Luigi Mangione shouts a message to the American people on his way to court:

“This is completely unjust and an insult to the intelligence of the American people and their lived experience.”

  • warm@kbin.earth
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    114
    ·
    2 days ago

    American police once again showing to us how unfit for the job they are.

    • Taco2112@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      35
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      The police in the US are there to protect and serve the 1%, AKA the Oligarchs. It’s be wonderful if they actually wanted to serve and provide safety for their communities. I’m sure there are a few in every city that actually want to do the right thing but as a whole, police are basically only around to protect property and harass anyone they think might be a threat to said property, especially when said property is owned by one of the Oligarchs.

      • WhatYouNeed@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        2 days ago

        '“This is OCP property!”

        Almost like the original RoboCop was trying to warn us about something. I had a thought but got distracted and can’t remember what it was.

        Oh well, I’ll buy that for a dollar!

      • warm@kbin.earth
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        2 days ago

        Maybe the (mostly) professionalism from other countries has poisoned my mind and the police should indeed treat everyone as vermin.

        • wildbus8979@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          2 days ago

          Whether they treat you professionally or not is irrelevant to the fact that their primary mission is upholding the state.

          • warm@kbin.earth
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            24 hours ago

            They are there to enforce the law and serve citizens. They are public servants. But in the US they are mostly there to protect the state and uphold their own ideals, yes.

            However I was pointing out the lack of proper training, they immediately rush to get physical and grab the suspect by the neck as soon as they get a chance.

  • GelatinGeorge@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    48
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    I’m unsure if he means his arrest is unjust due to the order of magnitude worse injustice of the healthcare system or Luigi stating he’s not the culprit (vigilante, hero, The Adjuster - whatever noun floats your boat).

    It seems like the former? Annoyingly unclear.

    • Ciderpunk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      130
      ·
      2 days ago

      He’s claiming the police planted evidence on him as a attempt to justify denying bail. Specifically he says they planted a large amount of cash that he didn’t have on him ever and has no idea where it came from, and they lied about a waterproof bag he had for his phone, saying it was a faraday cage, and claiming his possession of such an item means he’s too sophisticated a criminal to be allowed bail.

      He knows what’s coming. They aren’t gonna want him to get to speak to a jury because it’s not gonna be a guarantee they convict him. If he gets a not guilty verdict, that would be VERY bad for the ruling class, so that’s not gonna be allowed to possibly happen.

      • GelatinGeorge@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        55
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Yeah, I’m already extremely suspicious at the convenience of his arrest, given that there has to be a repercussion shown to the ‘plebs’ - can’t have them getting ideas now about the ease with which they could depose their ruling oligarchs and actually get away with it.

        I didn’t know about those details regarding the evidence being planted, so his statement makes much more sense with that context, thank you.

        • LeadersAtWork@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          38
          ·
          2 days ago

          I was suspicious the instant they called out the 3D printed “ghost gun”. While certainly possible, it was waaay too convenient an excuse given how that may have swung some opinions about gun safety and control. Now they’re rushing this.

          Keep an eye out for thinly veiled attempts at obfuscation.

          • Gork@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            Whatever happened to it being a Welrod?

            Goddess these news outlets don’t know shit when they publish shit.

          • Karyoplasma@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            16
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            The “3D printed gun” trope was taken back I think. They now claim that he only 3D printed the silencer. Some gun lobbyist probably donated a wad of cash.

            • peopleproblems@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              14
              ·
              2 days ago

              That wasn’t a 3D printed silencer in the video.

              If it was, that material is way stronger than anything I’ve worked with.

              • EldritchFeminity@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                6
                ·
                2 days ago

                Nowadays, you can print guns out of basic PLA. At least in .22 caliber, I don’t know about anything larger, though I do know 3d printed Glock frames are definitely a thing. A 3d printed suppressor is definitely feasible, as I’ve seen at least 1 design for PETG.

                Now, as to whether or not that’s what can be seen in the video? Who knows. I certainly can’t tell.

                • LeadersAtWork@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  So I’m not into firearms. Guns aren’t reaaally my thing. However, I imagine with quality material you need a larger silencer for a larger caliber, or a modified design to rapidly reduce pressure. It stands to reason then that with a design less capable of withstanding that pressure, you must then compensate with a larger design even at lower calibers. Someone correct me if I’m wrong, though this then stands to reason that even a .22 would need a much larger design, or a modified design which would by nature increase noise via gas release.

                  That said, a silencer doesn’t silence, it reduces. If he was as prepared as we think he was, he’d know that.

            • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              23
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              They now claim that he only 3D printed the silencer.

              It’s shit like this that reminds me how stupid cops are…

              You can’t “3d print a silencer” it would just explode from the pressure.

              • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                20 hours ago

                I still remember when they tried to claim a plastic bag seen on footage of Rittenhouse was a “makeshift molotov cocktail”

                1. A Molotov Cocktail is already a makeshift weapon, that’s the point, the poor will always have access to alcohol and fire so it’s the one weapon the state cannot take from you.

                2. A plastic bag would make for a terrible molotov considering it can’t be thrown far and would just burn up in your hands if you tried.

                • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  20 hours ago

                  A plastic bag would make for a terrible molotov considering

                  Gasoline melts plastic and would eat thru the bag…

        • CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          21
          ·
          2 days ago

          To be fair, I’m not sure if “just arrest anyone convenient and frame them”, is entirely in the wealthy’s interest here. Making an example is one thing, sure, but if you do that and dont get the guy that actually did it, then you have a guy out there who has proven themselves willing to go out and assassinate CEOs, who may well decide to do it again. If you do have the means to catch that guy, then what motivation is there to not just send him through the court system rather than framing someone else? Less risk of a frame up being discovered and sparking even more resentment if you have at least some genuine evidence, after all.

          • OfCourseNot@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            12
            ·
            2 days ago

            Could be both. They may know he is the guy, but they might not be able to say how they know it and by what means (extreme surveillance…) so they just frame him.

    • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      65
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      The cops leaked/released a picture of him in jail after he peed his pants, likely from being teased or something.

      And multiple of him in the suicide prevention room, which notoriously doesn’t prevent suicides, and is complete 24/7 isolation with only a weird smock.

      It’s not to prevent suicide, it’s torture. So he’s likely screaming about how he’s actively being tortured.

      He’s rich tho, his lawyer will likely get him bail.

      It’s like insane this is the standard and no politician ever wants to address our system.

      • xtr0n@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        2 days ago

        He’s rich tho, his lawyer will likely get him bail.

        His grandparents are wealthy. His parents may be rich but might not be wealthy (they may or may not be, we only know about the grandfather’s extensive holdings and the expensive schooling).

        It may sound like bullshit to people stressed about making rent, but middle aged people worth a few million aren’t wealthy. Like if you’re super lucky you can work for 20-30 years and own a house in or near a major city and have a enough of a retirement or pension to quit working when you’re old and have a reasonable lifestyle. I’m in a mid tier city and even here paying off your house or condo means you’re worth at least 500k. That isn’t “buy a politician” money. That isn’t “live in any country I want because I’m rich enough that everyone gives me citizenship” money. That isn’t “immune from health insurance fuckery” money. That isn’t “get away with murder“ money.

        Anyway. A wealthy grandfather may be willing to help out with or pay for schooling. But it’s a coin flip on whether he’s gonna shell out hundreds of thousands or millions for a legal defense (and if he did, would he pull funding if the defense wasn’t to his liking?). From the granddad’s perspective, the kid is a class traitor.

        • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          I mean shit, GoFundMe is trying to stamp it out right and left, but there was donations for Kyle Rittenhouse…

          Luigi is going to get a shit ton of money for legal fees, from pretty much every demographics. His generational wealth and connections mean he’s not going to get some ambulance chaser, he’s going to get an established law firm that will tear the state to shreds.

          Honestly, this might be what finally pits the 1% against the 0.01%…

          They’re not used to their own being mistreated, and (most likely correctly) assume if they unit with the other 98.9% of the country the wealthiest don’t have a chance.

          When people like this are bucking the system, it’s not a good sign

          • Drusas@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            Just because his grandfather was wealthy doesn’t mean that he is. Not destitute like so many, sure, but that’s not the same as being the 1%. I think I read that Luigi is one of like 37 grandchildren. That’s spreading things pretty thin.

          • peopleproblems@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            2 days ago

            I don’t have sources on me. But I’m fairly certain that in the French Revolution you had upper class supporters of the revolution, and maybe even some nobility. Most of the revolutions did, and they provided support to the revolution usually through some supply chain they had access to.

            That being said, I could be entirely making it up, because that would have been more than a decade ago I learned it.

    • miss phant@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      He definitely says “completely out of touch” (in an italian accent) and I think the fact that he’s saying that to a camera means he’s targeting the CEO-favored news coverage. I’m surprised not more people are picking up on that possibility.

      • Darkard@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        75
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        In his mugshot they put him in a vest reserved for people who are a suicide risk. He is definitely going to get Epsteined

        • gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          a vest reserved for people who are a suicide risk

          I haven’t seen the picture but… Straightjacket?

          • lemmylommy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            18
            ·
            2 days ago

            Not a straightjacket. More like a shitty shirt made from fabric you can’t tear to strangle yourself with. The real problem could be the conditions of suicide watch. Those can be torture and drive you insane, depending on the place.

            • Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              13
              ·
              2 days ago

              Someone called it like a turtle suit. Cuz it’s so cold in prison with it you have to curl up like a turtle to stay warm. Which is terrible because he has huge back issues.

          • Drusas@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            2 days ago

            No, it’s got like velcro on the shoulders or something from the look of it. I guess the idea is you can’t strangle yourself with it? I don’t know.

      • Cyborganism@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Why would they do that? What would be the point of killing an (presumably) innocent man if the killer is still on the loose?

            • gibmiser@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              2 days ago

              They asked why they would kill a patsy. In theory it’s just to placate the public and reduce likelihood of copycats.

              • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                2 days ago

                But if the killer kills again, the case is not closed and it is a loose end.

                It is only closed if this was a one and done.

                • notabot@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  7
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  The ‘killer’ died in prison, therefore and new incident must be a copycat by someone who happens to look a lot like him. That’s a brand new case. /s

            • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              20 hours ago

              No that’s just a “copycat” who should be shamed for wanting to be like the “Evil” Luigi

        • Fredselfish@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          31
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          To send a message and to look like they solved the crime. They feel confident the real killer will stay hidden or has left the country.

          • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            He killed for most likely ideological reasons, just cause he got away doesnt mean he is gonna stay away. Hell with these actions id say its entirely possible he may target someone sooner.

        • gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          The Adjustor had 1 target (so far as can be told) and it took almost a WEEK to “catch him”, which took a tip in to police to manage

          It wouldn’t be too out of the question to assume he won’t strike again and that any random fall guy is safe from a repeat attack blowing their plan to shit

        • MrZee@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          20
          ·
          2 days ago

          When police think they have right suspect they often do everything they can to prove that person did it. Essentially, once they have their targets set on a suspect, they shift from trying to figure out who may have done it to putting all their resources into finding evidence against the suspect and building the strongest case they can against them. This includes ignoring evidence that is counter to their theory and discontinuing investigation of other leads.

          Their goal at that point is to convict. Because, to them, getting a conviction is success and the person going free is failure. Alternately, getting the person to “commit suicide” is success because they can claim that they were guilty and no trial is necessary.

          It’s all about winning and getting a conviction because conviction=justice=case closed. And that means the public can rest soundly knowing “justice” has been served. Especially after PR has done their work.

          Prosecutors are the same. They treat their job as finding anything and everything to get the conviction. Exculpatory evidence is ignored and buried. If “evidence” is planted/manufactured, they do their best to ignore and hide that fact and make said evidence look real. It’s the defense’s job to prove innocence. In theory, the police should be working to find and provide evidence for both sides, but the police and Prosecutors anre working toward the same goal, leaving the defense severely hindered.

          This is the system that railroads people into conviction. They use the media to amplify their story and make it look like they are infallible. When information comes out that counters the police/prosecutor story, they circle the wagons to protect each other and discredit the information that contradicts them. Because they think that they are the good guys and even if they got something wrong, their original hunch must have been right.

        • Bronzebeard@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          The wealthy elite want an illusion of consequences for attacking them more than they need actual justice. They didn’t want the plebs thinking they can get away with attacking them, or else more will happen.

        • Chefdano3@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          19
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          Simple, they want the public to believe that if they follow in the killers footsteps, they will be caught and go through hell in order to dissuade other people who might do the same. There are obviously a lot of people who applaud his actions, so to try to prevent them from getting the idea that they can do this too, they make a show of force to make them think twice.

          In the end it doesn’t matter if Luigi did it or not. As long as people are scared of the pinishment, they will hesitate to imitate.

          Not true justice, but they never really cared about that to begin with.

  • peopleproblems@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    284
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 days ago

    They don’t want him in front of a jury.

    Regardless if it’s him or not. They cannot afford him to get acquitted.

    But they can’t martyr him. That will be a death sentence to the US.

    This isn’t going to end well for anyone. This guy has shown a much darker picture of the US to us that we all know too well.

    • Allonzee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      148
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Imho, as painful as it is, avoiding an economic civil war at this point does more harm than good over time. It kicks the can down the road until their side exclusively can use humanoid robots to fight their battles for them, and that just means get in line and die until collapse.

      The alternative is even darker, our non-wealthy children being judged by AI as to whether the potential profit/loss of healing them is greater or less than their remaining projected exploitation value to the owners.

      And that’s just in Healthcare. Our entire economy has become this sociopathic.

      This is silent slaughter. No one should confuse quiet with peace. We haven’t had peace for a long time.

      They don’t care if only the top 5% is free on the backs of the 95%, they don’t see the bottom 95% as human at all. I don’t think society should continue under that bargain. It isn’t worth it. No one is free until everyone is.

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        103
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        This is silent slaughter. No one should confuse quiet with peace. We haven’t had peace for a long time.

        “True peace is not merely the absence of tension; it is the presence of justice.” – MLK Jr.

          • EldritchFeminity@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            72
            ·
            2 days ago

            His family proved in court that the government killed him, but every judge in criminal courts refused to let the case go to trial, so it was only a civil court case. But the judge was convinced by the evidence and found the government guilty and dues were awarded.

      • MonkeyBusiness@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        23 hours ago

        Our entire economy has become this sociopathic.

        I don’t think that it has recently become sociopathic. It was certainly much worse in the past with the genocide of the Americas and slavery of Africans. I would argue that the ethics of the economy have improved, but the general public has become increasingly aware of how unjust it is.

        • btaf45@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          20 hours ago

          . I would argue that the ethics of the economy have improved,

          The Reagan era was a glorification of greed. Before then, CEOs were expected to care about all the stakeholders of a company. Not just stockholders but also customers and employees and the general community. A large amount of enshitification resulted from the glorification of greed era. For example, tuition at public universities went from very reasonable to absurdly expensive. Health care deductibles went from $250 to $6000. Anti-trust law stopped being enforced etc.

        • save_the_humans@leminal.space
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          16 hours ago

          There’s nothing inherently wrong with some level of selfish individuality but coupled with a capitalist organizations goal of ever increasing profit at the direct expense and exploitation of others and the environment, that’s practically textbook sociopathy.

        • Allonzee@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          edit-2
          23 hours ago

          Our economy was most fair when Unions had some power. From the 50s to the 70s, there was a corrupt equilibrium when Conservatives were bribed by business and liberals were bribed by unions, until they were convinced to take the larger corporate bribe checks and joined the owner movement to undermine unions. Today’s neoliberals. That is when, at least on economic policy, we effectively lost our vote. Then we lost our protest with designated protest zones out of the eyelines and profit operations of those being protested, which is effectively masturbation.

          I think it’s inevitable when you don’t inflict close to 100% enforced taxation above ludicrous levels of wealth accumulation. Because wealth at a certain level beyond material desires becomes power. Society warping levels of power, power to warp public opinion through media and captured education, power to neuter your own regulators through bribed politicians passing legislation written by the owners themselves(see ALEC), and no one should have such unelected power.

          No one.

          Part of the reason we know it’s gotten this bad, closer to a return to the 1920s with child labor on the rise, is because there were some less unfair decades, and it’s no surprise those decades came in the wake of the owner class created great depression.

          Now people watch wealthy people like the Kardashians as role models, when they should spit onto the street in disgust when such people walk by. Greed hurts people. Greed is a blight, a personal failing we’ve been propagandized to nurture.

          If you can’t be happy only making enough for 2 big houses and 1 regular yacht and to indulge your hobbies for the century give or take you’ll be alive, you’re broken inside, and need mental healthcare, not enablers for your God complex.

    • weeeeum@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      46
      ·
      2 days ago

      Yeah, I have a sneaking suspicion that hes going to commit suicide via 2 gunshots to the back of the head, with every security camera in the facility malfunctioning during it and that every other inmate in the vicinity was coincidentally unconscious.

    • AllHailTheSheep@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      19 hours ago

      the thing is, I think they can afford for him to be acquitted on the murder charges. the way the evidence was presented, he had a ghost gun and an illegal suppressor as well. whether they were planted or not is still up for debate, but that’s a slam dunk case that they can just give the maximum sentence for and move on. I don’t think the murder charges actually matter. I imagine if they can’t get him on murder we’ll quickly find out he was manufacturing drugs or some of bs charge they can give hime another 20 year sentence for and if the judge rules they can’t be served concurrently then bam, still a life sentence

      • solomon42069@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        23 hours ago

        Difference is that Epstein got whacked and his /clients/ let it happen.

        Luigi has real fans, who see what he did as a reflection of their own discontent.

        If something happens to him in jail, I believe that would still count as the aforementioned martyrdom.

        • PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          16 hours ago

          Yup. Epstein getting killed was inevitable, but it’s not like he had many fans; child molesters don’t tend to win popularity contests (unless it’s running for the highest seat in the country…) His death had people upset, but only because it meant he wouldn’t be able to testify against all the billionaires. He was only working against the billionaires because the prosecutors were forcing him to do so.

          But Luigi is a symbol of someone actively working against the billionaires, and killing him will turn him into a martyr.

      • solomon42069@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        22 hours ago

        My dream scenario is a mob marches on the capital cities ready to kill the 1% and Trump pardons Luigi and throws the rest of the wealthy to the mob to save his own ass. I believe Trump would do just about anything to save himself.

        Edit: Updated my silly hypothetical to better explain the idea. I obviously don’t think it’s realistic, but it would be amusing. Esp if it failed to sate the publics rage!

        • hark@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          22 hours ago

          Trump can already pardon himself. Even if he couldn’t, making enemies of the rich wouldn’t help himself, in fact it’d just do the opposite. The ultrawealthy have class solidarity, so Trump was never in actual trouble. They only face consequences if not doing so would majorly harm the collective image of the rich (e.g. this is why Jeffrey Epstein had to die).

          • jagged_circle@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            21 hours ago

            Where does the wealth go if his competitors are dead? Dude owns casions and hotels. If he offs the competition, that makes him a lot of $

            • Bronzebeard@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              21 hours ago

              He no longer owns any casinos. Those went bust. Most hotels aren’t even his, he just leased his name out. Killing a CEO doesn’t put the competing company out of business, either.

                • Bronzebeard@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  16 hours ago

                  No. It doesn’t. They already replaced the dead one. You think there aren’t more greedy shits who will roll those dice? Or shareholders who will remain unaffected by the killings?

  • Sam_Bass@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    2 days ago

    law enforcement, the media, and every other avenue that was once impartial enough to havea shot at fair treatment from them have all been bought by the very fatcats that are crying the loudest

  • Alph4d0g@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Well … um … you reported that he shouted in your headline but didn’t see the irony in what he was saying as you reported it. Nice job, Newsweek for supporting his statement through your actions.

  • WhatYouNeed@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    93
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Media will now work hard to turn him from hero to zero.

    They gotta protect those sponsor dollarsp

    • 4lan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      50 minutes ago

      Time to build some guillotines.
      The class war is here, if you are not fighting you are bending over

    • NielsBohron@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      39
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      People coming from privilege can still be progressive and want to enact change. I’m not sure why you’re denigrating this man and his actions based solely on the circumstances of his birth.

      • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        2 days ago

        “And yes, I recognize the irony that the very system I oppose affords me the luxury of biting the hand that feeds. But that’s exactly why priviledged fucks like me should feel obliged to whine and kick and scream - until everyone has everything they need.” - Propagandhi, “Resisting Tyrannical Government”

      • yeahiknow3@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Ironically, they’re the ones with the most time and education to figure out the truth. Then their own (wealthy) family will turn on them when they try for change.

            • Sop@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              24 hours ago

              Good point. Although in my experience rich people with good education are generally very bad representatives for the working class. The people I’ve met that do the best work regarding unionisation and organising are people who learned about class struggle through personal experience.

    • EpeeGnome@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      2 days ago

      Mangione’s grandparents may be rich, but they’re nowhere near the level of a national company CEO rich. So you’ve got it backwards; this is like a Baron’s grandson killing a Duke.