• pewter@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 days ago

      He probably didn’t. He was polling very well. Very well. Better than his last two elections for a long time. People pretended he couldn’t win and I admittedly didn’t think they’d do that since that’s exactly what happened in 2016.

      Simply assuming the election was stolen will be a mistake because that mindset will help Republicans win their next election. The voters wanted an irreparably changed supreme court and Trump functionally immune from prosecution and that’s what the voters got.

      • LustyArgonian@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        I reformatted my post for clarity if that helps. I have been trying to gather reputable sources and more info as story unfolds and I think I let it get too messy.

      • JackbyDev@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        There are reasons to want Congress to stop him apart from “stealing” the election (which I don’t think happened). Particularly the 14th amendment which states insurrectionists cannot hold office.

      • LustyArgonian@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        Um, or not realizing the danger we are literally in right now will be a mistake.

        Think of what Trump has literally said:

        • He wants a purge night, and a purge for “woke” military members (this is literally a military take over by Russia)
        • He wants to take away freedom of speech for leftists
        • He wants to end birthright citizenship
        • You will never vote again after this election

        There won’t be a next election. He is a Russian asset meant to take all of our money and kill us. The voters didn’t decide anything, Russia did. To kill us.

      • recapitated@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        3 days ago

        I’m pretty excited to see the left wing numerologists emerge from the woodwork. Don’t forget to buy those supplements.

        • LustyArgonian@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          3 days ago

          So what exactly is philosophically unsound about what I said?

          We can philosophically find the inconsistencies in numerology to debunk it as a science or predictive method. So what am I saying that is illogical?

          • jeffw@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            I think the illogical part is how you cited sources that don’t say what you claim they are saying.

            This is called “disinformation” folks

            • LustyArgonian@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              3 days ago

              Which article specifically is wrong?

              YouTube is indeed a source as people have official YouTube channels. I’m linking a video of someone saying something - that’s a source. People who are young think sources are only weblinks because they’ve never written a bibliography without links in it at all. That used to be the norm.

      • jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        One piece of this is pretty easily debunked:

        “Your votes are rigged. We can win New Mexico.”

        If that were true, why didn’t they? 🤔

        https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/2024_United_States_presidential_election_in_New_Mexico

        Not only did Trump lose, he wasn’t even close.

        Fewer people turned up for Harris, likely due to the lower emphasis on vote by mail this year compared to 2020, but he still lost.

        https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/2020_United_States_presidential_election_in_New_Mexico

        As for the whole “Starlink hacked the machines!” that’s as crazy a claim as the Hugo Chavez claims from 2020.

        https://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2024/11/11/left-wing-conspiracy-theorists-elon-musk-satellites/

        "There is no evidence to support the claims spreading on social media. US voting machines are typically disconnected from the internet in order to prevent interference.

        Last week Jen Easterly, director of the US Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, said there was “no evidence of any malicious activity that had a material impact on the security or integrity of our election infrastructure”.

        Allegations that there are millions of “missing” votes have been spread by both Democrats unhappy about Trump’s victory and Republicans who claimed the theories vindicate their concerns about the 2020 result.

        The discrepancy in the number of votes cast is mostly down to slow vote counting in California, which as of Monday had only processed around 74pc of ballots despite being called for Kamala Harris days ago."

        I’m not going through the rest of the claims as it’s obviously just so much tinfoil hattery.

        Youtube is not a source, anyone can go on Youtube and say anything.

        Ditto Facebook, Twitter, reddit, etc. etc.

          • jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            And still more useful than your sources.

            Trump did not win New Mexico despite your claim that they could flip it by cheating, that’s not up for debate.

            Voting machines are NOT connected to the Internet, starlink or otherwise. Again, not up for debate.

            Take your tin-foil hat somewhere else.

  • mightyfoolish@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    March and rally to protest Trump and the two-party war machine

    Mass protests against the two-party system. Perhaps we can get some actual representation next election.

    • zephorah@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      There isn’t going to be another election, not a real one anyway. It’s game over.

      For starters, his first speech on 1A basically says he’s prosecuting anyone who dares to enforce the Hatch Act.

    • joker125@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      18
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      Funny. Assuming there actually is a next time.

      Imagine being stupid enough to protest democracy, assist a wannabe dictator become the next US president, and still bitching about a two party system system. Because of ignorance and stupidity there will only be single party going forward in America.

      Fascism like the world has never seen.

      This shit is so self-defeating, anti-progressive and only inflicts damage on the truly innocent people

      But hey principles ami right?

      • Snowclone@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        You anthropomorphizing complex socio-polotical effects of a rotting economic system. Just thought you ought to know.

      • b_n@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        3 days ago

        Hey Bud. You okay?

        This reads like you’re feeling defeated. It’s okay to have hope that the world can get better, even if it feels like the dark days.

      • bstix@feddit.dk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        If it’s any consolation, at least Trump can only ever become a short term dictator, because he’s old.

        I doubt even the MAGAs would support Vance or any other republican trying to maintain a dictatorship. The entire GOP will crumble in infighting when Trump is gone and probably even beforehand.

  • jmsy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    americans are awful at protesting. they show up, cant figure out where to park, have no organizations, have lame chants (e.g. hey hey, ho ho, donald trump has go to go), present the same meaningless meme protest posters, leave tons of trash behind, and it last a few hours. Nothing is sustained for multiple days or weeks, and the solidarity is with people who already were with you.

  • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    yall had your chance. fucked around and found out.

    I still support the protests but, jesus christ, this fucking mess is only just beginning.

  • Ironchico@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    25
    ·
    3 days ago

    Where were all these people when they had the opportunity to vote? You lost a legitimate election. Now you want to protest the results? Please explain the difference when republicans protested and tried to overturn the election.

    • AmidFuror@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      34
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      4 days ago

      If the people had rallied far more before the election, it could have convinced enough ignorant fence sitters. Now we have people reacting to damage already done when the next chance to fix it is two years away.

      • FenrirIII@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        4 days ago

        It would have been worse. Fox News would paint them as anarchists and encourage violence. Nothing would change on the right

        • vividspecter@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          4 days ago

          Yeah, it would have just been feeding their infinitely expandable persecution fetish. The same goes for the legal cases against Trump. It was the right thing to do, but it just meant that Trump supporters dug in their heels even more.

      • btaf45@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        4 days ago

        If the people had rallied far more before the election, it could have convinced enough ignorant fence sitters.

        The exact same thing happened in 2016. Huge rallies a few days after Clinton lost. If those same street rallies had come a few days BEFORE the election, she probably would have won.

        • echo@lemmings.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          4 days ago

          Of course, there is the distinct possibility that the rallies were happening before the election. The billionaire owned media just didn’t choose to show it until now.

  • VinnyDaCat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    Remember if you’re going to any protests. Don’t bring your phone and wear a mask. Use a map if you’re not familiar with the area, write any important numbers you might need to call from a cell on your arm. Let friends know where you’re going and don’t go alone if you can.