repent for you homophobia or perish
this is epic as fuck
Who are the cuties and why do they need to repe…… oh. Now I see the fuckface
I want to be as hot as them
Put on the cat ears then :3
but i wan ouppy ear
then put on the collar and bark!
Woof woof woof woof woof woof woof woof woof :D
I didn’t pack them so they are back home :(
LONG BACON!!!
Heck, I thought it was a lanyard but just realised it’s a leash 😳
I want a long bacon leash,
right?!?
Woof :D
barkbarkbark!!! :3
Woof woof woof woof woof woof woof :D
Are you from /r Collapse?
no
Woof and/or Meow
Woof woof woof c:
Whats the line for? I have a sudden urge to queue and i think i like it.
:3
I like how he’s taking a snapshot for his spankbank.
Camera Snapshot Sound
He’s taking “EVIDENCE” … and he needs lots of documentation … “I just need one where you arch your back some more”
Conservatives sure do love jacking off to the things that they claim to hate… like an insane amount tbh
Sex is sin, so they fetishize sin.
Sexual repression do be like that.
Yup. Explains why half of the Republican leadership is closeted gay men. And why so many of them fetishize trans people, despite being against having rights.
How can they blackmail trans people/keep them as slaves if they have rights? That’s the true reason behind them being anti-trans
All those upvotes are just saying “Damn, someone thought of this comment first”
His going to abuse his dick like it was his 5th wife.
These conservatives are all the same. Sexually repressed and angry about it. The least harmful of which listen to fox news and get their rocks of later thinking about Tucker Carsol explaining “exploding milk porn”. Then it only gets worse from there.
But the reason they are so obsessed with sexual identity is because they were never allowed to explore their own and have never satisfied their partner in bed.
He’ll repent later.
Simple!
Roll camera at all times
Say horrible, horrible things
Hide desperation to be punched so you can sue
Very little fills me with more joy than making deeply religious zealots deeply religiously uncomfortable. If they’re going to be deeply religious in public I’m sorry. I don’t care what happens between a man and your woman in your religion but as long as you keep it to your fuckin self.
Chase them with dildos.
I used to work with this dude who was an asshole, had to work at a place with protesters around, they decided they should scream at him, it was entertaining.
“Chase them with dildos”. This made me chuckle uncontrollably.
I do care because they shouldn’t minoritize members of their own family for their gender or orientation. That isn’t like some not eating pigs or drawing ash on your face shit, it’s oppressive and wrong.
You’re mostly right. Maybe eating pigs is not oppressive or wrong, but what happens to the pigs before they get eaten sure is.
then get it from farms that don’t to that, it only costs multiple times the price
I practically have a recipe that only has 4 hard boiled eggs as an animal product. There’s no other reliable source of Vitamin B12
repent dude seems to be taking photos of the cuties.
Another deposit for the Spank Bank.
meow :3
Hot take: he’s not religious at all, just does the sign to get some action he can film for “later”.
Keep up the good work, ladies!
I think those two kitties are putting them evil thoughts into the pious obese man’s head.
Is that a leash?
Gonna go against the grain and say that’s a bit of a no-go, regardless of how much of an ass that guy is being. Get rid of that and I see nothing wrong here though.
Why do you care
From my understanding leashes are a sexual thing no?
Nah, kink is based and trying to censor it from queer culture is sex negative.
I consider high heels, fishnet stockings, and/or exposed bra straps to be a sexual things. Does that mean no one else is allowed to wear any of those in public now?
This is a false equivalence and you are lying if you say that you don’t see this as one.
No, I don’t think it is. Also in many conservative minds they also believe all that stuff is sexual. They believe the existence of all gay couple in a show means shoving gay sex down childrens throats, even if they only hug.
My sister got in trouble with the religion we were in because she was too curvy. The accusation of lying here might be a bit of projection if you can’t understand that some people will always make something sexual,and that even if you see it as sexual, not everyone does.
That’s the only sexual thing you see in that picture?
So what if they are? Seeing someone being led around on a leash isn’t gonna hurt anyone.
It’s common decency? I’m not going to judge someone for what they wear in public, but when it comes to sexual stuff, it’s just a matter of being mindful of others.
Not a “think of the children” or “I’m uncomfortable with queer people existing” sorta deal with what I’m saying either, making sure my words don’t get twisted, but a leash to me gives the same vibes as say, a couple having an intense makeout session on the bus. Like do you need to make this public?
This a minor nitpick here, I know, just worried something like that gives fuel to the narrative jackwad with the sign is pushing.
Oh god, I didn’t assume you’re anywhere near the dickwad in the picture. You’re all good on that front!
My point is, well, so what if two people are aggressively making out? What’s inherently wrong with that?
Thanks for that.
If I’m sitting on a busy bus for example, and two people, a couple, sit in front of me and start making out with some tongue on tongue action, I’m going to be disturbed. I’m not comfortable with that, and I didn’t consent to seeing that.
People have their kinks and sexually intimate acts that they’re into. Consent on both parties is important, but what’s important as well is the consent of people around you in seeing that. A regular kiss, hug, or other purely romantic or platonic show of affection you don’t need other people’s consent for, so a person claiming “consent” when gay people hold hands or kiss in front of them is just a bigot.
For the same reason I wouldn’t send a picture of kink art I know a friend isn’t into without their consent, I also wouldn’t indulge in my kinks in public where I know most people won’t be into it, as they didn’t consent to, for example, seeing me on a leash in this case (not my thing, hypothetical application of the pic).
I don’t want to totally derail you here, and I do understand where you’re coming from - but is it interesting to you that you say “making out” requires consent from other people to see but that a “regular kiss, hug, or other purely romantic or platonic show of affection” does not?
Genuinely, without meaning to sound hostile - why does what you are comfortable seeing dictate what other people need to get consent from the public for? What if I’m uncomfortable seeing any kind of kissing at all? What if I’m completely comfortable seeing more than you?
Why can’t I draw the line and decide what requires consent from the public instead of you? I might well draw that line in a different place entirely.
a leash to me gives the same vibes as say, a couple having an intense makeout session on the bus. Like do you need to make this public
This is a false equivalence and you are lying if you say that you don’t see this as one.
Wow, using the same words I did as some sort of cheap “gotcha”, aren’t you smart?
I’m not gonna engage with you if you’re not gonna come to the table with anything of value to add.
What I’m pointing out here is that you’re equating two things that are actually different for most people present, but you fail to explain why.
In my view, there is a distinction between having sex in public, where everyone sees you, and wearing an accessory that suggests that your sex life elsewhere is rather kinky.
If you think those are the same, where do you draw the line? What about a rainbow flag/sticker/patch? This also might imply they are having sex a bit differently from you?
Also, let’s not forget that this is a photo taken in a specific situation. Who knows if they were just wearing it there?
Can you explain why you think leashes are a sexual thing?
For what reason other than arousal would someone wear one?
This doesn’t count baby leashes btw, which are at the back and not the neck and are used to prevent a kid from getting lost or wandering off into danger (when used properly).
For what reason other than arousal would someone wear one?
You think they’re aroused in that photo?
What?
What’s wrong with a little public BDSM to piss off conservatives?
