Summary:
Amid rising early voting numbers from women in battleground states like Wisconsin, Michigan, and Pennsylvania—where they make up 55% of ballots cast—some conservative voices are panicking. Right-wing commentators are sounding the alarm, fearing that even MAGA-supporting husbands’ wives might be casting secret ballots for Kamala Harris.
Charlie Kirk, founder of Turning Point USA, has put it starkly: “If men stay at home, Kamala is president. It’s that simple.” Jesse Watters of Fox News has even equated a wife secretly voting for Harris to “having an affair.”
When you’re so surrounded by enemies you aren’t even safe in your own bunker!
So those MAGA women actually have two jobs: Vote early for Harris, and keep their husbands occupied on voting day…
Sneak in a good laxative!!! 😁
My wife just read to me a tweet (or whatever) where a husband was making his wife vote by mail so he could guarantee she voted for Trump.
I feel like he should be charged for voting twice. If she doesn’t get to pick who to vote for, she’s not voting, he is. Send him to jail for 15 years (or for whatever they sent that woman who cast the provisional ballot because she was told she could and then she wasn’t eligible to vote in the end).
The irony of these guys complaining about vote manipulation conspiracies while manipulating votes.
They think this is what everyone does. They publicly virtue signal that they oppose whichever bad thing so they can condemn others for doing it while secretly doing it themselves. It’s ok when they do it themselves anyway, because they are good people doing a necessary thing for good reasons. When others find out about their behavior, their reaction is to accuse harder, because they assume we are all doing that too and they are angry that we didn’t get caught yet.
That’s actually the one coherent argument I’ve seen against voting by mail. But if someone is that closely dominated, voting is only one of their problems. I don’t think depriving everybody else of voting by mail is the right way to handle it.
Yes, I agree. I think the solution for these case is to crack down on illegally voting this way.
deleted by creator
The solution I’ve heard is you’re able to go to the elections office after mailing your ballot and void the mailed one and vote in person. Depending on the level of control/oversight may be not realistic for everyone, but again, at that point I’m more concerned about the human than the vote and were talking a whole other problem to solve.
Next they’ll be wanting jobs, to own property and to wear trousers too!
Yeah, and we can’t give them that because trousers are a zero-sum game and if women wear trousers, then there won’t be enough trousers to go around!
/s
deleted by creator
It’s still an affair if it’s not secret. Fucking (over) every single woman in the country is still an affair, even if you proudly declare it to your wife and everyone you know.
Easy solution: make voting public like in communism! /s
Or, hear me out: Set the desired result first and then let them vote, but count what you planned and not the ballots!
Smash the patriarchy.
Salon - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)
Information for Salon:
Wiki: mixed - There is no consensus on the reliability of Salon. Editors consider Salon biased or opinionated, and its statements should be attributed.
MBFC: Left - Credibility: Medium - Factual Reporting: Mixed - United States of America
Search topics on Ground.News
How dare they have opinions of their own.
Their book says…
Which book is their book? Obviously not the one they wave around as a magic talisman but never read more than a few carefully selected sentences out of at a time….
That’s generous. Statistically speaking, fewer can read than will.
I wonder if divorce rates will go up.
No, most likely just spousal abuse. The right is well known for not having to need proof to believe something as fact. All they need is a passing thought that it could be possible, or worse the orange tells them “your wives are traitors that voted for Kam-ela”
As long as No Fault Divorce is still legal in their areas.
Exactly. Depends on who wins the election!
Will a republican judge see a fault in a married woman voting against her
ownershusbands wishes?
LOL you had me there for a sec.
worst thing about the Julia Roberts ad (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FaCPck2qDhk, if you must) is they someone not completely filling in the scantron bubble on the ballot
also Charlie “master debater” Kirk and Jesse “yelling on TV is my memorable trait” Watters are desperate tools, SO ANXIOUS to control women
I have to wonder how good political polls are at detecting this type of thing, also motivation to actually go vote on the day.
What I mean is, before and after the floating garbage joke, responses to polls might have been the same, but some responders might have become much more motivated to actually vote.
Most commentators and pollsters are saying the polling is very thorough and accurate but resolving these types of issues doesn’t really seem possible to me.
Treat women like objects and strip their rights… fuck around and find out.
