• supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    76
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    21 days ago

    Genocide Profiteer not War Profiteer

    Fuck you Microsoft, if I wasn’t already done with you for completely enshittifying your operating system, I would DEFINITELY be done with you for this.

    Fuck off and continue to become a Kodak or Yahoo or other still existing washout company that totally lost the plot.

  • wise_pancake@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    256
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    21 days ago

    the email to Aboussad reads. “It is also concerning that you have not apologized to the company, and in fact you have shown no remorse for the effect that your actions have had and will have.”

    Obviously there were going to fire these employees, especially the one who gave notice then did this.

    But why the fuck would anyone be like “yOu DiDn’T eVeN aPoLoGiZe To ThE cOmPaNy”? That’s the stupidest god damn thing I’ve heard since “Liberation Day”

    • FourWaveforms@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      21 days ago

      That email was almost certainly written by lawyers with the intention of supporting MS in court, should it come down to that.

      • shalafi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        21 days ago

        Bingo. Lots of stupid things at this level boil down to legal protection. You’ll see it everywhere once you learn and look.

        • parody@lemmings.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          21 days ago

          “Lucky we’re not countersuing! Oh the damages you are certain to be causing in the futureeee, the burns”

          Actually now that I think about it maybe this was a multimillion dollar protest. The headlines have been published for and wide. I bet a few people spent more time feeling guilty than working right after as well - imagine one of them quitting. Still somewhat hard to believe it would lose them contracts but perhaps there will be potential customers who want to avoid connection with Microsoft until this blows over.

      • binom@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        21 days ago

        that makes sense. i hate the fact that such a blatant play at covering your bases could hold up in any court. no matter the legal fineprint, it takes two functioning braincells to realise what’s going on here

    • seeigel@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      21 days ago

      But why the fuck would anyone be like “yOu DiDn’T eVeN aPoLoGiZe To ThE cOmPaNy”?

      Frame the debate. MS doesn’t have to justify their profiteering if they can talk about the employee. The attention span of the public is limited.

    • GnuLinuxDude@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      21 days ago

      Hey, when’s the last time you showed remorse to your multi-trillion market cap employer? Next you’re gonna tell me something really outrageous like you didn’t even swear an oath of fealty to them.

    • fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      21 days ago

      Because law. At every opportunity, make it seem like the employees were not blowing the whistle, but purposefully harming the company.

      • RowRowRowYourBot@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        21 days ago

        What message was that? They work for Microsoft a company that has had DOD contracts for at least the last 25-30 years.

        They were a war profiteer when this worker got their gig. Why is it a problem now?

        • IndustryStandard@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          21 days ago

          Direct participation in the military systems for a genocide is a tad further than the military industrial complex.

          The message is that people participating in genocide will not be made at the very least very uncomfortable for doing so.

          • RowRowRowYourBot@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            21 days ago

            They had IDF contracts for decades as well. Seriously if they had a problem with this and this is not a PR stunt by this person they are choosing an odd time to make this statement.

            • IndustryStandard@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              21 days ago

              An active mass genocide is an odd time to make a statement?

              Microsoft lied about not supplying the IDF military cloud in the past.

              And AI is a far more direct contribution to genocide than excel support.

              Plenty of reasons to do it now. And better now than tomorrow.

              • RowRowRowYourBot@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                21 days ago

                Yes because their military work has been public for decades and it isn’t as if the IDF just started becoming problematic in 2023.

            • Shardikprime@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              21 days ago

              Literally this

              It’s like they are signaling to the world how virtuous they are

              A kind of high ground moral messaging if you will

        • El Barto@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          19 days ago

          Oh yeah, “modern day slavery has been a problem for years. Why be vocal about it now?”

          Look, I am a cynical nobody, so I sometimes think “nothing will ever change.” But some brave souls, more idealistic than me, take these steps with the hope that it will spark change - or at least it will put one more straw in the camel.

          So yeah, it’s about sending a message, and I think that’s important.

        • underwire212@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          21 days ago

          Problems can be ongoing or increase in severity. Just because it’s been an issue for a while doesn’t mean it’s too late for change.

          Also, some people don’t have the luxury to choose an ethical employer (if they even exist).

    • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      21 days ago

      They probably expected their employer not to participate in genocide.

      What a dummy, right?!?! \s

    • stabryen@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      21 days ago

      In terms of Microsoft suing her?

      I guess it would depend on her contract, as Microsoft do profit from war so I would doubt a libel type case would get far.

          • pivot_root@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            21 days ago

            More importantly, with what money? Mega corporations can afford to draw out lawsuits until the end of time (or until the judge gets annoyed), but individuals can’t.

            • Saleh@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              21 days ago

              If she has a lawsuit i would be happy to bolster her legal fund and i am sure many other people too.

          • Laurel Raven@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            21 days ago

            The fact that it’s in retaliation for her speaking out about human rights violations, when they have a clear policy against retaliating against employees who speak out about human rights violations

  • katy ✨@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    81
    ·
    21 days ago

    the best thing i did was spend last month deleting the partitions in my desktop and laptop and installing mint.

    • Zink@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      21 days ago

      Heck yeah. Once in installed Mint on my PC at home, it was only a matter of weeks before I double checked my backed up files and nuked my windows partition.

      I still have the windows partition at work that I never use, and I have heard some bad stories about machines getting wiped when IT upgrades people to win11, so it might just have a little accident in its sleep.

    • SilentObserver@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      21 days ago

      I’ve been on Arch for a little while now, and Kubuntu before that. After Valve launched Proton on Steam, I found myself almost never booting into Windows. Once I ran out of disk space, it was an easy decision to completely purge Windows from my machine. Haven’t looked back in years.

      Fuck Microsoft for trying to control my computer. Finally nice not having it reinstall Candy Crush after every update. And none of that copilot or online account bullshit.

      • Zink@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        21 days ago

        That’s such a nice thing about Linux and FOSS in general. The issues you run into are different than what you may be used to with Windows, but at least the system and its developers aren’t working against you.

        • zarkanian@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          21 days ago

          And if you don’t like the way one distro does things, you can switch to another one, and there are dozens to choose from. With Windows, of course there is only one distro, and if you don’t like it, too bad.

  • SulaymanF@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    94
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    21 days ago

    IBM had a role in the holocaust. Those numbers tattooed on everyone in the concentration camp? Those were IBM ID numbers for the punch cards.

    If IBM staff protested about their role, it’s been lost to history. But it’s repeating today with Gaza and the staff who speak out are being demonized. Israel’s Lavender AI is being used to kill civilians. History will prove this woman and the other employees right in the end.

  • TarantulaFudge@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    104
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    22 days ago

    Microsoft has policy that prevents it from retaliatory actions against human rights violations. Court should rule Microsoft violated its own policies…

    • taladar@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      22 days ago

      prevents it from retaliatory actions against human rights violations

      They can’t retaliate if someone violates human rights?

      • taipan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        47
        ·
        edit-2
        21 days ago

        They’re referencing what the second protester (Vaniya Agrawal) mentioned in her email:

        Know that Microsoft’s human rights statement prohibits retaliation against anyone who raises a human rights-related concern: Human rights statement | Microsoft CSR

        The Microsoft Global Human Rights Statement has a “Foundational principles” section that says:

        Our commitment to human rights defenders: Our commitment to respecting and advancing human rights includes respect and support for the work of human rights defenders around the world. Human rights defenders are people who, individually or with others, engage in activities and advocacy that contribute to the protection of human rights and the rule of law, good governance, tolerance, and diversity and inclusion. Human rights defenders face persistent physical, social, economic, and psychological threats. Microsoft does not tolerate threats, intimidation, retaliation, physical, legal or cyber-attacks against human rights defenders. This commitment extends to all human rights defenders, including those working on issues related to Microsoft and those exercising their rights of freedom of expression, association, and peaceful assembly, including to challenge or protest aspects of our own business.

        Microsoft is clearly declining to fulfill its commitment as it is written in its statement.

  • MunkysUnkEnz0@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    94
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    21 days ago

    The fact that they’re asking her to apologize is Just ass backwards.

    They should apologize, and look into the issue, and possibly, stop, war profiting.

    That’s okay. They’re going to lose a lot of Windows users, forcing them to upgrade Perfectly good computers.

    • SilentObserver@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      21 days ago

      I wish that were the case. But I doubt most people will ditch Windows. They’ll just pony up for a new computer. They’ll certainly lose some users. But Windows will still remain as top dog, most likely. And I doubt that’ll ever change so long as traditional desktop computers and laptops still exist.

      • morrowind@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        21 days ago

        Windows isn’t the issue here. The war profiteering is coming from the AI and cloud divisions

        • SilentObserver@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          21 days ago

          Ok cool. But I was replying to the comment regarding Microsoft forcing new computers on people. So no need for the correction.

    • nutsack@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      21 days ago

      i agree with what you’re saying from an ethical standpoint. i think she’s right to protest.

      but it’s not “an issue”, it’s a huge fucking client of theirs. from a business standpoint its a huge ask to fire a whole military as a customer.

      • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        21 days ago

        Surely there’s an option between “drop major client” and “punish the person pointing out problems”

        • Bloomcole@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          21 days ago

          So a choice between money and ethics.
          There is never any question which one companies choose.
          Certainly not the one with a carreer in scumbaggery.

          • Psycoder@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            21 days ago

            Not only will they fire her, they will also be less willing to hire other Palestinians in the future.

            I don’t know about Microsoft but a FAANG company I worked for had very well documented means of raising ethical or legal issues within the company. She just violated her employment contract and possibly her NDA with the company by doing this.

            I don’t mean to say she is right/wrong. It is just that she did not follow the guidelines of the company she works for. Therefore she will be fired even if she is right/wrong.

          • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            21 days ago

            It didn’t have to. You only expect it to because there’s a history of companies being shitty.

      • Saleh@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        21 days ago

        “We cant stop selling to war criminals. They are among our biggest customers.”

        Sounds more like a company that needs to be dismantled and have their leadership face prison sentences. Given the size of Microsoft they could take the hit economically w.o. much hassle. They dont have to be evil. They want to be evil. And we need to punish them for it by boycotting their shit as much as possible.

  • binom@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    73
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    21 days ago

    It is also concerning that you have not apologized to the company, and in fact you have shown no remorse for the effect that your actions have had and will have.

    the fucking audacity. i mean, we all knew how it would end, but talk about 5d reverse psychology mindgames

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      21 days ago

      Only trouble is Microsoft clearly doesn’t care about negative reviews of their applications, because they’ve been receiving negative reviews for years now.

      It’s not like you can even avoid using their products, personally you can install Linux but you’re probably going to still have to use a Windows device at work, and business is where they make most of their profit anyway.

      • IndustryStandard@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        21 days ago

        They still have presence in for example the Play store. A review can cost little time to place, yet it can affect a lot. Though avoid mentioning certain words censored by the play store.

        • SynopsisTantilize@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          21 days ago

          Is “id rather take a shot to the back of the throat from Andy Dick, than be stuck using Microsoft Office” approved for the app store?

      • nek0d3r@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        21 days ago

        It’s mildly entertaining at times to scroll through the reviews of the HEIF Image Extension in the Microsoft Store. Microsoft doesn’t care one bit how bad they are.

      • Zink@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        21 days ago

        Yeah, work is where they get you. I’m fortunate to be able to use Linux at work too, but the company is still paying for my M365 account which I use in a browser for meetings and communication.

    • qfe0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      35
      ·
      22 days ago

      She didn’t know that to start. She learned and she took action. I think the Verge had another article on her that described how she was initially excited to work for them and then realized that the circumstance.

      • Chocobofangirl@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        21 days ago

        Yeah she was working on AI auto-transcription for audio thinking ‘this will help people sort audio! Yay’ and found out it’s ‘it’ll help them sort audio of Palestinian phone calls so we can forward locations to the Israelis for bombings! No!’ Like how dynamite was supposed to be for construction and then it got turned into bombs.

        How would you even screen tech work to make sure you’re not contributing to genocides by applying? Only apply to companies that explicitly say ‘Free Palestine’ on their profiles? Do they even exist in the USA? Not to mention she familiarized herself with the policy supporting human rights concerns before sending that message. The one that in a sane world would have prevented any of this from even happening (Microsoft’s involvement anyway).

    • Khanzarate@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      21 days ago

      It’s possible to not realize you’re complicit or not realize the depth of it.

      When this happens like it did, you do briefly become someone who is getting blood money. She took this chance to interfere with their event.

  • yarr@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    20 days ago

    He’s not wrong, but ‘bringing your true self to work’ is something companies like to say but they don’t actually believe.