• jaxxed@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 hours ago

    She will most likely not be a great president, but could be a good one. If Biden wasn’t so poor on the Middle East, he would have been a great one, from a policy perspective.

    • Rakonat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      53 minutes ago

      Biden never was going to be a great president, lacking a a majority in both houses means you burn up too much political capital to get anything done that doesn’t already have broad bipartisan support. And with how divided politics is today compared to any point in history where we had a great president, there is no such thing as bipartisan today.

        • Rakonat@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          25 minutes ago

          … The new deal was passed 10 years before the McCarthy era. FDR was dead before McCarthy even started his red scare.

    • RedAggroBest@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Same with a burger. Your lettuce should be dry (pat it with a paper towel if you must) and put it as the bottom layer. This creates a moisture barrier that stops your bread/bun from turning into a soggy mess.

      On a sandwich, the cheese should be on the other side for the same reason. Keep all the wet stuff from turning your bread into slop.

  • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    56
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Don’t worry, voters will definitely hand both houses to the Republicans in 2026 if she’s elected and they’ll take their orders directly from Trump.

    Because that’s what always happens.

    • Stovetop@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      56
      ·
      edit-2
      15 hours ago

      I just hope Trump is dead by 2026.

      There could always be some other MAGA asshole to fill the void, but the dissolution of Trump’s cult of personality would be a crippling blow.

      • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        27
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        15 hours ago

        There’s always an asshole. Newt Gingrich, Mitch McConnell, Donald Trump. And our electoral system and goldfish-memory population will continually put them into power.

        • phdepressed@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          11 hours ago

          Newt, Mitch and the others only have their local GOP cult, they don’t have the national cult that the orange turd does.

          • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            10 hours ago

            Okay, Rush, Hannity, and Alex Jones & The Turds.

            There will always be an asshole. That’s the entire reason we even have government in the first place.

    • rsuri@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      9 hours ago

      That’s not what happened in 2022, at least not quite. Don’t underestimate Trump’s ability to insert himself and mess up whatever easy wins the GOP would otherwise have.

  • Toneswirly@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    12 hours ago

    “Objectively” is such a fun way to describe what will always be a divisive position of power. Was any one president considered objectively good?

  • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Thank you for being honest and not trying to pretend you care about Palestinians.

    • legion02@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Is there a candidate that would help protect the Palestinians? Like a legitimate one that has even a remote possibility of winning? Nah? OK I’ll vote for the other things I care about then since that one is out of reach.

      • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        10 hours ago

        I think Kamala will be an objectively great president

        That means, not just in comparison to Trump, but actually good in general. The moment you say or endorse that statement, talking about Trump or whether there’s a viable alternative is 100% whataboutism.

        I respect you less than OP because you’re now pretending like you care about Palestinians, and it’s just because there’s no alternative that you support Harris. I prefer it when y’all take the mask off, because it’s pointless to argue against something the other side is only pretending to believe or value.

            • legion02@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              8 hours ago

              Because your comment is so disconnected from reality that it’s the only thing that makes sense to me. Genuinely concerned for you.

              • SoJB@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                6 hours ago

                The absolute liberal irony in this is fucking hilarious.

                You people are just genuinely lost in hyperreality, aren’t you?

                p.s. try sneering harder, you’re totally winning over the working class.

                • Eugene V. Debs' Ghost@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 hour ago

                  “If I act like a smug asshole, people will want to vote who I like!”

                  It doesn’t work for Musk, it won’t work for weirdos online who think bad polices are okay when it’s blue.

              • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                8 hours ago

                In what way is anything I said disconnected from reality? What are you confused about?

      • HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        29 minutes ago

        maybe that’s mortadella that’s cut way too thick? I dunno. I’m with you. It looks more like turkey than ham to me. Not my sammich.

  • SomeKindaName@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    10 hours ago

    A ham sandwich can be eaten. Eating is good. That’s 1 pt ham sandwich, 0 gop. Ham sandwich does more for Americans than gop.

  • OceanSoap@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Nah, I’m voting Trump. Especially since Dick Chaney came out in support of her. If the war pigs support her, I’m voting against her, 100%

  • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    16 hours ago

    And that’s cool…

    As long as when people want her to align more closely with the Dem voting base, you don’t yell at them for questioning the only option and imply they’re trying to help trump.

    That bullshit only depresses Dem turnout and actually helps trump.

    It’s just completely nonsensical to hear all the “moderates” claim they’d vote for anyone not trump, then go feral when someone points out banning fracking would hand the Dems Pennsylvania which trump needs to win the election.

    There are multiple issues like that where if Kamala moved to the left she’d lock this election down.

    If you truly only care about beating trump, your time online would be more productive trying to pull the party left than trying to pull tens of millions of voters to the right…

    With the obvious benefit of getting those popular policies on top of beating trump.

    • Ephoron@lemmy.kde.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      16 hours ago

      If it’s not been posted already…

      https://theintercept.com/2024/09/10/polls-arms-embargo-israel-weapons-gaza/

      Banning sales of arms to Israel would not only attract a huge proportion of otherwise reluctant leftists, but might even steal votes from Trump as a small but not insignificant number of voters have been fooled by his ‘started no wars’ con. The idea that doing so would lose some key demographic is clearly not supported by the data.

      But the Democratic strategists are not idiots. They must know this. So one of two things is the case; the polling is wrong, or the Democrats have absolutely no desire to move leftward on this and are willing to risk a Trump win to hold out on their position.

      We can rule out the first because if the Democrats had better poll data they’d share it. Nothing to lose by doing so.

      So we’re left with the second.

      Odd then that the online vitriol is delivered not to the Democrats for cynically risking a Trump victory, but to leftists for being opposed to genocide.

      • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        16 hours ago

        The idea that doing so would lose some key demographic is clearly not supported by the data.

        They wouldn’t lose significant voters, theyd lose a bunch of donations…

        It doesn’t cost a billion plus to beat donald trump, but the more money there is, the bigger everyone’s slice is and the bigger the bonuses for personally bringing more money is.

        The DNC isn’t being run to get Dems in office, it’s a fucking grift where sometimes we do get a Dem in office.

        Just never one who’s political policy matches Dem voters.

        Look at current DNC leadership, it’s not people that know how to win elections, it’s just whoever can bring in the most donations.

        The result is ridiculously expensive and incompetent campaigns. The solution is clearing house at the DNC.

        • Ephoron@lemmy.kde.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          15 hours ago

          The DNC isn’t being run to get Dems in office, it’s a fucking grift where sometimes we do get a Dem in office.

          True. And a cushy consulting job, or a few thousand in bonuses seems like an understandable inventive, if a misanthropic one.

          But for those who do the footwork supporting such a system, I just cannot see why. What have the Democrats done to deserve such blind obedience? Is being not-Trump just that impressive these days?

          • TexasDrunk@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            12 hours ago

            Is being not-Trump just that impressive these days?

            Today? Yes. Come inauguration day? Absolutely fucking not. If Kamala wins I’ll talk shit, write letters, donate to causes, protest, and cause trouble from the first day she’s in office until the end of primary season 4 years from now. Then I’m back on the train.

            Unless we can get rid of FPTP. Then I’m talking shit every day all fucking day long while happily voting for a candidate who agrees with me most instead of the one I disagree with the least.

            • Ephoron@lemmy.kde.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              10 hours ago

              If Kamala wins I’ll talk shit, write letters, donate to causes, protest, and cause trouble from the first day she’s in office until the end of primary season 4 years from now

              Why?

              Most people in America want to end sales of arms to Israel, don’t want to be complicit in genocide.

              And Harris is abusing her power by ignoring that to satisfy a few wealthy donors by threatening you all with Trump if you don’t let her do what she wants.

              The only way to stop abuse of power is to stand up to it. If you let her (or her replacements) just frighten you into submission with bogeymen you might as well give up any hope of progress.

              • TexasDrunk@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                9 hours ago

                Sorry, I thought you were here asking a reasonable question with my other reply. If I had known you were like this I wouldn’t have bothered. Is that why you replied with a single word then edited it instead of spewing your tripe initially?

                If “Israel should finish the job” Trump tickles your butthole, just say so.

                • Ephoron@lemmy.kde.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  2 hours ago

                  Sorry, I thought you were here asking a reasonable question with my other reply. If I had known you were like this I wouldn’t have bothered.

                  Yep. So when you thought I was going to play the part of the meek little student at their teacher’s knee you were happy to respond, but as soon as it was clear I might actually disagree… Instantly I must be a Trump supporter, because literally the only option you can think of that isn’t agreeing with you entirely is ‘Trump’.

                  It’s pathetic.

              • TexasDrunk@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                edit-2
                10 hours ago

                Edit: this started out as a single word question. The diatribe came after my reply.

                It’s a reasonable question. Because I don’t think she’ll go far enough. And if she goes further than I think she will, I’ll push her to go further left than that. I’m not nearly as far left as a lot of folks on Lemmy. I probably fall into Social Democrat on a good day. But that puts me further left than most US politics and pretty much all the politics in my home state.

                I’m a pragmatist when it comes to elections. She’s good enough to where I don’t think she’ll sponsor hunting parties for LGBTQ+ folks but I don’t think she’ll be trying very fucking hard to get universal healthcare or working with states to try to get rid of FPTP.

                Unless your question is why I won’t do it after primary season. That’s because we don’t fight in front of the kids. I’m going to support the furthest left feasible candidate because, again, pragmatic. I’ll shut my fucking mouth, back the least fascist, and start trying to affect change again the second I can without shitting on that candidate during election season. Plus I like to take a break between election day and inauguration day because it’s all so mentally exhausting and I’ll be drinking more than usual for the holidays.

      • bobburger@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        14
        ·
        15 hours ago

        This is absolutely correct. I’m sure the 40% of voters who want to keep sending weapons to Israel aren’t even Harris voters. So clearly the Democratic party is only doing it for the love of genocide and it seems obvious that after they finish the genocide in Gaza and Lebanon they’ll shift their focus to genocide of Palestinians and other arabs living in America. This is completely unacceptable to me which is why I voted for Trump.

        I thought about voting for a third party but I live in a swing state and want to minimize the chances of Koncentration Kamp Kamala from getting elected so I directly supported Trump rather than indirectly.

        • Ephoron@lemmy.kde.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          14 hours ago

          I live in a swing state and want to minimize the chances of Koncentration Kamp Kamala from getting elected so I directly supported Trump rather than indirectly.

          I could no more vote Trump ‘tactically’ than I could Harris. I think one ought vote according to one’s concience. The whole notion of tactical voting makes a mockery of democracy, if no one could be persuaded to vote tactically there’d be significantly less ‘electioneering’. More like the Nordic model, with way more parties catering to a broader range of political views.

          You only have to look at the current Democrat campaign, they barely need a policy at all, they’re running almost entirely on being not-Trump.

        • ArxCyberwolf@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          12 hours ago

          “Koncentration Kamp Kamala”

          Listen to yourself. You’re beyond delusional. Seek help.

        • Soup@lemmy.cafe
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          12 hours ago

          Sooooo… because you can’t be bothered to understand how things work. You voted for someone that suggests that Israel “finish the job.”

          That sure showed those pesky libs!

          You’re about as bad-faith as it gets. You’re MAGA, through and through. Drop the act that it has anything to do with genocide.

  • zante@lemmy.wtf
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    19
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Sure the meme is Kamala can be a terrible President, but I would vote for a Ham sandwich to keep the GOP from power ?

  • ceoofanarchism@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    12 hours ago

    I mean Kamala will be a horrible president. It’s not possible to be a good president when it is a job to uphold the American empire and its power. Kamala will be horrible though with her support for the ongoing Gaza genocide, terrible and half arse healthcare and environmental plans when we can afford to be half arse on neither, she is also trying to outflank Trump to the right on immigration and police violence.

  • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    7 hours ago

    “Voting for the Lesser Evil is still Evil”

    Makes sense.

    I throw out all my old uneaten perfectly edible still in the packaging food that hasn’t expired yet instead of donating it to a local food bank because if I can’t give the nutrition-insecure folks a gourmet dinner, why should I even fucking bother?

    • BallsandBayonets@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      19 minutes ago

      We’re talking about evil, it’d be you have moldy chicken or moldy potatoes to eat, which is less likely to kill you if you eat it?