• Rob T Firefly@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    edit-2
    11 days ago

    For what it’s worth: this was apparently a concept created by an airline seat company called Aviointeriors who showed the idea off at trade shows in 2010 (as the “SkyRider”) and 2018 (as the “SkyRider 2.0” pictured here.) Pretty much all the news articles about it are about Aviointeriors claiming vague unsourced “plans” for them to be adopted by some future date, steeped in Aviointeriors’ corporate PR speak, but the articles mostly end up being about the intense public backlash to the idea. No airlines have announced any plans to buy and use these seats, not even those lunatics at RyanAir, and in the years since all SkyRider mentions have been quietly removed from Aviointeriors’ own site.

    Sources:

    • cantstopthesignal@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      11 days ago

      The fact this company is still around makes me think someone with a lot of money is trying to promote the concept every so often just to see if the public might finally accept this ludicrous idea. A company being around for 15 years with 0 sales and just a concept means someone wants this to happen but thinks the only problem is that they haven’t figured out the right pitch.

  • barnaclebutt@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    13 days ago

    You need to fly somewhere? Okay, fuck you.

    Edit: wasn’t there just a story about how they are going to offer first class seats with five windows? I guess it is just gods and slobs now.

    • g0d0fm15ch13f@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 days ago

      I mean honestly though, I’m kinda here for that. It’s essentially teleportation at that point.

        • EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          11 days ago

          There’s sci-fi show (I think it’s “Foundation”) where passengers have to be sedated for their high-speed space travel. Not teleportation, but I think it’s approaching light speed.

          Some alien race can handle it, so they are used as pilots and crew of the ships.

    • andybytes@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 days ago

      Lowest common denominator…capitalism in crisis. It’s not a joke, man. If they can get away with it, they will.

      • ✺roguetrick✺@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        12 days ago

        Currently my strategy is to attempt to fold my legs under the seat and essentially kneel because it’s not physically possible for my thighs to fit. Between kneeling and praying to the God of capitalism to not give me a dvt vs crouching like the subhuman ogre I am: I’ll crouch.

        • blackris@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          12 days ago

          Oh man, I (also 2 m) can relate. For me it’s always one of the emergency exit seats, that fit not too bad. But that luxury to be able to sit decently costs extra.

  • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    12 days ago

    Honestly, that may actually be more comfortable for me than trying to fold my legs into the tiny rows they have now.

    • turtlesareneat@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      12 days ago

      I am super torn here because pre-back-surgery me looks at these and says “the NERVE of these fuckers” and post-back-surgery me is like “Well that WOULD be nice yes”

  • nuko147@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    13 days ago

    There’s an idea. Flights that people can make standing, should be banned, except when there is a body of water between the destination.

  • Scott_of_the_Arctic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 days ago

    I mean, I’m broke as shit. So if it halved the cost of the tickets I’d do it, but I’m 99% sure I’d be paying close to the same.

    • andybytes@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      11 days ago

      You must be a wizard. Of course the savings aren’t transferred to you. When they fuck up. They put it on the consumer. Time is unwinding. The poor pay more.

  • Talonflame (she/her)@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 days ago

    What about people like myself who have POTS and can’t be in a standing position for too long? My heart can legit stop causing me to pass out if I’m standing for too long.

      • Talonflame (she/her)@lemmy.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        11 days ago

        Why should I have to be forced to pay more for sitting seats just because I have a disability? What if all the sitting seats are fully booked or the plane has no sitting seats for passengers? It’s like intentionally designing a shop with several tall steps at the entrance that would make it impossible for wheelchair users to enter, and the wheelchair users have to pay each time they shop there to have a ramp extended at the entrance so they can enter. It’s an example of ablest design.

        • slappypantsgo@lemm.eeBanned
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 days ago

          This extreme capitalism is absurd and needs to end. People like to pretend that the state taking over industry is some radical thing, but it’s the only way to make it function correctly. Capitalists have not demonstrated an ability to handle anything, they’re like toddlers.

          • threeduck@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            10 days ago

            No, the problem is consumers buying the products.

            If everybody refused to use the standing seats, they’d eventually HAVE to get rid of them, there’d be no point in having a chunk of the plane empty.

            Communists be like, “we must unite to stop capitalists destroying the planet! Now where’s that planet destroying steak I paid for…”

              • threeduck@aussie.zone
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                10 days ago

                What? What does union organising have to do with consumer responsibility?

                My point is that communists love sitting around WAITING for someone to take drastic systemic overhauls, whilst being seemingly unable to control their own consumer habits.

                Communists will destroy the planet idly waiting for capitalism to end because “I’m a slave under capitalism, I have to drive everywhere, I have to eat meat”

                • slappypantsgo@lemm.eeBanned
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  10 days ago

                  I never said anything about unions. I was talking about an organized boycott. That’s the only way to achieve what you are talking about.

                  I really don’t understand what you’re talking about with regard to communists. Are you talking about random people you know?

                  Maybe you mean folks who say “there is no ethical consumption under capitalism”? I really don’t follow.

        • howrar@lemmy.ca
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          11 days ago

          Life is more expensive when you’re disabled. That’s not news. But why should you be mad about changes that help other people save money? What you should be mad about is that the savings are turned into extra profits instead of going towards making your tickets cheaper.

        • Mataresian@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          11 days ago

          I get your point and I believe people with a disability should get a sitting seat for the same price.

          However, this can actually reduce the price for the sitting seat as well. As now more people will be able to fit in the airplane. Meaning that more people can share the costs of the plane. The whole goal of this is to be able to offer lower prices by lowering the costs.

          In countries with a high amount of competition this is a good thing, of course in places where there isn’t you already have a situation in place where you are already being screwed, and then something such as this won’t help.

  • nroth@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    12 days ago

    Why don’t they do lay-down-only seats? Seems like you’d save the same amount of space or more with vastly more comfort.

      • andybytes@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 days ago

        Now, it would be pretty reactionary for me to say that you are wrong, especially when speaking about Americans or even the UK. But we are all a byproduct of our environment and I still have empathy and I don’t want a fat shame But I definitely don’t want to glorify it and I want to find the source of the problem Because people don’t necessarily choose to be overweight shit, I’m a little chunky. I’m a poor Yankee. Oh, also, very interesting, China is a capitalist country and it has an obese problem. This is all just shit on top of shit. Like, we gotta go down this rabbit hole of causation. But people don’t have the attention span. One day at a time, I suppose.

    • CatDogL0ver@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      12 days ago

      Yeah, since this is a shit post, why don’t they wrap the passengers like a piece of luggage and store them on a shelf? Save so much room… Just give them diapers! /S

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      12 days ago

      Why don’t they do lay-down-only seats?

      Bigger and older passengers would find it more difficult to get into the top bunk than to ride a standing-only seat.

      But it’s all shit regardless. Boeing can barely even make planes that don’t fall apart on the runway. The American airline industry’s fleet is increasingly defunct. The FAA is gutted. Airports are falling into disrepare due to mismanagement. You’ll be lucky to get any kind of air travel in another decade.

      • Dasus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        12 days ago

        Bigger and older passengers would find it more difficult to get into the top bunk than to ride a standing-only seat.

        Wouldn’t the same group have trouble standing for an entire flight?

        If only there was some sort of halfway point between lying down and standing up, something which would be easier to than lying down, but wouldn’t be as physically demanding as standing up.

        Oh well.

          • Dasus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            12 days ago

            Hmm…

            Well that’s one thing I can’t really complain about in Finland, access to physically disabled people. Its honestly pretty great, it’s been in the infra-design and all design mentality for decades.

            Anywhere there is public access, you’ll probably also find disabled access.

            Like just today, I felt a little bit proud, as I spotted an outhouse built to specifications allowing wheelchair access.

            We aren’t the utopia people seem to think we are, but if you’re in a wheelchair, you’ll still get access to nice nature paths on which to be depressed on. So that’s nice.

    • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      12 days ago

      The serious non-joke answer is the same as the one for these standing seats: emergency exit speed. When an airplane crash lands you have like less than 2 minutes to get everyone out before the huge inferno happens and roasts people. So for standing seats that pack even more people into an airplane, they have to prove that they can still get everyone out before the deadline. For laying-down seats they would have to prove the same thing.

      • qarbone@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        12 days ago

        I’ve been on enough planes to believe 2 minutes of evacuation time will see 5% evacuated and 95% trampled before the fiery inferno.

        • TheRealKuni@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          12 days ago

          Remarkably, it has happened. People suddenly decide to pay attention to authority when they’re in a terrifying situation they’ve never experienced.

          • qarbone@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            12 days ago

            What I’ve chosen to glean from this is that I should inflict varied and new terrors upon coworkers to help keep us on track.

        • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          11 days ago

          I hate to burst your bubble but almost no air disasters happen instantaneously. It takes many minutes to fall out of the sky. Also most air disasters still involve a mostly-controlled descent.

      • recall519@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        12 days ago

        Just lean it forward and have everyone slide down and out of the emergency slide.

      • burntrealm@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        12 days ago

        Not only that, but also the mess it would make. Airlines make good money off of selling food and drinks, how are you going to consume those laying down? Very messily, that’s how. More mess = more time spent cleaning the plane = less time in the air = less ticket sales. Not to mention the loss in drink and food sales from people who don’t want to do that laying down. It’s a lose lose for the airline.

        • zaperberry@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          12 days ago

          I would pay a premium ticket price to get a lay down seat at the back of the plane and have no food service in that zone. That gets rid of the food sales loss, for which I have never paid for anyway, as I’d be paying a higher ticket price. I guess at that point there is still a concern regarding a mess, since I can bring my own snacks, but it’s not like I would be getting some memory foam mattress with Egyptian cotton sheets with the way airlines would implement this anyway. I’d get a long pleather vinyl cushion with maybe a standard pillow.

          It would be worse than what I got in the Navy, slightly, but still better than any shit airplane seat I’ve sat in.

          • faltryka@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            11 days ago

            There is already a premium ticket price for lay down seats on large commercial passenger jets. Many of those first class seats go all the way down.

  • yoriaiko@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    13 days ago

    Next step - put bicycle seats, reducent material for backs. Then add bicycle pedals for engines, to reduce fuel usage. None said anything about actually reducing ticket price by that, high prices stays forever.

    • isolatedscotch@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      12 days ago

      None said anything about actually reducing ticket price by that, high prices stays forever.

      Standard ticket if you generate at least 1KW, otherwise the price goes up if you generate less, with a fine for less then 50W generated during the flight

      • yoriaiko@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        12 days ago

        Bet You will have to pay max price front. For security reason.

        Possible overpaid (in case You return some electricity), are returned in form of credit points for next purchase!

  • HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    12 days ago

    That’s right, girls. Start packing on those pounds because the only airline seat that poops, then lies about it doesn’t have farts in the headrest anymore.