Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett triggered fierce backlash from MAGA loyalists after forcefully questioning the Trump administration’s top lawyer and voicing skepticism over ending birthright citizenship during a heated Supreme Court argument.

Since taking office, Donald Trump has pushed for an executive order to end birthright citizenship, a constitutional guarantee under the 14th Amendment that grants automatic U.S. citizenship to anyone born on American soil.

During oral arguments, Barrett confronted Solicitor General Dean John Sauer, who was representing the Trump administration, over his dismissive response to Justice Elena Kagan’s concerns. Barrett sharply asked whether Sauer truly believed there was “no way” for plaintiffs to quickly challenge the executive order, suggesting that class-action certification might expedite the process.

  • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    67
    ·
    27 days ago

    More proof the right wing does not, nor have they ever, given one flying fuck about the Constitution that they go on so much about.

    • bitjunkie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      27 days ago

      It’s like they’d already been conditioned to be outraged about some other selectively-ignored sacred text…

      • PolarKraken@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        26 days ago

        How have I never made this connection? That’s gonna be my facepalm of the year I think…it’s so very obviously the exact same behavior.

    • markovs_gun@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      27 days ago

      They have only read one of the amendments all the way through and part of another one and the rest is too boring to read.

      • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        27 days ago

        Curious which ones? I don’t think they read all of the Second. The ding-a-lings certainly never read the First and actually understand it, because they keep acting like this is a “Christian” country, when the First says I don’t have to give two shits about the chosen lifestyle of the xtian book club. Meaning I most definitely have freedom FROM religion.

        • markovs_gun@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          27 days ago

          One in full is the second amendment, one they read partially is the first because they know FREE SPEECH and nothing else.

          • ubergeek@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            27 days ago

            They only read part of the 2A, as well, and none of the context in the rest of the document about it, either.

            The whole “well regulated militia”, and who and why the militia is.

  • Empricorn@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    27 days ago

    Cult-like behavior. Literally. “You’re with us all the way and must always back anything Dear Leader does or says. If you disagree with anything, you must be kicked out, expelled, recalled, fired, or voted out!” It’s absolutely psychotic to view the world in such zero-sum, black/white terms.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      26 days ago

      Cult-like behavior.

      They want a policy and they’re loudly advocating that any politicians standing in their way get removed.

      The thing they’re asking for is awful. But God Damn, this is the kind of FDR/LBJ style titty twisting that any major legislation needs in order to happen in this country.

      • andros_rex@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        27 days ago

        No see - it’s all about who’s doing the thing. Words are all made up anyway, there are just good guys and bad guys.

        Remember how “precedent” stopped them from allowing Obama to appoint a new Supreme Court judge as a lame duck, but the same logic didn’t apply to Trump?

    • SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      27 days ago

      This is the result of normalizing the practice of religiously indoctrinating children and leaded gasoline.

  • Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    27 days ago

    Does maga realize that the more they attack someone, the more they drive that person away?

    • TwistedCister@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      27 days ago

      The more they attack someone verbally the more threats that person will receive from their cult.

      It’s not about their rage changing anyone’s mind. It’s the threats of violence that follow. Those can make people fall in line or go into hiding and either of those is a win for the oppressors.

    • Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      27 days ago

      Its a cult, they don’t care. It just leads existing cult members to isolate harder from outsiders and stay loyal.

      • Blackmist@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        27 days ago

        But not enough.

        77 million people still voted this orange shit-stain into office again. They saw what he’d done before. They saw an attempted coup. They heard all the Nazi-era rhetoric. And they thought “that’s the man for us”.

        • atmorous@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          27 days ago

          I’d say half to 75% regret their vote now

          So it’s a lot less for how firmly support him. Even less for how many will actually fight for him if civil war breaks out

          • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            26 days ago

            75 might be hesitant but the media and these influencers are still bending everything they can to sanewash it all. So only about 5 percent would likely admit they regret their vote.

  • StayDoomed@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    27 days ago

    Every time I see verbs such as “rips” “slams” “melts down” I stop reading because I know it’s going to be hyperbole

    • obvs@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      27 days ago

      I know.

      Could you imagine if any of the articles about the right wing attacking itself were in any way realistic?

    • PineRune@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      27 days ago

      With how much these terms have been used lately, they seem to have lost all the meaning behind them.

    • Zenith@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      27 days ago

      lol you just waiting for the day a Supreme Court justice literally body slams someone?? Like of course it’s hyperbole, but it’s still interesting one of the DEI judges is showing skepticism, the article isn’t hyperbolic or audacious, just informative.

  • MagicShel@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    27 days ago

    If they don’t like that law, there is one path for them to change it: Constitutional Amendment. Good luck with that, fuckers.

  • cmbabul@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    27 days ago

    So she sucks in a great many ways, but I’ve actually been surprised that Coney Barrett hasn’t been the rubber stamp i expected her to be

    • throwawayacc0430@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      27 days ago

      That’s the double edge sword of a lifetime apppintment, they are beholden to no one after getting appointed (nothing short of a 2/3 senate conviction or illegal autocoups)

    • tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      27 days ago

      She mostly cares about forcing births because of her handmaiden upbringing, so with other issues she might possibly be less in lockstep with the fascists

    • Zenith@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      27 days ago

      If it makes you feel better she basically is the rubber stamp you expected, all she did here was “show skepticism”

      • ryry1985@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        27 days ago

        Of the conservative justices, she has voted the least conservative the past two years. Her skepticism may actually indicate where she’ll vote.

        • cmbabul@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          27 days ago

          Maybe she’s clever enough to realize they will yank her and the other women right off the court as soon as she’s no longer necessary? Again I don’t believe she’s a good person or done an about face, but I’ll take the foxhole allies if we can get them, we kinda fucked

  • kibiz0r@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    27 days ago

    At first, I thought “remove this imposter” was a quote from ACB and I was like “Damn, she really woke up to this whole thing, huh?”

      • Zenith@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        27 days ago

        It absolutely is now, they’re not legally challenging most of these for a reason.

    • BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      27 days ago

      The thought of a clearly defined and settled case getting heard by SCOTUS is bad enough on its own. This doesn’t even coincide with any kind of real world event besides an asshole President saying, “I don’t like this rule.”

    • OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      78
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      27 days ago

      It is if no one stops him. The Constitution doesn’t do anything unless people actively uphold it. So far Trump’s gotten away with so many things because no one’s actually stopping him.

      I keep waiting for the American public to take a stand, but apparently they’re willing to sit there on the couch while their democracy is stripped away.

          • AbidanYre@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            27 days ago

            It’s getting close to that. Someone’s going to be armed in one of those ICE videos eventually.

          • j0ester@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            13
            ·
            edit-2
            27 days ago

            I wouldn’t… until after mid-terms. Because he’ll declare martial law until then.

              • Empricorn@feddit.nl
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                27 days ago

                armed protests

                That’s a huge difference. Please don’t use false strawman arguments. I haven’t heard “don’t protest or he’ll get mad”, here or anywhere.

              • DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                11
                ·
                27 days ago

                More like don’t give them an excuse before the centrists wake up.

                Of course, they won’t ever wake up, that’s why they’re centrists.

            • ...m...@ttrpg.network
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              27 days ago

              …the sad fact is that fascists won a mostly-free-and-fair election, so i think many of us are sitting tight until midterms lest we give them ammunition to rationslise martial law; if midterm elections aren’t proprietous, though, that ammunition’s f*cking coming out…

          • Empricorn@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            27 days ago

            He’ll immediately declare martial law. This is bad, but that would be worse. Much worse…

            • Manifish_Destiny@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              26 days ago

              Oh yeah let’s not protest in case we anger the totally rational dictator who certainly won’t declare martial law at the first sign he might lose power no matter the scenario. That would be terrible.

    • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      26 days ago

      The “patriots” want nothing but the destruction of everything they claim to love and worship with regards to America, the Constitution, etc, etc.

      All so they can put a emotionally unstable manbaby pants shitting pedophile and rapist on a golden throne as god-fuhrer.

    • QuincyPeck@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      27 days ago

      She’s certainly performed better than expected. She actually seems to give a damn about the application of law in most cases.

    • burgerpocalyse@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      27 days ago

      they fast tracked her to the highest court in the country thinking she was properly trained to be their good little soldier

      • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        27 days ago

        I don’t think fast tracked really covers it. That implies her career was slightly shorter than other justices. In fact, her career basically didn’t exist until she became a justice.

    • Lukas Murch@thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      27 days ago

      If we can’t have a progressive, Coney-Barrett would be a better chief justice. She seems to at least try to follow the Constitution (most of the time). Eff her for lying about RvW in her confirmation hearing, though. Eff all those guys.

  • BigMacHole@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    27 days ago

    Don’t they KNOW the Founders EXPLICITLY Only Protected the RIGHT to SHOOT UP A SCHOOL?

    • Psythik@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      27 days ago

      I miss that game. Can’t enjoy it anymore because the kids ruined it with their constant “wHeRe?” comments and general stupidity.