Summary

A new WalletHub poll reveals that 74% of Americans believe Donald Trump’s proposed tariffs will worsen inflation, which remains a major concern for most households.

Trump’s plan includes significant tariffs—up to 60% on Chinese goods and 20% on other imports—to protect American jobs and address issues like fentanyl production and border security.

Experts warn these tariffs could increase consumer prices, with middle-income families potentially losing $2,500 annually.

Analysts caution Trump’s plans may face political hurdles in Congress despite his economic-focused campaign promises.

  • LANIK2000@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    8 hours ago

    How’s this news? That’s literally what MAGA was selling the entire time. The so called “Temporary Hardships”. They promised and they’re going to deliver some economic hardships, that was the sales pitch and people voted for it. Anybody shocked is just not paying attention.

  • Pyrin@kbin.melroy.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    2 days ago

    Polls don’t mean shit. The only polls Americans should’ve given more of a fuck about, were the election ones!

    Too fucking late.

  • ZoDoneRightNow@kbin.earth
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 days ago

    TLDR: this news paper found that less than 150 Americans out of the only 200 that were asked in a non-specified state think his tariffs will worsen inflation. This is bad news for Trump because he cares about what those 150 people think for some reason

  • kescusay@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    244
    ·
    2 days ago

    Are we going to pretend he gives a shit? He doesn’t. He got what he wanted, and he can’t be elected again (barring him fucking our systems so severely that he manages to force a third term on us). He’s going to wreck the justice system to avoid any consequences for his actions after his term, and he could very well kick the bucket while he’s in office anyway (dude’s got KFC gravy for blood).

    He doesn’t care. He no longer has to. He can play his country-destroying games with impunity. He has no reason to give a single fuck what the American people want.

    • takeda@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      I don’t think he cares as much about the tariffs, but I am quite sure tariffs on Mexico and Canada were Elonia’s idea

    • Granbo's Holy Hotrod@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      156,302,318 voters voted out of 244,666,890 eligible. 77,266,856 people voted for tRump. That’s 167,400,034 eligible voters who did not vote for tRump. So yeah…that tracks.

      • krashmo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        2 days ago

        Non-voters don’t matter as far as the political system we’re discussing is concerned so why do we spend so much time talking about them? How many of them there are and the reasons they don’t vote are both entirely irrelevant.

        • Scubus@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          2 days ago

          Nah, with the current political climate, if you didnt vote, you voted for trump. Meaning well over half our country voted for trump.

      • Auli@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 day ago

        And nobody gives one flying fuck about anyone who can’t be bothered to vote. If your to lazy to get off your ass and vote you have absolutely no right to complain about anything cause politically you don’t matter and you get what your lazy ass asked for.

    • Krzd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      and he can’t be elected again (barring him fucking our systems so severely that he manages to force a third term on us).

      That’s easy, create a national crisis (massive inflation + riots) and have SCOTUS suspend the 22nd amendment

    • rumba@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Oh it’s deeper than that, it’s money coming out of our pockets slipping through a third party and going back into the government offers. It’s an extra tax on goods by proxy. He then has a fresh revenue stream without any earmarks on it.

  • not_that_guy05@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    2 days ago

    Can’t wait for worker shortages to cause supply line issues. I really hope the US feels this one.

    So ashamed to be an American right now, but yet I might not be one starting January. So eh.

    Eat dicks fuckers.

  • Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    56
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Perhaps they should have thought about that before voting for a lunatic.

    • prof_wafflez@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      You don’t understand though. They really had to stick it to minorities and women, their every day be damned.

      • Blackmist@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 day ago

        It’s almost like they think if those people have less happiness then they will have more. It’s the same nonsense that underlies trickle down economics, a childlike belief that things won’t be held onto by the ruling class with a vice-like grip.

    • shaiatan@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Yep. Fuck everyone that bothered to vote against the fascists. Fuck everyone in a blue spot in red states that voted against the other idiots around them.

      Or - maybe we realize that people should actually bother to vote even if they have to vote for a candidate that doesn’t align 100% with their values.

      • CmdrShepard42@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        2 days ago

        Even if Harris won, that wouldn’t have changed anything materially with the country. There’s a deep rot in the country, and it’s just getting worse regardless of who’s winning elections.

        • wavebeam@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          This is not true. I don’t understand why you’re even saying this obvious both-sides propaganda after the election. Harris would not have tanked the economy like Trump’s about to. Biden recovered the damage trump did in his first term and it’s reasonable to think Harris would have continued that trend.

          • CmdrShepard42@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            Only if you think slapping a coat of paint on a dilapidated house makes it livable again. Republicans want to turn the country into a dystopian nightmare, and Democrats have proven time and time again through their actions that they’re more than willing to, at worst, help it along, or at best, do nothing to stop it.

            You can choose to believe the empty promises and hopium, but I don’t. A bunch of sycophants who are more preoccupied with deflecting criticism than actually wanting to fix things or hold politicians accountable aren’t going to change my mind. The 5 word responses that amount to little more than meme or bumper sticker phrases just proves that your position is indefensible.

            • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              You can choose to believe that being overtly evil is the same thing as being neglectful but it just makes you look like either a liar or asshole.

              • CmdrShepard42@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                23 hours ago

                I’d argue the person who defends abhorrent actions just because they’re being conducted by their “team” is the liar and the asshole. They’re lying to themselves about doing “good” and being an asshole by propping up these destructive politicians to the detriment of us all.

                Republicans being evil doesn’t make Democrats the good guys. We don’t live in a Marvel movie.

                • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  22 hours ago

                  No one is doing that but you’re working hard to make 2016 and 2024 the default moving forward.

        • atzanteol@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          2 days ago

          If Trump lost in 2016 abortion would still be legal and pregnant women wouldn’t be dying of sepsis.

          You are demonstrably wrong.

          • CmdrShepard42@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            1 day ago

            And if Dems had passed single-payer instead of a Republican healthcare plan when they had a supermajority in 2010, thousands of people wouldn’t be dying from lack of adequate healthcare and people wouldn’t be cheering about a healthcare CEO getting executed in the street in 2024.

            If they’d boosted the minimum wage at any point since 2009, maybe so many people wouldn’t be living in their cars or in tents on the sidewalk.

            If they’d fought harder to maintain Obama’s SCOTUS nomination in early 2016 instead of “waiting until after the election,” or fought against Trump nominating someone a month before the 2020 election, abortion would still be legal.

            If they actually stood for the principles that they claim to, our weapons and tax dollars wouldn’t be currently being used to turn tens of thousands of Palestinian men, women, and children into red mist.

            Trump is just a symptom of the rot that I’m speaking of not the cause. It doesn’t matter if he wins an election or not because there’s a lot more like him lining up to hold office.

              • CmdrShepard42@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                1 day ago

                If that’s your response, then you have no basis to complain about abortion rights, Trump, or anything else. Everything and every injustice can be boiled down to “the world isn’t perfect,” so we might as well throw up our hands and just accept it all, right?

    • AlecSadler@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      I agree. Let’s just hit the giant reset button, it won’t be fun, in fact it’ll be quite the opposite, but our current trajectory is no good and unsustainable anyway.

  • vrighter@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 days ago

    “could” increase consumer prices? Really? Still not sure whether they will actually increase, if tarriffs are implemented?

  • ExtremeDullard@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    158
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    74% of Americans believe Donald Trump’s proposed tariffs will worsen inflation

    How about not voting the guy in then?

    • takeda@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      2 days ago

      They voted because of “woke” and immigrants. A guy on social media told them those are the real problems we face.

      I can’t believe how little we are acknowledging that social media is currently being used to manipulate voters not just in US but also in Europe. Why people think that what happened in Romania didn’t also happen in US? And is not happening in other European countries?

          • spacesatan@leminal.space
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            Weird how people aren’t talking about the major shortcomings of the democratic candidate anymore. I wonder why that might be.

            If Kamala was anti trans rights you’d be sitting here like “why doesnt anyone talk about trans rights anymore, those damned russians at it again”. No, it’s tablestakes that the right is awful. You’re on a left leaning platform, most people here oppose the genocide. Obviously there was going to be vocal pushback on how your candidate sucked on an issue that basic.

        • Kroxx@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          1 day ago

          It was and they won! Now with Trump in office no more Palestinians will suffer! The humanitarian crisis is over, god-emperor himself said he wants Israel to “finish what they started”. He must mean that war needs to end, what other interpretation could possibly be accurate? I thank Jesus personally every night for helping the man win who wants to jack inflation right back up after it’s finally started taming. Our economy is in the right hands!

      • PugJesus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        27
        ·
        2 days ago

        As often as people beat that drum, it’s nothing but an excuse for most. They don’t have any actual thoughts or opinions on the economy. Just voting on vibes.

        • atzanteol@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 days ago

          I think it’s that and “the grass is greener” fallacy. “I’m upset with things now so I’ll vote for somebody different because it might be better.”

          • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            and “the grass is greener” fallacy. “I’m upset with things now so I’ll vote for somebody different because it might be better.”

            Canada is on our way toward falling into that same trap.

            It’s frustrating to see the right wing party so far ahead in the polls when they have nothing to offer except “We’re not that other guy”.

    • UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      If the voting public were not handcuffed to the two party system by First-past-the-post voting, perhaps they would have chosen someone else.

    • adarza@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      half of the respondents don’t care, because it hurts minorities and immigrants more.

  • futatorius@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 day ago

    It won’t. His Congressional majority is completely servile, and none of them care what the American people think. Their only focus is on looting and sabotage.