Summary

In his farewell speech, President Joe Biden warned of a growing “oligarchy” in the U.S., where extreme wealth and power threaten democracy.

Comparing modern elites to 19th-century robber barons, he called for reforms to hold the wealthy accountable, as done in the past.

Biden also criticized a “tech-industrial complex” concentrating power and spreading disinformation, weakening democracy.

His remarks sparked a surge in Google searches for “oligarchy.”

The speech comes amid rising concerns about policies favoring billionaires, like Trump’s tax cuts and potential cuts to social safety programs.

  • Diplomjodler@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    45
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    14 hours ago

    So, Joe, Buddy, what exactly did you do in your four years to actually curb the power of the oligarchy?

    • P1nkman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      13 hours ago

      He won’t be alive long enough to witness the disaster, so why should he care?

      -The baby boomers advocates.

    • Azzu@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      12 hours ago

      I mean obviously he knows how he’s part of evil, now that he’s at the end of his career or life I guess the personal benefits don’t outweigh the guilt anymore.

    • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      So, Joe, Buddy, what exactly did you do in your four years half century to actually curb the power of the oligarchy?

      The answer is that he’s been actively working for the oligarchy-beholden establishment since before most of us were even born.

      This is like the retiring CEO of Shell warning that extracting and burning fossil fuels might have deleterious effects on the global climate.

      • whotookkarl@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Same as politicians releasing biographies spilling the beans after they retire from ‘public service’, it’s never anyone’s responsibility or fault they are all taking graft, insider trading, selling natural reserves to foreign drilling companies, selling weapons to genocidal pricks, etc.

  • Qwazpoi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Everyone is so busy asking what is Oligarchy, nobody bothered to ask how is Oligarchy. Truly sad

  • sumguyonline@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    35
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Oligarchy, like when Nancy pelosi sets herself up as a defacto leader using insider trading… Or is it only oligarchy when the Republicans do it?

    • enbyecho@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 hours ago

      when Nancy pelosi sets herself up as a defacto leader using insider trading

      Dude. You should put down the bong long enough to read up on what was covered in the high school civics class you slept through.

    • Alteon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Oligarchy, like when Johann Rupert influences the South African markets and politics through his massive wealth and business empire… Or is it only oligarchy when Americans do it?

    • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      12 hours ago

      You’re right, but focusing on Pelosi when Biden himself is an excellent example smacks of whataboutism.

      It isn’t a whataboutism (since she and Biden have very much been working together on behalf of the oligarchs), but it looks like one to the casual observer, which is probably why you’re being bombarded with unfair downvotes in a Liberal (as opposed to Left) leaning community.

    • pirating@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      5 hours ago

      To be fair, high school government/civics classes are probably so gutted that I’m happy when people understand the three branches of government.

      • JTskulk@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        I still think those classes are a myth, I never heard of anyone taking a civics class when I was in school 20 years ago.

    • RagingRobot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      8 hours ago

      He was taking orders from rich people too just different ones than the next guy lol now he thinks it’s an issue but when they all pushed Bernie out it was fine.

      Assholes

        • RagingRobot@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          7 hours ago

          I never said anything about old white men. I was trying to say that Bernie has been warning about this for a long time but the Democrats were benefiting from it so they kept it going

        • Revan343@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          8 hours ago

          Funny how Jews are white when it’s convenient, and not white when that’s convenient.

          Convenient for the speaker, I mean; generally the opposite of convenient for the Jewish person in question

  • Draces@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 hours ago

    This is click baity. People don’t exclusively look up things they have no idea about. I’m constantly searching terms to reaffirm my understanding or to get a more precise definition of them. Oligarchy in particular doesn’t have a measurable identification which of course people are going to want to dig a little into it. Hell there’s a comment on here that made me dig into it since they’re stretching it’s definition way past it’s meaning

    • stetech@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Additionally, any mention of a word in a speech like that will result in an uptick in search usage – but that doesn’t let anyone quantify anything.

      You’d see an uptick if a single person over baseline average looked it up from the speech, and everyone else understood it.

      “X is trending in search because people don’t know it” is always a fallacy. See also: reporting on increased search for “who are the presidential candidates” a few days before the election.

    • DrSteveBrule@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 hours ago

      This can be said about almost any article that claims people type a specific word into a search engine after someone says it. There were a lot of articles about people looking up jury nullification after Luigi was arrested. Or people looking up the word tariff after trump said it. It’s just a quick way to find more information about the specific instance the word was used in. I didn’t search the term tariff because I didn’t know what it was, i searched it because I wanted to know what trump and his supporters thought it was.

    • Tiefling IRL@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      9 hours ago

      Hell, I looked this up just now fully knowing what an oligarchy was because a) I was curious about the formal definition and b) I wanted to learn more about the history

  • Furbag@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Probably the same people who were googling why Biden wasn’t on the ticket on election day 🙄

  • makyo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    48
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Huh, this actually seems legit. Compared to my ultra-scientific Google trends comparo it was half as popular of a search as Taylor Swift at its peak, which seems pretty big.

    Image

      • makyo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        94
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        13 hours ago

        Just to add, this proves:

        1. that Americans in general aren’t following along on their own
        2. that Biden could have influenced the discourse and been a force for good IF HE HAD BEEN COMMUNICATING LIKE THIS ALL ALONG. Unfortuntately they decided to ‘show not tell’ and let Trumpism fill the communication void with their lying bullshit for four years. Joe’s biggest failure and one we shouldn’t forgive him for.
        • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          12 hours ago

          His handlers didn’t want him appearing in public. But that’s where the bully pulpit is,

        • glimse@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          12 hours ago

          I swear he could have been communicating like this all along and it wouldn’t have mattered. The average person tuned out election coverage completely and even if they didn’t, the news would have hardly covered it.

          • makyo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            13
            ·
            12 hours ago

            You could sure be right. I am convinced it would have made a difference though. The thing that really infuriates me though is that they barely tried.

            • glimse@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              11
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              12 hours ago

              The thing that infuriates me is that the only two people allowed to run on the Democrat side were people Democrat voters didn’t really want to vote for. I’m sooooo tired of voting for “at least they’re not [other candidates]”

              (Don’t get the wrong idea, I sure as hell voted anyway)

          • ubergeek@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            9 hours ago

            The average person in the US was too busy trying to figure out how to get a 500 dollar paycheck to cover 300 in groceries, 200 in rent, 100 for electric, and 200 for gas to get to work. While also paying 300 for baby formula.

            • glimse@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              9 hours ago

              Yeah, exactly. When your life is on fire, putting out the flames is a lot more pressing than finding who started it.

            • Wildfire0Straggler3@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              7 hours ago

              Anyone who is only making $500 a paycheck needs to look for a new job, that’s just self owning themselves.

              • ubergeek@lemmy.today
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                6 hours ago

                That’s just reality for a ton of Americans. Where do you suggest they get these new jobs, since most pay about the same? Or should they just get multiple jobs? Because that sounds like a great way to keep more Americans uninterested in politics…

          • bstix@feddit.dk
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            12 hours ago

            Apparently they heard him this time. It would be interesting to know why they paid attention now.

            • glimse@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              12 hours ago

              Coverage. A lot more coverage. Farewell speeches happen once every 4 years so it’s much more novel than the constant campaign trail news (which was largely dominated by whatever distraction the other side was cooking up)

        • nthavoc@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          12 hours ago

          Moral victories rather than actual victories to stop or slow this down was their focus. And it still is.

          • WhoIsTheDrizzle@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            23
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            11 hours ago

            I get a lot of folks are busy, working two jobs, dealing with childcare and healthcare and whatnot, but how deep do you have to bury your head in the sand to be so unaware or disconnected from an American Presidential election? It’s unfathomable to me.

            • ByteJunk@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              12
              ·
              10 hours ago

              Holy F*CK. I live in another continent altogether, and couldn’t filter out the American elections spam even if tried (and oh did I try…)

      • ubergeek@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Nah, laws are the things that bind the working class while not protecting them; and at the same time protects the oligarchs without binding them.

  • Snapz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Two things are true:

    1. He did a lot and still should have done more - still ends up as probably the most progressive president to hold the office. More of a criticism of this country.

    2. All of you claiming “too little too late” don’t think on the scale of history. Those things have never been said by that leader’s voice, In that leader’s office, broadcast on primetime TV to everyone, everywhere.

    This is how progress works. Again, would have been better for him to say it from the start, but would have been fuel for the right (who doesn’t even really need credible fuel for the people they talk to) even more obstructionist, bad faith ghouls.

    All the above considered, we were fucked as soon as election result came in. Democracy is over, if there was s cashed they wouldn’t try to literally draw and quarter Biden on the national mall in the next four years, this likely solidified it. Don’t think him saying those words are said without personal risk. I think he failed to live up to the full mandate of his election, but this is an old mmm an whip knows he’s about to die saying fuck it and pulling the pin on the grenade knowing he won’t outrun the blast. In his reality, that’s what this decision was.

  • ubergeek@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    69
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    9 hours ago

    I think we have definitive proof that the American public, in general, are idiots.

    • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Want definitive proof?

      There are 244m eligible voters in the United States.

      77m voted for Trump. Idiots.

      2.6m voted 3rd party. Idiots.

      90m didn’t vote. Idiots.

      90+77+2.6 = 169.6

      That means 170m of 244m eligible voters are braindead stupid. That’s 69.7%. So we essentially have a 70% failure rate amongst eligible voters for maintaining our democracy.

      Yeah, Americans, in general, are STUUUUUUUUUPID.

      Yeah, we’re in a declining nation and it’s probably not going to get better anytime soon.

    • khannie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      6 hours ago

      I actually consider this really positive on a few fronts.

      Firstly, people are trying to learn. That’s great.

      Oligarchy is not a common word if your English level isn’t great and that’s true for lots of people. Even if you read books a decent amount it’s not something I think you’d come across frequently.

      Also, for folks who don’t know what an oligarchy is, for them to find out they’re possibly living in one may change their world view.

      I’m sure there are more.

      • spookedintownsville@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Honestly, I am one of those idiots. I had to look up oligarchy myself, although I looked it up because it was being thrown around a bit on Lemmy, not because Biden said it.

        • khannie@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          I do not consider you an idiot one bit for what it’s worth. I definitely did not know that word for a significant portion of my life.

          It’s not something that appears in books or something you come across in school.

      • ubergeek@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        6 hours ago

        That’s a very… generous interpretation, but I’ll “allow it”, because it gives me some hope.

  • HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    12 hours ago

    I really wish Plutocracy was used more because its not just that its a small group but in particular that politcal power is on a per dollar basis.