The Trump administration is preparing to cancel a large swath of federal funding for California, an effort that could begin as soon as Friday, according to multiple sources.

Agencies are being told to start identifying grants the administration can withhold from California. Sources said the administration is specifically considering a full termination of federal grant funding for the University of California and California State University systems.

Singling out one state for massive cuts would be an unusual move, but Donald Trump has long made Democratic-led California a target.

  • DarkCloud@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    57
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    13 days ago

    So Americans need to switch it off and on again. Gather up new founding fathers and mothers, write up a new constitution and declaration of independence - write up documents for a new federation between states…

    Create a back up United States. Declare the old one null and void. Stop interacting with the old one. Start interacting with the new one.

    Call all this something benign sounding. Try not to go to war about it. But yeah, you all need to switch this shit off and on again.

      • Nastybutler@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        12 days ago

        Except that’s exactly what the Heritage Foundation has been wanting for decades so they can turn the US into an official Christofascist nation.

    • BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      13 days ago

      Yup, by excluding the south east (Texas to Florida) they could easily reboot it in a much more progressive manner.

        • BreakerSwitch@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          12 days ago

          Woah woah woah. Texas seceded from Mexico to preserve slavery until they joined the US so they could secede to preserve slavery. And a cuba libre is delicious, not nearly as watered down (underwater) as Florida is.

  • RabbitBBQ@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    11 days ago

    The ICE raids are meant to cause the response we are seeing, and eventually an even more powerful response. The White House has already been throwing around the word insurrection, which implies the insurrection act. If the natural escalation that they expect takes place, it could create the conditions where the insurrection act can be invoked. Since the Federal level is under control of the Trump Administration, that leaves the National Guard, state police, county sheriffs, and local police departments. The only one of these capable of standing up to the Feds would be the National Guard. If things turn ugly over the next few weeks during continued raids in places like L.A., it could force the Governor to deploy the national guard given the numbers of people involved. Some of these communities are well armed and they are already fighting back. If the goal is to cause the conditions to invoke the insurrection act, it would take away the ablity of the California Governor to direct his national guard. They can be forced to follow the orders of the President, which is one of the reasons for using the Insurrection Act in the first place.

    In a place like L.A., this leaves just the LAPD and Sherrifs department and they do not have the power to stop both the Feds and a national guard under White House control. L.A. seems to be heavily targeted by the Trump administration in many different ways. They are looking at bribery and corruption in many areas like LA Homeless Agency. The ICE raids targeted the Fashion District are meant as an economic attack, as many of those people worked in shops and factories. Other ICE raids targeted companies involved in agriculture. The Trump admin is also looking at other Federal funding to take away from California.

    All of this combined could mean that the state Government, state and local police cannot protect these communities from what is being sent after them, partially as an overall form of economic warfare against California generally. You have the wildfire funds, the tariffs attacking the shipping areas of coastal California, and it’s obvious that it is a well planned operation. Behind this too is a hostile DOJ and FBI, not to mention DHS, ICE, and everyone else. They are being hunted.

    The State Government can’t protect anyone either, they have been totally outmanuvered at every stage, because they are just coasting until 2026. The one advantage people have is their numbers. Peaceful protest is the way forward, it just takes a lot more people knowing about the raids and being present to protest them. If the Trump admin wants a Kent state or Tiananmen Square type situation on their hands, that will be on them…

  • burgerpocalyse@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    12 days ago

    the only people who want California to secede are tech freaks that want to establish a monarchy and see this as an opportunity to do that

  • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    17
    ·
    12 days ago

    Since Confederate States of America have gained a negative connotation and to avoid confusion, you could proclaim Libertarian States of America, I know most people here are not libertarian, but still fucking closer to that than typical trumpists, and they are going to steal the word otherwise. Said as a libertarian and a citizen of Russia, which means I’ll enjoy watching the events from afar quite a lot, might even remember to make popcorn.

    • Soulg@ani.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      12 days ago

      Since Confederate States of America have gained a negative connotation

      No they did that to themselves by caring only about preserving slavery

  • 9point6@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    13 days ago

    Wow, so I thought I was fucked when I had “California secedes” on my bingo card

    • PattyMcB@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      15
      ·
      13 days ago

      I’m pretty sure Texas is the only “legal” state allowed to secede, but I’m not a lawyer and my info may be woefully out of date

          • entwine413@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            12 days ago

            That’s irrelevant to whether or not a state has an established legal right to do a thing.

            • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              12 days ago

              When it gets to the level of a component piece of a country leaving said country, it doesn’t really matter what the law is. The South isn’t part of the US because it was decided that secession was illegal, they’re there because they got their ass beaten.

        • blitzen@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          12 days ago

          The colonies weren’t “allowed” to leave England either, yet here we are.

          Would it cause a civil war? Yea. Would California win? Of course not.

          • Pandasdontfly@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            12 days ago

            I don’t think it would be at least that simple… Would it be bloody and awful most likely but California holds a lot of military how many would stay loyal is dependent but I could also see some other world power interfering maybe… For better trade or special treatment.

          • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            12 days ago

            I’m not convinced it would lead to civil war. It could, but it still takes a lot of manufacturing consent for us to go to war with random brown countries. It’d be no easy task to convince the US population and military we needed to start dropping bombs on Hollywood. Soldiers would desert and other states would think about joining.

      • Tower@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        edit-2
        13 days ago

        No, Texas (nor any other state) can not secede from the Union.

        https://www.sll.texas.gov/faqs/can-texas-secede

        Can Texas secede? I heard it is one of the only states that can secede from the United States.

        It is a common misunderstanding that Texas has the right to leave the United States. The Texas State Library and Archives Commission (TSLAC) addresses this on their page about Texas’s annexation:

        It is said of Texas (and, occasionally, Vermont) that it received a letter or document of permission to withdraw from the Federal Union if it so chose. […] In fact, Texas received no special terms in its admission to the Union. Once Texas had agreed to join the Union, she never had the legal option of leaving, either before or after the Civil War.

      • CXORA@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        12 days ago

        The US would never allow that much freedom. It has to ensure everyone is locked down.

  • Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    12 days ago

    How about California cancelling paying federal taxes in turn? This would probably lead to a big loss for the federal budget, wouldn’t it?