• Kyrgizion@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 month ago

    In a way.

    This world IS hell and them gaining larger and larger parts of it for their own benefit…

    Capitalists are demons. Or might as well be, outcome’s the same in the end.

  • jordanlund@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    You’re assuming they’re saving at all.

    A lot of billionaire wealth is tied up in assets that is only a “savings” if it’s converted to cash, like stock options.

    Amazon stock is $200 a share, Bezos has 908,804,311 shares. $181,760,862,200 in stock.

    https://www.wallstreetzen.com/stocks/us/nasdaq/amzn/ownership

    But that money doesn’t go anywhere unless he sells it. Stock market is closed Monday for memorial day, but let’s say he does nothing on Tuesday morning and decides to sleep in until 11:30 AM, shit, I WOULD. In that time the stock goes from $200 to $214.

    Bezos “makes” $12,723,260,354 while sleeping.

    When you have that many stock shares, the wealth is self perpetuating… but it’s not “real” until you sell it.

    What happens if he’s sleeping and the price drops to $180 because of more stupid Trump shit. Now he’s “lost” $18,176,086,220 overnight.

    • Saryn@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Thank you - well explained.

      It’s also interesting to think of the stocks that the various oligarchs and politicians control or own as a backdoor for institutional capture. You want Trump on your side and his administration making decisions that benefit you and your companies? Easy - just buy some of his BS stock and use it as leverage. You won’t even have to push it - he’ll do what you want because that’s how his underdeveloped brain perceives existence - as a series of quid pro quo agreements.

      Of course, it’s not just stocks. He’s created so many other avenues to bribe him. It’s bonkers.

    • untorquer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 month ago

      Maybe you should read “saving” as “hoarding”. The skeet (tweet?) Is making a point about their odd motivation to continue to accrue unimaginable wealth far beyond the point where the costs of their wildest dreams are trivial. The whole while having the ability to literally end world hunger many times over after subtracting those costs.

      • jordanlund@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 month ago

        Well, that’s what I’m saying, beyond a certain point, the wealth accumulates itself with no active intervention on his part besides making sure the stock price doesn’t tank.

        But that’s the whole point about “world hunger” too. It’s not like he can liquidate 900 million shares of Amazon at $200 a share.

        Estimates are it would take $40 billion a year, EVERY year, to solve world hunger.

        https://www.wfpusa.org/articles/how-much-would-it-cost-to-end-world-hunger/

        So to solve world hunger for 1 year, Bezos would have to sell 200 million of his 900 million Amazon shares at $200 a pop.

        1. Nobody has the money to buy 200 million Amazon shares at that price.

        2. As soon as he sold a fraction of that, it would flood the market and the stock price would crater.

        3. When it became clear Bezos was the one flooding the market, everyone else who had Amazon would panic sell, tanking the price even harder.

        • untorquer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 month ago

          You don’t even need to sell, you can take a loan out against an asset like every rich asshole or nation…

          I refuse to accept that the most powerful people in the world are so helpless.

          There’s a myriad of ways to handle covering wealth into purchasing power. The wealthy falling to do anything about the evils in the world is part of what makes them evil. They aren’t even trying. They use arguments like yours to throw their hands up and claim they’re helpless and that the system would fail, that the world would be worse off if they did anything at all.

          • jordanlund@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            You can take out a loan, but nobody can loan $40 billion.

            Even getting 3.3 billion every month for a year would be challenging.

            • untorquer@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 month ago

              Sigh… Look, the point is we don’t let people off the hook because it’s hard to do something. It’s hard to go to work 40+ hrs a week for 40 years and they ask that of every single one of us.

              They have the power or they don’t. If they do, and choose not to act or even attempt, they’re complicit in the world’s problems. If they don’t, and they’re relegated to continuing to sit and amass wealth, then the system itself is broken and must be raised.

    • Lyra_Lycan@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      I’ve always wondered - Who would he sell the stocks to? Is it a peer-to-peer system or is there a kind of centralised bank involved that pays out and assumes ownership of the shares? Is the price definite or do they have to auction it off, meaning the value is more of a guideline?

  • RockBottom@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    Yes, the mentality behing it is flawed. But those are the people that make it to the top in the current economic system.

      • NatakuNox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Not even as a joke. I oppose systems that create macro wealthy and powerful. Those systems create sociopaths.

      • Soulcreator@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Hypothetical situation, you are a normal person you’ve likely struggled all your life with bills and debts and then one day you randomly find yourself a billionaire. Perhaps you inherited it, or won the lotto. What would you suggest a person in that situation do? This is would be a once in a lifetime opportunity, , you could finally not have to stress about money, but in order to save your soul should you give it all away to charity and go back to your normal life as though nothing had happened?

        Edit: I was legitimately curious what the ethical solution would be if one were to find themselves in that exceedingly rare situation that I described. But okay looks like I ruffled a few feathers by asking.

        • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          1 month ago

          Honest answer? Call up a fiduciary firm in LA, NYC, London, Tokyo, or Paris, whichever you are closest to. Demand to speak with a partner. Let them know that you are working with 11 figures liquid, that will get you a senior partner. Set up a massive trust with the entire lump sum, there y ensuring the best ROI you can get. Split off $5 million blind and bridge trusts for yourself and any family and friends you want to help. Turn the rest of the money over to a board that must be made of 2 fiduciaries one from a NYC firm, one from a firm in any of the other aforementioned cities, and 3 data analysts. 2 must be from Oxfam, the third must be top of the field. Those 5 board members then run “The Sovereign Trust for Humanity’s Poor,” which then use a percentage of the ROI to set up trusts for the poorest people in the world first. Not for their government, or some other organization. They get life changing money to spread around their community.

          Add in stipulations that trust beneficiaries are NEVER allowed to have more than $50,000,000 in wealth at any time, and that they should pressure their governments to create a maximum wage.

        • vala@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          The difference between not stressing about money and having a billion dollars is about a billion dollars.

        • boredtortoise@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          1 month ago

          One can live their entire life with a lot less than a billion. Even putting 99% of it away to a good cause leaves 10 MILLION. Again excessive for a lifetime.

        • irmoz@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          1 month ago

          Spend all but a reasonable portion on materially, directly improving the world

          Then retire on a million

            • irmoz@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              1 month ago

              I have ambitions that, if realised, could generate income, but I don’t currently have enough cash to invest into. Game dev and music, particularly. I’d start a dev studio and actually hire talented artists, for example, so I don’t have to rely on my poor skills. Will it make lots of money? Who knows. But it’s better than sitting on a hoard and living on interest.

        • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          What would you suggest a person in that situation do?

          Not become a CEO of multiple companies and aggressively lobby the government in order to reduce the amount of taxes they have to pay.

          I would suggest this person pays off their bills, buy a house, and invest it. If they feel the need to continue working and spend some time figuring out what they need that’s understandable. If they immediately spend a million dollars to try to get another 2 million dollars that’s a mental illness.

          Keep in mind the billionaires people are talking about have never struggled will bills or debts. They were born obscenely wealthy, spent they entire lives obscenely wealthy, have more money than they could ever spend on their lives, and spend most of their time trying to get more. It’s an illness. If you or I suddenly inherited a billion dollars we wouldn’t work another day in our lives.

  • lepinkainen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 month ago

    My theory is that when you get that first Billion with a B, something fundamental breaks in the human brain.

    They don’t think like us normal folks anymore, even multimillionaires are “other” to them.

  • iAvicenna@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    they think that if for one brief moment they have the most billions, they will exist forever.

  • moakley@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 month ago

    Maybe that’s just it. They’ve accomplished something, but ultimately they know it’s meaningless. So they try to find a context where it has meaning.

    Some of them find that meaning in charity, helping large portions of humanity.

    Others realize that the only circumstance where the distinction between a billion and a hundred million matters is if the world is absolutely going to shit.

    • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      At least in D&D no dragon hoards that much, and the chromatic dragons have a legitimate reason for it.

      The wealthiest dragon you’ll encounter in any fantasy setting, we aren’t talking about Shadowrun or Cyberpunk where the real life billionaires are dragons, is an ancient red wyrm. They will have 1.5 million to 5 million gold pieces of treasure. 1 gold piece is ⅒ of an ounce of gold. Therefore the absolute wealthiest dragon in all of D&D and Pathfinder is only worth about $1,200,000,000, and that is only one of them. 99.99% of all other dragons would be worth less than a billion.

      The chromatic dragons have to eat their hoard just before they die. If they don’t have enough gold to pay Tiamat, then she eats their souls.

      Also, gold is a nice soft bed according to every metallic dragon I have encountered.

  • A_norny_mousse@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    1 month ago

    Amassing wealth is an obsession. These people get a dopamine rush anytime their line goes up. Which is how they got there in the first place. At some point, the value doesn’t really matter anymore but the obsession remains.

    Greetings, your most experienced armchair psychologist

    • thisisnotgoingwell@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      At a certain point, money is not about wealth or what you can buy with it but rather about power. And in life’s twists, those who amass a decent amount of wealth and power come to believe they are “chosen” because of how society treats them. The poors worship the rich. if we were living in a sane society, these amounts of wealth would be looked at disgustingly by society. Shit is beyond fucked and I don’t think anything can unfuck modern society.

      if these people were any kind of Christian they would be worried about the end of their mortal lives. Instead they are speedrunning everything Christ taught us NOT to be.

  • Knightfox@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    1 month ago

    It honestly is a waste for a true capitalist. Like, if you have enough money to cover all your expenses, while also having 2-3x your fun money expense, why aren’t you following the capitalist ideal and doing something with it?

    Start a nonprofit that suits your interests, buy a company you believe it, spin up scholarships, blow it on a do nothing project, but for fucks sake do something with it!

    • Katana314@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 month ago

      In their eyes, they sort of are. “Investing” your money into stocks gives you the feeling you’re giving back to the world with it, while also giving you the feeling it’s secure, still belongs to you, and is earning you more.

      Meanwhile, the people actually living this ideal create trusts for philanthropic efforts. They wave goodbye to the money completely, asking for no return but worldly benefit. There’s not nearly enough people like that in the world though.

    • hector@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 month ago

      In France, they’re buying medias to bring about a fascist state and using islamophobia and the fear of the enemy from within to justify an increasingly violent police state.

      I guess they are bored and need to ruin something else.

      • Mariemarion@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 month ago

        Please! It’s islamphobia and “narcotraffic” (i.e. small-scale pot dealers, who have no future anyway because of racism, classism, prejudice, and Paris-centrism.)

  • andybytes@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    Just like the president, who now has more executive powers than ever, still doesn’t run things the way you think they do. They have an inner circle. It also could be thought of in a way like other countries inside of the empire don’t really have sovereignty. Also, you could rethink the whole idea of a dictator. I mean if the capitalist class wants to defend themselves, they’re going to obfuscate their involvement. Like, you need a fall guy and the fall guy is a gambler. And sometimes he comes out winning and sometimes he gets beaten up in the street.