Roughly $11.1 trillion has been wiped away from the U.S. stock market since Jan. 17, the Friday before President Donald Trump took the oath of office and began his second term, according to data from Dow Jones Market Data.

Some $6.6 trillion of that figure was lost on Thursday and Friday alone — the largest two-day wipeout of shareholder value on record, Dow Jones data showed.

  • 0x01@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    54
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Curious how does that stack up historically with the largest drops in history percentage-wise?

    I checked out the investopedia article:

    • The Dow had its sixth-worst week of the 21st century; it fell 7.9% over the week and 9.3% in the last two days.
    • The Dow shed 2,231 points on Friday, its third-largest one-day point decline on record.
    • The Nasdaq Composite has dropped 11.4% since Trump’s tariff announcement, also its worst 2-day stretch since March 2020.
    • kreskin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      87
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      I mean, to be fair, most of the genocide already happened before election day under Biden, but yes, there will definitely be more as long as the AIPAC bribes keep flowing-- and no one is talking about shutting those down. I believe the last person (JFK) to try to deal with this by relisting AIPAC as a foreign agency was assassinated shortly afterward. RFK also tried and he was also killed.

      Which is nothing but a coincidence I’m sure, the zionists would never do something like that. And christians in the US are close friends and allies of Israelis, right.

      https://www.jpost.com/breaking-news/article-761490

      • Rhoeri@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        So… “to be fair” what you’re claiming, is that there’s little genocide left for Trump to commit, and then- a bunch of conspiracy theories.

        It’s a damn good thing you people argue so diligently on the side of reality. It really helps drive that batshit insane ideology of yours home.

          • papertowels@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            Trump could open the doors of hell and it would still be no excuse for having voted for evil.

            Do you view “evil” as a binary value or a numerical value that can be counted?

        • kreskin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          14
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          So… “to be fair” what you’re claiming, is that there’s little genocide left for Trump to commit

          Thats a good demonstration of strawmanning. Putting up a contrived BS argument then knocking it down. Come on, can’t you do better than that?
          Thats just lazy.

          • Rhoeri@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            I’m not the one that said it. The onus is on you to state your point in a way that makes sense. And what you said, is that:

            “most of the genocide already happened before election day under Biden.”

            If you want to make a straw man by accusing me of making a straw man, be my guest. But that won’t change the original argument, nor will it change the fact that it seems others agree with me on this.

            • kreskin@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              edit-2
              1 day ago

              I literally quoted you, and you did not quote me. So now you’re just lying. Time for a username block.

              • Rhoeri@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                edit-2
                14 hours ago

                Literal quote….

                “I mean, most of the genocide already happened before election day under Biden.”

                • you literally said this. But if it helps to use a more direct and unequivocal approach:

                If you are confused by what you’re seeing, that is a screenshot of your actual words.

                And- blocked or not, I think this needed to be said so that anyone unfortunate enough to have to interact with you, might come across this conversion in an attempt to make sense of… you,

                …and it helps illustrate to them exactly what they’re dealing with.

      • finder@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        68
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        2 days ago

        already happened

        Watching the ‘genocide Joe’ crowd cope with the fact they supported the turbo genocide candidate will never not be funny to me (In the grim irony kind of way).

        • 13igTyme@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          22
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          The genocide Joe crowd think the Israel/Palestine war started October 2023. They aren’t very smart.

        • kreskin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          12
          ·
          2 days ago

          I’m always a bit fascinated that theres so few of us that see it this way. The killings definitely happened, the US definitely helped. Seems pretty factual. And yet the pushback on these facts with the US crowd is extreme and seemingly very emotional for the pro zionist crowd-- which is not in line with what the rest of the world thinks.

        • Grimy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          18
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          I’m not sure why you refuse to hold him and his administration accountable. Genocide Joe is an apt name for someone that chose to give more importance to genocide then he did to representing his voters and this country in general.

          They sabotaged their own election so Israel can break child death records. He could have simply told Israel to fuck off. I’d rather blame them then normal people that felt conflicted about genocide of all things.

          Holding them accountable is also the only way we get real change.

          • agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            17 hours ago

            Holding them accountable is also the only way we get real change

            Helping to elect the opponent who even more enthusiastically supports genocide does less than nothing to hold anyone accountable.

      • selokichtli@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        I mean no disrespect, because we are writing sentences that we never intended to write, but Jesus Christ, “most of the genocide already happened (…) under Biden”. It’s utterly depressing. I’m really disappointed that American citizens worked very hard for this to happen, but it feels also like a consequence of something bigger, as if there was a bipartisan dictatorship or something even deeper, in which parties are just knights or bishops.

  • Guns0rWeD13@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    2 days ago

    so weird to be cheering for our own demise, but is it really our own demise? i don’t own stocks. do you? and where does 11 trillion actually go? to another country’s market? fiat currency is so weird. it’s almost as if it’s all just smoke and mirrors that don’t actually reflect reality. did anything physically change since dumptwat announced tariffs? capitalism just seems like a giant lie divorced from reality. let’s burn it all down.

      • Mirshe@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        No actually. My job doesn’t offer one. Many people either are in the same position where their job doesn’t offer retirement benefits or they’re not paying into it because they need every last cent they can spare.

        • Shardikprime@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          Turns out the thing about people not having 500 USD in their accounts was real after all

          People are just realizing that they were not cooked, just merely marinating

    • cows_are_underrated@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 days ago

      In terms of where the money foes its quite easily. The majority will just evaporate. A lot of people and company’s may shift their invested money to European (or somewhere else) companys whichay rise a bit in value, but the majority of the money is just gone. The value of a company is a mix of how profitable they are and a lot of how much people think a company will be profitable in the future and therefore are investing into it (its like the typical production and demand thing. If more people want to buy something it rises in value).

      • Guns0rWeD13@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        where the money foes its quite easily. The majority will just evaporate.

        the thing that didn’t exist in the first place evaporated. that doesn’t sound weird to you?

        also “how much people think a company will be profitable”… you just described a confidence game and gambling.

        • cows_are_underrated@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          It is like you said. Its artificial value. Its value generated, by how much people are willing to pay for a share of it. And as you rightfully realised, its basically gambling. You can make predictions based on the current trend (what ever trend it may be),but its still gambling.

    • bradorsomething@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      The value went away, not actual money. Say you own a pair of Jordan’s original shoes worn playing for the bulls, and he shows up drunk on a tv show and spends an hour crapping all over the bulls. You still own the shoes, but they will be worth less if you try to sell them.

    • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Unfortunately I sincerely doubt a lot of them have retirement savings of any significance. There’s a reason Red States are a bigger draw on federal money than Blue States. But if there’s any consolation, once the food prices start hitting again they’ll take notice.

      • Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 day ago

        My MAGA friends on Facebook are yelling about “buying opportunities”.

        Where is that buying money coming from? I got none myself.

        • NotJohnSmith@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 day ago

          Just as well as this sure as hell isn’t a buying opportunity, some indexes are only at 6 month lows. We’ve barely begun loses wise - 12% off all time highs on the S&P if I recall right, 50% is realistic in my mind

  • wanderwisley@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    55
    ·
    1 day ago

    I’m 41 years old, I’ll be 42 in a few weeks, I’m getting really tired of living through these “once in a lifetime events” every 24-48hrs.

      • grrgyle@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        18 hours ago

        Yeppp. Also makes me really distrust mainstream economists, because somehow these crashes always come as a surprise.

        Like what we’re doing is not working. We need to try something else

        • AreaKode@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          17 hours ago

          What tells you that this isn’t working? Seems to be working as intended. You mis-assumed that this administration gives a flying fuck about anyone worth less than $1 billion.

        • spidermanchild@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          18 hours ago

          What does this have to do with any economist? Are they supposed to be able to predict a cheeto imposing absurd global tarriffs? “Once in a lifetime” is just an expression the media likes to use.

          • grrgyle@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            17 hours ago

            Sorry I topic drifted a bit. I wasn’t actually thinking of that. I was under the impression that things were going very poorly even before tariffs.

        • 9thDragon@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          17 hours ago

          Mainstream economists have been predicting this for nearly a year. It’s a surprise to almost no one.

          • grrgyle@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            15 hours ago

            Oh i guess that’s true. I’m not sure what my point was. I guess political/party economists? But maybe they’re not informed by actual economists.

            It seems like there is a disconnect between what I hear politicians talking about vis what the journals say

            • null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              12 hours ago

              Trump doesn’t have a team of reputable economists guiding his policies.

              He’s just making decisions based on the vibe.

        • green@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          16 hours ago

          You assume that educated people are making the final decision, when that has not been the case in at least 60 years.

          Economists can scream from the roof-tops that the wealth-gap is harmful (they have), that ignoring science is regressive (they have), and that tariffs are fucking stupid (they have). But if the people in power (i.e CEO, Lobbyists, President) simply ignore them and do stupid shit anyway, it’s all pointless.

          Moral of the story, this is not on the economists. This is on the stupid being in positions of power and the ignorant masses not holding them accountable.

    • grrgyle@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Total sidebar: You should re-read The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy when you turn 42!

      That’s what I did. Now I’ll never forget the last time I read the series.

      • ChillPenguin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        21 hours ago

        I have parents who are near retirement who voted for trump. Only my dad works and has to support my mom. This upcoming weekend, I’m gonna ask him how his portfolio is looking. If his vote is paying off.

      • the_q@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        There’s more people who don’t have investments than there are that do. That includes 401k. Welcome to the poor people’s club.

          • hedgehogging_the_bed@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            21 hours ago

            Source that’s not so heavily “invested” in the answer perhaps? I can’t read this ad-ridden garage.

            Is it enough to stay that most Americans stocks are the smallest of their saving vehicles? Most people have the bulk of value in their home not their 401k.

            • kikutwo@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              14 hours ago

              Even the union worker who doesn’t have a Schwab account has their pension invested in the market.

            • TronBronson@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              18 hours ago

              Correct. Which makes sense when you consider home prices have gone up alot in the last 20 years, and an unaware investors portfolio is probably being slowly bled off by covering the mortgage of that house every time we go into a recession which is basically on a 2 year cycle now.

              So yes you are right, and you are so smart and a very good boi. But you are missing the bigger picture of American wealth distribution. Missing out on how jobs are tied to the market, income is needed for investment and selling investments when you lose your job and they are down 50% just shoots most of the country into poverty.

              Surprise its the great depression!

              • hedgehogging_the_bed@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                18 hours ago

                I’m not good and not a boi/boy/guy/whatever, but thanks I guess.

                I was more interested in getting to the fact that everyday American don’t rely on the stock market directly. If you are hurting directly in this downturn, you needed to have less volatile investments to begin with. Americans do have some small direct market investments but they are dwarfed compared to their other stores of value and to the quantity of money in the market from non-consumer level individuals.

                • TronBronson@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  17 hours ago

                  When you say ‘don’t rely on the stock market directly’ you’re aware of the second and third order effects from a market crash right?

                  The president just crashed the market harder than Covid for no reason, and you’re telling me i need less volatile investments? What investment would that be out of curiosity?

        • phar@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          20 hours ago

          Even if this were true, are you pretty much saying everyone that had a 401k can f off? Like, what exactly is your point? It’s okay for everyone to suffer?

            • phar@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              17 hours ago

              My apologies I thought you were the same person from the beginning of the thread, which would have changed the meaning behind what you said.

        • TronBronson@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          19 hours ago

          50% of the country has a 401k and like 40% has an IRA… They are not worth much, that is the point the poor people can’t afford to get more poor, the rich people can. they’ve realized theres nothing else their money can buy so their happy to destroy the world out of boredom. And you cheer them on.

          • the_q@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            17 hours ago

            My info was outdated, but where an I cheering it on? Is there some invisible message my reply had that I’m not seeing?

      • Shardikprime@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        22
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Dude how many of the 49% of USA citizens who can’t even handle a 1k USD emergency spend have stocks or options

        How many of the 120 million people who have feared for years that they won’t get to enjoy their social security have stocks or options

        Because that’s the regular people

        Are you even reading yourself

        • stonedtemplepilot@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          1 day ago

          I’m sorry to tell you but everyone is screwed except the billionairs who will just buy everything for pennies on the dollar. What do you think companies will do when their stocks are crashing? They will lay off more people until they inevitably go belly up and then all of those people are out of jobs. Shit is about to get real.

        • chatokun@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          1 day ago

          401ks are invested. People losing their retirement funds. I personally don’t have any because I had to use mine up last time I was between jobs for a year, but many innocent people who aren’t rich and voted against Trump are being hurt as well.

        • phar@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          Millions of people have 401k plans through their employers and have had them for years and are counting on them to live when they retire.

        • Fredthefishlord@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          Well over 49% of usa Americans make enough to save a thousand dollars . Many are just that bad at managing money. Part of why pensions are important over 401ks.

          • TronBronson@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            18 hours ago

            the deep irony of slashing pensions for 401k claiming that americans could invest better for their own retirement. They are not cheering crashing 401ks and rushing to cut social security like they also have a concept of a plan for retirement.

          • TronBronson@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            18 hours ago

            buddy 401k contributions come out of your paycheck. you can’t equate one with the other. Most people usually check the box to take taxes and contributions out of their paycheck and don’t consider their retirement account emergency savings.

            the point your missing is it often is. and it usually equates to to stock market losses. So stock market crashes are when the rich make the poor poorer.

            Yet here you poors go cheering on everyones grandma to starve to death. Far left and far right horseshoe death cult assemble.

    • errer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      2 days ago

      Not exactly sure how one is supposed to transfer one’s 401k to government securities on such a short timescale…

      • Mearuu@kbin.melroy.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        20
        ·
        2 days ago

        Trump was elected in November. I had every cent moved out of US stocks by mid December. My tax burden is already less than what I would have lost if I kept them money where it was.

        There was plenty of time if you were paying attention. If you didn’t move your money, unfortunately, that’s on you.

        Edit: SPY puts with 20%. The 40% bonds. 30% forex. 10% cash. But what the fuck do I know. I didn’t make any money and you all know exactly what you’re talking about and I’m full of shit.

        • errer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          23
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          It’s a 401k. I can’t move my money out of it without taking a tax penalty.

          • Mearuu@kbin.melroy.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            17
            ·
            2 days ago

            Yes there is a tax penalty. as I said in the original comment.

            However, that tax is less than the amount lost since December. As I said in the original comment.

            • errer@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              10
              ·
              2 days ago

              No it is not. Tax rate is ~20-30%. Market has dropped 10% since November. What is this batshit advice?

            • Opinionhaver@feddit.uk
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              15
              ·
              2 days ago

              I’m not familiar with 401K as I’m not from the US but do you really lose anything when the market dips? Because I don’t think you do unless you start selling at a loss. If you’re not planning on retiring in few years this shouldn’t affect you in any way.

              • vithigar@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                2 days ago

                It’s the same as any other non-liquid asset. Sure, you could argue that the value dropping is only a loss if you sell during the dip, but you’re still better off if you can sell before it happens.

                • Opinionhaver@feddit.uk
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  8
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  I don’t really see how you’re “better off” unless you then go and buy the dip too. If your retirement is decades ahead then simply holding and buying is what will very likely be the best bet on a long term. Historically speaking so far this has been the case. Reacting to short term events is how people lose their savings on the stock market.

    • AlecSadler@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      I don’t understand then, are they just bilking each other?

      If the billionaires are buying en masse to profit off this, someone is selling. If billionaires own the majority…they’re…selling to each other and losing?

      • Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 hours ago

        What if you short the market?

        Putting a lot of money into shorts (money you can barrow mind you), is essentially massively selling stocks you don’t have with the promise of buying them back later.

        If a lot of rich people do this, it will trigger a panic sell, get the price low, they buy back the “barrows stocks” at cheaper rate and now they have profit and some people have sold, so the stock is lower.

        They can now buy more stocks and we’re back to the first step but with the rich having a higher share than before cause of the panic sellers.

      • ReallyActuallyFrankenstein@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        A potential explanation is this is the Russian fall of communism / transition to oligarchy moment, where regular people will get rid of the “worthless” stocks fearing no bottom, and the top 1% will buy them for pennies on the dollar.

  • Lembot_0001@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    55
    ·
    2 days ago

    Stock market always fluctuates at big changes. Bigger the changes – bigger the fluctuation. There isn’t much sense of checking that fluctuation every few hours. Wait a few months at least. And that situation would be interesting.

    • Pennomi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      2 days ago

      Ask the economists if restricting trade will lower gdp or not. I have a tiny suspicion this isn’t a “fluctuation”.

    • alvvayson@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      TIL 2000 and 2008 were just fluctuations due to big changes.

      Stock market peaked 19 feb, 1.5 months ago. It has lost 17% since then.

      That’s an awfully long and persistent fluctuation.

      • Opinionhaver@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        Annual average growth of the stock market is around 7%. That means some years it might be +21% and the next year -5%. Now we’re about 2% on the negative from a year ago. That’s not great but it’s not catastrophic either. I bet that in few years this particular dip is just one of the many and it’ll barely even register on the graph.

        • barneypiccolo@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          2 days ago

          Your prediction is based on this being a drop based on normal market fluctuations, but that’s not what this is. This drop is based on just the NEWS of tariffs that ALL economists recognize will be disastrous. Wait until the tariffs are actually in place, prices rise steeply, spending plunges, and the ripple effect moves across the entire global economy. That 17% drop won’t be some random sawtooth on a chart, it will be the first dip in a steady long-term downward trend.

    • entwine413@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      41
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      The thing is that in the past our government wasn’t intentionally doing irreparable harm to our economy by giving nearly every trading partner we have the middle finger.

      Maybe the markets will recover, but we might be looking at a situation similar to the great depression, especially if people start making bank runs.

      • Zron@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        2 days ago

        I don’t know if people will hit the banks.

        Back on black Tuesday, most things were bought with cash.

        Now everyone either uses debit or credit. I don’t think there will be the big of a demand for cash unless one of the big banks says it has run out.

        I do think that the credit market might implode within 6 months, as many Americans will probably forgo paying their debt to buy food for the week, and the credit companies will not have the capacity to squeeze blood from that many stones at once.

        If consumer credit crashes, then the consumer economy essentially collapses, as a huge chunk of the population essentially lives on a knife edge between their bank balance and credit limits.

        I give it at least a month before this all really starts to go tits up.

        Anyway, I’m gonna go buy some waterproof storage bins and about 500 pounds of rice and beans tomorrow, just because that’s my new hobby.

    • EldritchFeminity@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      We do have evidence of the way this is almost guaranteed to go, however. There have been 2 other times in US history where the government has enacted massive tariffs on international trade: in 1828 and in 1930. The results of both times were the worst economic depressions the country has ever faced, and the world in the second case. The economy only recovered the second time thanks to the planned wartime economy, lend-lease program, and post-war rebuilding which cemented the dollar as the international currency, and the consequences of the tariffs were that the party responsible for them didn’t hold power again for 60 years.

  • flop_leash_973@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Amazing how every time the Republicans get majority control of things the markets go to shit. The faster they work to dismantle what democratic control of something exists the faster it falls apart.