one migrant who took a risk to work harder than almost any Americans do and give their children a better life (funny how they actually do what the American mythos claims to value, they walk the walk of our largely bullshit rhetoric), at our big corpo’s invitation no less, than a hundred of my fellow American supposed conservatives born in the developed world acting like they hit a triple and reveling in the suffering of those who weren’t born in what was once a cradle of safety until they demolished it with their ballot, seeking to destroy their enemies, aka most Americans, in the zero sum game Faux News drilled into their head.

    These people are unashamedly drunk on the schaudenfreude of cruelty. To me, their willful rejection of basic human empathy means they are wholly devoid of value.

    • SippyCup@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Even if you were a massive shithead racist, and only wanted white Americans working in America, it doesn’t matter. Even if you were to somehow convince white, natural born Americans to work the shitty farm, housekeeping, and industrial cleaning jobs, it doesn’t matter.

      There simply aren’t enough white, natural born Americans to fulfill all of those jobs. Our economy will fucking collapse without migrant labor. Our food supply will collapse. We depend on a lot of people working really awful jobs for peanuts to have food on the table every day. There is no amount of rhetoric that will change that. And if it takes the collapse of the United States for these motherfuckers to learn that then so be it. I’ll see y’all at the pitchforks and torches rally.

      • Zink@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 month ago

        This is something people around the world need to understand.

        All the developed countries with plummeting birth rates should be actively competing for citizens.

        Though for non-US nations they are already getting some help from our self-imposed brain drain.

  • WorkshopBubby@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    That first paragraph is perfect: By all criteria, this a concentration camp. Not “concentration camp” as rhetorical inflation, or emotionally manipulative shorthand, or edgy metaphor—but as in: literally. It’s so fucking frustrating how the media has done so much work normalizing Trump that you can’t just call things what they obviously are. Trump is doing all of this stuff loudly and proudly in all our faces but if you call CECOT a concentration camp, or you point out that he dropped a fucking shitcoin before the day of his inauguration to take bribes out in the open, you just have TDS. It must be so easy and comforting to just be a nice little Trumple cultist and slurp up everything he says and dismiss all evidence of your eyes and ears.

  • ssillyssadass@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    211
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    From Wikipedia:

    “A concentration camp is a prison or other facility used for the internment of political prisoners or politically targeted demographics, such as members of national or minority ethnic groups, on the grounds of state security, or for exploitation or punishment.”

    I’d say it tracks.

    • Regrettable_incident@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      What, so bomb the fuck out of a bunch of civilians, spend a few hundred billion, and go home a couple years later leaving a power vacuum and acting confused about why you went there in the first place?

      • cranakis@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Yeah can we not do that anymore. The fuck was/is wrong with these ppl? Let’s support actual democracy in those countries instead.

    • then_three_more@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      92
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      It is not new though, it started with Guantanamo concentration camp for Taliban fighters.

      It is not new though, it started with 10 concentrations camps during World War 2 for Japanese Americans.

      • brendansimms@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        75
        ·
        1 month ago

        It is not new though, it started with Guantanamo concentration camp for Taliban fighters.

        It is not new though, it started with 10 concentrations camps during World War 2 for Japanese Americans.

        It is not new though, it started with concentration camps for the extermination and removal of the Native Americans

          • Suite404@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            1 month ago

            I’ve always thought it was hypocritical of Americans to be calling Nazis the worst. We literally enslaved a group of people for hundreds of years, bred and slaughtered them at our whim. Had concentration camps, and more. We’re not better, and probably worse. We just had good propaganda.

            • LePoisson@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              1 month ago

              Eh, I wouldn’t say Americans reached the level of industrialized genocide Nazi Germany achieved but we definitely had and still have plenty of blood on our hands.

              • Cethin@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                1 month ago

                I’m not sure I’d agree, though maybe you’re correct because it wasn’t industrial. We put bounties on bison skulls though to encourage them being slaughtered because we new native populations relied on them, for example. It was brutal and systematic. Sure, we didn’t use industrial means to actually kill them, but I don’t think that makes it better or worse, only different.

      • insufferableninja@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        44
        ·
        1 month ago

        In Die Hard, when Hans is describing Takagi, he says “interned at Manzanar 1942-43”. 9 year old imsufferableninja thought he was talking about an internship at a prestigious company called Manzanar. 25 year old imsufferableninja finally figured it out. They did not teach about the US’s concentration camps at my schools, for some reason…

        • Pilferjinx@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          It was an off the record black torture/interrogation site. They didn’t send every taliban they accounted there. It was selective.

          • GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 month ago

            Ah, sorry, I didn’t realize that the Nazis sent all their prisoners to one camp. I guess those weren’t concentration camps, either.

            • tamman2000@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              1 month ago

              I’m sure the Nazis had torture/interrogation sites too.

              Nobody said that not being a concentration camp made Guantanamo ok.

              • GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                1 month ago

                No, someone just said it’s not a concentration camp because everyone of one demographic wasn’t there.

                Actually, on further thought, I’ll give you that. But, unsurprisingly, limited rights abuses tend to lead to more extensive rights abuses, and the only really surprising thing is that it took more than 20 years to go from torture camps to concentration camps. Waiting for those ghettos, Poland style.

                • Pilferjinx@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  You misinterpreted my response. The point is the intention (giving 1 example at the time of operation). That intention was interrogation not concentrating undesirables.

        • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          Because it was used for a select few (relatively speaking). It wasn’t a camp built to concentrate a sizeable portion of our population into one small area.

          • GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 month ago

            I’ve already said that there are good arguments for why this shouldn’t be considered a concentration camp, and this isn’t one of them. This is like saying genocide isn’t genocide because the unique tribe you wiped out was only a couple hundred people. So, if you took that same tribe of people and put them in a camp and resteicted their movement, would you not consider it a concentration camp because of it’s size?

            • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              1 month ago

              Gitmo was never meant to store large amounts of people (and not civilians). It was a place that was conveniently located that allow them to detain and torture individuals. That’s not a concentration camp dude.

              Even when they started trying to send some migrants there, there were articles saying that they didn’t have the facilities for it because it was never meant for that.

  • Itdidnttrickledown@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 month ago

    It is my firm belief that anyone who would do this or approve of this image should be removed from society. There should be some kind of test where these images are shown to a person. If they are not disgusted by them they should be imprisoned for the safety of everyone else for life. Not imprisoned like they would but housed somewhere they can do no harm to anyone.

    • andros_rex@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 month ago

      I didn’t know the criteria for not being placed in a concentration camp was whether or not I’d approve of them dating my hypothetical daughter.

      Sorry mate, that rules you out - good luck at CECOT.

    • tocopherol@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Yes because I would raise my daughter to get to know someone before dating them and have a good sense of character, and not assume someone was evil because they were in a prison. It’s also been shown that innocent people have been sent there.

    • oyo@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Fascist, racist ICE agents illegally abducting people and sending them to concentration camps? Hell no I wouldn’t allow her to date one of them.

  • Brave Little Hitachi Wand@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    57
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    They’re right that we should at minimum not allow them to define how we talk about this, and we should call it what it is.

    But we should also have a plan to avoid getting put in a concentration camp when we do so. Stay safe, and be good everyone.

  • thirtyfold8625@thebrainbin.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago
  • Matrix6664@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    1 month ago

    I am quite surprised on the lack of knowledge about El Salvador. I would expect this from other platforms, but not here.

    Please get informed before comparing this system to a concentration camp. Now if the administration of the United States wants to use El Salvador’s system to push their agenda, you should continue to blame the United States and not El Salvador.

    Before Bukele, El Salvador had a level of corruption and violence completely out of proportion. There were so many different approaches made to eradicate the complex issue and none of them worked. If you have a group of people that are terrorizing the population, you cannot be diplomatic if the approach. Bukele turned his country around overnight.

    • RagingRobot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      They are concentration camps whether you agree with them or not. Sounds like you are into them though so that’s weird.

          • Matrix6664@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 month ago

            You are spot on! Why are people being sent to a prison outside of the country without any trial or due process? That is to say that the United States and its administration is at fault not El Salvador.

            How is the Salvador, 1/4 the size of South Carolina, supposed to stand up to a command from the United States? Think about that. You have to realize how much influence and power the United States has had over the rest of the continent, they have played this game for decades.

            I am sure if the United States says we need them back, El Salvador will release them no questions asked. We cannot sit here and blame the people on the other side when the ones in the same turf are calling the shots.

    • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      37
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      Nazis got to all the points they wanted so lightning-fast that nothing happening now can rival it.

      That’s one of the reasons for the cultural shock about Nazis - everybody expected such processes to happen very slowly, in small flashes, as they do now. Thus them to be voted out or pressed out as a reaction, or at least for most potential victims to flee Germany, gradual pressure, compromise, all that.

      Instead they came to power, almost momentarily changed the internal balance of power (of armed forces, their own paramilitary organizations, veteran organizations and such), anschlussed Austria, “solved unemployment” (organized massive programs of building autobahns and such, not very economically viable, but a symbol and a working mechanism), attracted investments (various scams on enormous scale, but the funds were attracted and it wasn’t all scams), scaled the military back to something realistic, performed successful rearmament programs … And built concentration camps. They started with something like Guantanamo almost immediately after coming to power, then didn’t lose any time to learn.

      See, they had an apparatus, even a social layer of very well educated people, but with indoctrination of service and obedience, and the legacy of German science and industry and patriotism too. They broke that, but not before successfully using it for a lot of things.

      That’s the problem with building good systems, they prevent idiots from learning who they are earlier. It’s the same with Sun and DEC and other legacy in tech. Everybody still uses their paradigms and products descended from theirs. Vision, architecture, aesthetic (only hidden somewhere deep). So everybody big has now IMHO wrong ideas about how to solve problems, but since everybody also uses solutions made by those who had right ideas 30-15 years ago, they don’t get the feedback. Today’s tech is a pile of crap reinforced with yesteryear grass, but it doesn’t fall apart in your hands because for the main problems you use solutions from a more civilized age.

      • KeenFlame@feddit.nu
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        While this was informative, I don’t quite understand the progressive change from concentration camps in nazi Germany to a fanatic escalating hate for… Uh… x86 architecture?

        Sounds like a really, really wild ride to be on.

        • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 month ago

          It’s a more general thought. Our actions do not have immediate visible consequences. Thus we can break everything and think we are winning.

          Also on the subject of Nazis it does possess some value, they loved analogies between relevant modern techologies of their time and sociopolitical events. Where the word “anschluss” comes from, by the way. It literally translates like “connecting”, as with electricity. Well, electricity wasn’t new, but radio was, Nazis used radio a lot and referred to use of radio to show how modern and revolutionary they are.

          Important because it applies to leftists often, if you say “leftists made Trump” or “leftists made MAGA” or “leftists broke American democracy” or something like that, it’ll sound clearly wrong, but it won’t be. USSR was a clear case of using what others made and thinking that it’s their own achievement by its administrators, most of its history, while first they were using the tremendous results of Stolypin reforms and then NEP (Lenin was a bit smarter than his buddies), and then selling fossil resources to support visibility of a working economy, but that’s kinda off topic.

          I’m not talking about x86 architecture, I’m talking about everyone using Java and Sun idea of the web, just slowly worsened and degenerate, first of all. Or Windows NT, it was fine in year 1999, but being stuck there for 20 years is just wrong.

          So, back to our day and how it’s useful, systems should have smaller latency for evolution to work well. Like those temples in Japan, which are constantly being rebuilt in all of their parts. You should be able to tear down a republic and build a new one in a couple of years.

          Getting back to Nazis - if the system they captured had smaller latency, they wouldn’t have managed to even annex Austria.

    • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      The Nazis didn’t have the historical context of the Nazis’ rise to power to help guide them.