At least on the communities i follow. Every so often I come across a thread where i recognize most of the users there even in the big communities with over 30k members and I haven’t even been on lemmy that long.

    • ichbinjasokreativ@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      15
      ·
      1 month ago

      some of those are also the same kind of power tripping neckbeard discord mods we fled from by leaving reddit. (fragile ego ban incoming in 3…2…1…)

      • Today@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        I don’t understand what neck beard means. I see it used, but I still can’t really figure out what it means. The other thing I don’t understand is incel, not that you used that word but it’s another one that I see used frequently that I don’t understand. Are the two related? Also, I’m old In case you couldn’t tell

        • avguser@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          From Wikipedia:

          “Neckbeard” is a pejorative term and stereotype for an adult man or teenage boy who exhibits characteristics such as social awkwardness, underachievement, or pretentiousness.

          And incels are described as:

          An online community of young men who consider themselves unable to attract women sexually, typically associated with views that are hostile toward women and men who are sexually active.

          Certainly not related communities but could conceivably overlap. Not surprising that a lot of Internet trolls fall into one of those categories.

        • RedAggroBest@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          Neckbeards: having “facial” hair that basically only covers the neck. It’s the idea that these guys who don’t have the facial hair to grow a full beard have poor hygiene.

          Incel: Involuntary Celibate, shortened to incel. Someone who can’t get laid for one reason or another. The propblem being the people who generally self-identity as incel, who are usually toxic and sexist.

          These aren’t necessarily linked, but incels are usually the type to have such poor hygiene as to have a neckbeard.

          • Today@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 month ago

            Ohhhh. Thank you!

            I thought neckbeard referred to a hipster beard. That makes more sense now.

            Weirdly, sex has changed in the last couple of decades. When i was young (back in my day 🤦) women could get laid anytime they wanted and men had to put in a little effort. So when i hear involuntarily celibate, i just think ‘don’t be a dick. You’re gonna have to work a little for it,’ but i guess they’re not getting any because they’re misogynistic?

            • shani66@ani.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              1 month ago

              Lots of people just can’t or don’t get laid for plenty of reasons, shyness or some kind of disinterest does not an incel make. An incel is mostly synonymous with what you probably think of when you hear basement dweller, but inverse the elitism and with an added sexual element. extreme misogyny, extreme entitlement towards women, extreme resentment towards the sexually active, occasionally fixated on the idea of masculinity, and overwhelming self hatred.

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        the same kind of power tripping neckbeard discord mods

        I’ll never understand the intense and visceral anger some people on the internet have towards facial hair. Also really leaning into the 4chan-esque Everyone Online Is Dudes trope.

        • RedAggroBest@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 month ago

          Because a neck beard isn’t facial hair. It’s neck hair. Neckbeards are usually indications of poor hygiene rather than some appreciation of facial hair

          • klemptor@startrek.website
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            I can’t believe I’m defending neckbeards but…hey if Ringo Starr can rock the neckbeard, it’s not all bad!

            And I’m sure loads of people with neckbeards have overall poor grooming and hygiene, but I’m also sure plenty have good hygiene.

        • ichbinjasokreativ@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 month ago

          because that’s the excuse mods use to get rid of differing viewpoints. Anything they disagree with is suddenly ‘bigotry’.

              • 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 ℹ️@yiffit.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 month ago

                “COVID vaccinations were effective, but not safe.” - ichbinjasokreativ

                Also the claim that immigrant workers are “uneducated rapists,” and weird nonsense comparing trans people and how “they mutilate their genitals” to circumcizing a baby.

                “Facts.”

                • ichbinjasokreativ@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  5
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  All of this is accurate information. Covid vaccines were widely adopted at the same time as spikes in lung related hospitalization, in covid-negative people. Refugees were advertised to us in europe as being the well-educated middle class of their respective countries, which turned out to be a lie and the offiacial, government issued statistics on violent crime and spicifically sexual crimes showed massive increase since we let millions of them into our country. Also, the fact that mtf trans people need to insert stretching devices to prevent their mutilation wound from closing is true as well. Reality isn’t always comfortable.

    • faintwhenfree@lemmus.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      Yeah, you are very recognisable, but people like me, who lurk most of the time, comment maybe once a month.

      Not very memorable.

    • AstralPath@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 month ago

      I see you everywhere and I enjoy it. Thanks for contributing to all the conversations. O7

  • AgentGrimstone@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 month ago

    There’s one user that seems to be everywhere and it’s probably the same user everyone is thinking of right now lol.

    I’m also surprised I come across other “agents” on here more frequently than I would expect.

  • insight06@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    1 month ago

    The trick is not to read the usernames. I imagine myself surrounded by millions of mostly sensible people!

  • Num10ck@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 month ago

    everyone reading this should introduce lemmy to at least 1 cool person in their life. thats what it needs.

    • OpenStars@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 month ago

      I tried multiple times. They give me dirty looks and grief about all the political extremist content here. We who know how to block it tend to forget, but for a newcomer it’s definitely off-putting. And yes X is that way these days too, but people already know it and don’t visit it for the first time, so it gets grandfathered in.

      We have some work to do before we will go mainstream.

        • OpenStars@discuss.online
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          Yes but the only one I’ve ever seen that blocks all of the big 3 is lemmy.cafe. And even that does not block posts that advocate for violence - e.g. an example from literally yesterday, and this one from a memes community on Lemmy.world, from a user on sopuli.xyz.

          Note that I am not advocating for removal of such content, only relating how in my personal experience, suggesting the Fediverse to normies has never once turned out any other way than badly. Granted, hexbear.net for its severity and lemmy.ml for its large userbase are probably 99.9% of the issue, but especially until after the election I have no plans to tell people about Lemmy anymore. After that, if lemmy.cafe still has Lemmy.ml removed, I will probably tell people about that one as an entry point.

          Which isn’t all on its own going to push the Fediverse into the mainstream, until we do more cleanup to make normal people feel welcomed rather than scared to be here.

        • fern@lemmy.autism.place
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          If they follow through and block .world and .ee, then they can really get a handle of the extremism.

            • Aphelion@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              1 month ago

              Seriously? I moved to lemm.ee because it has a fair, democratic approach to federation, and doesn’t defederate at the drop of a hat.

              I’d personally rather be able to see more perspectives and block the crazy at my own discretion.

              • OpenStars@discuss.online
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 month ago

                That works too. Like some people prefer Arch btw, and that’s wonderful. But… mainstream normies aren’t likely to want that. Anyway, lemm.ee is already awesome and exists:-).

  • IAmNotACat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    1 month ago

    It’s called a community. If Reddit doesn’t seem like this anymore, it’s because half those people are actually AI.

  • Ironfacebuster@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 month ago

    I notice a lot of the same people in most of the popular posts. I guess it’s because the quantity of people that usually comment vs voting or just reading post is pretty low, so you’ll start to recognize them everywhere

    It makes me wonder if people recognize me from other posts I comment on!

    • GrammarPolice@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      That’s more difficult than it would seem. Especially since the niche stuff i would be interested in fostering is… well… niche. And lemmy isn’t that large. YET!

  • Andrew@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    I recognize most of the users there even in the big communities with over 30k members

    Communities with 30k members could really do with pruning the completely inactive ones. It’s not like there’s any commercial reasons to pretend that places are busier than they actually are.

    • Crackhappy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 month ago

      I disagree. There is nothing to be gained by removing people from a group. You can’t predict when they might suddenly become active and by removing them you’re abrogating their ability to participate.

      • qprimed@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        thoughtful. my issue here is while a community is nascent, isnt building maintaining an honest reflection of the community important?

        I have joined a few tiny locally communities based on one post/comment. I may never return and the community traffic is irregular.

        in a situation like that I can see a mod pruning me away for zero comments in a year. however that is a form of censorship. so its back to the default of mods run their communities as they wish and, if you disagree find/create another community or instance.

        thanks for the thoughful comment.

      • Andrew@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        It’s a trade-off, I guess. Admittedly, there’s not much benefit the user (though they could be warned via email if their account is going to be de-activated). There is however a benefit to the community, in that it can provide more reliable data to see if it’s trending in popularity (a 100 extra users isn’t significant if it thinks it has 30k users, but it moves the needle if that number is at a more realistic level).

          • Andrew@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 month ago

            It’s a useful metric. Maybe it’s the better one, but personally I’d like to see good data from both.

            • OpenStars@discuss.online
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              1 month ago

              Lurkers need to subscribe for the content to appear in their Subscribed feed. Kicking them out may simply result in them rejoining again. It would be a constant struggle against that.

              Plus, if such purges occur routinely, then what about a major poster who takes a break, even if for like a year (let’s say they have a baby)? Actively getting rid of lurkers sends a signal that they are not welcomed. Especially if in the future Lemmy adds the ability for mods to have to approve join requests.

              Whereas simply using “monthly active users” avoids all of that. Do as you please with any of your communities - in which case it would be helpful for the sake of transparency to literally add it to the rules (those who don’t participate will eventually get purged) - but I thought I would list out some of these issues, in case it helped!:-)

    • qprimed@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 month ago

      absolutely. careful pruning and caretaking is how you nurture good communities. excellent comment.

    • OpenStars@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 month ago

      I’ve stopped referring to community sizes - especially when there hasn’t been a post for a year. Instead, monthly active users is where it’s at:-).