Two British minehunter ships destined for Ukraine cannot travel through Turkish waters, Ankara stressed Tuesday, citing an international pact.

U.K. Defense Secretary Grant Shapps announced last month that Ukraine’s armed forces had struck a deal to procure the Sandown Class vessels from Britain’s Royal Navy as the war-torn country grapples with Russia’s continued blockade of the Black Sea.

But Turkey confirmed it had informed its NATO allies that the ships would not be allowed to travel through its waters.

  • Everythingispenguins@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    11 months ago

    The Montreux Convention has been around for just shy of 100 years. So this is news to nobody, additionally they have turned away Russian ships too. The convention clearly states that ships of war of belligerent powers cannot transit the bosphorus straits.

    Best I can tell reading it if the British had kept them in their Navy. Sailed them into the Black Sea and then just randomly decided to give them to the Ukrainians that would have worked. Also they’re not very big ships I believe they could sail up the Rhine and down the Danube. There is a canal that connects those two rivers and it looks like the ships fit.

    Ultimately though Ukrainians may not be able to effectively deploy them at the moment without having them destroyed. They do not have the naval capability to protect them. So it may be in their best interest to not have them in the Black Sea and till the war is over.

    • dukatos@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      11 months ago

      They can’t use Danube. There is no way they can pass through Hungary and Serbia.

      • Agent641@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        Just tape a bunch of C-5 galaxys together and hang it underneath in a big net.

        Yeet it into the black sea just off Odesa.

      • Everythingispenguins@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        That is a good point. I wonder what if any freedom of navigation treatise exists for the Danube. I am not sure if the Danube River Conference is still a thing or what it said on ships of war.

        Still I think that ultimately they couldn’t be deployed until after hostilities cease.

    • deegeese@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Turkey has long prevented warships from transiting the Bosporus Strait in wartime.

      I wouldn’t want warships passing my capital city either.

        • deegeese@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          18
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          11 months ago

          I’m sure Russia considers it a military target and would have no compunction about targeting it with cruise missiles at it passes through a city with 15 million people.

          • HikingVet@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            13
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            11 months ago

            Are you saying the Russians would target a boat filled with Brits in Turkey’s waters? Because that sounds like an Article 5 moment. Hell, even if Ukraine takes control of the boats in England, attacking them in Turkish waters is a terrible idea.

            • deegeese@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              10
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              Turkey is not obligated to invite an attack by Russia, even if it would be suicidal.

              This is just Turkey continuing a decades-old policy.

          • quindraco@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            11 months ago

            That would be Russia’s fault, not the UK’s or Ukraine’s - and there is no end to the road of attempting Russian appeasement.

      • meeeeetch@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        11 months ago

        Ankara’s their capital, but you’re right to point out that this is nothing new.

        The policy also ensures that no additional Russian warships get into the Black Sea.

      • stevehobbes@lemy.lol
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        14
        ·
        11 months ago

        The Montreux Convention does not prevent ships from returning to their ports. Which is presumably exactly what ships they acquired are doing. Returning to their new port.

        • Land_Strider@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          11 months ago

          The fuck does “returning to new port” mean? You don’t fucking return to a new port. Stop trying to interpret even the agreements your ancestors put in place just because they don’t suit how dumb of a move you did today. Internstional agreements aren’t there to be imposed on others and lifted for you whenever you like.

          As the other commenter said, there were and are alternatives. Should have utilized them. Turkey is keeping to the agreement, as it did when the matter was Russian warships last year. Were you crying for Russian warships then?

          • stevehobbes@lemy.lol
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            12
            ·
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            Ships have a home port, as defined by the owner of the ship. If a ship is sold, it would typically get a new home port, owned by the new owner.

            All of Ukraine’s ports are in the Black Sea. Hence any ship owned by Ukraine not currently in the Black Sea is sailing back to port.

            Why is that hard to understand?

            Russia has several deep water ports outside of the Black Sea. It’s a slightly different ballgame, wouldn’t you agree?

            • deegeese@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              10
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              One cannot “return” to a new “home”.

              You can return to your old home, or move to a new one.

              • stevehobbes@lemy.lol
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                7
                ·
                11 months ago

                Really? If you buy a house, the closing happens at the bank, then you can’t return to your home?

                Of course you can.

                • deegeese@sopuli.xyz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  9
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  That would be returning to somewhere you have been before.

                  You cannot return to somewhere you have not been.

    • pelerinli@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      UK sends two ship after two years - good guys

      Turkey sends hundereds of Bayraktars on day 1 - ass pieces of shit

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    11 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    LONDON — Two British minehunter ships destined for Ukraine cannot travel through Turkish waters, Ankara stressed Tuesday, citing an international pact.

    U.K. Defense Secretary Grant Shapps announced last month that Ukraine’s armed forces had struck a deal to procure the Sandown Class vessels from Britain’s Royal Navy as the war-torn country grapples with Russia’s continued blockade of the Black Sea.

    “Our pertinent allies have been duly apprised that the mine-hunting ships donated to Ukraine by the United Kingdom will not be allowed to pass through the Turkish Straits to the Black Sea as long as the war continues,” a statement from Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan’s communications directorate said.

    The Turkish statement — challenging what it called “disinformation about U.K. mine-hunting ships” — stressed that the Turkish Straits are closed to Russian and Ukrainian warships while the conflict between the two countries continues, citing the Montreux Convention of 1936 which governs maritime traffic through those waters.

    Approached for comment, a U.K. Ministry of Defense spokesperson pointed to a press conference by Shapps in London last month at which Ukrainian Admiral Oleksiy Neizhpapa said the vessels could not yet be brought to the Black Sea because of the pact.

    But Neizhpapa also noted the ships would still have lots of work to do once the Russia-Ukraine war ends given the ongoing threat of mines in the Black Sea.


    The original article contains 266 words, the summary contains 227 words. Saved 15%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!