“Apple CEO Tim Cook plans to donate $1 million to Donald Trump’s inauguration fund, reports Axios. The donation will be a personal donation directly from Cook rather than a donation from Apple”

I’ll defend Apple as being the least shitty of the big tech giants but I can’t defend this.

  • Snapz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    54
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    These CEOs are funding hate, violence and the end of American democracy - they have enough power, money and influence to oppose, yet they don’t. They decided that a few must be sacrificed for the greater good profit.

    Something happened on the 4th of December. Today is the 4th of January. Just in case anyone’s calendar app is stuck closed. Interesting if true…

      • skulbuny@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        And go where? Where in the world is safe right now? I thought about living in the Philippines with my family, but China is probably waging war soon. Europe? With the way America is headed and the war is going? Let’s assume Ukraine wins: Europe is out of gas and will militarize and right wing governments are rising with German nationalism leading the battle drums, Ukraine gonna be in an economic slump, Russia is gonna be subservient and dependent on China because its economy is gone without a win.

        That leaves countries with metropolises that are suffering from westerners gentrifying their neighborhoods with the USD being strong in these places. We are really going to make the poor in other nations pay the price for our government’s doing again, but this time by our own choice? That’s not any better imo. Unless you are leaving with the specific intent on making the place you are going better, stay home please

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          5 days ago

          Do you mean safe or safer than the U.S.? Because you can’t be guaranteed of absolute safety anywhere. If you’re queer or brown, there are a lot of countries where you’ll be safer than the U.S.

          • skulbuny@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            5 days ago

            Fair point. If you are in immediate danger then yeah, not gonna argue. But if you are able to stay and do something, that should be preferable.

            I am brown (Filipino). I won’t be leaving. My sister lives here. My nephew. They can go somewhere safe, but there aren’t many places safe from a hot, land war in this world like the US observably is. Mayyybe Canada, but enjoy that economy.

  • bulwark@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    110
    ·
    6 days ago

    Amazon, Meta, Uber, OpenAI’s Sam Altman, Goldman Sachs, Bank of America, Coinbase, Toyota, Ford, GM, AT&T, Black & Decker, and Charter Communications are also making donations to Trump’s inauguration fund.

    I guess I never really paid attention before but is it normal for companies to donate to an inauguration fund? It sure seems like a government sanctioned protection racket.

    • boonhet@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      5 days ago

      They’re the only one selling physical products as their main business so they can afford to give you marginally better privacy and UX than say, Google, who’s built their business on tying tracking and advertising into their open source products like Chromium and Android.

  • JamesFire@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    69
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    5 days ago

    I’ll defend Apple as being the least shitty of the big tech giants but I can’t defend this.

    Why would you do that though? The only thing I’m aware of that they do even remotely better than anyone else is privacy. But it’s not that much better, and it comes at the cost of gestures at everything else

    • IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      5 days ago

      Like I said, they’re the least shitty. Can you think of a corp that’s better? Google? Fucking Meta? Microsoft?

      • lengau@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        I have my own problems with them, but off the top of my head I think the following tech companies all do better than Apple: Red Hat, Canonical, Framework, Purism, System76, Fairphone.

      • homicidalrobot@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        5 days ago

        Microsoft didn’t spend multiple decades trying to force their own chargers and ports over universal standards. Not saying any of them are good, but apple is in no way better and has spent years creating contention between consumers. It’s just as likely they sell your tracking data as anyone else, they spend developer time every month making sure their ecosystem is considered better for cultural reasons while being ostensibly worse than competitors for most things. Their phones are generally a year or more behind competitors but they have made-up features that serve no purpose consumers rally around like imessage. They have a tiny sandbox to play in without completely voiding your warranty - Themes instead of real customization. “Blue bubbles”? Are you kidding me? How about allowing any form of tinkering beyond a garden path? How about supporting repair of devices at their actual branded stores? They’re easily up there as one of the worst for consumers at large.

        • IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          12
          ·
          edit-2
          5 days ago

          I’m really not interested in a long, drawn out debate about this, suffice to say that if you think all the things you listed, most of which are your opinion rather than indisputable fact, somehow make Apple worse than Google, Microsoft, or Meta … well let’s just agree to disagree.

      • Chewget@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        At least with android devices there is a possibility of swapping the operating system and windows computers can always be made Linux.

    • ratel@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      51
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      5 days ago

      IDK why people say they have better privacy: They just settled a lawsuit over evesdroping using Siri. I think they probably have less interest than Google in selling data for advertising, mostly likely using it internally for their ecosystem so they probably come across more privacy focused but I assume they snoop just as much as any other big tech company.

      • dan@upvote.au
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        less interest than Google in selling data for advertising

        Google don’t sell data. The data is what makes them valuable, so it wouldn’t make sense. If they did sell data, the other big tech companies would just buy their data to remove their competitive advantage.

        What Google actually sells is your attention. Advertisers can target people based on demographic data, things you like, etc, but the advertiser never sees the data used for targeting.

        You can use Google and Facebook’s Ads Manager sites yourself and see exactly what advertisers see.

        On the other hand, Apple mostly keep their collected data for their own ad network. Yes, they have one - it’s mostly just used for ads for “recommended” apps in the app store, but last I heard, they have plans to expand it.

        • ratel@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          5 days ago

          Yeah apologies, that’s a good point - thanks for adding more context!

          • dan@upvote.au
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            5 days ago

            No worries - it’s a pretty common misconception that tech companies sell data. I’ve worked on ads systems at big tech companies so I’ve seen some parts of how it works. The companies are very protective of their data as it’s essentially their highest-value asset. Employees can’t see any of your data either - it’s very tightly locked down, with strict ACLs and audit logging.

            Large advertisers generally don’t get any special access either - the tools/apps that large advertisers use are mostly the same as what small advertisers / individuals can see and use.

    • Corgana@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      5 days ago

      The only thing I’m aware of that they do even remotely better than anyone else is privacy.

      Where did you hear this? Its my understanding that they are one of the worst when it comes to privacy.

      • Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        5 days ago

        Siri “unintentionally” (because it’s a sentient being right?) recording entire conversations def feels pretty terrible.

    • groet@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      5 days ago

      They do better about privacy because they make enough money from their inflated prices and blind brand loyalty where they dont have to become an ad company like google. Google is very good at protecting their users data from third parties, as long as they can still collect all of it.

      Apple (currently) doesn’t collect a lot of data which allows them to design products with security as a primary component instead of as an afterthought

  • fox2263@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    5 days ago

    They’re all “donating” the same amount.

    And also this is the largest inaugural fund in history. In comparison to his previous which was $107m this is so far over $150m.

    Considering Bidens and both of Obamas were between $50m and $70m is this not ringing alarm bells with anyone? Or is this something to “look” in to in like 7 years time when no one gives a shit.

    Beggars belief.

    • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      This is how things are going to work going forward.

      Even if it is illegal, these people are above the law. Internet just exposing obvious corruption.

  • cultsuperstar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    5 days ago

    Paying his tribute to the king. He’ll have to donate more if he wants to usurp Elon. How much has Zuck donated?

  • Buffalox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    84
    ·
    5 days ago

    Why does such a thing as an inaugural fund exist? Seems like it’s just to facilitate more corruption!