• Snapz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    2 days ago

    “Our’research has determined that we can fill up to 90% of the visual field with advertisements before inducing seizures!”

    Corporations all genuinely want to be that guy so fucking bad, just because they think that if they do become him, they might actually starry to finally feel something… anything. Or they think if they become that guy their father might say "I love you " for the first time or some other sad “this is why I’m a serial killer” shit.

  • leadore@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    2 days ago

    If you answer wrong, what does it do? Refuse to show you any more of the program you are paying them to provide?

    Oh wait, I know. It shows another ad, right? That’s gotta be it. We’ll keep showing you ads until you fucking pay attention!

    • you_are_dust@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      So I think this might be getting misrepresented. Now I don’t in anyway support"interactive ads" like this, but I’m pretty sure that is all this is. I actually had this exact commercial yesterday and didn’t even realize that it was actually asking the question in a non-rhetorical way. So I didn’t touch the remote and the commercial just plays out and ends as it would if the text wasn’t on the screen. I don’t know what happens if you actually answer the question. Hulu puts an ad countdown timer on the screen when ads are playing so you know how much of the ad is left and my show resumed at the time it said it would before the commercials started.

  • RaymondLuxuryYacht@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Can you continue to watch your show without answering? Or are you forced to watch the commercial and answenthe question to continue?

    I mean, it’s fine if they’re doing research on the commercials themselves, and the answers show how much or little people actually pay attention. But if you can’t continue your show without the right answer, that’s a problem.

    • 7toed@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 day ago

      2 minute ad slot who? Even if it does “let you continue”, I left my TV on to watch it not interact. YouTube does this shit where it will hand out a 30 MINUTE ad because nobody has interacted to skip after a few ads. It’s slippery slope bullshit all the way through.

      • RaymondLuxuryYacht@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        Look, ads are how they pay the bills. We wouldn’t have ads if they’d set their prices in a way that allowed them to make a profit, which is how businesses function. They are businesses, after all, not charities.

        They underpriced their services, and lost money for as long as they could, hoping they’d somehow “win” the Steaming Wars. I absolutely detest having commercials on something I already pay for, but it’s how it’s going to be because they lost money for so long.

        So a commercial is one thing, but a commercial that quizzes me to see if I paid attention is a completely different entity altogether. That’s the part of the whole equation that would be too much.

        • frostysauce@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          So a commercial is one thing, but a commercial that quizzes me to see if I paid attention is a completely different entity altogether. That’s the part of the whole equation that would be too much.

          Drink verification can to continue.

        • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          You’re right, but that doesn’t mean it’s a good system. Charging for their services would be much less nonsensical in the end.

      • PersnickityPenguin@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        30 minutes? I got a 24 hour ad one time, during the pandemic. It was this trippy art video thing where worms were eating the universe. Or something. I don’t know, but it was animated in a hand drawn style.

        Those were strange times

  • shalafi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    I have one TV for my PC monitor and one for, well, TV. Both hardwired to the network, no external network access. Wrote a quick PS script to switch from one to the other or both, made it into an EXE with buttons, très chic. Everything streams off a crappy USB drive “RAID” array. OpenVPN server with Digital Ocean, hosted in Amsterdam, $6/month. DONE.

    I’m not on some crusade against capitalism, I simply choose not to participate in bullshit like this.

    tl;dr: STEAL YO SHIT.

    • shameless@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      2 days ago

      Its honestly getting to the point now where doing these home setups are so much simpler than owning these proprietary streaming boxes which have everything locked up to serve you ads or just steal data in general.

      Hooking a PC up to the TV even to watch the paid services is probably better at this point.

      • shalafi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        Throw in an ad blocker like a Pi-hole. Life changing. FFS, $10 a month on AWS and you can spin a Lightsail instance, or roll your own on a toaster.

    • Aussiemandeus@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      I wish I was technically savy enough to do any of this.

      Unfortunately I am cursed, I break shit and hate having to spend hours working out what’s fucked on my computer.

      TV’s wifi card shit itself, problem solved pulled out replaced.

      Computer wouldn’t boot cause reason number 432 (actually the flash on the MB said fault reserved for future fault finding) hours of struggling.

      • shalafi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Perhaps you’re a bogon emitter like my wife?

        Learn more here:

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_bogodynamics

        Charles Stross put it succinctly in The Atrocity Archives:

        Idiots emit bogons, causing machinery to malfunction in their presence. System administrators absorb bogons, letting machinery work again.

        This explains why computers suddenly start to work when help arrives. Becoming a bogon sink takes much suffering and practice. You’re already on the path.

    • Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      For over a decade I’ve been watching TV Series and Movies from a Media Box connected via Ethernet to my home NAS (which is generally an old notebook or even my router - once I got myself a decent router - with some external hardisks), which is actually a pretty simple network to set up using Ethernet Over Powerlinr adaptors (which were already good enough for it back when they only did 20 Mb/second and now that they’re 1000Mb/s will handle even the huge resolution lightly compressed stuff that one can now find as booty out there).

      The setup has been recently upgraded to a Mini-PC with Lubuntu and Kodi, which is in my living room (right next to my Internet router to which it is connect with Gigabit Ethernet) and is also my home NAS and Bittorrent server over always on VPN, with a wireless remote for using in my living room to control Kodi (so it works the same as a TV Box for watching media) whilst the background stuff I control from my main PC remotely using a mix of web interfaces and ssh command line.

      I had never had this good an environment for TV entertainment and I’m not even using any of the *arr suite or Usenet to source content so a lot of it is really just doing the same stuff as a decade ago but with better hardware and a more modern UI for media playing and (most importing) a way faster Internet connection.

      Anyways, the point I’m making is that nowadays one can actually upgrade a little bit from your setup (which, by the way, is superior to what I had before my Mini-PC upgrade) cheaply and even get themselves very close to the same experience as the corporate stuff (media box with remote and a nice UI to play stuff from a media library) whilst maintaining maximum control and getting no shit from enshittification.

      PS: I couldn’t recommend more getting a wireless remote if you want to just be able to sit down on your sofa and have a no hassle media box experienced (even whilst behind sits a far more complex home infrastructure that what people who outsource that side of things to the likes of Hulu have). It real helps with having a shit-free under your total control entertainment experience without sacrificing the part of that experience that comes from having a modern interface for media selection.

      • MunkysUnkEnz0@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Instead of a wireless remote

        Check out Unified Remote app on Play Store or Apple. It’s rock steady . Never have issues. It’s one of the few apps I’ve ever paid for.

        Basically control Your desktop from your phone. including text-to-speech for typing. It simply hands down a must have.

        • Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          18 hours ago

          Before this Mini-PC TV Media Box I had an actual dedicated TV Media Box which lasted for maybe a decade, and at some point its remote broke, so rather than throw the whole thing out I made my own IR-translation box with a WiFi-Enabled micro-controller (so it had an IR emitter pointed at my TV Box and that was controlled by some software running on the microcontroller that exposed a REST interface on the WiFi) and also made my own Android app to remote control the TV Media Box via that translation box.

          A dedicate remote and a remote control app on a smartphone or tablet are just not the same thing in practice.

          Whilst I don’t tend to have my phone on my living room, I do have a tablet there, but a dedicated remote is much more straightforward to use because it just directly works with zero delay: there is no need wake it up and unlock it like I would my tablet, I will never need to switch apps like I do on a tablet if I was using the tablet for something else, the user interface in a dedicated remote is as standard and familiar as it gets, and that remote can just stay there in my living room all the time for anybody to use just for that purpose alone whilst the tablet will move around to be used for other things and even taken away from home.

          The smartphone/tablet remote control app is a more flexible option that can pack-in as many or as few controls as one wants, but that is a tradeoff for it being overall more of a hassle, less practical and slower to use for the most frequently used commands. Ultimately I just want to select a video and start it, possibly stopping it or pausing it, with the least hassle possible and with no unrelated tasks (like getting the tablet from somewhere else, having the unlock it or switch tasks on it) getting in the way.

          So in my experience, having tried both ways, the dedicated hardware remote is a superior option which is why I recommended it.

  • BananaTrifleViolin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    100
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    I would immediately cancel any service that does that.

    I actively avoid advertising. I’ve cancelled Amazon prime now it has advertising.

    I got Sky’s Internet TV here in the UK - a supposedly premium service yet the first VOD demand show I streamed I found it had adverts and you had to pay more to be able to fast forward through them. I immediately cancelled.

    These companies are greedy as fuck, and driven by the stupidity of always trying to be “growing” to grow their share prices. That just means always trying to save money and take more money from their customers. Enshittification is a result of the stupidity of the stock markets.

    • Blackmist@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      55
      ·
      2 days ago

      I was on Amazon Prime for years.

      Then in the space of one year they decided that listening to an album in order was now a “premium” feature, and that ads would be shovelled into everything.

      Sure, I lost the “free” shipping, so now I hardly buy anything from Amazon either. I see this as an absolute win.

      • 3dmvr@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        2 days ago

        same i was really buying a lot of pointless shit it turns out lol

      • BigPotato@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        I cancelled Prime over a year ago and for some reason I still get “Prime” delivery. I don’t get the games, movies, or Twitch stuff but if I order something it shows up faster than when my partner does.

        So, I don’t hate that about Amazon… Everything else keeps me from ordering there unless there’s no other options.

    • PrettyFlyForAFatGuy@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 days ago

      I cancelled Amazon Prime the second they sent me that email.

      My GF then got her own subscription within less than a month so it nets out as 0 loss to Bezos in the end…

      Sometimes i imagine him pointing and laughing at me

    • blackn1ght@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 days ago

      Sky really pisses me off. They have exclusive rights to the F1 in the UK, but you need to pay a fortune for it, as you have to have the base sky package plus sky sports (I think) plus sky sports F1.

      Probably comes to over £50/month for something that’s on every other weekend on average, and they still show ads! If there’s a subscription, there shouldn’t be any ads.

      • Knuschberkeks@leminal.space
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        If all you want is F1, and you kniw someone who lives ina country where F1TV is available, try booking F1TV through them. It’s 50€/year.

  • THCDenton@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    2 days ago

    If i ever am forced to answer a quiz like this, I will make a youtube video lambasting that product or service.