• recentSloth43@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 months ago

    Doesn’t change much for me. Violence is a consequence of a broken system. Whatever the motive was, fixing the system is the solution either way.

  • ATDA@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    I go from it being a statement about the times to a mundane murder that warrants no coverage.

    He had a sweet life until he didn’t. Still don’t feel bad. If that makes me a bad person, well, America doesn’t care about that either clearly so guess it is what it is. Shrug emoji

  • paddirn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    2 months ago

    That’s what I’ve been wondering, we really don’t even know what the motive was, but the one thing that kind of elevates this beyond him being a “basic murderer” is the carved words on the bullets. That seems to suggest some kind of motive above just him being a hitman or just killing some random person.

    Regardless, I think most people are having the reaction they’re having to this because of our ridiculous healthcare system, everyone recognizes it as a problem and alot of people have a loved one who has been wronged by it. Almost any other issue would’ve created a partisan split where Republicans took one position and Democrats took the other position. That a set of clear Left/Right narratives haven’t emerged yet kind of suggests that alot of people aren’t particularly bothered by it. Where this goes though is anyone’s guess, maybe it’s just a single unified moment that is quickly overshadowed by some other bullshit that comes along.

  • ERROR: Earth.exe has crashed@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    2 months ago

    nazi Germany didn’t lose because the world cared about the genocide, its because the world didn’t like their invasion of other countries. Nevertheless, I celebrate the downfall of nazi Germany and death of hitler.

    Same thing can be applied here. Doesn’t matter if this mass murderer CEO fell down some stairs, choked on a burger, or get beaten to death over a personal dispute, death of a killer is a good thing.

  • roofuskit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    2 months ago

    I mean, is this just a wild hypothetical? Because it’s really obvious that this isn’t the case. Nothing about this murder was normal. He wasn’t some professional killer because he was sloppy with cameras and the garbage in Starbucks. But he definitely plotted and planned to murder this guy. And then he purposely left evidence of his motive. The gun he used was rare, and he clearly trained with the weapon because of how quickly he was able to clear the jam he had and then kept firing.

    • yesman@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      To be clear: I’m talking about a possibility, not a prediction.

      We’ve nothing to go on but incomplete and likely incorrect public information. It would be foolish of me to entrench around speculation.

    • GBU_28@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Speculative discussion is pointing towards the smiling guy but bring the same person. Any conclusions to the methods of the shooter are still very fraught.

        • GBU_28@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          You mean how I used the word speculative?

          Or how I said conclusions are fraught?

          You didn’t know any better than anyone else, and perhaps you forget the Boston bomber situation, but it’s always good to slow down on plastering someone’s face/identity on a crime till reports are concrete.

          • roofuskit@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            The police released that information because they were confident in it. It wasn’t reddit.

            • GBU_28@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              And reports from authorities, at the time I commented that, were raising concerns that it may not have been the same person. My comment was one of caution, yours is of luck.

  • intensely_human@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    It means society is in danger because lots of people think lots of other people deserve death.

        • chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          They said it’s “false” that the killer was motivated by something else. It’s not false, it’s unknown, because there isn’t enough information to actually be confident about that. People trying to give a misleading sense of their motives to throw investigations off when committing crimes is something that happens. If you think there is enough information, that’s more of an opinion than a fact.